| | CFB : Teaser Line Matchup |
| |
VIRGINIA TECH GEORGIA TECH |
|
| 43 | 17 Final 10 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
103 | VIRGINIA TECH | +13 | Over 36.5 | 104 | GEORGIA TECH | -1 | Under 48.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 3-1 | +2 | 0-2 | 1-3 | 24.7 | 13.0 | 341.7 | (4.7) | 1.7 | 17.2 | 14.0 | 233.2 | (3.6) | 2.5 | Road Games | 1-1 | +1 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 12.5 | 8.5 | 261.5 | (3.8) | 1.0 | 22.5 | 17.5 | 205.0 | (3.5) | 2.0 | Last 3 Games | 3-0 | +2 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 29.7 | 14.0 | 385.0 | (5) | 2.0 | 11.3 | 9.3 | 242.3 | (3.7) | 3.0 | Grass Games | 3-0 | +2 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 29.7 | 14.0 | 385.0 | (5) | 2.0 | 11.3 | 9.3 | 242.3 | (3.7) | 3.0 |
|
| |
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 24.7 | 13.0 | 18.0 | 32:13 | 38-161 | (4.2) | 17-34 | 49.3% | 181 | (5.2) | 73-342 | (4.7) | (13.8) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 26.4 | 13.8 | 19.4 | 31:15 | 36-140 | (3.9) | 21-35 | 59.7% | 230 | (6.6) | 71-369 | (5.2) | (14) | Offense Road Games | 12.5 | 8.5 | 12.5 | 32:59 | 33-103 | (3.1) | 15-34 | 43.5% | 158 | (4.6) | 68-261 | (3.8) | (20.9) | Defense (All Games) | 17.2 | 14.0 | 14.0 | 27:47 | 37-96 | (2.6) | 13-27 | 47.3% | 137 | (5) | 64-233 | (3.6) | (13.5) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 30.6 | 17.4 | 19.6 | 29:45 | 35-126 | (3.6) | 20-32 | 62.2% | 238 | (7.4) | 67-364 | (5.4) | (11.9) | Defense Road Games | 22.5 | 17.5 | 13.0 | 27:01 | 30-71 | (2.3) | 14-27 | 52.7% | 134 | (4.9) | 58-205 | (3.5) | (9.1) |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 3-0 | +2 | 3-0 | 1-2 | 45.3 | 26.7 | 484.7 | (6.6) | 0.7 | 11.3 | 9.0 | 275.3 | (4.5) | 1.7 | Home Games | 2-0 | +1 | 2-0 | 1-1 | 49.0 | 28.0 | 492.5 | (6.8) | 0.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 286.0 | (4.7) | 2.5 | Last 3 Games | 3-0 | +2 | 3-0 | 1-2 | 45.3 | 26.7 | 484.7 | (6.6) | 0.7 | 11.3 | 9.0 | 275.3 | (4.5) | 1.7 | Grass Games | 3-0 | +2 | 3-0 | 1-2 | 45.3 | 26.7 | 484.7 | (6.6) | 0.7 | 11.3 | 9.0 | 275.3 | (4.5) | 1.7 | Conference Games | 2-0 | +2 | 2-0 | 0-2 | 33.0 | 19.0 | 448.5 | (5.6) | 1.0 | 17.0 | 13.5 | 286.5 | (5) | 0.5 |
|
| |
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 45.3 | 26.7 | 26.0 | 35:32 | 60-345 | (5.7) | 7-13 | 56.4% | 139 | (10.7) | 73-485 | (6.6) | (10.7) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 40.8 | 23.4 | 21.8 | 31:14 | 47-259 | (5.5) | 12-21 | 58.3% | 188 | (9.1) | 68-447 | (6.6) | (10.9) | Offense Home Games | 49.0 | 28.0 | 25.0 | 34:01 | 60-346 | (5.7) | 7-11 | 60.9% | 146 | (12.7) | 72-492 | (6.8) | (10.1) | Defense (All Games) | 11.3 | 9.0 | 15.3 | 24:28 | 31-107 | (3.5) | 16-31 | 53.3% | 168 | (5.5) | 61-275 | (4.5) | (24.3) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 19.6 | 11.4 | 19.6 | 29:46 | 36-131 | (3.6) | 21-34 | 60.9% | 223 | (6.5) | 70-354 | (5) | (18.1) | Defense Home Games | 10.0 | 10.0 | 16.5 | 25:58 | 29-95 | (3.3) | 17-32 | 53.1% | 191 | (6) | 61-286 | (4.7) | (28.6) |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: VIRGINIA TECH 32.8, GEORGIA TECH 23 |
| | |
|
|
8/31/2013 | *ALABAMA | 10-35 | L | 21 | L | 45.5 | U | 33-153 | 5-26-59 | 1 | 38-96 | 10-24-110 | 1 | 9/7/2013 | W CAROLINA | 45-3 | W | -42 | T | | - | 34-237 | 20-35-225 | 3 | 40-111 | 4-14-51 | 3 | 9/14/2013 | @ E CAROLINA | 15-10 | W | -8.5 | L | 45.5 | U | 34-53 | 25-43-258 | 1 | 23-46 | 19-31-158 | 3 | 9/21/2013 | MARSHALL | 29-21 | W | -8 | T | 48 | O | 53-201 | 18-34-181 | 2 | 46-133 | 19-41-228 | 3 | 9/26/2013 | @ GEORGIA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/5/2013 | N CAROLINA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/12/2013 | PITTSBURGH | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/26/2013 | DUKE | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
8/31/2013 | ELON | 70-0 | W | -44 | W | 58.5 | O | 50-368 | 7-11-189 | 0 | 34-89 | 20-35-164 | 4 | 9/14/2013 | @ DUKE | 38-14 | W | -8.5 | W | 55 | U | 60-344 | 8-16-125 | 1 | 34-132 | 15-28-122 | 0 | 9/21/2013 | N CAROLINA | 28-20 | W | -6.5 | W | 59.5 | U | 71-324 | 7-12-104 | 1 | 24-101 | 14-29-218 | 1 | 9/26/2013 | VIRGINIA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/5/2013 | @ MIAMI | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/12/2013 | @ BYU | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/19/2013 | SYRACUSE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/26/2013 | @ VIRGINIA | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | VIRGINIA TECH: The Hokies are coming off their worst campaign in two decades (7-6). The offense ranked 83rd in the nation in both yards (377 YPG) and points (25.1 PPG), and is hoping new OC Scot Loeffler can work miracles with erratic QB Logan Thomas (51% completions, 2,976 pass yds, 18 TD, 16 INT). Both starting OTs and top three receivers are gone, but the Hokies do get back senior WR D.J. Coles (480 rec. yds in 2011) who missed last year with a knee injury. Top RB J.C. Coleman (492 rush yds, 4.5 YPC) returns, but he gained 50 rushing yards just once in 2012. The excellent defense (333 YPG, 18th in FBS; 99 TFL, T-9th in FBS) is loaded again. DE James Gayle (5 sacks) and LB Jack Tyler (119 tackles) headline a fierce front seven. The secondary may struggle until CB Antone Exum (5 INT) returns from a torn ACL suffered in January. | | GEORGIA TECH: The 7-7 Yellow Jackets lost top QB Tevin Washington and top RB Orwin Smith, but the multi-faceted offense (triple-option, spread-option and Pistol formation) should thrive with supremely athletic QB Vad Lee (544 rush yds, 9 TD; 596 pass yds, 4 TD). The nation's 4th-best rushing offense (311 YPG) will thrive behind an O-Line that returns everyone. That's great news for RBs David Sims (612 rush yds, 4 TD) and Robert Godhigh (429 rush yds, 4 TD), but the top returning WR, Darren Waller, had just eight catches in 2012. DE Jeremiah Attaochu (10 sacks) made a seamless transition from linebacker to one of the nation's premier pass rushers. He will anchor new defensive coordinator Ted Roof's 4-3 scheme, along with LB Jabari Hunt-Days (84 tackles) and rising CBs Jemea Thomas (86 tackles, 4 INT) and Louis Young. |
| | Game Notes: |
| Last Updated: 5/4/2024 11:15:21 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|