|
|
ARMY TULANE |
|
| 45.5 | 17 Final 21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
381 | ARMY | +9 | Over 39 | 382 | TULANE | +3 | Under 51 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 2-1 | +1 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 30.7 | 16.0 | 376.7 | (6) | 0.7 | 20.3 | 13.3 | 401.3 | (6.6) | 1.0 | Road Games | 0-1 | 0 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 278.0 | (4.2) | 1.0 | 38.0 | 17.0 | 586.0 | (8.5) | 0.0 | Last 3 Games | 2-1 | +2 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 30.7 | 16.0 | 376.7 | (6) | 0.7 | 20.3 | 13.3 | 401.3 | (6.6) | 1.0 | Turf Games | 2-1 | +1 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 30.7 | 16.0 | 376.7 | (6) | 0.7 | 20.3 | 13.3 | 401.3 | (6.6) | 1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 30.7 | 16.0 | 19.0 | 32:14 | 57-365 | (6.4) | 1-6 | 22.2% | 12 | (2) | 63-377 | (6) | (12.3) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 33.2 | 16.7 | 21.3 | 31:32 | 46-286 | (6.2) | 11-20 | 54.4% | 126 | (6.3) | 66-413 | (6.2) | (12.4) | Offense Road Games | 7.0 | 7.0 | 16.0 | 36:57 | 58-259 | (4.5) | 2-8 | 25.0% | 19 | (2.4) | 66-278 | (4.2) | (39.7) | Defense (All Games) | 20.3 | 13.3 | 20.3 | 27:46 | 30-152 | (5.1) | 22-31 | 70.2% | 250 | (8) | 61-401 | (6.6) | (19.7) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 19.8 | 11.7 | 20.8 | 29:28 | 36-155 | (4.3) | 21-34 | 63.2% | 235 | (6.9) | 70-390 | (5.6) | (19.7) | Defense Road Games | 38.0 | 17.0 | 30.0 | 23:03 | 32-270 | (8.4) | 29-37 | 78.4% | 316 | (8.5) | 69-586 | (8.5) | (15.4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 1-2 | 0 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 26.0 | 17.0 | 344.7 | (5.2) | 0.7 | 31.0 | 14.0 | 394.0 | (6.8) | 1.7 | Home Games | 1-0 | +1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 43.0 | 24.0 | 481.0 | (7.3) | 0.0 | 14.0 | 0.0 | 225.0 | (4.6) | 1.0 | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | 0 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 26.0 | 17.0 | 344.7 | (5.2) | 0.7 | 31.0 | 14.0 | 394.0 | (6.8) | 1.7 | Turf Games | 1-1 | 0 | 2-0 | 1-1 | 32.0 | 18.5 | 371.5 | (5.9) | 0.0 | 18.5 | 7.0 | 275.5 | (4.9) | 1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 26.0 | 17.0 | 19.0 | 34:19 | 53-241 | (4.6) | 8-13 | 60.0% | 103 | (7.7) | 66-345 | (5.2) | (13.3) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 25.1 | 14.5 | 18.9 | 30:05 | 42-190 | (4.6) | 13-21 | 60.9% | 158 | (7.6) | 63-348 | (5.6) | (13.9) | Offense Home Games | 43.0 | 24.0 | 26.0 | 36:14 | 51-296 | (5.8) | 10-15 | 66.7% | 185 | (12.3) | 66-481 | (7.3) | (11.2) | Defense (All Games) | 31.0 | 14.0 | 16.3 | 25:41 | 35-156 | (4.4) | 13-23 | 56.5% | 238 | (10.3) | 58-394 | (6.8) | (12.7) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 31.4 | 13.2 | 19.2 | 30:55 | 39-181 | (4.6) | 15-24 | 62.6% | 236 | (9.9) | 63-417 | (6.6) | (13.3) | Defense Home Games | 14.0 | 0.0 | 10.0 | 23:46 | 22-77 | (3.5) | 15-27 | 55.6% | 148 | (5.5) | 49-225 | (4.6) | (16.1) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: ARMY 25, TULANE 32.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
9/1/2017 | FORDHAM | 64-6 | W | -18.5 | W | 66 | O | 47-513 | 0-2-0 | 1 | 34-66 | 28-41-240 | 1 | 9/9/2017 | BUFFALO | 21-17 | W | -16 | L | 53.5 | U | 66-322 | 2-8-17 | 0 | 23-119 | 9-16-193 | 2 | 9/16/2017 | @ OHIO ST | 7-38 | L | 32.5 | W | 55 | U | 58-259 | 2-8-19 | 1 | 32-270 | 29-37-316 | 0 | 9/23/2017 | @ TULANE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/30/2017 | UTEP | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/7/2017 | @ RICE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/14/2017 | E MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/21/2017 | TEMPLE | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/2/2017 | GRAMBLING | 43-14 | W | -13.5 | W | 52.5 | O | 51-296 | 10-15-185 | 0 | 22-77 | 15-27-148 | 1 | 9/9/2017 | @ NAVY | 21-23 | L | 8 | W | 49.5 | U | 46-191 | 8-13-71 | 0 | 52-194 | 4-12-132 | 2 | 9/16/2017 | @ OKLAHOMA | 14-56 | L | 33.5 | L | 52.5 | O | 62-237 | 6-12-54 | 2 | 32-197 | 20-30-434 | 2 | 9/23/2017 | ARMY | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/7/2017 | TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/14/2017 | @ FLA INTERNATIONAL | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/21/2017 | S FLORIDA | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| ARMY: Jeff Monken is doing tremendous things in Army, as he led the Black Knights to a victory over rival Navy last year. He'll now look to build off that success, and it's hard to imagine him struggling to do that. This team plays good defense and knows how to run the ball. | | TULANE: Tulane needs far better quarterback play than it received last year from Glen Cuiellette, who finished last among FBS passers in both completion percentage (42.6) and yards per attempt (5.5). Tulane's secondary is strong, but the defense needs improvement everywhere else. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 4/18/2024 8:02:05 AM EST. |
|
|