|
|
MICHIGAN ST First Half Results MINNESOTA |
|
| 19.5 | 13 Final 7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
151 | MICHIGAN ST | -4 | 152 | MINNESOTA | 20 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 5-6 | -7.2 | 3-8 | 2-8 | 19.7 | 8.1 | 365.7 | (4.9) | 1.5 | 16.9 | 9.5 | 289.4 | (4.5) | 1.3 | Road Games | 3-1 | +2.8 | 3-1 | 1-2 | 24.5 | 10.2 | 371.5 | (5.1) | 0.7 | 14.7 | 10.0 | 269.5 | (4.3) | 1.0 | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | -2.3 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 20.0 | 7.3 | 352.3 | (4.7) | 2.3 | 21.3 | 9.0 | 322.0 | (4.7) | 1.0 | Turf Games | 3-1 | +2.8 | 3-1 | 1-2 | 24.5 | 10.2 | 371.5 | (5.1) | 0.7 | 14.7 | 10.0 | 269.5 | (4.3) | 1.0 | Conference Games | 2-5 | -7.2 | 2-5 | 2-5 | 19.0 | 7.0 | 343.1 | (4.8) | 1.3 | 19.9 | 10.0 | 321.3 | (4.8) | 1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 19.7 | 8.1 | 19.5 | 33:01 | 37-140 | (3.8) | 20-37 | 53.8% | 226 | (6.1) | 74-366 | (4.9) | (18.5) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 23 | 10.9 | 19.5 | 30:05 | 38-159 | (4.2) | 19-32 | 58.3% | 207 | (6.4) | 70-366 | (5.2) | (15.9) | Offense Road Games | 24.5 | 10.2 | 20.2 | 33:40 | 35-116 | (3.3) | 23-37 | 62.7% | 255 | (6.8) | 73-371 | (5.1) | (15.2) | Defense (All Games) | 16.9 | 9.5 | 15.5 | 26:59 | 31-108 | (3.5) | 18-33 | 53.8% | 181 | (5.4) | 64-289 | (4.5) | (17.1) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 29.1 | 15.1 | 20.5 | 30:53 | 40-188 | (4.8) | 17-29 | 59.3% | 207 | (7.2) | 68-394 | (5.8) | (13.5) | Defense Road Games | 14.7 | 10.0 | 14.7 | 26:20 | 27-72 | (2.6) | 19-34 | 56.5% | 197 | (5.7) | 62-269 | (4.3) | (18.3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 6-5 | +2.4 | 5-6 | 4-5 | 22.4 | 11.4 | 337.6 | (5.1) | 1.5 | 23.7 | 11.8 | 346.5 | (5.2) | 1.5 | Home Games | 4-2 | +2.4 | 4-2 | 2-3 | 26.5 | 18.2 | 367.7 | (5.4) | 1.2 | 20.7 | 10.3 | 333.3 | (5) | 1.5 | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | 0 | 1-2 | 1-1 | 14.7 | 3.3 | 253.7 | (4) | 1.0 | 25.3 | 13.7 | 369.7 | (5.6) | 1.7 | Turf Games | 6-5 | +2.4 | 5-6 | 4-5 | 22.4 | 11.4 | 337.6 | (5.1) | 1.5 | 23.7 | 11.8 | 346.5 | (5.2) | 1.5 | Conference Games | 2-5 | -1.9 | 2-5 | 3-3 | 18.1 | 8.6 | 298.6 | (4.7) | 1.7 | 27.7 | 15.3 | 368.9 | (5.7) | 0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 22.4 | 11.4 | 18.0 | 31:17 | 40-159 | (3.9) | 14-26 | 54.8% | 179 | (7) | 66-338 | (5.1) | (15.1) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 26.8 | 14.2 | 19.5 | 30:19 | 40-166 | (4.2) | 17-29 | 59.1% | 209 | (7.2) | 69-376 | (5.4) | (14) | Offense Home Games | 26.5 | 18.2 | 20.0 | 32:33 | 43-171 | (4) | 14-25 | 56.3% | 197 | (7.8) | 68-368 | (5.4) | (13.9) | Defense (All Games) | 23.7 | 11.8 | 18.5 | 30:00 | 37-165 | (4.4) | 17-30 | 56.7% | 182 | (6.1) | 67-347 | (5.2) | (14.6) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 25.1 | 13.1 | 20.1 | 30:48 | 39-168 | (4.3) | 19-32 | 59.0% | 210 | (6.6) | 71-378 | (5.3) | (15) | Defense Home Games | 20.7 | 10.3 | 18.0 | 27:27 | 35-150 | (4.2) | 18-31 | 57.1% | 183 | (5.8) | 67-333 | (5) | (16.1) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: MICHIGAN ST 40.3, MINNESOTA 32.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
9/29/2012 | OHIO ST | 16-17 | L | -3 | L | 41.5 | U | 22-34 | 22-42-269 | 0 | 44-204 | 16-23-179 | 3 | 10/6/2012 | @ INDIANA | 31-27 | W | -15 | L | 49 | O | 42-120 | 24-40-290 | 0 | 19-35 | 33-48-282 | 0 | 10/13/2012 | IOWA | 16-19 | L | -8 | L | 39 | U | 39-149 | 12-31-179 | 1 | 34-123 | 19-36-134 | 1 | 10/20/2012 | @ MICHIGAN | 10-12 | L | 8 | W | 43.5 | U | 31-112 | 21-34-192 | 1 | 32-163 | 14-30-163 | 1 | 10/27/2012 | @ WISCONSIN | 16-13 | W | 5.5 | W | 41 | U | 28-61 | 24-39-216 | 1 | 37-19 | 14-22-171 | 0 | 11/3/2012 | NEBRASKA | 24-28 | L | -1 | L | 44.5 | O | 43-238 | 9-27-123 | 2 | 40-313 | 16-36-160 | 3 | 11/17/2012 | NORTHWESTERN | 20-23 | L | -7 | L | 47 | U | 39-122 | 22-47-297 | 4 | 27-57 | 26-43-246 | 0 | 11/24/2012 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/29/2012 | @ IOWA | 13-31 | L | 6 | L | 46 | U | 32-102 | 20-33-197 | 4 | 25-182 | 18-31-192 | 0 | 10/13/2012 | NORTHWESTERN | 13-21 | L | 3 | L | 54 | U | 42-158 | 16-30-169 | 3 | 34-208 | 11-17-67 | 0 | 10/20/2012 | @ WISCONSIN | 13-38 | L | 17 | L | 46.5 | O | 30-96 | 13-24-149 | 2 | 54-337 | 7-15-106 | 0 | 10/27/2012 | PURDUE | 44-28 | W | 2 | W | 50 | O | 41-212 | 15-22-246 | 0 | 34-183 | 21-43-198 | 1 | 11/3/2012 | MICHIGAN | 13-35 | L | 8.5 | L | 45 | O | 38-128 | 14-31-147 | 1 | 41-155 | 12-18-234 | 1 | 11/10/2012 | @ ILLINOIS | 17-3 | W | -2.5 | W | 45.5 | U | 50-231 | 9-15-78 | 0 | 35-101 | 15-25-175 | 2 | 11/17/2012 | @ NEBRASKA | 14-38 | L | 21 | L | 52 | P | 29-87 | 10-28-90 | 2 | 47-133 | 22-33-311 | 2 | 11/24/2012 | MICHIGAN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| MICHIGAN ST: After a season that almost ended in a trip to the Rose Bowl, the Spartans are looking to take the next step. Offensively, they are losing almost all of their skill players, but QB Andrew Maxwell (18-for-26, 171 yds, 1 TD, 0 INT) and RB Le'Veon Bell (948 rush yds, 13 TD) seem as though they are ready to make an impact. MSU will have one of the best offensive lines in college football in 2012 as they return four of last year's starters. Defensively, they lost Jerel Worthy, but it doesn't seem as though they'll miss him with William Gholston (five sacks) and Marcus Rush (4 sacks) around. The Spartans should have a dominant pass rush as they have the size and depth to cause nightmares for opposing offenses. | | MINNESOTA: The Golden Gophers had a difficult first year under head coach Jerry Kill, but things should go a lot smoother this time around. QB MarQueis Gray has all the tools to be an effective player in an offense that desperately needs him. Gray is a dual threat who will likely lead Minnesota in both passing and rushing in this coming season. The team lacks talent at both the RB and WR positions. Defensively, leading tackler Mike Rallis (83 tackles) returns, but outside of him, there isn't much to get excited about. This team had a lot of trouble stopping opponents last year (31.7 PPG allowed), so it's hard to be optimistic about the fact that they return six defensive starters. |
|
|
Game Notes: |
|
Last Updated: 3/28/2024 7:50:06 PM EST. |
|
|