| | | |
ILLINOIS WISCONSIN |
|
| 128 | 51 Final 74 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
565 | ILLINOIS | 128 | 128 | 566 | WISCONSIN | -6.5 | -6 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 14-3 | +7 | 6-8 | 7-5 | 75.2 | 36.5 | 43.6% | 36.1 | 65.8 | 29.9 | 41.3% | 35.4 | Road Games | 6-2 | +5.6 | 4-4 | 5-2 | 79.2 | 39.6 | 44.6% | 34.2 | 70.7 | 33.9 | 41.7% | 39.2 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -2.2 | 1-4 | 3-2 | 71.2 | 36.4 | 39.6% | 34.8 | 73.6 | 34.6 | 42.6% | 41.8 | Conference Games | 1-2 | -1.2 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 67.3 | 33.3 | 39.6% | 36.0 | 69.0 | 30.0 | 41.9% | 37.3 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 75.2 | 36.5 | 26-60 | 43.6% | 9-26 | 35.2% | 14-19 | 71.8% | 36 | 11 | 12 | 17 | 8 | 12 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 66.4 | 30.7 | 23-56 | 41.7% | 6-19 | 33.2% | 13-19 | 68.0% | 34 | 10 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 79.2 | 39.6 | 27-60 | 44.6% | 10-26 | 36.8% | 16-21 | 77.1% | 34 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 8 | 11 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 65.8 | 29.9 | 24-57 | 41.3% | 7-20 | 33.7% | 12-18 | 66.7% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 17 | 6 | 15 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 71.2 | 33.3 | 26-58 | 44.2% | 7-19 | 34.4% | 14-20 | 69.2% | 37 | 11 | 14 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 3 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 70.7 | 33.9 | 25-60 | 41.7% | 6-20 | 32.9% | 14-21 | 66.3% | 39 | 12 | 13 | 17 | 4 | 14 | 2 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 11-4 | -5.9 | 4-9 | 4-5 | 70.6 | 33.9 | 44.3% | 37.3 | 54.9 | 24.6 | 40.4% | 31.3 | Home Games | 9-1 | -4.5 | 4-4 | 2-3 | 75.5 | 37.0 | 47.0% | 39.3 | 49.5 | 19.5 | 37.5% | 28.2 | Last 5 Games | 5-0 | +1 | 1-4 | 1-3 | 66.6 | 32.6 | 44.8% | 36.2 | 50.0 | 19.4 | 39.9% | 30.2 | Conference Games | 2-0 | +1 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 53.5 | 24.0 | 38.2% | 35.0 | 46.0 | 18.5 | 41.6% | 36.5 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 70.6 | 33.9 | 26-59 | 44.3% | 8-22 | 34.8% | 11-18 | 61.4% | 37 | 12 | 15 | 13 | 7 | 9 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 65.7 | 30.5 | 23-55 | 42.3% | 6-19 | 33.7% | 13-18 | 69.5% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 17 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 75.5 | 37.0 | 28-60 | 47.0% | 8-22 | 37.0% | 11-17 | 66.1% | 39 | 12 | 16 | 11 | 8 | 8 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 54.9 | 24.6 | 21-52 | 40.4% | 4-13 | 32.5% | 9-13 | 68.2% | 31 | 6 | 8 | 18 | 5 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 66.7 | 31.8 | 24-55 | 44.0% | 6-17 | 33.6% | 13-18 | 69.9% | 34 | 9 | 13 | 17 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 49.5 | 19.5 | 19-51 | 37.5% | 4-13 | 31.1% | 7-11 | 66.0% | 28 | 5 | 8 | 17 | 5 | 14 | 2 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: ILLINOIS 71.6, WISCONSIN 72.3 |
| | |
|
|
11/25/2012 | GARDNER WEBB | 63-62 | W | -17 | L | 131.5 | U | 21-48 | 43.7% | 29 | 18 | 22-54 | 40.7% | 29 | 14 | 11/28/2012 | GEORGIA TECH | 75-62 | W | -10 | W | 126.5 | O | 27-57 | 47.4% | 36 | 14 | 23-52 | 44.2% | 30 | 17 | 12/4/2012 | W CAROLINA | 72-64 | W | -18 | L | | - | 26-65 | 40.0% | 34 | 11 | 20-52 | 38.5% | 41 | 22 | 12/8/2012 | @ GONZAGA | 85-74 | W | 11.5 | W | 143.5 | O | 30-60 | 50.0% | 28 | 11 | 24-49 | 49.0% | 32 | 16 | 12/11/2012 | NORFOLK ST | 64-54 | W | | - | | - | 21-60 | 35.0% | 43 | 9 | 21-55 | 38.2% | 36 | 14 | 12/16/2012 | E KENTUCKY | 66-53 | W | -14 | L | 133.5 | U | 25-50 | 50.0% | 42 | 20 | 21-58 | 36.2% | 23 | 10 | 12/22/2012 | *MISSOURI | 73-82 | L | 2 | L | 145.5 | O | 25-74 | 33.8% | 35 | 7 | 29-73 | 39.7% | 58 | 12 | 12/29/2012 | *AUBURN | 81-79 | W | -13.5 | L | 133.5 | O | 25-52 | 48.1% | 31 | 11 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 39 | 20 | 1/2/2013 | @ PURDUE | 61-68 | L | -3 | L | 138.5 | U | 21-59 | 35.6% | 35 | 10 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 45 | 11 | 1/5/2013 | OHIO ST | 74-55 | W | 3 | W | 143 | U | 28-58 | 48.3% | 40 | 18 | 20-60 | 33.3% | 30 | 16 | 1/9/2013 | MINNESOTA | 67-84 | L | 1.5 | L | 140.5 | O | 23-65 | 35.4% | 33 | 7 | 27-51 | 52.9% | 37 | 15 | 1/12/2013 | @ WISCONSIN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/17/2013 | NORTHWESTERN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/22/2013 | @ NEBRASKA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/27/2013 | MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/31/2013 | @ MICHIGAN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/3/2013 | WISCONSIN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
11/23/2012 | *CREIGHTON | 74-84 | L | 1 | L | 128.5 | O | 27-66 | 40.9% | 34 | 8 | 27-58 | 46.6% | 40 | 10 | 11/24/2012 | *ARKANSAS | 77-70 | W | -8.5 | L | | - | 22-49 | 44.9% | 39 | 11 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 34 | 6 | 11/28/2012 | VIRGINIA | 54-60 | L | -10 | L | 115.5 | U | 21-55 | 38.2% | 25 | 5 | 21-46 | 45.7% | 36 | 10 | 12/2/2012 | CALIFORNIA | 81-56 | W | -8 | W | 127.5 | O | 30-58 | 51.7% | 36 | 13 | 18-47 | 38.3% | 30 | 23 | 12/4/2012 | NEBRASKA-OMAHA | 86-40 | W | -36 | W | | - | 34-70 | 48.6% | 49 | 9 | 17-51 | 33.3% | 26 | 19 | 12/8/2012 | @ MARQUETTE | 50-60 | L | -2.5 | L | 130.5 | U | 17-52 | 32.7% | 35 | 14 | 25-52 | 48.1% | 39 | 16 | 12/12/2012 | WI-GREEN BAY | 65-54 | W | -17.5 | L | 128 | U | 24-51 | 47.1% | 32 | 6 | 21-56 | 37.5% | 35 | 9 | 12/22/2012 | WI-MILWAUKEE | 74-53 | W | -26.5 | L | 124 | O | 28-59 | 47.5% | 36 | 8 | 22-50 | 44.0% | 21 | 13 | 12/29/2012 | SAMFORD | 87-51 | W | -29 | W | | - | 31-59 | 52.5% | 43 | 6 | 18-51 | 35.3% | 22 | 10 | 1/3/2013 | PENN ST | 60-51 | W | -18.5 | L | 124 | U | 22-57 | 38.6% | 32 | 4 | 24-52 | 46.2% | 38 | 15 | 1/6/2013 | @ NEBRASKA | 47-41 | W | -8.5 | L | 118 | U | 20-53 | 37.7% | 38 | 6 | 18-49 | 36.7% | 35 | 8 | 1/12/2013 | ILLINOIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/15/2013 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/19/2013 | @ IOWA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/22/2013 | MICHIGAN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/26/2013 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/29/2013 | @ OHIO ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/3/2013 | @ ILLINOIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | ILLINOIS: Replacing Bruce Weber, John Groce gets a chance to take over a major conference squad that returns four starters from a disappointing team that posted a dismal 6-12 conference record. It will take him time to bring in top talent that will let this program compete again, but with three of their top four scorers coming back in Brandon Paul (14.7 PPG, 4.7 RPG), D.J. Richardson (11.6 PPG) and Joseph Bertrand (6.5 PPG, 54% FG), this team has a respectable core. Look for Bertrand and Coastal Carolina transfer Sam McLaurin to assume big roles on this team as the Fighting Illini attempt to compete during this transition period. | | WISCONSIN: Head coach Bo Ryan's Badgers may not be able to match up to Indiana, Michigan, Michigan State and Ohio State in this year's Big Ten but they should be favored against the rest of the competition. Wisconsin's defense and slow tempo is legendary, holding opponents to a Division-I low 53.2 PPG, and that shouldn't change even without last year's leader Jordan Taylor, who had a team-high 14.8 PPG and 4.1 APG. Now it's time for Ryan Evans (11.0 PPG, 6.8 RPG) and Jared Berggren (10.5 PPG, 4.9 RPG, 1.7 BPG) to lead this team from the inside out. Despite standing at 6-foot-10 and playing center in a lot of Ryan's lineups, Berggren is also a threat on the perimeter, averaging 1.3 threes per game last year, where he will be especially needed considering sniper Josh Gasser, who played 34.1 MPG last year and nailed 45.2% of his shots from beyond the arc, is out for the year with a torn ACL. At 6-foot-7, freshman SF Sam Dekker will be a perfect addition to Ryan's style of play, giving this team a lengthy and flexible roster that should continue to play lockdown defense. |
| | |
| Last Updated: 4/19/2024 12:08:43 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|