|
|
GEORGIA ST MEMPHIS |
|
| 63.5 | 22 Final 59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
105 | GEORGIA ST | | 106 | MEMPHIS | N.L. |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 1-1 | +1 | 1-1 | 0-1 | 15.5 | 10.5 | 332.0 | (5.1) | 1.0 | 30.5 | 17.0 | 461.5 | (6.6) | 1.5 | Road Games | 0-1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 349.0 | (5.4) | 1.0 | 41.0 | 20.0 | 541.0 | (7.7) | 1.0 | Last 3 Games | 1-1 | +1 | 1-1 | 0-1 | 15.5 | 10.5 | 332.0 | (5.1) | 1.0 | 30.5 | 17.0 | 461.5 | (6.6) | 1.5 | Turf Games | 1-0 | +1 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 24.0 | 14.0 | 315.0 | (4.8) | 1.0 | 20.0 | 14.0 | 382.0 | (5.5) | 2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 15.5 | 10.5 | 19.5 | 28:25 | 34-117 | (3.4) | 19-31 | 62.9% | 214 | (6.9) | 65-332 | (5.1) | (21.4) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 17 | 10.5 | 20.8 | 29:59 | 36-132 | (3.6) | 21-30 | 69.2% | 204 | (6.8) | 66-336 | (5.1) | (19.8) | Offense Road Games | 7.0 | 7.0 | 18.0 | 29:28 | 31-107 | (3.5) | 19-34 | 55.9% | 242 | (7.1) | 65-349 | (5.4) | (49.9) | Defense (All Games) | 30.5 | 17.0 | 21.5 | 31:34 | 41-148 | (3.6) | 22-29 | 75.9% | 313 | (10.8) | 70-461 | (6.6) | (15.1) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 26.2 | 16.2 | 21.8 | 31:01 | 40-140 | (3.5) | 21-30 | 70.8% | 284 | (9.5) | 70-424 | (6) | (16.2) | Defense Road Games | 41.0 | 20.0 | 24.0 | 30:32 | 31-115 | (3.7) | 32-39 | 82.1% | 426 | (10.9) | 70-541 | (7.7) | (13.2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 1-1 | -2.7 | 1-1 | 0-1 | 43.5 | 31.5 | 565.0 | (8.4) | 2.5 | 18.0 | 4.5 | 245.0 | (3.8) | 1.5 | Home Games | 1-0 | 0 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 66.0 | 56.0 | 752.0 | (8.7) | 1.0 | 14.0 | 0.0 | 174.0 | (3.4) | 2.0 | Last 3 Games | 1-1 | -2.7 | 1-1 | 0-1 | 43.5 | 31.5 | 565.0 | (8.4) | 2.5 | 18.0 | 4.5 | 245.0 | (3.8) | 1.5 | Turf Games | 1-1 | -2.7 | 1-1 | 0-1 | 43.5 | 31.5 | 565.0 | (8.4) | 2.5 | 18.0 | 4.5 | 245.0 | (3.8) | 1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 43.5 | 31.5 | 23.0 | 25:08 | 35-278 | (7.8) | 21-32 | 67.2% | 286 | (9) | 67-565 | (8.4) | (13) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 53 | 39.2 | 25.8 | 28:30 | 36-242 | (6.6) | 26-36 | 70.3% | 359 | (9.9) | 73-601 | (8.3) | (11.3) | Offense Home Games | 66.0 | 56.0 | 32.0 | 33:04 | 47-324 | (6.9) | 28-39 | 71.8% | 428 | (11) | 86-752 | (8.7) | (11.4) | Defense (All Games) | 18.0 | 4.5 | 14.0 | 34:51 | 48-162 | (3.3) | 9-16 | 54.5% | 83 | (5) | 65-245 | (3.8) | (13.6) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 22.8 | 5.8 | 13.8 | 32:30 | 42-178 | (4.2) | 10-18 | 52.1% | 91 | (5) | 61-269 | (4.4) | (11.8) | Defense Home Games | 14.0 | 0.0 | 8.0 | 26:56 | 24-60 | (2.5) | 14-27 | 51.9% | 114 | (4.2) | 51-174 | (3.4) | (12.4) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: GEORGIA ST 20.5, MEMPHIS 17.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
8/30/2018 | KENNESAW ST | 24-20 | W | -2.5 | W | | - | 38-128 | 20-28-187 | 1 | 51-181 | 12-19-201 | 2 | 9/8/2018 | @ NC STATE | 7-41 | L | 25 | L | 56 | U | 31-107 | 19-34-242 | 1 | 31-115 | 32-39-426 | 1 | 9/14/2018 | @ MEMPHIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/22/2018 | W MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/29/2018 | LA MONROE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/4/2018 | @ TROY | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/1/2018 | MERCER | 66-14 | W | -31 | W | | - | 47-324 | 28-39-428 | 1 | 24-60 | 14-27-114 | 2 | 9/8/2018 | @ NAVY | 21-22 | L | -6.5 | L | 67 | U | 24-233 | 15-25-145 | 4 | 73-264 | 4-6-52 | 1 | 9/14/2018 | GEORGIA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/22/2018 | S ALABAMA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/28/2018 | @ TULANE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/6/2018 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/13/2018 | UCF | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| GEORGIA ST: A 7-5 record in 2017 marked the best season in the Panthers' short history, and the future is bright for this young program. This year, however, they might take a small step back. Pint-sized wideout Penny Hart is a stud, but QB Conner Manning's exit means there should be some regression in the passing game. That's bad news, given that State loses its top two rushers from an attack that averaged a paltry 3.2 yards per carry. The defense loses some key guys, and the secondary in particular will rely on youngsters. Georgia State's recruiting has picked up in the last couple of years, so there is talent to pull from. | | MEMPHIS: Riley Ferguson and Anthony Miller are no longer around, but it's pretty clear that head coach Mike Norvell's spread offense can adapt to any player who's running the show. The Tigers are going to put up points, especially considering talented running backs Darrell Henderson and Patrick Taylor return to make plays behind what could be the conference's best O-line. On the other side of the ball, Memphis has some talent in its secondary. The Tigers aren't going to shut anybody out, but they can create turnovers and aren't going to completely let their offense down. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 3/29/2024 9:50:49 AM EST. |
|
|