| | | |
AKRON
First Half Results
TOLEDO |
|
|
31.5
| 17
Final
21 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | | |
|
|
| All Games | 1-10 | -12.5 | 5-6 | 4-6 | 26.4 | 13.4 | 435.8 | (5.5) | 2.4 | 35.7 | 17.8 | 449.2 | (6) | 1.0 | | Road Games | 0-5 | -3 | 4-1 | 2-3 | 26.0 | 16.2 | 429.0 | (5.3) | 1.8 | 38.4 | 17.0 | 464.6 | (6.1) | 0.8 | | Last 3 Games | 0-3 | -9.5 | 1-2 | 0-3 | 17.3 | 10.3 | 453.7 | (5.8) | 2.7 | 30.7 | 14.3 | 378.3 | (5.7) | 0.7 | | Turf Games | 1-9 | -12.5 | 4-6 | 3-6 | 26.4 | 12.4 | 445.0 | (5.6) | 2.3 | 34.6 | 17.3 | 430.8 | (5.8) | 0.9 | | Conference Games | 0-7 | -13.5 | 2-5 | 1-6 | 20.9 | 11.9 | 423.0 | (5.6) | 2.1 | 34.7 | 16.9 | 468.7 | (6.2) | 0.6 |
|
| |
|
|
| Offense (All Games) | 26.4 | 13.4 | 24.0 | 27:42 | 30-119 | (3.9) | 30-49 | 62.2% | 317 | (6.5) | 79-436 | (5.5) | (16.5) | | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 31.6 | 15.6 | 22.9 | 30:48 | 38-181 | (4.7) | 21-35 | 61.3% | 256 | (7.4) | 73-437 | (6) | (13.8) | | Offense Road Games | 26.0 | 16.2 | 23.2 | 29:16 | 31-128 | (4.2) | 30-50 | 59.4% | 301 | (6) | 81-429 | (5.3) | (16.5) | | Defense (All Games) | 35.7 | 17.8 | 24.6 | 33:17 | 44-218 | (5) | 18-31 | 58.8% | 231 | (7.4) | 75-449 | (6) | (12.6) | | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 28.2 | 14.7 | 20.7 | 30:11 | 38-166 | (4.3) | 19-32 | 58.6% | 228 | (7.1) | 70-393 | (5.6) | (13.9) | | Defense Road Games | 38.4 | 17.0 | 24.8 | 33:44 | 47-248 | (5.3) | 18-29 | 61.4% | 216 | (7.5) | 76-465 | (6.1) | (12.1) |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 8-3 | +4 | 7-4 | 3-7 | 32.7 | 16.1 | 455.8 | (6.1) | 1.5 | 27.7 | 12.4 | 475.2 | (6.5) | 2.2 | | Home Games | 4-1 | +1.5 | 3-2 | 1-3 | 34.2 | 16.8 | 433.6 | (6.1) | 1.4 | 27.0 | 13.6 | 416.0 | (5.8) | 1.6 | | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | -2.3 | 1-2 | 0-3 | 25.3 | 12.7 | 444.7 | (6.1) | 2.3 | 28.3 | 12.7 | 471.3 | (6.4) | 2.7 | | Turf Games | 8-2 | +5 | 6-4 | 3-6 | 34.3 | 16.3 | 465.6 | (6.4) | 1.5 | 28.1 | 12.6 | 460.3 | (6.4) | 2.1 | | Conference Games | 5-2 | +1.7 | 4-3 | 2-5 | 34.6 | 16.1 | 485.0 | (6.7) | 1.9 | 28.4 | 11.3 | 452.4 | (6.3) | 2.3 |
|
| |
|
|
| Offense (All Games) | 32.7 | 16.1 | 22.9 | 31:12 | 41-203 | (5) | 20-33 | 61.0% | 253 | (7.6) | 74-456 | (6.1) | (13.9) | | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 29 | 14.6 | 21.3 | 31:52 | 39-176 | (4.5) | 20-33 | 60.8% | 240 | (7.2) | 73-416 | (5.7) | (14.3) | | Offense Home Games | 34.2 | 16.8 | 21.2 | 30:15 | 40-193 | (4.8) | 20-31 | 64.7% | 241 | (7.7) | 71-434 | (6.1) | (12.7) | | Defense (All Games) | 27.7 | 12.4 | 23.9 | 28:48 | 35-177 | (5.1) | 23-39 | 60.8% | 298 | (7.7) | 73-475 | (6.5) | (17.1) | | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 29.5 | 14.7 | 22.2 | 29:28 | 38-174 | (4.6) | 21-35 | 59.3% | 255 | (7.3) | 73-428 | (5.9) | (14.5) | | Defense Home Games | 27.0 | 13.6 | 22.6 | 29:45 | 31-135 | (4.3) | 25-41 | 61.2% | 281 | (6.8) | 72-416 | (5.8) | (15.4) |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: AKRON 25.7, TOLEDO 27.2 |
| | |
|
|
| 9/22/2012 | @ TENNESSEE | 26-47 | L | 32 | W | 65 | O | 26-115 | 27-49-229 | 3 | 46-232 | 27-43-401 | 2 | | 9/29/2012 | MIAMI OHIO | 49-56 | L | 1.5 | L | 57 | O | 26-183 | 32-43-446 | 1 | 39-189 | 34-49-516 | 0 | | 10/6/2012 | BOWLING GREEN | 10-24 | L | 5.5 | L | 59.5 | U | 26-88 | 29-50-228 | 1 | 44-292 | 14-33-180 | 1 | | 10/13/2012 | @ OHIO U | 28-34 | L | 18 | W | 68 | U | 33-158 | 32-53-298 | 2 | 53-252 | 14-28-189 | 0 | | 10/20/2012 | N ILLINOIS | 7-37 | L | 17 | L | 64 | U | 37-42 | 15-29-157 | 3 | 50-305 | 20-33-223 | 1 | | 10/27/2012 | @ C MICHIGAN | 14-35 | L | 7.5 | L | 65.5 | U | 29-140 | 33-53-352 | 2 | 44-264 | 15-25-180 | 0 | | 11/3/2012 | @ KENT ST | 24-35 | L | 18.5 | W | 61 | U | 32-130 | 30-42-312 | 1 | 40-261 | 14-19-103 | 0 | | 11/10/2012 | MASSACHUSETTS | 14-22 | L | -14.5 | L | 59 | U | 27-95 | 34-51-332 | 5 | 33-61 | 23-39-266 | 2 | | 11/20/2012 | @ TOLEDO | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 9/22/2012 | COASTAL CAROLINA | 38-28 | W | -29 | L | | - | 31-112 | 27-36-290 | 1 | 34-76 | 30-47-356 | 0 | | 9/29/2012 | @ W MICHIGAN | 37-17 | W | 1 | W | 57 | U | 37-278 | 22-33-243 | 0 | 30-173 | 26-46-232 | 4 | | 10/6/2012 | C MICHIGAN | 50-35 | W | -11.5 | W | 64 | O | 36-183 | 26-40-250 | 3 | 24-46 | 28-44-327 | 2 | | 10/13/2012 | @ E MICHIGAN | 52-47 | W | -15 | L | 55 | O | 37-254 | 21-32-401 | 2 | 41-323 | 18-29-301 | 1 | | 10/20/2012 | CINCINNATI | 29-23 | W | 5 | W | 64.5 | U | 43-229 | 13-24-126 | 1 | 35-251 | 15-37-227 | 2 | | 10/27/2012 | @ BUFFALO | 25-20 | W | -7 | L | 60.5 | U | 46-241 | 12-25-171 | 2 | 39-170 | 11-28-202 | 2 | | 11/6/2012 | BALL ST | 27-34 | L | -5.5 | L | 70 | U | 51-311 | 14-27-215 | 1 | 33-166 | 29-42-280 | 3 | | 11/14/2012 | @ N ILLINOIS | 24-31 | L | 10 | W | 69.5 | U | 38-131 | 22-33-265 | 4 | 42-189 | 25-36-407 | 3 | | 11/20/2012 | AKRON | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| |  | AKRON: The Zips made a surprising move hiring Terry Bowden as head coach this offseason, who brought along Chuck Amato to take over a defense that allowed 119 points in the final two games of its 1-11 season. Akron has some talented players returning this season including QB Clayton Moore (1,655 pass yds, 9 TD, 9 INT). Once Moore improves his accuracy, the offense will move the ball a lot more efficiently. Also returning is RB Jawson Chisholm (961 rush yds, 5 TD) and WR Keith Sconiers (639 rec yds, 5 TD). On the defensive side of the ball, the Zips weren't as bad as they were offensively last year. Amato is a great defensive mind and will get back LB Troy Gilmer (71 tackles). Gilmer will need another big season if the Zips are to claim their first conference win in two years. | | TOLEDO: Toledo is going to be sporting one of the most unique offenses in college football that features two very talented quarterbacks. Austin Dantin (1,404 pass yds, 15 TD) is the more traditional pocket passer, while Terrance Owens (2,022 pass yds, 18 TD) is a threat to run as well as throw. The quarterbacks switch off based on different situations, but these Rockets have an explosive offense and that shouldn't change in 2012, even with new head coach Matt Campbell taking over for Tim Beckman, who left for the Illinois job. Toledo has a quality RB in David Fluellen and if the offensive line can create holes and protect the pass, the Rockets offense should be no different than last year. On the defensive end, they'll need to do a better job. Last season the Rockets struggled to stay healthy and it caught up with them, as they were often involved in high-scoring affairs. They'll need to be at full strength in order to win the MAC, otherwise they'll just be an exciting team to watch lose. They do have hope with the arrival of Michigan transfer Vladimir Emilien, who will play LB for Campbell, and LB Dan Molls, who was out for half of the 2011 season after a huge 2010 campaign. |
| | Game Notes: |
| | Last Updated: 4/20/2024 9:05:22 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|