|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
303 | SMU | 73 | 72 | 304 | HOUSTON | -22 | -26 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 1-4 | -5.5 | 3-2 | 4-1 | 31.4 | 16.4 | 428.8 | (5.7) | 1.4 | 44.4 | 20.0 | 593.4 | (8) | 2.2 | Road Games | 0-1 | 0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 37.0 | 17.0 | 508.0 | (6.4) | 0.0 | 56.0 | 28.0 | 720.0 | (10.1) | 1.0 | Last 3 Games | 0-3 | -6.5 | 1-2 | 3-0 | 35.0 | 18.0 | 443.7 | (6) | 0.7 | 51.0 | 22.0 | 668.0 | (8.5) | 2.0 | Turf Games | 1-3 | -5.5 | 2-2 | 3-1 | 30.0 | 16.2 | 409.0 | (5.5) | 1.7 | 41.5 | 18.0 | 561.7 | (7.5) | 2.5 | Conference Games | 0-1 | -1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 23.0 | 23.0 | 329.0 | (4.8) | 0.0 | 49.0 | 21.0 | 555.0 | (6.9) | 2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 31.4 | 16.4 | 23.4 | 32:39 | 46-185 | (4) | 18-29 | 59.9% | 244 | (8.3) | 75-429 | (5.7) | (13.7) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 33.9 | 15.8 | 22.9 | 32:00 | 44-195 | (4.5) | 19-31 | 60.7% | 245 | (7.8) | 75-440 | (5.9) | (13) | Offense Road Games | 37.0 | 17.0 | 23.0 | 32:57 | 48-178 | (3.7) | 17-31 | 54.8% | 330 | (10.6) | 79-508 | (6.4) | (13.7) | Defense (All Games) | 44.4 | 20.0 | 26.4 | 26:52 | 43-285 | (6.6) | 19-31 | 60.0% | 309 | (10) | 74-593 | (8) | (13.4) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 42.1 | 21.4 | 28.1 | 28:53 | 44-273 | (6.3) | 22-35 | 61.5% | 306 | (8.6) | 79-580 | (7.3) | (13.8) | Defense Road Games | 56.0 | 28.0 | 28.0 | 27:03 | 41-266 | (6.5) | 21-30 | 70.0% | 454 | (15.1) | 71-720 | (10.1) | (12.9) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 4-0 | +5.8 | 3-1 | 2-2 | 45.7 | 24.2 | 604.0 | (7) | 0.7 | 23.2 | 10.2 | 398.2 | (5.3) | 2.7 | Home Games | 2-0 | +1 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 55.5 | 33.0 | 658.0 | (8.2) | 0.5 | 19.0 | 8.5 | 371.0 | (5.3) | 2.5 | Last 3 Games | 3-0 | +5.8 | 3-0 | 1-2 | 43.7 | 24.3 | 596.3 | (6.8) | 0.7 | 23.0 | 10.3 | 417.3 | (5.2) | 3.3 | Turf Games | 4-0 | +5.8 | 3-1 | 2-2 | 45.7 | 24.2 | 604.0 | (7) | 0.7 | 23.2 | 10.2 | 398.2 | (5.3) | 2.7 | Conference Games | 1-0 | +1 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 38.0 | 21.0 | 638.0 | (6.8) | 1.0 | 24.0 | 10.0 | 456.0 | (5.2) | 2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 45.7 | 24.2 | 27.2 | 31:59 | 53-307 | (5.8) | 22-34 | 66.7% | 297 | (8.8) | 86-604 | (7) | (13.2) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 40.1 | 19.7 | 25 | 31:04 | 45-240 | (5.3) | 22-33 | 67.8% | 292 | (8.9) | 78-532 | (6.8) | (13.3) | Offense Home Games | 55.5 | 33.0 | 28.0 | 30:41 | 49-319 | (6.5) | 22-31 | 72.6% | 339 | (10.9) | 80-658 | (8.2) | (11.9) | Defense (All Games) | 23.2 | 10.2 | 19.7 | 28:01 | 33-82 | (2.4) | 25-41 | 60.2% | 316 | (7.6) | 75-398 | (5.3) | (17.1) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 31.1 | 16.6 | 21.4 | 29:58 | 39-149 | (3.8) | 21-35 | 60.9% | 297 | (8.5) | 74-446 | (6) | (14.3) | Defense Home Games | 19.0 | 8.5 | 15.5 | 29:18 | 32-64 | (2) | 23-38 | 61.8% | 307 | (8.1) | 70-371 | (5.3) | (19.5) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: SMU 33.8, HOUSTON 22 |
|
|
|
|
|
9/4/2015 | BAYLOR | 21-56 | L | 37 | W | 69.5 | O | 54-203 | 16-24-166 | 2 | 37-300 | 17-32-423 | 1 | 9/12/2015 | NORTH TEXAS | 31-13 | W | -6 | W | 59.5 | U | 53-273 | 17-24-171 | 3 | 33-112 | 16-34-128 | 4 | 9/19/2015 | @ TCU | 37-56 | L | 36.5 | W | 68.5 | O | 48-178 | 17-31-330 | 0 | 41-266 | 21-30-454 | 1 | 9/26/2015 | JAMES MADISON | 45-48 | L | -13 | L | 76.5 | O | 44-232 | 18-30-262 | 2 | 52-440 | 20-33-289 | 3 | 10/3/2015 | E CAROLINA | 23-49 | L | 5.5 | L | 64.5 | O | 30-40 | 20-38-289 | 0 | 54-306 | 19-26-249 | 2 | 10/8/2015 | @ HOUSTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/24/2015 | @ S FLORIDA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/31/2015 | TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/6/2015 | TEMPLE | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/5/2015 | TENNESSEE TECH | 52-24 | W | -37 | L | 54.5 | O | 44-272 | 27-38-355 | 1 | 33-29 | 16-26-312 | 1 | 9/12/2015 | @ LOUISVILLE | 34-31 | W | 13 | W | 56.5 | O | 57-226 | 23-35-236 | 1 | 26-70 | 27-45-325 | 4 | 9/26/2015 | TEXAS ST | 59-14 | W | -17.5 | W | 73.5 | U | 54-366 | 18-24-323 | 0 | 32-99 | 31-50-302 | 4 | 10/3/2015 | @ TULSA | 38-24 | W | -9 | W | 79.5 | U | 56-365 | 22-38-273 | 1 | 43-130 | 26-45-326 | 2 | 10/8/2015 | SMU | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/16/2015 | @ TULANE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/24/2015 | @ UCF | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/31/2015 | VANDERBILT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/7/2015 | CINCINNATI | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| SMU: SMU appears to have made a strong hire with Chad Morris, but it will take him a few years to make this a winning program again. Not only was the team 1-11 last season, but the losses were by a staggering average margin of 33.6 PPG! There is a favorable uneven split of seven home games and five road games for the Mustangs, but there are plenty of guaranteed losses on the 2015 slate. The most notable of these are versus Baylor, at TCU, at Memphis and at Houston. The best SMU can really expect is four wins. | | HOUSTON: There is certainly enough talent to reach a bowl game for the ninth time in 11 seasons. The schedule is also favorable, as three of the four AAC road games are at Tulsa, Tulane and Connecticut, who were a combined 5-19 in conference play last season. Houston does have to take on all three teams with 7-1 records in the American, but faces both Cincinnati and Memphis at home in November. |
|
|
Game Notes: |
|
Last Updated: 3/19/2024 5:15:22 AM EST. |
|
|