|
|
MICHIGAN ST INDIANA |
|
| 49 | 31 Final 27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
315 | MICHIGAN ST | -9.5 | Over 42 | 316 | INDIANA | +21.5 | Under 54 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 3-2 | -1.6 | 1-4 | 0-4 | 20.0 | 8.6 | 384.8 | (5.1) | 1.4 | 12.8 | 8.2 | 263.4 | (4.3) | 1.8 | Road Games | 1-0 | +1 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 41.0 | 24.0 | 495.0 | (6.3) | 1.0 | 7.0 | 0.0 | 245.0 | (4.1) | 3.0 | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | -3.6 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 14.0 | 3.0 | 322.7 | (4.7) | 0.7 | 14.7 | 9.3 | 288.7 | (4.6) | 1.3 | Turf Games | 1-0 | +1 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 41.0 | 24.0 | 495.0 | (6.3) | 1.0 | 7.0 | 0.0 | 245.0 | (4.1) | 3.0 | Conference Games | 0-1 | -1.6 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 16.0 | 3.0 | 303.0 | (4.7) | 0.0 | 17.0 | 7.0 | 383.0 | (5.7) | 3.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 20.0 | 8.6 | 20.4 | 33:35 | 37-148 | (4) | 22-38 | 56.5% | 237 | (6.2) | 75-385 | (5.1) | (19.2) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 23.4 | 10.2 | 19.9 | 31:52 | 39-189 | (4.9) | 19-32 | 58.9% | 199 | (6.3) | 71-388 | (5.5) | (16.6) | Offense Road Games | 41.0 | 24.0 | 24.0 | 35:11 | 41-173 | (4.2) | 25-37 | 67.6% | 322 | (8.7) | 78-495 | (6.3) | (12.1) | Defense (All Games) | 12.8 | 8.2 | 14.6 | 26:25 | 31-96 | (3.1) | 15-30 | 49.7% | 167 | (5.5) | 61-263 | (4.3) | (20.6) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 24.6 | 14.2 | 19.3 | 29:03 | 36-162 | (4.5) | 17-30 | 57.3% | 206 | (7) | 66-368 | (5.6) | (15) | Defense Road Games | 7.0 | 0.0 | 14.0 | 24:49 | 22-72 | (3.3) | 17-38 | 44.7% | 173 | (4.6) | 60-245 | (4.1) | (35) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 2-2 | -0.4 | 1-3 | 3-0 | 34.2 | 20.0 | 510.0 | (6.3) | 0.5 | 27.0 | 15.0 | 448.7 | (5.7) | 1.2 | Home Games | 1-1 | -0.4 | 0-2 | 1-0 | 31.5 | 21.0 | 504.5 | (5.9) | 0.0 | 29.0 | 17.0 | 413.5 | (5.4) | 1.0 | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | -1.4 | 1-2 | 3-0 | 37.7 | 21.0 | 529.7 | (6.5) | 0.7 | 30.3 | 16.7 | 469.3 | (5.6) | 1.0 | Turf Games | 2-1 | +0.6 | 1-2 | 2-0 | 36.0 | 26.7 | 538.3 | (6.2) | 0.3 | 21.3 | 13.3 | 363.7 | (4.9) | 0.7 | Conference Games | 0-1 | -1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 29.0 | 0.0 | 425.0 | (6.3) | 1.0 | 44.0 | 20.0 | 704.0 | (7.6) | 3.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 34.2 | 20.0 | 25.7 | 29:21 | 40-196 | (4.9) | 27-42 | 65.9% | 313 | (7.5) | 81-510 | (6.3) | (14.9) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 31.1 | 18.2 | 23.8 | 30:03 | 39-170 | (4.3) | 23-36 | 63.0% | 282 | (7.8) | 76-453 | (6) | (14.6) | Offense Home Games | 31.5 | 21.0 | 27.0 | 29:51 | 39-153 | (3.9) | 31-45 | 69.2% | 351 | (7.7) | 85-504 | (5.9) | (16) | Defense (All Games) | 27.0 | 15.0 | 25.2 | 30:39 | 42-213 | (5) | 23-36 | 62.3% | 235 | (6.4) | 79-449 | (5.7) | (16.6) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 25.1 | 12.1 | 23 | 30:57 | 40-191 | (4.7) | 21-34 | 61.3% | 220 | (6.4) | 75-411 | (5.5) | (16.4) | Defense Home Games | 29.0 | 17.0 | 25.5 | 30:08 | 38-191 | (5) | 23-38 | 61.0% | 222 | (5.8) | 76-413 | (5.4) | (14.3) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: MICHIGAN ST 37.4, INDIANA 17.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
8/31/2012 | BOISE ST | 17-13 | W | -8 | L | 47 | U | 52-213 | 22-38-248 | 4 | 24-37 | 15-32-169 | 2 | 9/8/2012 | @ C MICHIGAN | 41-7 | W | -17.5 | W | 48 | P | 41-173 | 25-37-322 | 1 | 22-72 | 17-38-173 | 3 | 9/15/2012 | NOTRE DAME | 3-20 | L | -4.5 | L | 44 | U | 25-50 | 23-45-187 | 1 | 34-122 | 14-32-178 | 0 | 9/22/2012 | E MICHIGAN | 23-7 | W | -31.5 | L | 47 | U | 44-269 | 16-29-159 | 1 | 29-46 | 13-26-137 | 1 | 9/29/2012 | OHIO ST | 16-17 | L | -3 | L | 41.5 | U | 22-34 | 22-42-269 | 0 | 44-204 | 16-23-179 | 3 | 10/6/2012 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/13/2012 | IOWA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/20/2012 | @ MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/27/2012 | @ WISCONSIN | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/3/2012 | NEBRASKA | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/1/2012 | INDIANA ST | 24-17 | W | -13.5 | L | | - | 47-171 | 26-36-280 | 0 | 32-176 | 20-32-211 | 2 | 9/8/2012 | @ MASSACHUSETTS | 45-6 | W | -14 | W | 48.5 | O | 52-321 | 25-37-285 | 1 | 36-78 | 21-34-186 | 0 | 9/15/2012 | BALL ST | 39-41 | L | -2.5 | L | 64 | O | 32-135 | 37-55-423 | 0 | 44-206 | 27-45-234 | 0 | 9/29/2012 | @ NORTHWESTERN | 29-44 | L | 11.5 | L | 60.5 | O | 28-159 | 22-39-266 | 1 | 58-394 | 23-35-310 | 3 | 10/6/2012 | MICHIGAN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/13/2012 | OHIO ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/20/2012 | @ NAVY | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/27/2012 | @ ILLINOIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/3/2012 | IOWA | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| MICHIGAN ST: After a season that almost ended in a trip to the Rose Bowl, the Spartans are looking to take the next step. Offensively, they are losing almost all of their skill players, but QB Andrew Maxwell (18-for-26, 171 yds, 1 TD, 0 INT) and RB Le'Veon Bell (948 rush yds, 13 TD) seem as though they are ready to make an impact. MSU will have one of the best offensive lines in college football in 2012 as they return four of last year's starters. Defensively, they lost Jerel Worthy, but it doesn't seem as though they'll miss him with William Gholston (five sacks) and Marcus Rush (4 sacks) around. The Spartans should have a dominant pass rush as they have the size and depth to cause nightmares for opposing offenses. | | INDIANA: The good news for the Hoosiers is that they can't get any worse than they were last year. Indiana won only one game in 2011 (38-21 over FCS school South Carolina State), and returns all four starters from its defensive line as well as three defensive backs. Head coach Kevin Wilson has a decent group of running backs to work with, led by junior Stephen Houston (802 rush yds, 8 TD), but they are inexperienced at the quarterback position. The Hoosiers will need either Tre Roberson (3 TD, 6 INT) or Edward Wright-Baker (4 TD, 4 INT) to develop in order to have their answer under center. |
|
|
Game Notes: |
|
Last Updated: 3/29/2024 6:34:34 AM EST. |
|
|