|
|
CINCINNATI RUTGERS |
|
| 54 | 52 Final 17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
331 | CINCINNATI | -2.5 | -1 | 332 | RUTGERS | 53 | 54 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 7-2 | -2.2 | 4-5 | 5-3 | 33.3 | 16.1 | 463.1 | (6.2) | 2.1 | 18.8 | 11.1 | 299.0 | (4.9) | 1.7 | Road Games | 2-2 | -6.2 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 21.2 | 6.7 | 403.0 | (5.2) | 2.2 | 23.0 | 12.7 | 270.5 | (4.6) | 1.2 | Last 3 Games | 3-0 | +3 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 34.3 | 18.3 | 474.7 | (6.4) | 2.3 | 20.7 | 6.7 | 353.3 | (5.2) | 1.7 | Turf Games | 7-1 | +2 | 4-4 | 5-2 | 35.0 | 17.4 | 477.2 | (6.3) | 1.9 | 17.9 | 9.6 | 306.2 | (5) | 1.7 | Conference Games | 4-1 | -0.2 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 32.2 | 17.8 | 449.8 | (6.1) | 2.4 | 21.6 | 12.6 | 335.4 | (5.4) | 1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 33.3 | 16.1 | 24.6 | 31:56 | 42-179 | (4.3) | 24-33 | 72.1% | 284 | (8.6) | 75-463 | (6.2) | (13.9) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 35.8 | 18 | 22.8 | 31:09 | 40-192 | (4.8) | 20-31 | 63.4% | 255 | (8.2) | 71-447 | (6.3) | (12.5) | Offense Road Games | 21.2 | 6.7 | 23.5 | 30:55 | 39-141 | (3.6) | 25-38 | 65.1% | 262 | (6.9) | 77-403 | (5.2) | (19) | Defense (All Games) | 18.8 | 11.1 | 16.1 | 28:04 | 30-96 | (3.2) | 19-31 | 60.5% | 203 | (6.6) | 61-299 | (4.9) | (15.9) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 19.4 | 10.1 | 17.9 | 29:50 | 33-112 | (3.4) | 19-35 | 56.1% | 212 | (6.1) | 68-324 | (4.8) | (16.6) | Defense Road Games | 23.0 | 12.7 | 14.5 | 29:05 | 33-105 | (3.2) | 15-26 | 58.7% | 165 | (6.4) | 59-270 | (4.6) | (11.8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 5-3 | -1.4 | 3-4 | 4-4 | 30.9 | 13.4 | 401.7 | (5.7) | 2.4 | 28.9 | 13.2 | 411.5 | (5.5) | 1.6 | Home Games | 4-1 | -0.4 | 1-4 | 2-3 | 26.2 | 11.8 | 391.4 | (5.8) | 2.2 | 20.6 | 12.2 | 344.4 | (5.2) | 1.2 | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | -2.4 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 15.7 | 8.0 | 366.7 | (5.4) | 3.7 | 31.0 | 19.3 | 464.7 | (6.8) | 2.0 | Turf Games | 5-3 | -1.4 | 3-4 | 4-4 | 30.9 | 13.4 | 401.7 | (5.7) | 2.4 | 28.9 | 13.2 | 411.5 | (5.5) | 1.6 | Conference Games | 2-2 | -1.4 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 25.5 | 11.2 | 393.5 | (5.5) | 3.2 | 36.2 | 16.2 | 488.0 | (6.4) | 1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 30.9 | 13.4 | 19.9 | 29:46 | 38-148 | (3.9) | 19-32 | 58.7% | 254 | (7.8) | 70-402 | (5.7) | (13) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 29.7 | 14.4 | 21.9 | 31:32 | 40-170 | (4.3) | 21-33 | 62.1% | 256 | (7.7) | 73-426 | (5.8) | (14.3) | Offense Home Games | 26.2 | 11.8 | 20.0 | 29:27 | 38-157 | (4.1) | 17-30 | 58.8% | 234 | (7.9) | 68-391 | (5.8) | (14.9) | Defense (All Games) | 28.9 | 13.2 | 20.7 | 30:14 | 32-104 | (3.2) | 27-42 | 64.1% | 307 | (7.3) | 74-411 | (5.5) | (14.3) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 28.5 | 14.7 | 21.8 | 29:19 | 35-151 | (4.3) | 22-37 | 60.9% | 262 | (7.1) | 71-413 | (5.8) | (14.5) | Defense Home Games | 20.6 | 12.2 | 17.0 | 30:33 | 34-106 | (3.1) | 19-32 | 60.2% | 239 | (7.4) | 67-344 | (5.2) | (16.7) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: CINCINNATI 20.3, RUTGERS 29 |
|
|
|
|
|
9/21/2013 | @ MIAMI OHIO | 14-0 | W | -24.5 | L | 55 | U | 52-198 | 23-37-171 | 3 | 29-7 | 7-16-80 | 2 | 10/5/2013 | @ S FLORIDA | 20-26 | L | -10.5 | L | 47 | U | 33-110 | 24-36-240 | 4 | 37-112 | 11-18-129 | 1 | 10/11/2013 | TEMPLE | 38-20 | W | -20 | L | 55 | O | 42-205 | 31-37-270 | 1 | 31-176 | 12-25-200 | 2 | 10/19/2013 | CONNECTICUT | 41-16 | W | -14 | W | 46 | O | 36-137 | 21-30-388 | 3 | 32-56 | 24-42-321 | 3 | 10/30/2013 | @ MEMPHIS | 34-21 | W | -2 | W | 44.5 | O | 41-108 | 29-37-329 | 1 | 28-92 | 17-33-140 | 2 | 11/9/2013 | SMU | 28-25 | W | -6.5 | L | 67 | U | 45-163 | 27-32-299 | 3 | 20-48 | 38-47-403 | 0 | 11/16/2013 | @ RUTGERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/23/2013 | @ HOUSTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/5/2013 | LOUISVILLE | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/21/2013 | ARKANSAS | 28-24 | W | -1.5 | W | 42.5 | O | 36-54 | 22-43-346 | 3 | 34-101 | 16-28-182 | 0 | 10/5/2013 | @ SMU | 55-52 | W | -3 | T | 54.5 | O | 52-191 | 19-33-283 | 2 | 28-74 | 45-71-484 | 1 | 10/10/2013 | @ LOUISVILLE | 10-24 | L | 19 | W | 55.5 | U | 27-12 | 20-37-228 | 4 | 36-151 | 21-31-310 | 3 | 10/26/2013 | HOUSTON | 14-49 | L | -6 | L | 59 | O | 41-204 | 18-31-216 | 6 | 38-211 | 28-35-400 | 0 | 11/2/2013 | TEMPLE | 23-20 | W | -11.5 | L | 57.5 | U | 28-69 | 27-39-371 | 1 | 33-119 | 21-31-203 | 3 | 11/16/2013 | CINCINNATI | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/21/2013 | @ UCF | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/30/2013 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/7/2013 | S FLORIDA | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| CINCINNATI: The new coach prefers QB Brendon Kay (9.4 YPA, 10 TD, 2 INT) over QB Munchie Legaux (7.5 YPA, 13 TD, 9 INT) to run the offense. TE Travis Kelce (722 rec. yds, 8 TD) and WR Anthony McClung (539 rec. yds) are both solid. All five O-Line starters return for this quality ground attack (201 YPG, 30th in FBS). The nation's 14th-best scoring defense (18.5 PPG) is fast and athletic, led by LB Greg Blair (138 tackles), but the weak D-Line is concerning. | | RUTGERS: QB Gary Nova (2,695 pass yds, 22 TD, 16 INT) had an up-and-down 2012, but is thriving under new OC Ron Prince. Nova still has 6-foot-6 WR Brandon Coleman (718 rec. yds, 10 TD) to rely on and RB Savon Huggins (410 rush yds) is very capable. New DC Dave Cohen takes over a depleted defense that gave up 14.2 PPG (4th in FBS). Twin brothers DE Jamil Merrell (5.5 sacks) and LB Jamal Merrell (83 tackles) will shine, but the green DBs may struggle. |
|
|
Game Notes: |
|
Last Updated: 3/28/2024 9:32:35 PM EST. |
|
|