|
|
UTEP First Half Results TULSA |
|
| 29 | 3 Final 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 1-5 | -3.2 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 17.0 | 8.8 | 329.3 | (4.8) | 1.5 | 27.0 | 14.8 | 439.5 | (6) | 1.8 | Road Games | 0-3 | -3 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 18.0 | 6.3 | 316.3 | (4.6) | 2.0 | 31.0 | 19.3 | 478.7 | (7) | 3.0 | Last 3 Games | 0-3 | -3.2 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 14.7 | 6.3 | 307.7 | (4.5) | 2.7 | 27.3 | 18.0 | 423.3 | (5.9) | 2.3 | Turf Games | 1-4 | -2.2 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 16.8 | 8.6 | 334.8 | (4.8) | 1.0 | 26.8 | 15.0 | 432.4 | (6) | 1.4 | Conference Games | 0-2 | -2.2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 9.0 | 5.0 | 293.5 | (4.3) | 3.5 | 22.5 | 15.5 | 423.5 | (5.3) | 2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 17.0 | 8.8 | 17.8 | 28:45 | 34-126 | (3.7) | 17-35 | 50.0% | 203 | (5.8) | 69-329 | (4.8) | (19.4) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 24.8 | 12.9 | 19.6 | 30:03 | 36-143 | (4) | 20-35 | 58.3% | 240 | (6.9) | 71-383 | (5.4) | (15.4) | Offense Road Games | 18.0 | 6.3 | 18.0 | 30:15 | 33-88 | (2.7) | 20-36 | 54.1% | 228 | (6.3) | 69-316 | (4.6) | (17.6) | Defense (All Games) | 27.0 | 14.8 | 23.5 | 31:15 | 39-203 | (5.2) | 20-34 | 57.5% | 237 | (6.9) | 73-439 | (6) | (16.3) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 26.8 | 12.7 | 20.5 | 30:57 | 34-139 | (4.1) | 21-35 | 58.3% | 242 | (6.8) | 70-381 | (5.5) | (14.2) | Defense Road Games | 31.0 | 19.3 | 23.7 | 29:45 | 42-254 | (6.1) | 19-27 | 70.0% | 225 | (8.4) | 68-479 | (7) | (15.4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 5-1 | +1.8 | 3-3 | 3-2 | 42.5 | 27.0 | 457.8 | (5.7) | 1.8 | 28.3 | 15.7 | 377.0 | (5) | 2.0 | Home Games | 3-0 | +1 | 2-1 | 0-2 | 46.0 | 31.3 | 523.7 | (6.4) | 1.7 | 17.3 | 10.7 | 303.7 | (4.4) | 1.7 | Last 3 Games | 3-0 | +3 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 40.3 | 23.0 | 390.7 | (5) | 2.0 | 35.3 | 19.3 | 424.7 | (5.4) | 2.7 | Turf Games | 5-0 | +3 | 3-2 | 2-2 | 46.4 | 29.2 | 477.8 | (5.9) | 1.6 | 26.4 | 14.0 | 364.2 | (5) | 2.2 | Conference Games | 3-0 | +2 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 46.3 | 29.0 | 489.7 | (6.1) | 1.3 | 30.0 | 13.7 | 362.3 | (5.1) | 2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 42.5 | 27.0 | 22.5 | 28:55 | 46-246 | (5.3) | 17-35 | 50.2% | 212 | (6.1) | 81-458 | (5.7) | (10.8) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 32.9 | 18.5 | 20.8 | 30:40 | 42-195 | (4.7) | 18-31 | 56.3% | 210 | (6.7) | 73-405 | (5.5) | (12.3) | Offense Home Games | 46.0 | 31.3 | 24.0 | 28:07 | 48-274 | (5.8) | 17-35 | 48.1% | 249 | (7.2) | 82-524 | (6.4) | (11.4) | Defense (All Games) | 28.3 | 15.7 | 18.8 | 31:05 | 39-115 | (2.9) | 23-36 | 64.0% | 262 | (7.3) | 75-377 | (5) | (13.3) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 25.7 | 13.8 | 20.4 | 30:20 | 36-122 | (3.4) | 23-38 | 62.0% | 254 | (6.8) | 73-376 | (5.1) | (14.6) | Defense Home Games | 17.3 | 10.7 | 13.7 | 31:53 | 37-121 | (3.2) | 18-31 | 56.4% | 183 | (5.8) | 69-304 | (4.4) | (17.5) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: UTEP 36.2, TULSA 21.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
9/1/2012 | OKLAHOMA | 7-24 | L | 29.5 | W | 63 | U | 36-207 | 7-26-48 | 0 | 37-205 | 21-36-222 | 0 | 9/8/2012 | @ OLE MISS | 10-28 | L | 8 | L | 53 | U | 30-37 | 27-40-274 | 1 | 46-332 | 16-23-206 | 3 | 9/15/2012 | NEW MEXICO ST | 41-28 | W | -14 | L | 58.5 | O | 37-177 | 23-36-310 | 0 | 35-112 | 20-47-290 | 1 | 9/22/2012 | @ WISCONSIN | 26-37 | L | 18 | W | 50.5 | O | 33-77 | 22-39-259 | 1 | 40-213 | 12-17-210 | 2 | 9/29/2012 | @ E CAROLINA | 18-28 | L | 4 | L | 48.5 | U | 36-151 | 10-30-151 | 4 | 39-217 | 28-40-258 | 4 | 10/6/2012 | SMU | 0-17 | L | -1 | L | 52 | U | 30-107 | 16-39-178 | 3 | 36-138 | 22-44-234 | 1 | 10/11/2012 | @ TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/20/2012 | TULANE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/27/2012 | @ HOUSTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/10/2012 | UCF | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/1/2012 | @ IOWA ST | 23-38 | L | -1.5 | L | 50.5 | O | 34-160 | 23-49-198 | 3 | 45-160 | 32-45-281 | 1 | 9/8/2012 | TULANE | 45-10 | W | -22 | W | 57 | U | 55-364 | 17-32-287 | 1 | 29-7 | 15-29-170 | 0 | 9/15/2012 | NICHOLLS ST | 66-16 | W | -41 | W | | - | 45-333 | 19-34-233 | 1 | 46-222 | 12-21-148 | 3 | 9/22/2012 | FRESNO ST | 27-26 | W | -5.5 | L | 66.5 | U | 43-126 | 14-38-228 | 3 | 37-133 | 26-44-231 | 2 | 9/29/2012 | @ UAB | 49-42 | W | -13.5 | L | 58 | O | 46-241 | 23-39-237 | 2 | 35-1 | 20-30-337 | 3 | 10/6/2012 | @ MARSHALL | 45-38 | W | -3 | W | 68 | O | 53-250 | 9-17-90 | 1 | 45-169 | 32-45-403 | 3 | 10/11/2012 | UTEP | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/20/2012 | RICE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/3/2012 | @ ARKANSAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/10/2012 | @ HOUSTON | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| UTEP: Head coach Mike Price needs to deliver a winning season in 2012. The pressure will be on QB Nick Lamaison (1,718 pass yds, 12 TD, 10 INT) who unfortunately was derailed by a few injuries. This year he'll get back his two top targets in WRs Mike Edwards (657 rec yds, 3 TD) and Jordan Leslie (430 rec yds, 2 TD), as well as multiple pass-catching tight ends. RB Nathan Jeffery averaged 6.4 YPC last season and shows a lot of promise, especially with four starting OLs returning. The Miners defense struggled last year, allowing 442 YPG (104th in nation) and 49+ points three times. But the defensive line returns three quality starters and their linebackers will get a boost from Jamie Irving, who missed last season with shoulder injuries. The secondary could also be better with CB Drew Thomas (42 tackles, 5 PD) and S DeShawn Grayson (67 tackles, 2 INT) returning. | | TULSA: Tulsa is looking to repeat the success of last year's team despite losing QB G.J. Kinne. This year, the guy under center looks to be Cody Green, who transferred from Nebraska. Green looks the part of an NFL quarterback as he is an athletic 6-foot-4, 247-pound physical specimen, and he'll have WR Bryan Burnham (850 rec yds) to throw to. RBs Trey Watts and Ja'Terian Douglas, both of whom rushed for over 800 yards last season, will also make Green's job a heck of a lot easier. However, the offensive line lost three starters and lacks depth. The defense for this team looks to be very promising in 2012 as they get back a few starters in every area of the defense. This includes S Dexter McCoil (13 INT in career). They have a lot of speed on their defense, so it'll be very tough to move the ball on the Golden Hurricane, especially in a conference full of uncertainty at the quarterback position. |
|
|
Game Notes: |
|
Last Updated: 3/29/2024 9:19:51 AM EST. |
|
|