|
|
DUKE
VIRGINIA TECH |
|
|
55
| 20
Final
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|  | |
| 127 | DUKE | +16 | Over 49 | | 128 | VIRGINIA TECH | -4 | Under 61 |
|
|
|  | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 5-1 | +2.2 | 5-1 | 4-1 | 37.8 | 18.5 | 414.7 | (5.6) | 1.8 | 25.2 | 14.7 | 372.2 | (5.3) | 2.0 | | Road Games | 1-1 | +0.2 | 1-1 | 2-0 | 23.5 | 8.0 | 383.0 | (4.7) | 2.5 | 38.5 | 16.5 | 385.0 | (5.8) | 2.5 | | Last 3 Games | 3-0 | +2.2 | 3-0 | 2-1 | 38.0 | 14.7 | 425.0 | (5.6) | 1.7 | 19.3 | 13.7 | 336.7 | (4.9) | 2.0 | | Grass Games | 4-1 | +1 | 4-1 | 3-1 | 38.6 | 19.6 | 421.4 | (5.8) | 2.0 | 24.8 | 15.6 | 367.2 | (5.2) | 1.6 | | Conference Games | 2-0 | +2.2 | 2-0 | 2-0 | 38.0 | 13.5 | 387.5 | (5.4) | 0.5 | 22.0 | 13.5 | 429.0 | (5.5) | 3.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Offense (All Games) | 37.8 | 18.5 | 20.8 | 31:25 | 33-126 | (3.8) | 28-41 | 68.0% | 289 | (7.1) | 74-415 | (5.6) | (11) | | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 34.7 | 17.8 | 20.9 | 30:16 | 36-156 | (4.3) | 23-36 | 61.8% | 254 | (7) | 73-410 | (5.6) | (11.8) | | Offense Road Games | 23.5 | 8.0 | 20.0 | 33:11 | 29-75 | (2.5) | 36-51 | 69.9% | 308 | (6) | 81-383 | (4.7) | (16.3) | | Defense (All Games) | 25.2 | 14.7 | 18.2 | 28:35 | 35-130 | (3.7) | 20-36 | 54.8% | 242 | (6.7) | 71-372 | (5.3) | (14.8) | | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 23.4 | 11.6 | 17.1 | 31:10 | 37-132 | (3.6) | 18-32 | 57.5% | 224 | (7) | 69-356 | (5.2) | (15.2) | | Defense Road Games | 38.5 | 16.5 | 17.5 | 26:48 | 30-129 | (4.2) | 18-35 | 52.1% | 255 | (7.2) | 66-385 | (5.8) | (10) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 3-3 | -5.4 | 1-5 | 3-2 | 29.0 | 13.2 | 376.8 | (5.6) | 1.8 | 22.3 | 10.3 | 390.0 | (5.4) | 1.5 | | Home Games | 3-0 | +2 | 1-2 | 0-2 | 33.0 | 16.3 | 380.3 | (5.5) | 0.7 | 8.0 | 2.3 | 258.3 | (3.9) | 1.7 | | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | -2.4 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 31.7 | 16.0 | 397.3 | (5.7) | 2.0 | 25.0 | 11.3 | 431.3 | (5.9) | 1.7 | | Grass Games | 3-3 | -5.4 | 1-5 | 3-2 | 29.0 | 13.2 | 376.8 | (5.6) | 1.8 | 22.3 | 10.3 | 390.0 | (5.4) | 1.5 | | Conference Games | 1-1 | 0 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 27.0 | 13.5 | 360.0 | (4.9) | 1.0 | 32.5 | 17.5 | 410.5 | (5.6) | 1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Offense (All Games) | 29.0 | 13.2 | 19.2 | 27:47 | 33-131 | (3.9) | 18-34 | 53.2% | 245 | (7.3) | 67-377 | (5.6) | (13) | | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 24.5 | 13.9 | 19.3 | 30:09 | 34-141 | (4.1) | 20-33 | 59.9% | 238 | (7.2) | 67-380 | (5.7) | (15.5) | | Offense Home Games | 33.0 | 16.3 | 21.0 | 28:16 | 39-176 | (4.6) | 17-31 | 54.8% | 204 | (6.6) | 70-380 | (5.5) | (11.5) | | Defense (All Games) | 22.3 | 10.3 | 20.0 | 32:12 | 42-197 | (4.6) | 15-30 | 48.9% | 193 | (6.4) | 72-390 | (5.4) | (17.5) | | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 28.4 | 14.1 | 20.1 | 30:49 | 41-203 | (5) | 16-28 | 57.3% | 208 | (7.6) | 68-412 | (6) | (14.5) | | Defense Home Games | 8.0 | 2.3 | 14.0 | 31:44 | 41-161 | (4) | 11-26 | 40.5% | 97 | (3.7) | 67-258 | (3.9) | (32.3) |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: DUKE 23.3, VIRGINIA TECH 32.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 9/1/2012 | FLA INTERNATIONAL | 46-26 | W | -2.5 | W | 53.5 | O | 30-119 | 23-34-301 | 2 | 45-165 | 27-46-348 | 2 | | 9/8/2012 | @ STANFORD | 13-50 | L | 16 | L | 55 | O | 23-27 | 42-63-358 | 4 | 26-92 | 18-33-281 | 1 | | 9/15/2012 | NC CENTRAL | 54-17 | W | -35 | W | | - | 29-128 | 25-35-280 | 0 | 39-98 | 19-31-239 | 3 | | 9/22/2012 | MEMPHIS | 38-14 | W | -21.5 | W | 61 | U | 44-177 | 27-40-323 | 4 | 28-71 | 13-22-81 | 0 | | 9/29/2012 | @ WAKE FOREST | 34-27 | W | 2.5 | W | 57 | O | 36-123 | 30-40-258 | 1 | 35-167 | 19-38-230 | 4 | | 10/6/2012 | VIRGINIA | 42-17 | W | 0 | W | 55 | O | 36-182 | 19-32-212 | 0 | 35-186 | 23-47-275 | 2 | | 10/13/2012 | @ VIRGINIA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/20/2012 | N CAROLINA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/27/2012 | @ FLORIDA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/3/2012 | CLEMSON | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 9/3/2012 | GEORGIA TECH | 20-17 | W | -8 | L | 46 | U | 35-96 | 21-38-230 | 0 | 55-192 | 10-16-96 | 1 | | 9/8/2012 | AUSTIN PEAY | 42-7 | W | -53 | L | | - | 38-187 | 18-26-232 | 1 | 41-159 | 8-21-62 | 2 | | 9/15/2012 | @ PITTSBURGH | 17-35 | L | -10 | L | 45 | O | 26-59 | 14-31-265 | 4 | 55-254 | 19-28-283 | 1 | | 9/22/2012 | BOWLING GREEN | 37-0 | W | -17 | W | 47.5 | U | 43-246 | 12-29-150 | 1 | 26-133 | 14-42-133 | 2 | | 9/29/2012 | *CINCINNATI | 24-27 | L | -6 | L | 47 | O | 34-160 | 17-30-242 | 3 | 32-103 | 20-43-392 | 2 | | 10/6/2012 | @ N CAROLINA | 34-48 | L | 6 | L | 52 | O | 25-40 | 26-49-354 | 2 | 45-339 | 17-30-194 | 1 | | 10/13/2012 | DUKE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/20/2012 | @ CLEMSON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/1/2012 | @ MIAMI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/8/2012 | FLORIDA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
 | DUKE: This could be the year that Duke football finally becomes nationally relevant. QB Sean Renfree is coming off a year in which he threw for 2,511 yards and 14 TDs in his final 10 games. The 6-foot-5 junior has made great strides and he seems as though he's ready to take Duke to the next level. The Blue Devils have little running game (94 rush YPG, 6th-lowest in FBS), but they do have a standout WR in Conner Vernon (956 rec yds). While the defense was a mess last season (425 YPG, 31.2 PPG allowed), it should be able to improve in its second year under coordinator Jim Knowles. If this happens, there's an outside shot that the Blue Devils could be playing in a bowl game for the first time since the 1994 season. | | VIRGINIA TECH: Of all of the ACC quarterbacks, Virginia Tech may have the best in Logan Thomas. The 6-foot-6, 254-pound Thomas threw for 3,013 yards and 19 TD while also running for 469 yards and 11 TD in his first year as a starter. Running back is a huge weakness for the Hokies as their top three RBs have little experience -- freshmen Michael Holmes and J.C. Coleman, and senior Martin Scales all enter the 2012 season with zero career carries. However, the Hokies will have one of the best defensive lines in the country next year, led by junior DE James Gayle (7 sacks, 12.5 TFL). They stack eight in the box often, with the technique paying off way more than it doesn't (12th in nation in sacks, 7th in points allowed). On the other end, VT will hope teams don't put eight in the box as the Hokies return just one starter on the offensive line. |
|
|
Game Notes: |
|
| Last Updated: 4/16/2024 1:26:50 AM EST. |
|
|