| | | CFB : Teaser Line Matchup |
| |
PITTSBURGH
NAVY |
|
|
51
| 21
Final
24 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 131 | PITTSBURGH | +0.5 | Over 46 | | 132 | NAVY | +11.5 | Under 58 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | |
|
|
| All Games | 4-2 | +1 | 2-4 | 3-2 | 29.7 | 20.0 | 366.8 | (5.9) | 1.5 | 28.2 | 13.7 | 373.8 | (5.4) | 1.3 | | Road Games | 1-1 | 0 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 33.5 | 20.0 | 404.0 | (6) | 0.0 | 37.0 | 19.0 | 423.5 | (6) | 2.0 | | Last 3 Games | 2-1 | +1 | 1-2 | 0-2 | 19.3 | 12.7 | 259.7 | (4.2) | 1.0 | 15.3 | 6.7 | 302.7 | (4.2) | 1.0 |
|
| |
|
|
| Offense (All Games) | 29.7 | 20.0 | 17.7 | 28:19 | 35-142 | (4) | 15-26 | 56.7% | 225 | (8.6) | 62-367 | (5.9) | (12.4) | | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 25.2 | 14.7 | 19.6 | 29:01 | 40-167 | (4.2) | 17-30 | 56.1% | 206 | (6.9) | 69-373 | (5.4) | (14.8) | | Offense Road Games | 33.5 | 20.0 | 19.0 | 31:05 | 36-98 | (2.7) | 18-31 | 58.1% | 305 | (9.9) | 67-404 | (6) | (12.1) | | Defense (All Games) | 28.2 | 13.7 | 19.3 | 31:41 | 35-136 | (3.8) | 20-34 | 60.6% | 238 | (7) | 69-374 | (5.4) | (13.3) | | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 34.9 | 18.1 | 22.5 | 31:20 | 41-195 | (4.8) | 20-32 | 63.0% | 247 | (7.7) | 73-442 | (6.1) | (12.7) | | Defense Road Games | 37.0 | 19.0 | 20.0 | 28:54 | 37-144 | (3.9) | 20-33 | 61.2% | 279 | (8.3) | 70-423 | (6) | (11.4) |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 3-3 | +1.4 | 4-2 | 2-4 | 29.7 | 13.7 | 407.8 | (5.7) | 1.2 | 25.2 | 9.7 | 401.3 | (5.7) | 1.7 | | Home Games | 2-0 | +2 | 2-0 | 0-2 | 39.5 | 15.0 | 458.0 | (6.6) | 0.5 | 8.5 | 8.5 | 324.5 | (4.7) | 3.0 | | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | -1 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 26.3 | 9.3 | 386.7 | (5) | 1.3 | 30.0 | 11.3 | 391.3 | (5.5) | 1.3 | | Turf Games | 3-2 | +2.4 | 4-1 | 2-3 | 34.2 | 15.0 | 425.6 | (5.8) | 0.8 | 23.2 | 8.8 | 394.6 | (5.7) | 2.0 |
|
| |
|
|
| Offense (All Games) | 29.7 | 13.7 | 23.2 | 30:13 | 60-304 | (5.1) | 6-12 | 50.0% | 104 | (8.4) | 72-408 | (5.7) | (13.7) | | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 33.9 | 17.5 | 24.3 | 32:46 | 47-221 | (4.7) | 17-28 | 62.8% | 233 | (8.5) | 74-454 | (6.1) | (13.4) | | Offense Home Games | 39.5 | 15.0 | 24.5 | 31:21 | 56-312 | (5.5) | 8-12 | 68.0% | 145 | (11.6) | 69-458 | (6.6) | (11.6) | | Defense (All Games) | 25.2 | 9.7 | 21.7 | 31:38 | 40-197 | (4.9) | 21-30 | 69.1% | 205 | (6.8) | 71-401 | (5.7) | (15.9) | | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 28.4 | 15.2 | 21.5 | 28:25 | 40-201 | (5.1) | 19-31 | 61.5% | 226 | (7.3) | 71-427 | (6) | (15) | | Defense Home Games | 8.5 | 8.5 | 18.5 | 28:38 | 45-194 | (4.3) | 13-24 | 54.2% | 130 | (5.4) | 69-324 | (4.7) | (38.2) |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: PITTSBURGH 36.2, NAVY 24.3 |
| | |
|
|
| 9/2/2013 | FLORIDA ST | 13-41 | L | 11 | L | 47 | O | 27-96 | 15-28-201 | 2 | 34-156 | 27-29-377 | 0 | | 9/14/2013 | NEW MEXICO | 49-27 | W | -21.5 | W | 46.5 | O | 34-283 | 14-18-244 | 4 | 52-213 | 9-17-57 | 1 | | 9/21/2013 | @ DUKE | 58-55 | W | -4.5 | L | 52 | O | 46-174 | 23-33-424 | 0 | 36-213 | 22-33-319 | 4 | | 9/28/2013 | VIRGINIA | 14-3 | W | -6 | W | 50 | U | 35-8 | 13-31-191 | 3 | 33-65 | 15-37-123 | 2 | | 10/12/2013 | @ VIRGINIA TECH | 9-19 | L | 7 | L | 42.5 | U | 26-23 | 13-29-187 | 0 | 38-76 | 19-34-239 | 0 | | 10/19/2013 | OLD DOMINION | 35-24 | W | -16.5 | L | | - | 45-266 | 11-18-104 | 0 | 20-93 | 31-53-312 | 1 | | 10/26/2013 | @ NAVY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/2/2013 | @ GEORGIA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/9/2013 | NOTRE DAME | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/16/2013 | N CAROLINA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/23/2013 | @ SYRACUSE | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 9/7/2013 | @ INDIANA | 41-35 | W | 11 | W | 66.5 | O | 70-444 | 2-5-71 | 0 | 26-118 | 31-43-363 | 1 | | 9/14/2013 | DELAWARE | 51-7 | W | -16.5 | W | 61.5 | U | 62-352 | 11-15-237 | 1 | 34-157 | 19-32-179 | 3 | | 9/28/2013 | @ W KENTUCKY | 7-19 | L | -4 | L | 59 | U | 33-107 | 7-17-76 | 2 | 43-219 | 25-31-198 | 2 | | 10/5/2013 | AIR FORCE | 28-10 | W | -13.5 | W | 56 | U | 51-273 | 6-10-54 | 0 | 57-231 | 7-16-82 | 3 | | 10/12/2013 | @ DUKE | 7-35 | L | 4 | L | 57 | U | 50-230 | 6-14-89 | 3 | 37-134 | 32-39-301 | 0 | | 10/19/2013 | @ TOLEDO | 44-45 | L | 9 | W | 55 | O | 93-419 | 5-13-95 | 1 | 46-321 | 11-20-105 | 1 | | 10/26/2013 | PITTSBURGH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/2/2013 | @ NOTRE DAME | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/9/2013 | HAWAII | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/16/2013 | S ALABAMA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/22/2013 | @ SAN JOSE ST | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| |  | PITTSBURGH: Pittsburgh enters its first ACC campaign with an offense in shambles. QB Tino Sunseri and RB Ray Graham graduated, then RB Rushel Shell transferred. WR Devin Street (975 rec. yds, 5 TD) is the lone skill-position star, and he will be catching passes from either senior QB Tom Savage (16 TD, 10 INT at Rutgers) or dual-threat freshman QB Chad Voytik. Unproven junior RB Isaac Bennett (87 carries, 4.3 YPC in career) should get the bulk of the carries. The nation's 17th-best defense (331 YPG) is in great shape for new DC Matt House, who oversaw Pitt's nasty secondary last year (194 pass YPG, 20th in FBS). DT Aaron Donald (18.5 TFL) is a beast, MLB Shane Gordon (6 PD) does it all, and S Jason Hendricks is excellent (90 tackles, 6 INT). | | NAVY: The Midshipmen began 1-3 last year, but then won seven of eight games to become bowl eligible. The triple-option propelled them to 278 rushing YPG (6th in FBS), but QB Keenan Reynolds (61-of-108, 898 yds, 9 TD, 2 INT; 649 rush yds, 10 TD) throws well enough to work out of the shotgun in some spread formations this year. He should have plenty of protection from his line, and top WR Brandon Turner (321 rec. yds, 4 TD) is dependable. RBs Noah Copeland (738 rush yds, 5 TD) and Chris Swain (154 rush yds, 10.3 YPC) are the two main ball carriers for this offense. The defense provided little pressure in opposing backfields (18 sacks, T-100th in FBS), 54 TFL (T-17th-worst in FBS). But a strong veteran presence remains in this 3-4 defense with ILB Cody Peterson (67 tackles), OLB Jordan Drake (49 tackles, 2 sacks), CB Parrish Gaines (69 tackles, 2 INT) and FS Chris Ferguson (37 tackles). |
| | Game Notes: |
| | Last Updated: 4/19/2024 8:22:18 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|