|
|
PITTSBURGH SYRACUSE |
|
| 59 | 13 Final 14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
309 | PITTSBURGH | -3 | 59.5 | 310 | SYRACUSE | 55 | -2 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 2-2 | -13 | 2-2 | 1-1 | 29.2 | 14.5 | 486.7 | (6.9) | 1.5 | 20.5 | 9.2 | 324.0 | (5.5) | 1.7 | Road Games | 0-1 | -1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 10.0 | 0.0 | 415.0 | (5.3) | 2.0 | 34.0 | 17.0 | 464.0 | (7.9) | 0.0 | Last 3 Games | 2-1 | +2 | 2-1 | 1-1 | 33.3 | 16.0 | 526.0 | (7) | 1.3 | 17.0 | 7.7 | 305.0 | (5.5) | 2.3 | Conference Games | 0-1 | -1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 10.0 | 0.0 | 415.0 | (5.3) | 2.0 | 34.0 | 17.0 | 464.0 | (7.9) | 0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 29.2 | 14.5 | 22.7 | 31:54 | 40-187 | (4.6) | 20-30 | 67.8% | 299 | (9.9) | 71-487 | (6.9) | (16.6) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 25.7 | 11.5 | 19.2 | 29:15 | 35-166 | (4.7) | 18-30 | 60.6% | 263 | (8.7) | 65-429 | (6.6) | (16.7) | Offense Road Games | 10.0 | 0.0 | 23.0 | 36:12 | 42-137 | (3.3) | 24-37 | 64.9% | 278 | (7.5) | 79-415 | (5.3) | (41.5) | Defense (All Games) | 20.5 | 9.2 | 16.5 | 28:06 | 33-138 | (4.2) | 14-26 | 53.3% | 185 | (7.1) | 59-324 | (5.5) | (15.8) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 21.8 | 10.8 | 18.6 | 31:45 | 37-148 | (4) | 16-27 | 57.0% | 191 | (7) | 64-339 | (5.3) | (15.6) | Defense Road Games | 34.0 | 17.0 | 19.0 | 23:48 | 31-259 | (8.4) | 14-28 | 50.0% | 205 | (7.3) | 59-464 | (7.9) | (13.6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 1-3 | -2.8 | 1-3 | 2-1 | 27.0 | 8.2 | 487.5 | (6) | 2.5 | 29.5 | 14.7 | 357.5 | (5.4) | 1.0 | Home Games | 1-1 | -1.3 | 0-2 | 1-0 | 34.5 | 13.5 | 572.5 | (6.5) | 2.0 | 29.5 | 19.0 | 324.0 | (5) | 1.5 | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | -1.6 | 1-2 | 1-1 | 22.3 | 6.7 | 451.3 | (5.9) | 2.3 | 25.3 | 12.7 | 364.3 | (5.7) | 1.0 | Dome Games | 1-1 | -1.3 | 0-2 | 1-0 | 34.5 | 13.5 | 572.5 | (6.5) | 2.0 | 29.5 | 19.0 | 324.0 | (5) | 1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 27.0 | 8.2 | 27.0 | 29:29 | 37-149 | (4) | 29-44 | 66.1% | 339 | (7.7) | 81-487 | (6) | (18.1) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 18.8 | 7.4 | 20.4 | 28:16 | 35-147 | (4.2) | 20-34 | 57.5% | 222 | (6.4) | 69-369 | (5.3) | (19.7) | Offense Home Games | 34.5 | 13.5 | 30.0 | 31:11 | 37-170 | (4.5) | 33-50 | 66.0% | 402 | (8) | 87-572 | (6.5) | (16.6) | Defense (All Games) | 29.5 | 14.7 | 17.7 | 30:30 | 38-176 | (4.6) | 16-28 | 58.6% | 181 | (6.5) | 66-357 | (5.4) | (12.1) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 28.6 | 16.4 | 21.5 | 32:29 | 43-207 | (4.8) | 17-27 | 61.0% | 204 | (7.5) | 71-411 | (5.8) | (14.4) | Defense Home Games | 29.5 | 19.0 | 17.0 | 28:49 | 39-170 | (4.4) | 13-25 | 51.0% | 153 | (6) | 64-324 | (5) | (11) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: PITTSBURGH 20.2, SYRACUSE 29.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
9/1/2012 | YOUNGSTOWN ST | 17-31 | L | -18 | L | | - | 28-130 | 19-30-239 | 2 | 46-204 | 14-24-177 | 0 | 9/6/2012 | @ CINCINNATI | 10-34 | L | 4.5 | L | 50.5 | U | 42-137 | 24-37-278 | 2 | 31-259 | 14-28-205 | 0 | 9/15/2012 | VIRGINIA TECH | 35-17 | W | 10 | W | 45 | O | 55-254 | 19-28-283 | 1 | 26-59 | 14-31-265 | 4 | 9/22/2012 | GARDNER WEBB | 55-0 | W | -41 | W | | - | 37-229 | 20-26-397 | 1 | 29-32 | 14-22-95 | 3 | 10/5/2012 | @ SYRACUSE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/13/2012 | LOUISVILLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/20/2012 | @ BUFFALO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/27/2012 | TEMPLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/3/2012 | @ NOTRE DAME | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/1/2012 | NORTHWESTERN | 41-42 | L | -2 | L | 53.5 | O | 30-126 | 44-65-470 | 3 | 40-124 | 22-32-213 | 1 | 9/8/2012 | *USC | 29-42 | L | 24.5 | W | 62.5 | O | 41-133 | 30-46-322 | 2 | 33-258 | 23-30-187 | 1 | 9/15/2012 | STONY BROOK | 28-17 | W | -21.5 | L | | - | 45-214 | 22-35-335 | 1 | 38-217 | 4-19-94 | 2 | 9/22/2012 | @ MINNESOTA | 10-17 | L | -3 | L | 54 | U | 33-122 | 21-31-228 | 4 | 41-106 | 16-30-231 | 0 | 10/5/2012 | PITTSBURGH | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/13/2012 | @ RUTGERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/19/2012 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/27/2012 | @ S FLORIDA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/3/2012 | @ CINCINNATI | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| PITTSBURGH: New head coach Paul Chryst has a lot to do to get this Panthers team to perform at a high level again, but this team does have talent to build on. On the defensive end, they got help from two Michigan transfers who are ready to play immediately in Ray Vinopal and Cullen Christian. They also get DL Aaron Donald back after an 11-sack season. On offense, senior QB Tino Sunseri will have to improve his decision-making and accuracy after a season in which he threw more interceptions (11) than he did touchdowns (10). He does return his top three targets in WRs Devin Street (754 rec yds) and Mike Shanahan (493 rec yds), and TE Hubie Graham (325 rec yds). The running game is also an issue as their main back, Ray Graham (958 rush yds, 9 TD), is trying to recover from a torn ACL suffered in late October. | | SYRACUSE: Syracuse should be a good passing team in 2012 with Ryan Nassib (2,685 pass yds, 22 TD, 9 INT) returning under center. He'll get back his two best targets in leading receiver Alec Lemon (834 rec yds, 6 TD) and WR Marcus Sales, who missed all of 2011 after being arrested on drug-related charges, which have since been dropped. The rushing attack is an issue as there isn't a clear-cut No. 1 back between Jerome Smith, Prince-Tyson Gulley and Ashton Broyld. The offensive line is also suspect (90th in FBS in sacks allowed). On the defensive side, there is skepticism about the Orange's front four after losing their top pass rusher, Chandler Jones to the NFL. The secondary could also be an issue again (258 pass YPG allowed, 98th in nation), as Syracuse lacks talent at the defensive back positions.
|
|
|
Game Notes: |
|
Last Updated: 3/29/2024 9:17:32 AM EST. |
|
|