| | | |
OKLAHOMA ST OKLAHOMA |
|
| 70.5 | 48 Final 51 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
185 | OKLAHOMA ST | 72.5 | 71 | 186 | OKLAHOMA | -8.5 | -6.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 7-3 | -2 | 6-4 | 6-3 | 45.4 | 24.3 | 553.7 | (7.2) | 1.9 | 26.1 | 13.0 | 388.2 | (5.1) | 1.4 | Road Games | 1-2 | -5 | 0-3 | 2-1 | 29.3 | 13.7 | 503.7 | (6.4) | 3.3 | 39.0 | 18.0 | 460.0 | (5.7) | 0.0 | Last 3 Games | 2-1 | +1 | 2-1 | 3-0 | 48.0 | 27.7 | 478.0 | (7.1) | 2.0 | 33.0 | 20.7 | 447.7 | (5.6) | 1.7 | Grass Games | 0-1 | -4 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 38.0 | 14.0 | 636.0 | (6.9) | 4.0 | 59.0 | 23.0 | 501.0 | (5.6) | 0.0 | Conference Games | 5-2 | +2 | 4-3 | 4-3 | 38.1 | 19.4 | 496.7 | (6.9) | 1.7 | 25.4 | 15.3 | 409.4 | (5.3) | 1.6 |
|
| |
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 45.4 | 24.3 | 26.3 | 27:39 | 40-217 | (5.4) | 24-37 | 63.8% | 337 | (9.1) | 77-554 | (7.2) | (12.2) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 33.2 | 18.5 | 22 | 29:14 | 37-170 | (4.6) | 21-34 | 62.0% | 260 | (7.7) | 71-430 | (6.1) | (13) | Offense Road Games | 29.3 | 13.7 | 24.3 | 25:30 | 33-134 | (4) | 27-45 | 60.3% | 369 | (8.1) | 79-504 | (6.4) | (17.2) | Defense (All Games) | 26.1 | 13.0 | 21.1 | 32:21 | 37-126 | (3.4) | 24-40 | 60.3% | 262 | (6.6) | 76-388 | (5.1) | (14.9) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 30 | 15.5 | 21.4 | 30:50 | 38-167 | (4.4) | 20-33 | 61.2% | 237 | (7.1) | 71-404 | (5.7) | (13.5) | Defense Road Games | 39.0 | 18.0 | 26.3 | 34:30 | 47-186 | (4) | 21-34 | 63.4% | 274 | (8.1) | 81-460 | (5.7) | (11.8) |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 8-2 | -10 | 5-5 | 6-3 | 40.8 | 22.5 | 502.3 | (6.7) | 1.5 | 22.5 | 9.2 | 370.5 | (5.3) | 1.3 | Home Games | 3-2 | -14 | 2-3 | 2-2 | 39.0 | 22.6 | 456.8 | (6.6) | 1.8 | 21.6 | 9.4 | 346.6 | (4.9) | 0.8 | Last 3 Games | 3-0 | +2 | 1-2 | 3-0 | 42.3 | 24.3 | 571.7 | (7.1) | 2.0 | 34.3 | 13.3 | 497.3 | (6.5) | 1.0 | Grass Games | 5-2 | -12 | 4-3 | 4-2 | 41.9 | 23.3 | 507.7 | (6.8) | 1.7 | 21.3 | 7.9 | 330.3 | (4.8) | 1.1 | Conference Games | 6-1 | -5.4 | 4-3 | 6-1 | 43.1 | 25.3 | 507.9 | (6.8) | 1.7 | 25.0 | 9.3 | 401.7 | (5.5) | 1.7 |
|
| |
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 40.8 | 22.5 | 26.0 | 30:07 | 34-169 | (5) | 27-41 | 66.4% | 333 | (8.2) | 75-502 | (6.7) | (12.3) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 32.4 | 17.4 | 22.7 | 30:44 | 38-180 | (4.8) | 21-34 | 62.3% | 262 | (7.6) | 72-442 | (6.1) | (13.7) | Offense Home Games | 39.0 | 22.6 | 25.0 | 26:45 | 30-146 | (4.9) | 27-39 | 67.5% | 311 | (7.9) | 69-457 | (6.6) | (11.7) | Defense (All Games) | 22.5 | 9.2 | 18.9 | 29:52 | 38-185 | (4.9) | 16-32 | 50.6% | 185 | (5.9) | 70-370 | (5.3) | (16.5) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 30.4 | 16.2 | 21.7 | 30:15 | 38-169 | (4.5) | 21-33 | 62.1% | 250 | (7.5) | 71-419 | (5.9) | (13.8) | Defense Home Games | 21.6 | 9.4 | 18.2 | 33:15 | 44-185 | (4.2) | 14-27 | 50.4% | 161 | (5.9) | 71-347 | (4.9) | (16) |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: OKLAHOMA ST 37.2, OKLAHOMA 37.6 |
| | |
|
|
9/29/2012 | TEXAS | 36-41 | L | 2 | L | 63.5 | O | 40-275 | 18-27-301 | 1 | 42-136 | 30-38-304 | 1 | 10/13/2012 | @ KANSAS | 20-14 | W | -26.5 | L | 68 | U | 44-116 | 18-29-255 | 1 | 49-187 | 15-32-211 | 0 | 10/20/2012 | IOWA ST | 31-10 | W | -14 | W | 57.5 | U | 42-210 | 32-47-415 | 2 | 22-101 | 23-48-240 | 2 | 10/27/2012 | TCU | 36-14 | W | -7 | W | 64 | U | 40-147 | 18-33-324 | 2 | 27-121 | 24-44-223 | 3 | 11/3/2012 | @ KANSAS ST | 30-44 | L | 7 | L | 68.5 | O | 24-87 | 27-47-417 | 5 | 43-191 | 21-28-290 | 0 | 11/10/2012 | W VIRGINIA | 55-34 | W | -11 | W | 73.5 | O | 35-151 | 22-31-292 | 1 | 35-78 | 37-56-401 | 2 | 11/17/2012 | TEXAS TECH | 59-21 | W | -10 | W | 73 | O | 42-256 | 12-22-231 | 0 | 34-99 | 29-42-284 | 3 | 11/24/2012 | @ OKLAHOMA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/1/2012 | @ BAYLOR | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
10/6/2012 | @ TEXAS TECH | 41-20 | W | -4.5 | W | 57 | O | 29-121 | 25-40-259 | 1 | 32-89 | 26-41-271 | 3 | 10/13/2012 | *TEXAS | 63-21 | W | -3 | W | 54.5 | O | 51-343 | 22-39-334 | 1 | 23-74 | 18-37-215 | 3 | 10/20/2012 | KANSAS | 52-7 | W | -34.5 | W | 55.5 | O | 18-93 | 21-33-304 | 1 | 58-185 | 13-28-124 | 3 | 10/27/2012 | NOTRE DAME | 13-30 | L | -11 | L | 47.5 | U | 24-15 | 36-52-364 | 1 | 39-215 | 14-27-188 | 0 | 11/3/2012 | @ IOWA ST | 35-20 | W | -13 | W | 50.5 | O | 40-188 | 32-45-405 | 2 | 24-99 | 20-40-191 | 1 | 11/10/2012 | BAYLOR | 42-34 | W | -21 | L | 74.5 | O | 40-183 | 25-36-277 | 2 | 51-252 | 12-33-172 | 0 | 11/17/2012 | @ W VIRGINIA | 50-49 | W | -10.5 | L | 72.5 | O | 31-108 | 38-51-554 | 2 | 47-458 | 20-35-320 | 2 | 11/24/2012 | OKLAHOMA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/1/2012 | @ TCU | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | OKLAHOMA ST: Reality sets in this year for Cowboys fans as the best QB-WR tandem in college football (Brandon Weeden and Justin Blackmon) has moved on to the NFL. OSU will replace Weeden with junior Clint Chelf, who has 5 TD and 1 INT in mop-up duty in his career. OSU was able to put up 48.7 PPG last year (2nd in FBS), thanks to the best turnover margin in the nation and 24 TD from RB Joseph Randle, who finished with 1,216 rushing yards on 5.8 YPC. Senior WR Tracy Moore (672 rec yds, 4 TD) moves up to take Blackmon's No. 1 receiver spot. The Cowboys defense ranked among the top-40 teams in the nation in both sacks (2.2 per game) and Tackles For Loss (7.0 per game), but allowed a whopping 272 pass YPG in the pass-happy Big 12. But there is talent in the secondary, and most of last year's defense, which held Texas Tech to six points and Oklahoma to 10, returns for the 2012 season. | | OKLAHOMA: After starting the 2011 season as the favorites to win the BCS National Championship, the Sooners faltered down the stretch, losing four of their final seven games. A lot of it had to do with injuries to top offensive players WR Ryan Broyles and RB Dominique Whaley, but QB Landry Jones also struggled with 1 TD and 6 INT in his final four games, losing twice. Jones is Oklahoma's all-time leading passer though, and he has talented weapons to use in junior WRs Kenny Stills (849 rec yds, 8 TD) and Jaz Reynolds (715 rec yds, 5 TD). With Whaley (627 rush yds, 5.5 YPC, 9 TD) and Roy Finch (605 rush yds, 5.5 YPC) running behind a great offensive line, the Sooners offense will remain explosive. The secondary has a lot of potential, but it's a unit that struggled last year (241 passing YPG allowed, 79th in FBS). However, the front seven is fierce, returning most of the players that helped the Sooners rank among the nation's top-12 in both sacks (3.1 per game) and Tackles For Loss (7.5 per game). |
| | AP Sports Writer John Raby contributed to this report from Morgantown, W.Va.
Game Notes: |
| Last Updated: 3/29/2024 8:28:13 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|