| | | |
WISCONSIN PURDUE |
|
| 49.5 | 38 Final 14 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
129 | WISCONSIN | Pick | 50.5 | 130 | PURDUE | 53.5 | -1 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 4-2 | -0.4 | 2-4 | 3-2 | 24.0 | 11.0 | 328.8 | (5.2) | 1.3 | 19.2 | 7.2 | 338.0 | (4.9) | 0.8 | Road Games | 0-2 | -3.4 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 17.0 | 10.0 | 251.0 | (3.9) | 1.5 | 20.0 | 6.5 | 397.0 | (5.2) | 1.0 | Last 3 Games | 2-1 | +1 | 2-1 | 3-0 | 31.7 | 16.7 | 381.7 | (6.2) | 1.7 | 23.3 | 8.7 | 353.3 | (5) | 1.7 | Conference Games | 1-1 | 0 | 2-0 | 2-0 | 29.0 | 13.5 | 361.0 | (5.7) | 1.5 | 22.0 | 8.5 | 362.0 | (5.2) | 2.0 |
|
| |
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 24.0 | 11.0 | 17.2 | 30:24 | 38-133 | (3.5) | 15-24 | 60.5% | 195 | (8) | 63-329 | (5.2) | (13.7) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 23.4 | 11.1 | 19.6 | 30:04 | 37-149 | (4) | 19-32 | 57.9% | 222 | (7) | 69-371 | (5.4) | (15.9) | Offense Road Games | 17.0 | 10.0 | 15.0 | 26:42 | 32-45 | (1.4) | 17-33 | 53.0% | 205 | (6.2) | 65-251 | (3.9) | (14.8) | Defense (All Games) | 19.2 | 7.2 | 17.3 | 29:35 | 33-115 | (3.5) | 20-36 | 57.0% | 223 | (6.3) | 69-338 | (4.9) | (17.6) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 24.5 | 13 | 19.8 | 30:56 | 36-148 | (4.1) | 21-34 | 61.6% | 250 | (7.4) | 70-398 | (5.7) | (16.2) | Defense Road Games | 20.0 | 6.5 | 21.0 | 33:17 | 38-168 | (4.4) | 23-38 | 60.5% | 228 | (6) | 76-397 | (5.2) | (19.8) |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 3-2 | 0 | 3-2 | 3-1 | 36.6 | 25.2 | 413.4 | (5.5) | 2.8 | 25.4 | 12.8 | 364.4 | (5.1) | 2.6 | Home Games | 3-1 | +1 | 2-2 | 3-0 | 41.5 | 29.7 | 444.7 | (5.7) | 3.0 | 26.7 | 14.2 | 361.5 | (5.1) | 3.0 | Last 3 Games | 2-1 | 0 | 1-2 | 3-0 | 39.3 | 28.3 | 410.7 | (5.5) | 2.3 | 33.7 | 17.0 | 418.7 | (5.5) | 2.7 | Grass Games | 3-2 | 0 | 3-2 | 3-1 | 36.6 | 25.2 | 413.4 | (5.5) | 2.8 | 25.4 | 12.8 | 364.4 | (5.1) | 2.6 | Conference Games | 0-1 | -1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 13.0 | 10.0 | 213.0 | (3.5) | 4.0 | 44.0 | 28.0 | 409.0 | (5.8) | 1.0 |
|
| |
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 36.6 | 25.2 | 22.0 | 30:01 | 38-172 | (4.5) | 25-37 | 66.8% | 241 | (6.4) | 76-413 | (5.5) | (11.3) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 31.7 | 17.7 | 23.7 | 32:54 | 42-195 | (4.7) | 22-34 | 64.1% | 227 | (6.7) | 75-421 | (5.6) | (13.3) | Offense Home Games | 41.5 | 29.7 | 24.0 | 31:04 | 40-193 | (4.8) | 26-37 | 70.7% | 252 | (6.7) | 78-445 | (5.7) | (10.7) | Defense (All Games) | 25.4 | 12.8 | 18.8 | 29:59 | 36-145 | (4) | 20-35 | 56.9% | 219 | (6.3) | 71-364 | (5.1) | (14.3) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 24.5 | 13 | 18.6 | 28:02 | 36-157 | (4.4) | 17-31 | 56.8% | 204 | (6.7) | 66-361 | (5.4) | (14.8) | Defense Home Games | 26.7 | 14.2 | 18.7 | 28:55 | 36-168 | (4.6) | 19-34 | 55.6% | 193 | (5.7) | 70-361 | (5.1) | (13.5) |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: WISCONSIN 29.7, PURDUE 29.2 |
| | |
|
|
9/1/2012 | N IOWA | 26-21 | W | -32.5 | L | | - | 47-168 | 19-23-219 | 0 | 20-41 | 18-34-265 | 0 | 9/8/2012 | @ OREGON ST | 7-10 | L | -6 | L | 49 | U | 23-35 | 20-38-172 | 2 | 30-78 | 29-47-276 | 0 | 9/15/2012 | UTAH ST | 16-14 | W | -14 | L | 51.5 | U | 45-156 | 7-16-78 | 1 | 35-127 | 18-35-181 | 0 | 9/22/2012 | UTEP | 37-26 | W | -18 | L | 50.5 | O | 40-213 | 12-17-210 | 2 | 33-77 | 22-39-259 | 1 | 9/29/2012 | @ NEBRASKA | 27-30 | L | 11 | W | 52 | O | 41-56 | 15-28-239 | 1 | 46-259 | 17-29-181 | 2 | 10/6/2012 | ILLINOIS | 31-14 | W | -14.5 | W | 44.5 | O | 33-173 | 16-25-254 | 2 | 34-106 | 18-30-178 | 2 | 10/13/2012 | @ PURDUE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/20/2012 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/27/2012 | MICHIGAN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/10/2012 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
9/1/2012 | E KENTUCKY | 48-6 | W | -19.5 | W | | - | 40-175 | 37-47-372 | 5 | 31-105 | 8-22-85 | 4 | 9/8/2012 | @ NOTRE DAME | 17-20 | L | 14 | W | 53.5 | U | 30-90 | 19-37-198 | 2 | 36-52 | 24-39-324 | 1 | 9/15/2012 | E MICHIGAN | 54-16 | W | -23.5 | W | 49.5 | O | 42-392 | 19-31-184 | 2 | 38-169 | 14-29-144 | 3 | 9/29/2012 | MARSHALL | 51-41 | W | -17 | L | 61.5 | O | 53-149 | 27-37-294 | 1 | 23-95 | 45-68-439 | 4 | 10/6/2012 | MICHIGAN | 13-44 | L | 3 | L | 55 | O | 26-56 | 23-35-157 | 4 | 54-304 | 8-16-105 | 1 | 10/13/2012 | WISCONSIN | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/20/2012 | @ OHIO ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/27/2012 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/3/2012 | PENN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/10/2012 | @ IOWA | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | WISCONSIN: It appears Wisconsin has no interest in grooming its own QBs, as two years in a row the Badgers have landed big-name transfers. Danny O'Brien isn't Russell Wilson, but he did throw for 2,438 yards, 22 TD and just 8 INT at Maryland in 2010 before a major coaching change stunted his development last year (7 TD, 10 INT). With Heisman Trophy candidate RB Montee Ball (1,923 rush yds, 33 TD; 6 rec TD) keeping defenses honest, O'Brien should have a relatively easy time throwing to Jared Abbrederis (933 rec yds, 8 TD), the team's leading receiver from a year ago. Defense could be an issue for a unit that lost five starters, but the Badgers do return Chris Borland, who was one of the better linebackers in the nation last season. Head coach Bret Bielema usually does a solid job putting a quality defense on the field, so despite losing some key upperclassmen, there's reason not to believe the Badgers defensive unit will again be a force. | | PURDUE: Purdue is yet another Big Ten team with a quarterback controversy. QB Robert Marve (633 pass yds, 4 TD, 5 INT) will return to take snaps away from another talented QB in Caleb TerBush (1,905 pass yds, 13 TD, 6 INT). Fortunately for Purdue, both of these quarterbacks are very capable. If they can sure up an iffy offensive line, their solid corps of running backs and receivers could make the Boilermakers one of the tougher offenses to stop. On the other side of the ball, Kawann Short (6.5 sacks, 54 tackles, 17 TFL) is trying to solidify himself as the best defensive end in college football. In the secondary, the team is losing some players, but also returns some nice talent at cornerback. |
| | Game Notes: |
| Last Updated: 4/19/2024 8:51:40 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|