|
|
VIRGINIA TECH
N CAROLINA |
|
|
52
| 34
Final
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|  | |
| 345 | VIRGINIA TECH | 48.5 | 50.5 | | 346 | N CAROLINA | -3.5 | -5.5 |
|
|
|  | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 3-2 | -4.4 | 1-4 | 2-2 | 28.0 | 11.8 | 373.4 | (5.7) | 1.8 | 17.2 | 6.8 | 361.4 | (5) | 1.6 | | Road Games | 0-2 | -6.4 | 0-2 | 2-0 | 20.5 | 5.0 | 363.0 | (6) | 3.5 | 31.0 | 13.5 | 516.0 | (6.5) | 1.5 | | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | -5.4 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 26.0 | 10.3 | 374.0 | (5.8) | 2.7 | 20.7 | 9.0 | 432.7 | (5.7) | 1.7 | | Grass Games | 3-2 | -4.4 | 1-4 | 2-2 | 28.0 | 11.8 | 373.4 | (5.7) | 1.8 | 17.2 | 6.8 | 361.4 | (5) | 1.6 | | Conference Games | 1-0 | +1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 20.0 | 7.0 | 326.0 | (4.5) | 0.0 | 17.0 | 7.0 | 288.0 | (4.1) | 1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Offense (All Games) | 28.0 | 11.8 | 18.6 | 27:14 | 35-150 | (4.2) | 16-31 | 53.2% | 224 | (7.3) | 66-373 | (5.7) | (13.3) | | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 25.5 | 12.9 | 19 | 30:51 | 35-156 | (4.5) | 18-30 | 60.4% | 230 | (7.6) | 65-386 | (5.9) | (15.1) | | Offense Road Games | 20.5 | 5.0 | 15.0 | 25:41 | 30-109 | (3.6) | 15-30 | 50.8% | 253 | (8.3) | 60-363 | (6) | (17.7) | | Defense (All Games) | 17.2 | 6.8 | 18.6 | 32:46 | 42-168 | (4) | 14-30 | 47.3% | 193 | (6.4) | 72-361 | (5) | (21) | | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 24.3 | 12 | 19.3 | 30:08 | 40-195 | (4.9) | 15-27 | 56.4% | 201 | (7.5) | 67-396 | (5.9) | (16.3) | | Defense Road Games | 31.0 | 13.5 | 25.5 | 34:18 | 43-178 | (4.1) | 19-35 | 54.9% | 337 | (9.5) | 79-516 | (6.5) | (16.6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 3-2 | -4 | 3-2 | 3-1 | 43.2 | 23.4 | 477.4 | (6.5) | 1.6 | 14.6 | 12.6 | 296.0 | (4.3) | 2.4 | | Home Games | 3-0 | +1 | 3-0 | 1-1 | 51.7 | 32.0 | 516.3 | (6.9) | 1.3 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 197.3 | (3) | 3.3 | | Last 3 Games | 2-1 | 0 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 42.3 | 20.7 | 478.3 | (6.9) | 1.3 | 15.0 | 14.0 | 294.7 | (4.5) | 2.3 | | Grass Games | 3-0 | +1 | 3-0 | 1-1 | 51.7 | 32.0 | 516.3 | (6.9) | 1.3 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 197.3 | (3) | 3.3 | | Conference Games | 0-1 | -4 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 27.0 | 14.0 | 428.0 | (5.2) | 2.0 | 28.0 | 21.0 | 426.0 | (5.8) | 1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Offense (All Games) | 43.2 | 23.4 | 22.8 | 26:38 | 37-173 | (4.6) | 23-36 | 63.5% | 305 | (8.6) | 73-477 | (6.5) | (11.1) | | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 36.5 | 20.8 | 21.2 | 28:25 | 39-180 | (4.6) | 19-31 | 62.3% | 253 | (8.2) | 70-434 | (6.2) | (11.9) | | Offense Home Games | 51.7 | 32.0 | 24.0 | 28:10 | 43-220 | (5.1) | 21-32 | 66.0% | 297 | (9.2) | 75-516 | (6.9) | (10) | | Defense (All Games) | 14.6 | 12.6 | 16.8 | 33:22 | 35-96 | (2.7) | 21-33 | 62.3% | 200 | (6) | 68-296 | (4.3) | (20.3) | | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 17.9 | 10 | 17.1 | 32:09 | 35-107 | (3.1) | 21-34 | 61.1% | 207 | (6.1) | 68-314 | (4.6) | (17.5) | | Defense Home Games | 2.0 | 2.0 | 11.0 | 31:50 | 32-77 | (2.4) | 18-33 | 53.0% | 120 | (3.6) | 66-197 | (3) | (98.7) |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: VIRGINIA TECH 29.2, N CAROLINA 21.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 9/3/2012 | GEORGIA TECH | 20-17 | W | -8 | L | 46 | U | 35-96 | 21-38-230 | 0 | 55-192 | 10-16-96 | 1 | | 9/8/2012 | AUSTIN PEAY | 42-7 | W | -53 | L | | - | 38-187 | 18-26-232 | 1 | 41-159 | 8-21-62 | 2 | | 9/15/2012 | @ PITTSBURGH | 17-35 | L | -10 | L | 45 | O | 26-59 | 14-31-265 | 4 | 55-254 | 19-28-283 | 1 | | 9/22/2012 | BOWLING GREEN | 37-0 | W | -17 | W | 47.5 | U | 43-246 | 12-29-150 | 1 | 26-133 | 14-42-133 | 2 | | 9/29/2012 | *CINCINNATI | 24-27 | L | -6 | L | 47 | O | 34-160 | 17-30-242 | 3 | 32-103 | 20-43-392 | 2 | | 10/6/2012 | @ N CAROLINA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/13/2012 | DUKE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/20/2012 | @ CLEMSON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/1/2012 | @ MIAMI | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 9/1/2012 | ELON | 62-0 | W | -32 | W | | - | 46-243 | 20-28-281 | 2 | 36-42 | 17-34-128 | 4 | | 9/8/2012 | @ WAKE FOREST | 27-28 | L | -10 | L | 53.5 | O | 42-157 | 23-40-271 | 2 | 34-64 | 28-39-362 | 1 | | 9/15/2012 | @ LOUISVILLE | 34-39 | L | 3 | L | 56 | O | 17-47 | 26-41-363 | 2 | 43-183 | 23-28-279 | 1 | | 9/22/2012 | E CAROLINA | 27-6 | W | -14.5 | W | 63.5 | U | 29-129 | 27-43-321 | 0 | 33-109 | 17-30-124 | 1 | | 9/29/2012 | IDAHO | 66-0 | W | -27 | W | 60 | O | 53-287 | 17-26-288 | 2 | 28-80 | 19-36-109 | 5 | | 10/6/2012 | VIRGINIA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/13/2012 | @ MIAMI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/20/2012 | @ DUKE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/27/2012 | NC STATE | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
 | VIRGINIA TECH: Of all of the ACC quarterbacks, Virginia Tech may have the best in Logan Thomas. The 6-foot-6, 254-pound Thomas threw for 3,013 yards and 19 TD while also running for 469 yards and 11 TD in his first year as a starter. Running back is a huge weakness for the Hokies as their top three RBs have little experience -- freshmen Michael Holmes and J.C. Coleman, and senior Martin Scales all enter the 2012 season with zero career carries. However, the Hokies will have one of the best defensive lines in the country next year, led by junior DE James Gayle (7 sacks, 12.5 TFL). They stack eight in the box often, with the technique paying off way more than it doesn't (12th in nation in sacks, 7th in points allowed). On the other end, VT will hope teams don't put eight in the box as the Hokies return just one starter on the offensive line. | | N CAROLINA: If the spring game is any indication of how junior QB Bryn Renner is going to fare in new head coach Larry Fedora's spread offense, then Tar Heel fans have a reason to be excited in a year in which the team is banned from playing in a bowl game. Renner completed 9-of-13 passes for 123 yards and a touchdown in his new offense. North Carolina will get back RB Giovani Bernard (1,253 rush yds, 13 TD) and WR Erik Highsmith (726 rec yds, 5 TD), both of whom will play an even bigger role in the offense this year. The defense is a huge question mark as the UNC defensive coordinators are changing their scheme to a 4-3 after losing their most talented players to the NFL draft. This team doesn't have a lot to play for, which doesn't bode well considering its lack of talent at most positions. |
|
|
Game Notes: |
|
| Last Updated: 4/18/2024 4:21:29 PM EST. |
|
|