|
|
VANDERBILT WAKE FOREST |
|
| 47 | 55 Final 21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
141 | VANDERBILT | -450 | 142 | WAKE FOREST | +325 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 7-4 | +2 | 7-4 | 4-6 | 27.0 | 13.0 | 389.0 | (5.7) | 1.4 | 18.0 | 8.5 | 327.9 | (4.8) | 1.0 | Road Games | 3-2 | +2 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 20.4 | 11.0 | 353.6 | (5.1) | 1.4 | 22.4 | 10.4 | 400.8 | (5.3) | 0.2 | Last 3 Games | 3-0 | +3.4 | 3-0 | 1-2 | 36.0 | 15.3 | 420.0 | (5.8) | 1.3 | 14.7 | 8.7 | 340.3 | (4.4) | 1.0 | Turf Games | 6-2 | +3.6 | 6-2 | 3-4 | 30.1 | 12.9 | 397.1 | (5.9) | 1.2 | 15.9 | 7.9 | 307.0 | (4.6) | 1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 27.0 | 13.0 | 19.1 | 30:12 | 41-169 | (4.1) | 16-27 | 57.9% | 220 | (8.1) | 68-389 | (5.7) | (14.4) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 29 | 14.4 | 20.5 | 31:52 | 40-180 | (4.5) | 19-31 | 61.2% | 227 | (7.4) | 70-407 | (5.8) | (14) | Offense Road Games | 20.4 | 11.0 | 19.0 | 30:11 | 40-125 | (3.2) | 17-30 | 56.4% | 228 | (7.7) | 70-354 | (5.1) | (17.3) | Defense (All Games) | 18.0 | 8.5 | 17.5 | 29:48 | 38-153 | (4.1) | 16-31 | 52.5% | 175 | (5.6) | 69-328 | (4.8) | (18.2) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 24.5 | 12.3 | 18.5 | 29:55 | 38-153 | (4.1) | 17-30 | 58.0% | 202 | (6.8) | 68-355 | (5.3) | (14.5) | Defense Road Games | 22.4 | 10.4 | 21.2 | 29:49 | 40-160 | (4) | 19-36 | 51.6% | 241 | (6.6) | 76-401 | (5.3) | (17.9) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 5-6 | +2 | 5-6 | 4-6 | 18.3 | 10.0 | 300.5 | (4.4) | 1.2 | 29.7 | 18.6 | 432.9 | (5.6) | 1.8 | Home Games | 4-2 | +2.6 | 3-3 | 3-2 | 27.5 | 14.5 | 388.7 | (5.3) | 1.3 | 28.5 | 16.5 | 432.2 | (5.5) | 1.7 | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | 0 | 1-2 | 0-3 | 11.3 | 9.0 | 267.7 | (3.8) | 1.3 | 29.7 | 18.3 | 464.3 | (6) | 2.3 | Turf Games | 4-2 | +2.6 | 3-3 | 3-2 | 27.5 | 14.5 | 388.7 | (5.3) | 1.3 | 28.5 | 16.5 | 432.2 | (5.5) | 1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 18.3 | 10.0 | 15.4 | 29:05 | 33-98 | (3) | 20-35 | 56.8% | 202 | (5.7) | 68-301 | (4.4) | (16.4) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 24.9 | 13.2 | 18.5 | 30:40 | 38-149 | (3.9) | 18-32 | 58.0% | 221 | (7) | 70-370 | (5.3) | (14.8) | Offense Home Games | 27.5 | 14.5 | 20.2 | 30:20 | 34-132 | (3.9) | 24-38 | 62.8% | 257 | (6.7) | 73-389 | (5.3) | (14.1) | Defense (All Games) | 29.7 | 18.6 | 21.6 | 30:55 | 41-163 | (3.9) | 22-35 | 61.3% | 270 | (7.7) | 77-433 | (5.6) | (14.6) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 29 | 15.7 | 21.1 | 30:08 | 40-165 | (4.2) | 20-34 | 59.6% | 251 | (7.5) | 73-416 | (5.7) | (14.4) | Defense Home Games | 28.5 | 16.5 | 22.5 | 29:40 | 42-152 | (3.6) | 23-36 | 62.7% | 280 | (7.7) | 78-432 | (5.5) | (15.2) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: VANDERBILT 33.6, WAKE FOREST 35 |
|
|
|
|
|
10/6/2012 | @ MISSOURI | 19-15 | W | 7 | W | 45 | U | 43-89 | 15-26-206 | 1 | 35-150 | 14-40-245 | 1 | 10/13/2012 | FLORIDA | 17-31 | L | 9.5 | L | 39 | O | 47-126 | 17-31-237 | 1 | 35-326 | 11-20-77 | 0 | 10/20/2012 | AUBURN | 17-13 | W | -6 | L | 45.5 | U | 45-209 | 15-26-173 | 3 | 33-103 | 15-21-109 | 0 | 10/27/2012 | MASSACHUSETTS | 49-7 | W | -33 | W | 50 | O | 37-226 | 17-22-217 | 2 | 32-54 | 23-41-210 | 3 | 11/3/2012 | @ KENTUCKY | 40-0 | W | -6.5 | W | 46 | U | 50-227 | 18-30-220 | 2 | 31-101 | 13-35-159 | 0 | 11/10/2012 | @ OLE MISS | 27-26 | W | 3 | W | 50.5 | O | 36-104 | 20-35-267 | 1 | 40-55 | 31-50-403 | 0 | 11/17/2012 | TENNESSEE | 41-18 | W | -2.5 | W | 61.5 | U | 40-194 | 14-28-248 | 1 | 33-149 | 19-41-154 | 3 | 11/24/2012 | @ WAKE FOREST | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/29/2012 | DUKE | 27-34 | L | -2.5 | L | 57 | O | 35-167 | 19-38-230 | 4 | 36-123 | 30-40-258 | 1 | 10/6/2012 | @ MARYLAND | 14-19 | L | 7 | W | 47.5 | U | 29-71 | 13-38-170 | 2 | 43-53 | 14-25-191 | 3 | 10/20/2012 | @ VIRGINIA | 16-10 | W | 3 | W | 51 | U | 41-105 | 8-21-108 | 0 | 32-48 | 22-39-253 | 3 | 10/25/2012 | CLEMSON | 13-42 | L | 11.5 | L | 61 | U | 28-51 | 28-45-239 | 1 | 45-101 | 29-40-433 | 0 | 11/3/2012 | BOSTON COLLEGE | 28-14 | W | -4 | W | 53 | U | 32-116 | 39-57-293 | 1 | 21-12 | 30-51-369 | 4 | 11/10/2012 | @ NC STATE | 6-37 | L | 9 | L | 50 | U | 23-16 | 22-40-169 | 2 | 51-170 | 25-43-258 | 2 | 11/17/2012 | @ NOTRE DAME | 0-38 | L | 23.5 | L | 42 | U | 25-55 | 23-35-154 | 1 | 30-221 | 22-36-363 | 1 | 11/24/2012 | VANDERBILT | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| VANDERBILT: This has the look of a promising season for the Commodores as their top three offensive players return in QB Jordan Rodgers (1,524 pass yds, 9 TD, 10 INT), RB Zac Stacy (1,193 rush yds, 14 TD) and WR Jordan Matthews (778 rec yds, 5 TD). The success of this team is ultimately going to come down to the defense, which loses several key players from a unit that overachieved by allowing just 323 total YPG (18th in nation) and ranking 29th in FBS in points allowed (21.6 PPG). Yet the Commodores still finished only 2-6 in SEC play, beating only Ole Miss and Kentucky at home for their two conference victories. | | WAKE FOREST: One thing the Demon Deacons will have going this season this season is a formidable QB-WR combo. Tanner Price is returning to school after throwing for 3,017 yards and 20 TD as a sophomore. He'll be looking again for WR Michael Campanaro, who caught 73 passes last year without even being the No. 1 target. Wake Forest is unfortunately only returning one member of the offensive line. The Deacons will need to figure out how to block (100th in FBS in sacks allowed) if they want to be competitive in the ACC this season. Defensively, this team will be able to stop the run with seven starters coming back, most of whom the defensive line. They'll need some younger players to step up and make plays in the secondary after picking off just eight passes last season. |
|
|
Game Notes: |
|
Last Updated: 3/29/2024 4:31:15 AM EST. |
|
|