|
|
BUFFALO RUTGERS |
|
| 53.5 | 42 Final 13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
351 | BUFFALO | -270 | 352 | RUTGERS | +210 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 3-0 | +2.6 | 2-1 | 2-0 | 39.7 | 24.7 | 423.3 | (5.8) | 0.7 | 22.3 | 10.3 | 373.3 | (5.1) | 2.7 | Road Games | 1-0 | +1.6 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 36.0 | 12.0 | 427.0 | (5) | 1.0 | 29.0 | 7.0 | 355.0 | (5.3) | 3.0 | Last 3 Games | 3-0 | +2.6 | 2-1 | 2-0 | 39.7 | 24.7 | 423.3 | (5.8) | 0.7 | 22.3 | 10.3 | 373.3 | (5.1) | 2.7 | Turf Games | 2-0 | +1 | 1-1 | 1-0 | 41.5 | 31.0 | 421.5 | (6.3) | 0.5 | 19.0 | 12.0 | 382.5 | (5) | 2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 39.7 | 24.7 | 22.0 | 31:53 | 40-157 | (3.9) | 22-33 | 66.0% | 267 | (8) | 73-423 | (5.8) | (10.7) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 34.4 | 18.6 | 23.3 | 32:45 | 41-196 | (4.8) | 21-33 | 63.3% | 220 | (6.6) | 74-416 | (5.6) | (12.1) | Offense Road Games | 36.0 | 12.0 | 27.0 | 35:42 | 41-152 | (3.7) | 26-45 | 57.8% | 275 | (6.1) | 86-427 | (5) | (11.9) | Defense (All Games) | 22.3 | 10.3 | 18.7 | 28:07 | 42-152 | (3.6) | 17-31 | 53.2% | 221 | (7.1) | 73-373 | (5.1) | (16.7) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 22 | 12.2 | 17 | 28:15 | 39-137 | (3.5) | 15-26 | 56.8% | 193 | (7.5) | 65-330 | (5.1) | (15) | Defense Road Games | 29.0 | 7.0 | 16.0 | 24:18 | 29-115 | (4) | 17-38 | 44.7% | 240 | (6.3) | 67-355 | (5.3) | (12.2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 1-2 | -0.1 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 17.3 | 11.7 | 277.0 | (4.2) | 4.0 | 38.0 | 22.0 | 430.7 | (6.4) | 1.0 | Home Games | 1-0 | +1 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 35.0 | 21.0 | 423.0 | (5.6) | 4.0 | 7.0 | 0.0 | 169.0 | (3.1) | 3.0 | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | -0.1 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 17.3 | 11.7 | 277.0 | (4.2) | 4.0 | 38.0 | 22.0 | 430.7 | (6.4) | 1.0 | Turf Games | 1-2 | -0.1 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 17.3 | 11.7 | 277.0 | (4.2) | 4.0 | 38.0 | 22.0 | 430.7 | (6.4) | 1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 17.3 | 11.7 | 16.3 | 29:53 | 37-146 | (4) | 15-30 | 50.0% | 131 | (4.4) | 67-277 | (4.2) | (16) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 22.8 | 9.9 | 15.8 | 28:07 | 34-142 | (4.1) | 18-31 | 55.8% | 200 | (6.4) | 66-342 | (5.2) | (15) | Offense Home Games | 35.0 | 21.0 | 23.0 | 35:32 | 46-218 | (4.7) | 20-29 | 69.0% | 205 | (7.1) | 75-423 | (5.6) | (12.1) | Defense (All Games) | 38.0 | 22.0 | 21.7 | 30:07 | 40-231 | (5.8) | 18-27 | 65.9% | 199 | (7.3) | 67-431 | (6.4) | (11.3) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 39.1 | 19.8 | 23.4 | 32:53 | 44-221 | (5) | 20-31 | 63.2% | 232 | (7.5) | 75-453 | (6) | (11.6) | Defense Home Games | 7.0 | 0.0 | 11.0 | 24:28 | 31-69 | (2.2) | 9-24 | 37.5% | 100 | (4.2) | 55-169 | (3.1) | (24.1) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: BUFFALO 19.7, RUTGERS 31.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
9/1/2018 | DELAWARE ST | 48-10 | W | -44 | L | | - | 37-154 | 19-29-200 | 0 | 54-199 | 8-18-76 | 4 | 9/8/2018 | @ TEMPLE | 36-29 | W | 4 | W | 52.5 | O | 41-152 | 26-45-275 | 1 | 29-115 | 17-38-240 | 3 | 9/15/2018 | E MICHIGAN | 35-28 | W | -3 | W | 54 | O | 41-164 | 21-26-325 | 1 | 43-142 | 25-38-348 | 1 | 9/22/2018 | @ RUTGERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/29/2018 | ARMY | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/6/2018 | @ C MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/13/2018 | AKRON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/20/2018 | @ TOLEDO | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/1/2018 | TEXAS ST | 35-7 | W | -16.5 | W | 47.5 | U | 46-218 | 20-29-205 | 4 | 31-69 | 9-24-100 | 3 | 9/8/2018 | @ OHIO ST | 3-52 | L | 34 | L | 57.5 | U | 31-69 | 11-30-65 | 2 | 40-225 | 30-33-354 | 0 | 9/15/2018 | @ KANSAS | 14-55 | L | -1 | L | 44.5 | O | 33-150 | 14-31-124 | 6 | 48-400 | 15-25-144 | 0 | 9/22/2018 | BUFFALO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/29/2018 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/6/2018 | ILLINOIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/13/2018 | @ MARYLAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/20/2018 | NORTHWESTERN | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| BUFFALO: In 6'7", 245-pound quarterback Tyree Jackson and star wideout Anthony Johnson'who racked up 1,356 yards and 14 touchdowns last season'the Bulls have one of the best QB-WR duos in the conference. This passing game should be explosive, and Buffalo isn't going to have much of a problem running the ball either. Defensively, the Bulls are expected to be a force this year. They return most of a defense that allowed just 20.5 PPG in non-overtime games last season. There's some serious value in backing them to win the conference at +1000. | | RUTGERS: Rutgers had the Power Five's worst offense a year ago, which led to the team hiring its ninth offensive coordinator in as many years. The Scarlet Knights are now hoping that they can take advantage of what is actually a pretty good stable of running backs. Help, however, needs to come from the quarterback position. There have been some positive vibes coming out of New Jersey surrounding freshman Artur Sitkowski, but it might be another year or two before he hits his stride. Defensively, the best that can be said for Rutgers is its secondary is decent. Of course, that's not enough to prevent this team from being the worst in the East yet again. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 5/4/2024 6:02:21 AM EST. |
|
|