|
|
TULSA
TEXAS |
|
|
59.5
| 21
Final
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|  | |
| 381 | TULSA | 59.5 | 61.5 | | 382 | TEXAS | -20 | -23.5 |
|
|
|  | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 1-0 | +1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 38.0 | 21.0 | 470.0 | (5.4) | 3.0 | 27.0 | 13.0 | 247.0 | (4.3) | 2.0 | | Last 3 Games | 1-0 | +1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 38.0 | 21.0 | 470.0 | (5.4) | 3.0 | 27.0 | 13.0 | 247.0 | (4.3) | 2.0 | | Turf Games | 1-0 | +1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 38.0 | 21.0 | 470.0 | (5.4) | 3.0 | 27.0 | 13.0 | 247.0 | (4.3) | 2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Offense (All Games) | 38.0 | 21.0 | 25.0 | 29:16 | 63-274 | (4.3) | 15-24 | 62.5% | 196 | (8.2) | 87-470 | (5.4) | (12.4) | | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 38 | 21 | 25 | 29:16 | 63-274 | (4.3) | 15-24 | 62.5% | 196 | (8.2) | 87-470 | (5.4) | (12.4) | | Defense (All Games) | 27.0 | 13.0 | 16.0 | 26:32 | 32-82 | (2.6) | 17-25 | 68.0% | 165 | (6.6) | 57-247 | (4.3) | (9.1) | | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 27 | 13 | 16 | 27:32 | 32-82 | (2.6) | 17-25 | 68.0% | 165 | (6.6) | 57-247 | (4.3) | (9.1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 0-1 | -5 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 29.0 | 22.0 | 405.0 | (5.4) | 3.0 | 34.0 | 24.0 | 407.0 | (5.1) | 0.0 | | Last 3 Games | 0-1 | -5 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 29.0 | 22.0 | 405.0 | (5.4) | 3.0 | 34.0 | 24.0 | 407.0 | (5.1) | 0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Offense (All Games) | 29.0 | 22.0 | 20.0 | 27:14 | 36-142 | (3.9) | 21-39 | 53.8% | 263 | (6.7) | 75-405 | (5.4) | (14) | | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 29 | 22 | 20 | 27:14 | 36-142 | (3.9) | 21-39 | 53.8% | 263 | (6.7) | 75-405 | (5.4) | (14) | | Defense (All Games) | 34.0 | 24.0 | 21.0 | 32:46 | 46-143 | (3.1) | 21-34 | 61.8% | 264 | (7.8) | 80-407 | (5.1) | (12) | | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 34 | 24 | 21 | 33:46 | 46-143 | (3.1) | 21-34 | 61.8% | 264 | (7.8) | 80-407 | (5.1) | (12) |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: TULSA -3, TEXAS 28 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 9/1/2018 | C ARKANSAS | 38-27 | W | -11.5 | L | | - | 63-274 | 15-24-196 | 3 | 32-82 | 17-25-165 | 2 | | 9/8/2018 | @ TEXAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/15/2018 | ARKANSAS ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/20/2018 | @ TEMPLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/4/2018 | @ HOUSTON | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 9/1/2018 | *MARYLAND | 29-34 | L | -12 | L | 54.5 | O | 36-142 | 21-39-263 | 3 | 46-143 | 21-34-264 | 0 | | 9/8/2018 | TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/15/2018 | USC | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/22/2018 | TCU | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/29/2018 | @ KANSAS ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/6/2018 | @ OKLAHOMA | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
 | TULSA: After a 10-win season in his second year with the program, head coach Philip Montgomery was looking like a star in the making. But his momentum took a big hit with last year's 2-10 season, and it's hard to imagine the Golden Hurricane being much better in 2018-19. They still have some serious question marks at the quarterback position, which severely handicaps a strong group of skill-position players. Defensively, Tulsa was miserable at every level last season. It'll get some help in the form of transfers, but that's not going to improve the team as much as it needs. | | TEXAS: Given the resources available to this program, it has been impossibly frustrating to watch the Longhorns wallow in mediocrity for nearly a decade now. This year, however'and apologies if you've heard this before'could be the start of the turnaround in Austin. Tom Herman didn't find a real solution at quarterback last season between Sam Ehlinger and Shane Buechele, and solving that conundrum is his obvious top priority. He should be able to give it his full attention, though, given how solid coordinator Todd Orlando's defense is shaping up to be. While stars like Malik Jefferson and Poona Ford are gone, the unit as a whole actually figures to improve thanks to a solid core of veterans and a promising pool of highly touted youngsters. |
|
|
|
|
| Last Updated: 10/7/2024 1:26:58 PM EST. |
|
|