|
|
SYRACUSE TEMPLE |
|
| 58 | 38 Final 20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
119 | SYRACUSE | -1 | Over 51 | 120 | TEMPLE | +13 | Under 63 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 6-5 | +1.4 | 5-6 | 7-3 | 28.5 | 12.3 | 473.3 | (6) | 1.6 | 26.2 | 13.9 | 389.2 | (5.7) | 1.3 | Road Games | 2-4 | -0.3 | 3-3 | 4-2 | 24.3 | 7.2 | 455.0 | (5.7) | 2.2 | 30.0 | 13.7 | 420.8 | (6) | 1.0 | Last 3 Games | 2-1 | +1.9 | 2-1 | 3-0 | 33.3 | 19.3 | 503.7 | (6.3) | 1.0 | 29.3 | 14.7 | 475.3 | (6.5) | 2.0 | Grass Games | 1-0 | +1.4 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 37.0 | 3.0 | 520.0 | (6) | 0.0 | 36.0 | 23.0 | 552.0 | (7.4) | 1.0 | Conference Games | 4-2 | +2.4 | 3-3 | 4-2 | 29.2 | 15.3 | 458.0 | (6) | 1.2 | 23.8 | 12.8 | 394.5 | (5.8) | 1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 28.5 | 12.3 | 25.1 | 29:00 | 40-165 | (4.1) | 24-38 | 63.3% | 308 | (8.1) | 78-473 | (6) | (16.6) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 21.4 | 9.8 | 20 | 30:35 | 38-149 | (4) | 19-32 | 59.2% | 220 | (6.9) | 69-369 | (5.3) | (17.2) | Offense Road Games | 24.3 | 7.2 | 25.5 | 27:14 | 38-137 | (3.6) | 25-41 | 61.8% | 317 | (7.7) | 79-455 | (5.7) | (18.7) | Defense (All Games) | 26.2 | 13.9 | 19.9 | 30:60 | 36-146 | (4) | 20-31 | 62.7% | 243 | (7.7) | 68-389 | (5.7) | (14.9) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 26.4 | 13.8 | 20.1 | 31:31 | 38-165 | (4.3) | 18-30 | 59.7% | 224 | (7.5) | 68-389 | (5.7) | (14.7) | Defense Road Games | 30.0 | 13.7 | 20.7 | 32:46 | 41-200 | (4.8) | 18-28 | 62.6% | 221 | (7.7) | 70-421 | (6) | (14) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 4-6 | -2.2 | 4-6 | 6-3 | 25.2 | 11.5 | 320.2 | (5.1) | 1.5 | 30.5 | 16.7 | 432.9 | (6.3) | 1.5 | Home Games | 2-3 | -2.6 | 2-3 | 3-1 | 25.0 | 10.6 | 286.6 | (4.6) | 1.4 | 28.6 | 13.4 | 385.2 | (5.8) | 2.2 | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | -0.4 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 30.0 | 16.0 | 380.3 | (6.1) | 1.7 | 37.0 | 21.7 | 491.7 | (7.5) | 0.7 | Grass Games | 3-5 | -2.8 | 3-5 | 4-3 | 21.5 | 8.7 | 291.0 | (4.6) | 1.4 | 28.5 | 15.7 | 415.7 | (6) | 1.6 | Conference Games | 2-4 | -0.5 | 2-4 | 4-2 | 18.0 | 8.8 | 301.3 | (4.5) | 2.0 | 33.8 | 17.8 | 440.7 | (6.6) | 1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 25.2 | 11.5 | 16.4 | 29:16 | 43-205 | (4.7) | 10-20 | 50.5% | 116 | (5.8) | 63-320 | (5.1) | (12.7) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 24.5 | 12.4 | 18.6 | 29:26 | 38-160 | (4.2) | 17-29 | 57.7% | 199 | (6.9) | 67-360 | (5.4) | (14.7) | Offense Home Games | 25.0 | 10.6 | 14.0 | 30:13 | 43-163 | (3.8) | 10-20 | 49.0% | 124 | (6.3) | 62-287 | (4.6) | (11.5) | Defense (All Games) | 30.5 | 16.7 | 21.3 | 30:44 | 42-193 | (4.6) | 16-27 | 60.2% | 240 | (8.9) | 69-433 | (6.3) | (14.2) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 24 | 12.3 | 20 | 31:33 | 41-171 | (4.2) | 17-28 | 58.7% | 215 | (7.7) | 69-387 | (5.6) | (16.1) | Defense Home Games | 28.6 | 13.4 | 19.0 | 29:47 | 41-178 | (4.3) | 14-25 | 56.5% | 208 | (8.4) | 66-385 | (5.8) | (13.5) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: SYRACUSE 36.1, TEMPLE 32.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
10/5/2012 | PITTSBURGH | 14-13 | W | -2 | L | 59 | U | 33-120 | 19-31-185 | 1 | 37-27 | 25-33-319 | 1 | 10/13/2012 | @ RUTGERS | 15-23 | L | 6.5 | L | 50.5 | U | 32-62 | 25-42-356 | 4 | 36-85 | 14-23-152 | 0 | 10/19/2012 | CONNECTICUT | 40-10 | W | -5 | W | 43.5 | O | 53-251 | 14-20-251 | 0 | 18--6 | 23-41-296 | 2 | 10/27/2012 | @ S FLORIDA | 37-36 | W | 3 | W | 53.5 | O | 46-192 | 27-40-328 | 0 | 45-369 | 17-30-183 | 1 | 11/3/2012 | @ CINCINNATI | 24-35 | L | 4.5 | L | 56 | O | 41-193 | 23-47-286 | 2 | 53-263 | 16-27-207 | 3 | 11/10/2012 | LOUISVILLE | 45-26 | W | 0 | W | 59 | O | 52-278 | 15-23-246 | 0 | 17-48 | 36-50-424 | 2 | 11/17/2012 | @ MISSOURI | 31-27 | W | 6 | W | 55 | O | 36-123 | 26-40-385 | 1 | 41-120 | 21-31-364 | 1 | 11/23/2012 | @ TEMPLE | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10/6/2012 | S FLORIDA | 37-28 | W | 4.5 | W | 47 | O | 51-216 | 16-20-167 | 0 | 44-165 | 18-31-219 | 3 | 10/13/2012 | @ CONNECTICUT | 17-14 | W | 5 | W | 41 | U | 49-202 | 13-26-132 | 2 | 41-88 | 22-39-293 | 1 | 10/20/2012 | RUTGERS | 10-35 | L | 3.5 | L | 44.5 | O | 42-119 | 8-17-72 | 3 | 30-139 | 17-27-232 | 2 | 10/27/2012 | @ PITTSBURGH | 17-47 | L | 6.5 | L | 47.5 | O | 40-129 | 18-28-195 | 2 | 36-207 | 20-28-321 | 0 | 11/3/2012 | @ LOUISVILLE | 17-45 | L | 16 | L | 53 | O | 43-255 | 6-16-54 | 4 | 32-170 | 22-33-338 | 0 | 11/10/2012 | CINCINNATI | 10-34 | L | 8 | L | 56 | U | 35-125 | 12-32-142 | 1 | 40-228 | 13-21-244 | 0 | 11/17/2012 | @ ARMY | 63-32 | W | 3.5 | W | 57.5 | O | 57-534 | 2-4-31 | 0 | 62-407 | 4-9-88 | 2 | 11/23/2012 | SYRACUSE | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| SYRACUSE: Syracuse should be a good passing team in 2012 with Ryan Nassib (2,685 pass yds, 22 TD, 9 INT) returning under center. He'll get back his two best targets in leading receiver Alec Lemon (834 rec yds, 6 TD) and WR Marcus Sales, who missed all of 2011 after being arrested on drug-related charges, which have since been dropped. The rushing attack is an issue as there isn't a clear-cut No. 1 back between Jerome Smith, Prince-Tyson Gulley and Ashton Broyld. The offensive line is also suspect (90th in FBS in sacks allowed). On the defensive side, there is skepticism about the Orange's front four after losing their top pass rusher, Chandler Jones to the NFL. The secondary could also be an issue again (258 pass YPG allowed, 98th in nation), as Syracuse lacks talent at the defensive back positions.
| | TEMPLE: The inexperienced Owls could be in for a rude awakening when they rejoin the Big East in 2012. However, they are finally strong at the quarterback position with junior Chris Coyer (30-for-50, 463 yds, 6 TD, 0 INT), who emerged as the leader of their football team. The offensive line is losing four starters, but head coach Steve Addazio is confident that the new linemen can step in and contribute immediately. The running game has big shoes to fill for the departed Bernard Pierce and his 1,481 rushing yards and 27 TD. On defense, Temple allowed a mere 13.9 PPG (3rd in nation), holding five teams to single digits. But the Owls return only five players and will be facing more talented offenses in the Big East than they did in the MAC. |
|
|
Game Notes: |
|
Last Updated: 3/29/2024 10:01:31 AM EST. |
|
|