|
|
NEBRASKA ILLINOIS |
|
| 46.5 | 28 Final 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
107 | NEBRASKA | -7 | -5.5 | 108 | ILLINOIS | 49.5 | 47.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 2-2 | -3.2 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 30.5 | 13.7 | 378.5 | (5.1) | 2.2 | 29.0 | 23.0 | 367.5 | (5.4) | 1.7 | Road Games | 0-1 | -1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 35.0 | 14.0 | 361.0 | (5.2) | 4.0 | 42.0 | 42.0 | 566.0 | (7.4) | 2.0 | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | -4.2 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 26.3 | 9.3 | 350.3 | (4.7) | 3.0 | 26.7 | 22.0 | 324.3 | (5.3) | 1.7 | Turf Games | 2-2 | -3.2 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 30.5 | 13.7 | 378.5 | (5.1) | 2.2 | 29.0 | 23.0 | 367.5 | (5.4) | 1.7 | Conference Games | 1-0 | +1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 27.0 | 14.0 | 306.0 | (4.2) | 2.0 | 17.0 | 10.0 | 194.0 | (3.7) | 2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 30.5 | 13.7 | 20.7 | 33:24 | 37-154 | (4.1) | 19-36 | 52.1% | 224 | (6.2) | 74-378 | (5.1) | (12.4) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 22.9 | 12.3 | 19 | 32:57 | 40-133 | (3.3) | 18-34 | 52.4% | 215 | (6.3) | 75-348 | (4.7) | (15.2) | Offense Road Games | 35.0 | 14.0 | 19.0 | 29:22 | 29-109 | (3.8) | 19-41 | 46.3% | 252 | (6.1) | 70-361 | (5.2) | (10.3) | Defense (All Games) | 29.0 | 23.0 | 19.7 | 26:36 | 30-109 | (3.6) | 25-38 | 66.0% | 258 | (6.8) | 68-367 | (5.4) | (12.7) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 34.8 | 21.7 | 22.6 | 28:03 | 38-172 | (4.5) | 22-36 | 62.3% | 257 | (7.2) | 74-429 | (5.8) | (12.3) | Defense Road Games | 42.0 | 42.0 | 22.0 | 30:38 | 44-201 | (4.6) | 25-33 | 75.8% | 365 | (11.1) | 77-566 | (7.4) | (13.5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 2-1 | +1.9 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 22.3 | 12.7 | 290.0 | (4.9) | 1.7 | 25.0 | 10.0 | 433.0 | (5.4) | 1.7 | Home Games | 2-0 | +2.9 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 22.0 | 14.5 | 258.0 | (4.2) | 1.0 | 14.0 | 3.5 | 309.5 | (4.3) | 2.0 | Last 3 Games | 2-1 | +1.9 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 22.3 | 12.7 | 290.0 | (4.9) | 1.7 | 25.0 | 10.0 | 433.0 | (5.4) | 1.7 | Turf Games | 2-0 | +2.9 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 22.0 | 14.5 | 258.0 | (4.2) | 1.0 | 14.0 | 3.5 | 309.5 | (4.3) | 2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 22.3 | 12.7 | 16.0 | 27:41 | 32-110 | (3.5) | 15-28 | 52.4% | 180 | (6.4) | 60-290 | (4.9) | (13) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 20.9 | 11 | 17.7 | 28:03 | 33-107 | (3.2) | 19-35 | 53.5% | 222 | (6.4) | 68-329 | (4.8) | (15.7) | Offense Home Games | 22.0 | 14.5 | 16.5 | 30:40 | 40-132 | (3.3) | 12-22 | 54.5% | 126 | (5.7) | 62-258 | (4.2) | (11.7) | Defense (All Games) | 25.0 | 10.0 | 24.3 | 32:19 | 44-184 | (4.2) | 22-36 | 60.6% | 249 | (6.8) | 81-433 | (5.4) | (17.3) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 31.4 | 15.2 | 22.6 | 32:35 | 45-178 | (4) | 20-33 | 60.9% | 233 | (7) | 78-410 | (5.3) | (13.1) | Defense Home Games | 14.0 | 3.5 | 17.5 | 29:19 | 33-88 | (2.6) | 24-38 | 63.6% | 221 | (5.7) | 72-309 | (4.3) | (22.1) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: NEBRASKA 33.2, ILLINOIS 35.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
9/2/2017 | ARKANSAS ST | 43-36 | W | -14.5 | L | 51.5 | O | 38-225 | 19-32-238 | 0 | 21-82 | 46-68-415 | 2 | 9/9/2017 | @ OREGON | 35-42 | L | 14 | W | 69.5 | O | 29-109 | 19-41-252 | 4 | 44-201 | 25-33-365 | 2 | 9/16/2017 | N ILLINOIS | 17-21 | L | -10.5 | L | 56 | U | 36-85 | 25-47-299 | 3 | 31-85 | 15-23-128 | 1 | 9/23/2017 | RUTGERS | 27-17 | W | -11 | L | 48 | U | 47-197 | 13-26-109 | 2 | 24-68 | 15-29-126 | 2 | 9/29/2017 | @ ILLINOIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/7/2017 | WISCONSIN | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/14/2017 | OHIO ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/28/2017 | @ PURDUE | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/2/2017 | BALL ST | 24-21 | W | -4.5 | L | 55.5 | U | 30-71 | 10-19-145 | 1 | 51-171 | 21-34-204 | 2 | 9/9/2017 | W KENTUCKY | 20-7 | W | 6 | W | 51.5 | U | 50-193 | 14-25-107 | 1 | 16-6 | 28-43-238 | 2 | 9/15/2017 | @ S FLORIDA | 23-47 | L | 16.5 | L | 54.5 | O | 15-67 | 20-40-287 | 3 | 66-376 | 17-32-304 | 1 | 9/29/2017 | NEBRASKA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/7/2017 | @ IOWA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/14/2017 | RUTGERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/21/2017 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/28/2017 | WISCONSIN | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| NEBRASKA: The Cornhuskers no longer have the mobility of Tommy Armstrong under center, but transfer Tanner Lee is a good pocket passer. The defense should be a strength, so NU's success relies on the ability to score points. | | ILLINOIS: Illinois has an explosive rushing attack, but that's pretty much it for Lovie Smith's team. The Fighting Illini have inconsistent play under center and a leaky defense that gives up far too many big plays. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 3/18/2024 11:40:22 PM EST. |
|
|