| | | |
ILLINOIS NEBRASKA |
|
| 62.5 | 19 Final 39 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
339 | ILLINOIS | 63 | 62.5 | 340 | NEBRASKA | -10.5 | -8.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 3-1 | +2.2 | 3-1 | 3-1 | 40.2 | 21.2 | 478.5 | (6.8) | 1.2 | 24.7 | 6.0 | 432.0 | (6.1) | 1.0 | Road Games | 0-1 | -1 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 24.0 | 3.0 | 327.0 | (5.3) | 1.0 | 34.0 | 10.0 | 615.0 | (7.2) | 2.0 | Last 3 Games | 2-1 | +1.2 | 3-0 | 2-1 | 39.7 | 20.0 | 483.3 | (6.8) | 1.0 | 21.7 | 5.7 | 440.3 | (6.1) | 1.0 | Turf Games | 3-0 | +3.2 | 2-1 | 3-0 | 45.7 | 27.3 | 529.0 | (7.2) | 1.3 | 21.7 | 4.7 | 371.0 | (5.6) | 0.7 |
|
| |
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 40.2 | 21.2 | 25.2 | 31:22 | 37-171 | (4.6) | 22-33 | 66.2% | 307 | (9.2) | 70-478 | (6.8) | (11.9) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 26.8 | 14.4 | 20.7 | 30:55 | 37-135 | (3.7) | 22-34 | 63.3% | 256 | (7.5) | 71-391 | (5.5) | (14.6) | Offense Road Games | 24.0 | 3.0 | 17.0 | 28:24 | 36-136 | (3.8) | 10-26 | 38.5% | 191 | (7.3) | 62-327 | (5.3) | (13.6) | Defense (All Games) | 24.7 | 6.0 | 21.2 | 28:38 | 37-160 | (4.3) | 21-33 | 63.2% | 271 | (8.2) | 70-432 | (6.1) | (17.5) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 29.3 | 11.1 | 19.8 | 30:05 | 40-165 | (4.1) | 19-30 | 63.0% | 244 | (8.2) | 70-409 | (5.8) | (13.9) | Defense Road Games | 34.0 | 10.0 | 30.0 | 31:36 | 50-273 | (5.5) | 28-35 | 80.0% | 342 | (9.8) | 85-615 | (7.2) | (18.1) |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 3-1 | -1.1 | 2-2 | 3-1 | 43.2 | 27.7 | 496.2 | (6.3) | 1.5 | 27.0 | 11.7 | 463.7 | (6.6) | 2.5 | Home Games | 3-1 | -1.1 | 2-2 | 3-1 | 43.2 | 27.7 | 496.2 | (6.3) | 1.5 | 27.0 | 11.7 | 463.7 | (6.6) | 2.5 | Last 3 Games | 2-1 | -1.1 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 45.3 | 31.3 | 485.0 | (6.4) | 1.3 | 24.7 | 11.0 | 417.7 | (6) | 2.7 | Turf Games | 3-1 | -1.1 | 2-2 | 3-1 | 43.2 | 27.7 | 496.2 | (6.3) | 1.5 | 27.0 | 11.7 | 463.7 | (6.6) | 2.5 |
|
| |
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 43.2 | 27.7 | 28.0 | 31:51 | 50-281 | (5.6) | 19-28 | 70.3% | 215 | (7.8) | 78-496 | (6.3) | (11.5) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 35.9 | 20.6 | 24.9 | 32:01 | 47-233 | (4.9) | 19-28 | 67.2% | 221 | (7.9) | 75-454 | (6) | (12.6) | Offense Home Games | 43.2 | 27.7 | 28.0 | 31:51 | 50-281 | (5.6) | 19-28 | 70.3% | 215 | (7.8) | 78-496 | (6.3) | (11.5) | Defense (All Games) | 27.0 | 11.7 | 25.7 | 28:09 | 37-179 | (4.9) | 21-34 | 63.0% | 284 | (8.4) | 71-464 | (6.6) | (17.2) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 28.8 | 16 | 24.5 | 28:59 | 38-189 | (5) | 23-37 | 63.2% | 272 | (7.4) | 75-461 | (6.2) | (16) | Defense Home Games | 27.0 | 11.7 | 25.7 | 28:09 | 37-179 | (4.9) | 21-34 | 63.0% | 284 | (8.4) | 71-464 | (6.6) | (17.2) |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: ILLINOIS 26.5, NEBRASKA 23.5 |
| | |
|
|
8/31/2013 | S ILLINOIS | 42-34 | W | -16.5 | L | 40.5 | O | 30-49 | 29-37-415 | 2 | 26-66 | 26-41-341 | 1 | 9/7/2013 | CINCINNATI | 45-17 | W | 7 | W | 56.5 | O | 39-210 | 26-37-312 | 0 | 32-148 | 23-42-308 | 1 | 9/14/2013 | *WASHINGTON | 24-34 | L | 10.5 | W | 61 | U | 36-136 | 10-26-191 | 1 | 50-273 | 28-35-342 | 2 | 9/28/2013 | MIAMI OHIO | 50-14 | W | -27.5 | W | 49 | O | 43-289 | 23-33-312 | 2 | 41-155 | 7-15-95 | 0 | 10/5/2013 | @ NEBRASKA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/19/2013 | WISCONSIN | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/26/2013 | MICHIGAN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/2/2013 | @ PENN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
8/31/2013 | WYOMING | 37-34 | W | -31 | L | 64.5 | O | 63-375 | 17-22-155 | 2 | 30-219 | 29-44-383 | 2 | 9/7/2013 | SOUTHERN MISS | 56-13 | W | -28 | W | 60.5 | O | 46-285 | 19-28-194 | 1 | 27-62 | 21-37-222 | 4 | 9/14/2013 | UCLA | 21-41 | L | 0 | L | 70 | U | 42-128 | 21-35-203 | 1 | 53-210 | 16-25-294 | 1 | 9/21/2013 | S DAKOTA ST | 59-20 | W | -20.5 | W | 61 | O | 51-335 | 21-26-310 | 2 | 38-227 | 19-29-238 | 3 | 10/5/2013 | ILLINOIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/12/2013 | @ PURDUE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/26/2013 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/2/2013 | NORTHWESTERN | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | ILLINOIS: Not only were the Illini 0-8 in Big Ten play under first-year coach Tim Beckham, but they lost by an average score of 35-12. The offense finished third-worst in the nation in both points (16.7 PPG) and yards (297 YPG). Illinois ditched the two-OC system and brought in new OC Bill Cubit whose offense will force QB Nathan Scheelhaase (246 pass attempts, 4 TD, 8 INT) to get the ball out quickly. WR Ryan Lankford (469 rec. yds, 5 TD) leads an unproven receiving corps, but Illinois has two capable ball carriers in RBs Donovonn Young (571 rush yds, 3 TD) and Josh Ferguson (312 rush yds). The pass defense allowed just 194 YPG (19th in FBS), but mostly because teams ran all over Illinois (194 YPG, 97th in FBS). Most of the D-Line and secondary are gone -- three to the NFL -- putting more pressure on LBs Mason Monheim (86 tackles) and Jonathan Brown (9.5 TFL) to be all over the field. | | NEBRASKA: Dual-threat QB Taylor Martinez (2,871 pass yds, 23 TD, 12 INT; 1,019 rush yds, 10 TD) returns for his fourth year of running the Huskers' offense. The turnover-prone Martinez (16 fumbles, 8 lost) has plenty of weapons at his disposal again with his WR trio of Kenny Bell (863 rec. yds, 8 TD), Quincy Enunwa (470 rec. yds) and Jamal Turner (417 rec. yds). Star RB Rex Burkhead is gone, but RB Ameer Abdullah (1,137 rush yds, 8 TD) proved that he is a strong every-down back. He and his veteran O-Line could even surpass the Huskers' 253 rushing YPG (8th in nation) from last year. The defense, which allowed 53.5 PPG in its four losses, still has major questions. DE Jason Ankrah (6 TFL) is the only starter back from the front seven, but sophomore LB David Santos had a monster spring. The nation's No. 4 pass defense (168 YPG) is stacked with shut-down CBs Ciante Evans (56 tackles, 8 PD) and Andrew Green (50 tackles) leading the heavily experienced secondary. |
| | Game Notes: |
| Last Updated: 4/20/2024 4:49:56 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|