|
|
TULSA First Half Results TULANE |
|
| 29 | 14 Final 24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 5-6 | +2.1 | 5-5 | 5-5 | 35.1 | 16.7 | 511.4 | (6) | 1.7 | 39.0 | 19.4 | 531.6 | (6.5) | 1.8 | Road Games | 2-3 | +2.1 | 5-0 | 2-3 | 34.6 | 16.2 | 534.6 | (6.1) | 0.8 | 36.6 | 21.4 | 520.6 | (6.7) | 2.0 | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | 0 | 1-2 | 2-0 | 34.7 | 15.0 | 456.3 | (6.1) | 2.3 | 41.0 | 15.7 | 529.3 | (6.9) | 2.7 | Turf Games | 5-4 | +3.1 | 3-5 | 4-4 | 36.8 | 17.8 | 506.6 | (6) | 1.9 | 38.6 | 18.0 | 521.4 | (6.4) | 1.9 | Conference Games | 2-5 | -2 | 3-4 | 3-3 | 32.4 | 14.1 | 463.0 | (5.8) | 2.0 | 41.1 | 20.6 | 531.1 | (6.5) | 1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 35.1 | 16.7 | 25.9 | 28:14 | 47-185 | (3.9) | 24-38 | 62.4% | 326 | (8.7) | 85-511 | (6) | (14.6) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 29.2 | 14.9 | 21.1 | 30:48 | 42-180 | (4.3) | 18-31 | 58.0% | 235 | (7.6) | 72-415 | (5.7) | (14.2) | Offense Road Games | 34.6 | 16.2 | 26.4 | 29:51 | 48-204 | (4.3) | 24-40 | 59.3% | 330 | (8.3) | 88-535 | (6.1) | (15.5) | Defense (All Games) | 39.0 | 19.4 | 26.5 | 31:46 | 46-243 | (5.3) | 22-35 | 62.5% | 288 | (8.2) | 81-532 | (6.5) | (13.6) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 31.2 | 17.1 | 22 | 30:11 | 42-189 | (4.5) | 19-31 | 60.1% | 236 | (7.6) | 73-425 | (5.8) | (13.6) | Defense Road Games | 36.6 | 21.4 | 26.2 | 30:09 | 42-201 | (4.8) | 23-35 | 65.3% | 320 | (9.1) | 77-521 | (6.7) | (14.2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 3-8 | -0.6 | 6-5 | 6-5 | 18.4 | 11.8 | 297.6 | (4.6) | 1.2 | 35.5 | 17.7 | 412.6 | (5.8) | 1.4 | Home Games | 2-3 | 0 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 20.0 | 11.6 | 313.0 | (4.6) | 1.0 | 24.8 | 13.0 | 374.2 | (5) | 2.2 | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | -0.6 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 19.3 | 12.7 | 278.3 | (4.4) | 0.7 | 29.0 | 21.0 | 369.0 | (5.6) | 0.7 | Turf Games | 3-6 | +0.4 | 6-3 | 4-5 | 20.2 | 12.6 | 324.0 | (4.9) | 1.0 | 30.7 | 16.2 | 402.6 | (5.5) | 1.3 | Conference Games | 1-6 | -2 | 4-3 | 3-4 | 16.1 | 10.1 | 270.1 | (4.1) | 1.0 | 35.7 | 18.0 | 397.1 | (5.7) | 1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 18.4 | 11.8 | 15.5 | 27:36 | 32-109 | (3.4) | 17-33 | 50.3% | 188 | (5.7) | 65-298 | (4.6) | (16.2) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 27.3 | 14.3 | 19.8 | 29:12 | 39-166 | (4.3) | 18-30 | 59.0% | 231 | (7.6) | 69-397 | (5.7) | (14.6) | Offense Home Games | 20.0 | 11.6 | 14.2 | 28:54 | 33-109 | (3.3) | 17-35 | 49.1% | 204 | (5.8) | 68-313 | (4.6) | (15.6) | Defense (All Games) | 35.5 | 17.7 | 21.5 | 32:24 | 44-191 | (4.3) | 17-27 | 61.3% | 221 | (8.1) | 72-413 | (5.8) | (11.6) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 27.8 | 14.2 | 19.7 | 31:34 | 42-189 | (4.4) | 15-27 | 56.2% | 189 | (7.1) | 69-378 | (5.5) | (13.6) | Defense Home Games | 24.8 | 13.0 | 19.6 | 31:06 | 39-130 | (3.4) | 20-36 | 57.3% | 244 | (6.9) | 74-374 | (5) | (15.1) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: TULSA 32.5, TULANE 30.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
10/3/2015 | HOUSTON | 24-38 | L | 9 | L | 79.5 | U | 43-130 | 26-45-326 | 2 | 56-365 | 22-38-273 | 1 | 10/10/2015 | LA MONROE | 34-24 | W | -10 | T | 65.5 | U | 62-222 | 28-45-341 | 0 | 29-173 | 25-48-231 | 3 | 10/17/2015 | @ E CAROLINA | 17-30 | L | 14 | W | 76.5 | U | 45-175 | 19-41-288 | 2 | 43-143 | 20-29-239 | 1 | 10/23/2015 | MEMPHIS | 42-66 | L | 9.5 | L | 75.5 | O | 45-113 | 24-36-421 | 3 | 52-257 | 32-44-447 | 1 | 10/31/2015 | @ SMU | 40-31 | W | -1 | W | 75 | U | 57-179 | 19-27-240 | 0 | 32-84 | 23-46-322 | 2 | 11/7/2015 | UCF | 45-30 | W | -17 | L | 61 | O | 46-275 | 10-18-150 | 4 | 40-109 | 23-43-303 | 4 | 11/14/2015 | @ CINCINNATI | 38-49 | L | 22.5 | W | 76.5 | O | 39-213 | 30-50-375 | 1 | 41-266 | 29-42-386 | 3 | 11/21/2015 | NAVY | 21-44 | L | 12.5 | L | 65 | P | 34-78 | 32-37-278 | 2 | 61-469 | 2-3-55 | 1 | 11/27/2015 | @ TULANE | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10/3/2015 | UCF | 45-31 | W | 1.5 | W | 44 | O | 44-170 | 17-29-225 | 1 | 22--35 | 30-52-392 | 5 | 10/10/2015 | @ TEMPLE | 10-49 | L | 14 | L | 44.5 | O | 27-8 | 17-30-102 | 2 | 46-122 | 14-18-223 | 2 | 10/16/2015 | HOUSTON | 7-42 | L | 21 | L | 57.5 | U | 32-112 | 14-33-150 | 0 | 47-239 | 17-25-222 | 1 | 10/24/2015 | @ NAVY | 14-31 | L | 25 | W | 56.5 | U | 27-123 | 27-38-263 | 3 | 54-133 | 8-12-158 | 0 | 10/31/2015 | @ MEMPHIS | 13-41 | L | 30 | W | 62 | U | 42-139 | 10-24-131 | 0 | 39-223 | 27-44-358 | 0 | 11/7/2015 | CONNECTICUT | 3-7 | L | 5 | W | 44.5 | U | 25-34 | 13-40-106 | 1 | 42-146 | 8-19-81 | 1 | 11/14/2015 | @ ARMY | 34-31 | W | 3 | W | 43.5 | O | 28-115 | 14-29-252 | 1 | 55-216 | 7-13-146 | 1 | 11/21/2015 | @ SMU | 21-49 | L | 3 | L | 55.5 | O | 33-200 | 13-33-128 | 0 | 44-323 | 18-25-195 | 0 | 11/27/2015 | TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| TULSA: Tulsa will be an exciting team to watch with its Baylor offense, but the porous defense will be the reason the team struggles to reach .500. The schedule isn't kind either, as Tulsa must face all five AAC schools that finished 2014 with a winning record in conference play (vs. Memphis, at Cincinnati, vs. UCF, at East Carolina, vs. Houston). But the Golden Hurricane should pad their win total with victories hosting 3-9 Florida Atlantic and 4-8 UL Monroe, as well as a trip to 4-8 New Mexico. It wouldn't be shocking to see Tulsa increase its two-win total threefold. | | TULANE: There are too many offensive question marks to expect Tulane to make a huge jump from three wins. Sure, there are winnable home games versus FCS program Maine, 2-10 UConn and 2-10 Tulsa, but in-conference trips to Temple, Navy and Memphis could all spell major trouble for the Green Wave. Anything more than four wins in 2015 would be an overachievement for Tulane. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 5/2/2024 6:32:12 PM EST. |
|
|