|
|
TULSA E CAROLINA |
|
| 76.5 | 17 Final 30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
181 | TULSA | 73 | 76.5 | 182 | E CAROLINA | -10 | -14 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 3-2 | +3.1 | 2-2 | 2-3 | 36.6 | 19.0 | 568.0 | (6.2) | 1.4 | 35.8 | 18.0 | 553.6 | (6.6) | 1.6 | Road Games | 1-1 | +2.1 | 2-0 | 1-1 | 39.0 | 22.0 | 601.5 | (6.7) | 0.5 | 36.5 | 22.5 | 581.5 | (7.6) | 2.0 | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | 0 | 1-1 | 1-2 | 32.0 | 18.0 | 540.7 | (5.7) | 0.7 | 38.0 | 19.7 | 605.0 | (7.1) | 2.0 | Grass Games | 0-1 | 0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 38.0 | 24.0 | 603.0 | (6.6) | 0.0 | 52.0 | 31.0 | 773.0 | (9.1) | 2.0 | Conference Games | 0-1 | -1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 24.0 | 10.0 | 456.0 | (5.2) | 2.0 | 38.0 | 21.0 | 638.0 | (6.8) | 1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 36.6 | 19.0 | 29.4 | 28:40 | 51-200 | (3.9) | 25-41 | 60.7% | 368 | (8.9) | 92-568 | (6.2) | (15.5) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 27.4 | 14.2 | 21.2 | 30:01 | 44-181 | (4.1) | 17-31 | 56.2% | 216 | (7) | 75-398 | (5.3) | (14.5) | Offense Road Games | 39.0 | 22.0 | 31.0 | 29:16 | 49-227 | (4.6) | 25-40 | 61.7% | 374 | (9.2) | 90-601 | (6.7) | (15.4) | Defense (All Games) | 35.8 | 18.0 | 27.2 | 31:20 | 48-270 | (5.6) | 23-36 | 62.8% | 284 | (7.9) | 84-554 | (6.6) | (15.5) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 32.4 | 16.9 | 21.6 | 30:35 | 42-190 | (4.5) | 19-32 | 60.9% | 239 | (7.5) | 74-429 | (5.8) | (13.2) | Defense Road Games | 36.5 | 22.5 | 28.5 | 30:43 | 47-255 | (5.4) | 21-29 | 72.9% | 326 | (11.1) | 76-581 | (7.6) | (15.9) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 3-3 | +2 | 4-2 | 5-1 | 32.5 | 16.3 | 443.5 | (6.1) | 2.0 | 32.0 | 18.8 | 420.2 | (5.6) | 1.2 | Home Games | 2-0 | +3 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 31.5 | 17.5 | 425.0 | (6.3) | 1.0 | 24.0 | 12.0 | 427.5 | (5.6) | 1.5 | Last 3 Games | 2-1 | +3 | 3-0 | 3-0 | 40.7 | 21.0 | 494.3 | (6.8) | 2.3 | 32.0 | 21.7 | 425.3 | (5.6) | 1.0 | Grass Games | 2-2 | +2 | 3-1 | 3-1 | 31.2 | 15.7 | 425.2 | (5.9) | 2.0 | 31.0 | 15.5 | 434.0 | (5.8) | 1.7 | Conference Games | 1-1 | 0 | 1-1 | 2-0 | 35.0 | 17.5 | 480.0 | (6.4) | 2.0 | 34.0 | 25.5 | 392.5 | (5.2) | 0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 32.5 | 16.3 | 23.3 | 27:40 | 34-150 | (4.4) | 27-39 | 71.1% | 294 | (7.6) | 73-443 | (6.1) | (13.6) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 26 | 13.2 | 20.6 | 28:53 | 38-180 | (4.8) | 19-31 | 61.8% | 220 | (7.1) | 69-400 | (5.8) | (15.4) | Offense Home Games | 31.5 | 17.5 | 21.0 | 26:37 | 38-196 | (5.1) | 21-28 | 75.4% | 229 | (8) | 67-425 | (6.3) | (13.5) | Defense (All Games) | 32.0 | 18.8 | 23.2 | 32:20 | 45-188 | (4.1) | 17-29 | 57.4% | 232 | (7.9) | 75-420 | (5.6) | (13.1) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 29.8 | 16.2 | 21.7 | 32:03 | 43-190 | (4.4) | 16-28 | 58.5% | 211 | (7.5) | 71-402 | (5.6) | (13.5) | Defense Home Games | 24.0 | 12.0 | 23.5 | 33:23 | 43-168 | (3.9) | 18-34 | 54.4% | 259 | (7.6) | 77-427 | (5.6) | (17.8) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: TULSA 30.2, E CAROLINA 31.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
9/5/2015 | FLA ATLANTIC | 47-44 | W | -4.5 | L | 68 | O | 51-194 | 21-35-424 | 4 | 61-300 | 23-35-263 | 0 | 9/12/2015 | @ NEW MEXICO | 40-21 | W | 6.5 | W | 71.5 | U | 59-279 | 16-30-321 | 1 | 47-224 | 11-21-166 | 2 | 9/19/2015 | @ OKLAHOMA | 38-52 | L | 33.5 | W | 71 | O | 40-176 | 34-51-427 | 0 | 47-286 | 32-38-487 | 2 | 10/3/2015 | HOUSTON | 24-38 | L | 9 | L | 79.5 | U | 43-130 | 26-45-326 | 2 | 56-365 | 22-38-273 | 1 | 10/10/2015 | LA MONROE | 34-24 | W | -10 | T | 65.5 | U | 62-222 | 28-45-341 | 0 | 29-173 | 25-48-231 | 3 | 10/17/2015 | @ E CAROLINA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/23/2015 | MEMPHIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/31/2015 | @ SMU | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/7/2015 | UCF | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/14/2015 | @ CINCINNATI | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/5/2015 | TOWSON | 28-20 | W | -28 | L | 58 | U | 34-210 | 29-37-230 | 0 | 44-179 | 17-33-237 | 2 | 9/12/2015 | @ FLORIDA | 24-31 | L | 20.5 | W | 53 | O | 22--13 | 37-58-346 | 3 | 38-168 | 15-25-205 | 2 | 9/19/2015 | @ NAVY | 21-45 | L | 4.5 | L | 58.5 | O | 21-80 | 36-49-325 | 2 | 75-415 | 4-7-41 | 0 | 9/26/2015 | VIRGINIA TECH | 35-28 | W | 10 | W | 50 | O | 43-182 | 14-20-228 | 2 | 42-158 | 20-35-281 | 1 | 10/3/2015 | @ SMU | 49-23 | W | -5.5 | W | 64.5 | O | 54-306 | 19-26-249 | 2 | 30-40 | 20-38-289 | 0 | 10/10/2015 | @ BYU | 38-45 | L | 10 | W | 60 | O | 32-133 | 30-42-385 | 3 | 43-167 | 25-38-341 | 2 | 10/17/2015 | TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/22/2015 | TEMPLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/30/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/7/2015 | S FLORIDA | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| TULSA: Tulsa will be an exciting team to watch with its Baylor offense, but the porous defense will be the reason the team struggles to reach .500. The schedule isn't kind either, as Tulsa must face all five AAC schools that finished 2014 with a winning record in conference play (vs. Memphis, at Cincinnati, vs. UCF, at East Carolina, vs. Houston). But the Golden Hurricane should pad their win total with victories hosting 3-9 Florida Atlantic and 4-8 UL Monroe, as well as a trip to 4-8 New Mexico. It wouldn't be shocking to see Tulsa increase its two-win total threefold. | | E CAROLINA: There could be some growing pains with the new quarterback, so four road tilts in the first six games of 2015 is less than ideal. But that sets up four home games in the second half of the season and a trip to woeful UConn (2-10 last year). The final two games of the season (at UCF and versus Cincinnati) could determine the AAC title, since Memphis, one of three 7-1 AAC teams last year, is not on the Pirates schedule. The non-conference slate contains only one cupcake (Towson) plus games at Florida, at BYU and hosting Virginia Tech, but an ECU bowl berth for the ninth time in 10 years appears to be likely. |
|
|
Game Notes: |
|
Last Updated: 4/19/2024 11:55:07 PM EST. |
|
|