|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 0-6 | -7.8 | 0-6 | 2-2 | 15.7 | 8.8 | 274.5 | (4.1) | 2.8 | 29.7 | 12.5 | 396.7 | (5.8) | 0.7 | Road Games | 0-3 | -2.2 | 0-3 | 1-1 | 17.3 | 8.0 | 256.0 | (3.8) | 3.0 | 35.7 | 14.0 | 428.7 | (6.1) | 0.7 | Last 3 Games | 0-3 | -3.2 | 0-3 | 2-0 | 19.3 | 9.0 | 300.7 | (4.5) | 3.7 | 38.7 | 18.3 | 409.3 | (5.8) | 0.7 | Grass Games | 0-5 | -6.6 | 0-5 | 1-2 | 12.6 | 8.6 | 258.0 | (4) | 2.4 | 26.6 | 10.2 | 397.0 | (5.9) | 0.6 | Conference Games | 0-2 | -2.2 | 0-2 | 2-0 | 22.0 | 6.5 | 336.0 | (4.9) | 4.5 | 42.5 | 23.5 | 414.0 | (5.8) | 0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 15.7 | 8.8 | 17.5 | 26:46 | 27-50 | (1.9) | 22-40 | 54.6% | 225 | (5.6) | 67-274 | (4.1) | (17.5) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 26.2 | 13.7 | 20.7 | 30:36 | 39-174 | (4.5) | 19-32 | 59.7% | 216 | (6.8) | 70-390 | (5.6) | (14.9) | Offense Road Games | 17.3 | 8.0 | 16.7 | 25:34 | 25-7 | (0.3) | 22-42 | 53.2% | 249 | (5.9) | 67-256 | (3.8) | (14.8) | Defense (All Games) | 29.7 | 12.5 | 18.0 | 33:14 | 39-145 | (3.8) | 18-29 | 62.5% | 251 | (8.6) | 68-397 | (5.8) | (13.4) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 22.4 | 11.9 | 17.9 | 30:23 | 36-138 | (3.8) | 17-29 | 57.0% | 205 | (7) | 65-343 | (5.3) | (15.3) | Defense Road Games | 35.7 | 14.0 | 19.3 | 34:26 | 43-172 | (4) | 16-28 | 56.0% | 257 | (9.2) | 71-429 | (6.1) | (12) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 5-0 | +6.8 | 4-1 | 2-3 | 34.4 | 13.0 | 347.6 | (5.1) | 1.6 | 14.4 | 9.2 | 327.8 | (4.8) | 2.2 | Home Games | 2-0 | +2.9 | 2-0 | 1-1 | 38.0 | 14.0 | 331.0 | (5.2) | 1.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 145.0 | (2.7) | 1.5 | Last 3 Games | 3-0 | +3 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 37.0 | 16.0 | 375.0 | (5.2) | 2.0 | 12.0 | 10.0 | 300.7 | (4.4) | 1.7 | Grass Games | 2-0 | +2.9 | 2-0 | 1-1 | 38.0 | 14.0 | 331.0 | (5.2) | 1.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 145.0 | (2.7) | 1.5 | Conference Games | 2-0 | +2.8 | 2-0 | 2-0 | 41.5 | 15.5 | 320.5 | (5.3) | 1.5 | 18.0 | 8.0 | 333.5 | (4.8) | 3.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 34.4 | 13.0 | 18.8 | 34:20 | 41-152 | (3.7) | 16-26 | 62.6% | 196 | (7.5) | 68-348 | (5.1) | (10.1) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 31.7 | 15.4 | 20.1 | 31:52 | 40-172 | (4.3) | 18-31 | 60.1% | 223 | (7.3) | 71-395 | (5.6) | (12.5) | Offense Home Games | 38.0 | 14.0 | 19.0 | 35:16 | 44-135 | (3) | 15-19 | 76.9% | 195 | (10) | 64-331 | (5.2) | (8.7) | Defense (All Games) | 14.4 | 9.2 | 17.4 | 25:40 | 31-97 | (3.2) | 20-38 | 52.9% | 231 | (6.1) | 68-328 | (4.8) | (22.8) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 24.5 | 16.1 | 20.6 | 29:07 | 37-141 | (3.8) | 21-37 | 55.9% | 254 | (6.9) | 74-395 | (5.4) | (16.1) | Defense Home Games | 10.0 | 10.0 | 8.5 | 24:43 | 27-42 | (1.6) | 14-27 | 50.9% | 102 | (3.7) | 54-145 | (2.7) | (14.5) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: UCF 27.5, TEMPLE 22.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
9/3/2015 | FLA INTERNATIONAL | 14-15 | L | -11 | L | 44.5 | U | 30-46 | 23-34-249 | 0 | 31-131 | 29-38-260 | 1 | 9/12/2015 | @ STANFORD | 7-31 | L | 20.5 | L | 46 | U | 29-30 | 14-36-151 | 2 | 41-130 | 18-30-361 | 0 | 9/19/2015 | FURMAN | 15-16 | L | -24.5 | L | | - | 42-171 | 14-30-98 | 4 | 28-54 | 16-30-216 | 1 | 9/26/2015 | @ S CAROLINA | 14-31 | L | 14 | L | 45 | P | 23-26 | 23-38-204 | 2 | 43-216 | 12-25-184 | 1 | 10/3/2015 | @ TULANE | 31-45 | L | -1.5 | L | 44 | O | 22--35 | 30-52-392 | 5 | 44-170 | 17-29-225 | 1 | 10/10/2015 | CONNECTICUT | 13-40 | L | 1 | L | 38 | O | 14-60 | 27-50-255 | 4 | 45-170 | 18-24-263 | 0 | 10/17/2015 | @ TEMPLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/24/2015 | HOUSTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/31/2015 | @ CINCINNATI | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/7/2015 | @ TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/5/2015 | PENN ST | 27-10 | W | 6 | W | 43 | U | 43-149 | 16-21-168 | 1 | 27-77 | 11-25-103 | 1 | 9/12/2015 | @ CINCINNATI | 34-26 | W | 5.5 | W | 55.5 | O | 36-215 | 13-20-81 | 1 | 31-130 | 30-52-427 | 5 | 9/19/2015 | @ MASSACHUSETTS | 25-23 | W | -13.5 | L | 55.5 | U | 37-67 | 28-49-391 | 3 | 24-45 | 29-55-393 | 2 | 10/2/2015 | @ CHARLOTTE | 37-3 | W | -20 | W | 43.5 | U | 45-206 | 11-23-116 | 1 | 44-223 | 13-27-131 | 1 | 10/10/2015 | TULANE | 49-10 | W | -14 | W | 44.5 | O | 46-122 | 14-18-223 | 2 | 27-8 | 17-30-102 | 2 | 10/17/2015 | UCF | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/22/2015 | @ E CAROLINA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/31/2015 | NOTRE DAME | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/6/2015 | @ SMU | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/14/2015 | @ S FLORIDA | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| UCF: The Knights' conference schedule is favorable with only one road game versus a team that finished above .500 in the AAC last year (at Cincinnati on Halloween). UCF should win at least four home games versus 4-8 Florida International, 3-9 FCS Furman, 2-10 UConn and 4-8 South Florida, but the road slate is difficult, especially the two non-conference games at Stanford and at South Carolina. UCF's projected win total is between five and seven victories. | | TEMPLE: If defense really does win championships, Temple will win the AAC with ease. But the Owls are not the most complete team in the conference because they are so inept on offense. They also play the top four teams in the American (vs. Memphis, at Cincinnati, vs. UCF and at East Carolina) plus non-conference clashes with Penn State and Notre Dame, both at home. However, there's no reason Temple can't steal a couple of those games and wind up 6-2 in the American. With almost certain wins at UMass and Charlotte, the Owls look to be a great bet for eight victories. |
|
|
Game Notes: |
|
Last Updated: 5/6/2024 12:54:03 AM EST. |
|
|