|
|
RICE PITTSBURGH |
|
| 51 | 10 Final 42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
115 | RICE | 49.5 | 51 | 116 | PITTSBURGH | -21.5 | -20.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 1-3 | -0.1 | 1-3 | 1-3 | 12.0 | 4.2 | 292.0 | (4.5) | 1.7 | 31.7 | 23.2 | 385.0 | (5.8) | 0.5 | Road Games | 1-2 | +1 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 13.7 | 3.3 | 306.7 | (4.9) | 2.0 | 38.0 | 27.7 | 423.0 | (6.2) | 0.3 | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | -0.1 | 1-2 | 0-3 | 13.7 | 5.7 | 309.0 | (4.8) | 1.7 | 21.7 | 18.3 | 328.0 | (5.1) | 0.7 | Grass Games | 0-1 | 0 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 7.0 | 0.0 | 241.0 | (3.9) | 2.0 | 62.0 | 38.0 | 556.0 | (7.6) | 0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 12.0 | 4.2 | 17.2 | 30:41 | 41-170 | (4.2) | 12-23 | 50.0% | 122 | (5.2) | 64-292 | (4.5) | (24.3) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 28.7 | 15.9 | 21.8 | 32:46 | 39-175 | (4.5) | 22-33 | 66.0% | 254 | (7.7) | 72-430 | (6) | (15) | Offense Road Games | 13.7 | 3.3 | 16.7 | 29:36 | 41-194 | (4.8) | 10-22 | 46.3% | 113 | (5.1) | 63-307 | (4.9) | (22.4) | Defense (All Games) | 31.7 | 23.2 | 19.7 | 29:19 | 32-135 | (4.2) | 22-34 | 66.2% | 249 | (7.3) | 66-385 | (5.8) | (12.1) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 23.9 | 14.9 | 18 | 28:14 | 31-144 | (4.7) | 20-33 | 60.5% | 211 | (6.4) | 64-355 | (5.6) | (14.9) | Defense Road Games | 38.0 | 27.7 | 20.3 | 30:24 | 32-148 | (4.6) | 24-36 | 67.6% | 275 | (7.6) | 68-423 | (6.2) | (11.1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 1-3 | -2 | 0-4 | 1-3 | 20.0 | 13.7 | 329.0 | (4.6) | 1.7 | 37.0 | 21.0 | 472.5 | (7.4) | 2.0 | Home Games | 1-1 | 0 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 24.5 | 17.5 | 369.5 | (5.1) | 1.5 | 40.0 | 24.5 | 547.0 | (8.4) | 1.5 | Last 3 Games | 0-3 | -3 | 0-3 | 1-2 | 17.3 | 11.3 | 322.7 | (4.6) | 2.0 | 42.3 | 28.0 | 490.7 | (7.4) | 2.3 | Grass Games | 1-3 | -2 | 0-4 | 1-3 | 20.0 | 13.7 | 329.0 | (4.6) | 1.7 | 37.0 | 21.0 | 472.5 | (7.4) | 2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 20.0 | 13.7 | 19.0 | 32:20 | 38-126 | (3.3) | 21-34 | 61.5% | 203 | (6) | 72-329 | (4.6) | (16.4) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 20.8 | 11.6 | 19.3 | 31:12 | 40-145 | (3.6) | 17-29 | 60.2% | 168 | (5.8) | 69-313 | (4.5) | (15) | Offense Home Games | 24.5 | 17.5 | 20.5 | 33:01 | 43-155 | (3.6) | 18-29 | 62.7% | 214 | (7.3) | 73-369 | (5.1) | (15.1) | Defense (All Games) | 37.0 | 21.0 | 21.2 | 27:40 | 38-199 | (5.2) | 16-26 | 60.6% | 274 | (10.5) | 64-472 | (7.4) | (12.8) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 36.9 | 16.6 | 23.1 | 29:48 | 40-222 | (5.5) | 17-28 | 61.9% | 273 | (9.9) | 68-495 | (7.3) | (13.4) | Defense Home Games | 40.0 | 24.5 | 23.0 | 26:58 | 30-105 | (3.5) | 22-34 | 63.8% | 441 | (12.8) | 65-547 | (8.4) | (13.7) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: RICE 29.8, PITTSBURGH 37.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
8/26/2017 | *STANFORD | 7-62 | L | 29.5 | L | 51 | O | 38-146 | 10-24-95 | 2 | 36-287 | 21-37-269 | 0 | 9/9/2017 | @ UTEP | 31-14 | W | 1.5 | W | 55 | U | 49-306 | 10-18-131 | 1 | 24-26 | 18-33-203 | 1 | 9/16/2017 | @ HOUSTON | 3-38 | L | 23.5 | L | 53.5 | U | 35-129 | 11-25-113 | 3 | 37-130 | 34-38-354 | 0 | 9/23/2017 | FLA INTERNATIONAL | 7-13 | L | -1 | L | 53 | U | 41-100 | 16-27-148 | 1 | 33-99 | 17-28-172 | 1 | 9/30/2017 | @ PITTSBURGH | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/7/2017 | ARMY | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/21/2017 | @ UTSA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/28/2017 | LOUISIANA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/2/2017 | YOUNGSTOWN ST | 28-21 | W | -13 | L | 66 | U | 53-208 | 17-24-140 | 1 | 26-107 | 18-32-311 | 1 | 9/9/2017 | @ PENN ST | 14-33 | L | 18.5 | L | 64.5 | U | 45-155 | 24-41-187 | 3 | 24-148 | 15-28-164 | 1 | 9/16/2017 | OKLAHOMA ST | 21-59 | L | 10.5 | L | 66.5 | O | 34-103 | 20-35-288 | 2 | 35-104 | 26-37-572 | 2 | 9/23/2017 | @ GEORGIA TECH | 17-35 | L | 7.5 | L | 55 | U | 20-37 | 22-35-198 | 1 | 67-436 | 4-7-48 | 4 | 9/30/2017 | RICE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/7/2017 | @ SYRACUSE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/14/2017 | NC STATE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/21/2017 | @ DUKE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/28/2017 | VIRGINIA | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| RICE: Rice has an experienced O-Line that should make for a potent running game. The offense will be rock solid, but the passing defense needs to improve. Rice allowed more YPG passing than all but six teams last year. | | PITTSBURGH: USC transfer Max Browne replaces Nathan Peterman, and he should able to reinvent himself. The Panthers will, however, need to be better in
the secondary. They gave up a ton of big plays last season. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 3/19/2024 8:49:53 AM EST. |
|
|