|
|
NEW MEXICO ST IDAHO |
|
| 55 | 18 Final 26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
367 | NEW MEXICO ST | +290 | 368 | IDAHO | -370 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 1-4 | -3.2 | 2-3 | 2-2 | 25.8 | 12.6 | 352.0 | (5.4) | 1.6 | 34.6 | 18.4 | 452.0 | (6.4) | 1.0 | Road Games | 0-2 | -1 | 1-1 | 2-0 | 26.0 | 10.5 | 304.0 | (4.4) | 1.0 | 46.0 | 24.0 | 535.5 | (7) | 0.5 | Last 3 Games | 0-3 | -4.2 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 18.7 | 7.0 | 362.0 | (5.2) | 2.3 | 34.3 | 20.3 | 426.3 | (6.1) | 0.3 | Conference Games | 0-1 | -1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 14.0 | 7.0 | 350.0 | (4.8) | 4.0 | 35.0 | 21.0 | 398.0 | (6.2) | 0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 25.8 | 12.6 | 19.6 | 27:60 | 32-87 | (2.8) | 18-34 | 52.9% | 265 | (7.8) | 66-352 | (5.4) | (13.6) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 27.3 | 15.4 | 20.2 | 29:34 | 33-134 | (4) | 20-33 | 59.3% | 256 | (7.7) | 67-389 | (5.8) | (14.3) | Offense Road Games | 26.0 | 10.5 | 22.0 | 28:49 | 32-91 | (2.8) | 16-37 | 44.6% | 212 | (5.7) | 69-304 | (4.4) | (11.7) | Defense (All Games) | 34.6 | 18.4 | 23.4 | 31:60 | 41-198 | (4.8) | 19-30 | 62.7% | 254 | (8.5) | 71-452 | (6.4) | (13.1) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 29.3 | 17.4 | 21 | 31:22 | 41-184 | (4.5) | 17-28 | 61.1% | 208 | (7.4) | 69-391 | (5.7) | (13.3) | Defense Road Games | 46.0 | 24.0 | 27.5 | 31:11 | 44-235 | (5.3) | 20-32 | 63.1% | 300 | (9.2) | 76-535 | (7) | (11.6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 0-5 | -4.4 | 1-4 | 3-1 | 13.4 | 8.6 | 301.2 | (4.5) | 3.2 | 42.0 | 20.8 | 455.4 | (6.7) | 1.2 | Home Games | 0-2 | -3.4 | 0-2 | 1-0 | 20.0 | 11.5 | 373.0 | (5.1) | 2.5 | 30.0 | 12.0 | 428.5 | (6.2) | 0.5 | Last 3 Games | 0-3 | -1.4 | 0-3 | 3-0 | 17.0 | 11.3 | 303.7 | (4.3) | 4.0 | 56.3 | 29.0 | 497.3 | (7.2) | 1.0 | Dome Games | 0-2 | -3.4 | 0-2 | 1-0 | 20.0 | 11.5 | 373.0 | (5.1) | 2.5 | 30.0 | 12.0 | 428.5 | (6.2) | 0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 13.4 | 8.6 | 15.2 | 30:41 | 28-80 | (2.8) | 24-38 | 64.2% | 221 | (5.8) | 66-301 | (4.5) | (22.5) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 19.2 | 13.3 | 17 | 32:42 | 36-132 | (3.7) | 19-32 | 60.3% | 190 | (6) | 67-322 | (4.8) | (16.8) | Offense Home Games | 20.0 | 11.5 | 18.0 | 29:54 | 33-138 | (4.1) | 25-40 | 62.5% | 235 | (5.9) | 73-373 | (5.1) | (18.6) | Defense (All Games) | 42.0 | 20.8 | 20.6 | 32:19 | 38-172 | (4.5) | 19-31 | 61.4% | 284 | (9.3) | 68-455 | (6.7) | (10.8) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 29.9 | 15.9 | 20.4 | 29:03 | 36-155 | (4.3) | 20-35 | 57.1% | 268 | (7.7) | 70-423 | (6) | (14.2) | Defense Home Games | 30.0 | 12.0 | 19.5 | 37:35 | 35-116 | (3.3) | 18-34 | 52.2% | 312 | (9.1) | 69-428 | (6.2) | (14.3) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: NEW MEXICO ST 18.6, IDAHO 30.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
8/30/2012 | SACRAMENTO ST | 49-19 | W | -7.5 | W | | - | 40-101 | 14-22-367 | 0 | 31-89 | 23-35-308 | 3 | 9/8/2012 | @ OHIO U | 24-51 | L | 21 | L | 58.5 | O | 30-71 | 13-27-135 | 1 | 51-293 | 18-29-291 | 1 | 9/15/2012 | @ UTEP | 28-41 | L | 14 | W | 58.5 | O | 35-112 | 20-47-290 | 1 | 37-177 | 23-36-310 | 0 | 9/22/2012 | NEW MEXICO | 14-27 | L | -5 | L | 56 | U | 20-78 | 22-34-256 | 2 | 54-302 | 11-18-92 | 1 | 9/29/2012 | UTSA | 14-35 | L | 1 | L | 56.5 | U | 33-74 | 21-40-276 | 4 | 32-129 | 19-32-269 | 0 | 10/6/2012 | @ IDAHO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/20/2012 | @ UTAH ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/27/2012 | LOUISIANA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/3/2012 | @ AUBURN | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/30/2012 | E WASHINGTON | 3-20 | L | -4.5 | L | | - | 28-73 | 16-32-164 | 2 | 40-152 | 13-33-260 | 1 | 9/8/2012 | @ BOWLING GREEN | 13-21 | L | 17 | W | 49.5 | U | 20-6 | 30-38-352 | 2 | 27-90 | 24-35-283 | 2 | 9/15/2012 | @ LSU | 14-63 | L | 42 | L | 52 | O | 26-39 | 23-36-174 | 4 | 39-250 | 17-23-222 | 1 | 9/22/2012 | WYOMING | 37-40 | L | -2.5 | L | 52 | O | 39-203 | 34-48-306 | 3 | 30-80 | 23-36-365 | 0 | 9/29/2012 | @ N CAROLINA | 0-66 | L | 27 | L | 60 | O | 28-80 | 19-36-109 | 5 | 53-287 | 17-26-288 | 2 | 10/6/2012 | NEW MEXICO ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/13/2012 | @ TEXAS ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/20/2012 | @ LOUISIANA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/3/2012 | SAN JOSE ST | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| NEW MEXICO ST: New Mexico State had tons of injuries in its 4-9 season, but it will get back QB Andrew Manley, the guy they originally pinned as their starter last year. Manley threw for six touchdowns and three interceptions in three games last year before a season-ending ACL injury. RB Kenny Turner is gone after rushing for 1,074 yards and Manley also loses his best wide receivers. But New Mexico State has some solid skill position recruits coming in and could still push for a winning season. The Aggies are going to struggle defensively early on as they are losing eight starters and don't have much depth. Last season, NMSU ranked 112th in the nation in both scoring defense (36.8 PPG) and total defense (462 YPG), but new defensive coordinator David Elson was brought in to improve those numbers. | | IDAHO: Idaho had a defense that was lit up at the end of the season, allowing 147 points (49.0 PPG) in the final three games. The Vandals are losing two of their top playmakers from that defense, but they'll be getting back LB Robert Siavii, a top playmaker in 2010 (13.5 TFL, 4 FF) who missed all of last season with a knee injury. The defense should be up to the task, but it won't matter if the offense doesn't improve. This will be difficult for head coach Robb Akey, as none of his quarterbacks stood out this spring. Junior Taylor Davis has the most experience (28-of-62, 234 yds, 1 TD, 4 INT) and will likely win the job. The offensive line was a strength last year and should be again. The running game, which will feature former Arizona State RB Ryan Bass (175 rush yds, 2 TD), must improve, otherwise the Vandals will be stuck in a lot of third-and-long situations that they can't afford to be in. |
|
|
Game Notes: |
|
Last Updated: 3/28/2024 4:54:55 PM EST. |
|
|