|
|
MISSOURI
CONNECTICUT |
|
|
75
| 52
Final
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|  | |
| 141 | MISSOURI | -11 | -14 | | 142 | CONNECTICUT | 75.5 | 75 |
|
|
|  | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 2-5 | -4.7 | 3-4 | 5-2 | 33.1 | 22.0 | 474.1 | (7.3) | 2.3 | 39.1 | 25.1 | 467.1 | (6.2) | 0.9 | | Road Games | 0-2 | -1 | 2-0 | 2-0 | 31.0 | 17.5 | 440.0 | (7) | 1.5 | 46.5 | 27.0 | 591.0 | (7.7) | 1.0 | | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | 0 | 3-0 | 3-0 | 43.3 | 28.7 | 512.7 | (8.1) | 1.3 | 38.0 | 22.7 | 486.7 | (6.4) | 1.0 | | Grass Games | 0-1 | 0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 28.0 | 21.0 | 312.0 | (6.4) | 1.0 | 53.0 | 34.0 | 696.0 | (9) | 1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Offense (All Games) | 33.1 | 22.0 | 21.3 | 22:06 | 31-160 | (5.1) | 19-34 | 55.7% | 314 | (9.4) | 65-474 | (7.3) | (14.3) | | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 27.9 | 15.5 | 20.3 | 28:13 | 37-158 | (4.3) | 19-32 | 59.9% | 255 | (8) | 69-413 | (6) | (14.8) | | Offense Road Games | 31.0 | 17.5 | 17.0 | 22:07 | 28-136 | (4.8) | 18-34 | 54.4% | 304 | (8.9) | 62-440 | (7) | (14.2) | | Defense (All Games) | 39.1 | 25.1 | 21.4 | 37:54 | 44-203 | (4.6) | 21-31 | 67.3% | 265 | (8.5) | 75-467 | (6.2) | (11.9) | | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 30.5 | 18 | 19.3 | 32:46 | 39-170 | (4.4) | 18-29 | 62.0% | 232 | (8) | 68-402 | (5.9) | (13.2) | | Defense Road Games | 46.5 | 27.0 | 23.0 | 37:52 | 45-279 | (6.2) | 20-31 | 63.5% | 312 | (9.9) | 76-591 | (7.7) | (12.7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 3-4 | -0.4 | 2-5 | 4-3 | 27.1 | 10.3 | 432.9 | (6.2) | 1.6 | 36.6 | 19.1 | 543.4 | (6.6) | 0.7 | | Home Games | 2-2 | -1.6 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 29.0 | 12.0 | 488.0 | (6.6) | 1.5 | 36.2 | 20.5 | 551.7 | (6.5) | 0.5 | | Last 3 Games | 2-1 | +3.8 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 26.3 | 13.7 | 387.3 | (5.6) | 1.7 | 36.0 | 14.0 | 545.7 | (6.4) | 1.0 | | Grass Games | 3-3 | +0.6 | 2-4 | 3-3 | 27.0 | 10.3 | 438.3 | (6.1) | 1.7 | 34.5 | 18.8 | 551.0 | (6.7) | 0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Offense (All Games) | 27.1 | 10.3 | 20.6 | 27:22 | 38-132 | (3.5) | 22-32 | 68.1% | 301 | (9.3) | 70-433 | (6.2) | (15.9) | | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 32.1 | 15.6 | 22.1 | 30:05 | 42-199 | (4.8) | 20-33 | 62.7% | 261 | (8) | 74-459 | (6.2) | (14.3) | | Offense Home Games | 29.0 | 12.0 | 22.0 | 26:35 | 38-146 | (3.9) | 24-36 | 66.7% | 341 | (9.5) | 74-488 | (6.6) | (16.8) | | Defense (All Games) | 36.6 | 19.1 | 27.7 | 31:59 | 38-170 | (4.5) | 30-45 | 67.0% | 373 | (8.4) | 82-543 | (6.6) | (14.9) | | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 29.6 | 16.5 | 22.5 | 30:32 | 36-151 | (4.2) | 23-39 | 58.0% | 285 | (7.2) | 75-437 | (5.8) | (14.7) | | Defense Home Games | 36.2 | 20.5 | 27.7 | 32:17 | 40-171 | (4.2) | 30-44 | 66.9% | 381 | (8.6) | 85-552 | (6.5) | (15.2) |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: MISSOURI 33.3, CONNECTICUT 25.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 9/2/2017 | MISSOURI ST | 72-43 | W | -36.5 | L | 63.5 | O | 41-294 | 21-34-521 | 2 | 39-139 | 24-35-353 | 2 | | 9/9/2017 | S CAROLINA | 13-31 | L | -2.5 | L | 71 | U | 37-178 | 14-32-245 | 3 | 40-172 | 18-28-187 | 0 | | 9/16/2017 | PURDUE | 3-35 | L | -5.5 | L | 75.5 | U | 24-70 | 12-28-133 | 3 | 50-205 | 26-34-272 | 1 | | 9/23/2017 | AUBURN | 14-51 | L | 18.5 | L | 61 | O | 31-124 | 23-39-216 | 4 | 53-263 | 16-21-219 | 0 | | 10/7/2017 | @ KENTUCKY | 34-40 | L | 8.5 | W | 58.5 | O | 33-213 | 22-43-355 | 2 | 39-188 | 22-37-298 | 1 | | 10/14/2017 | @ GEORGIA | 28-53 | L | 28.5 | W | 58.5 | O | 24-59 | 15-25-253 | 1 | 51-370 | 18-26-326 | 1 | | 10/21/2017 | IDAHO | 68-21 | W | -14 | W | 65 | O | 30-183 | 24-34-475 | 1 | 38-81 | 22-36-197 | 1 | | 10/28/2017 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/4/2017 | FLORIDA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/11/2017 | TENNESSEE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/18/2017 | @ VANDERBILT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/24/2017 | @ ARKANSAS | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 8/31/2017 | HOLY CROSS | 27-20 | W | -22 | L | 50 | U | 37-160 | 28-41-278 | 2 | 26-89 | 33-56-358 | 1 | | 9/16/2017 | @ VIRGINIA | 18-38 | L | 12.5 | L | 51.5 | O | 41-207 | 18-26-227 | 2 | 31-171 | 30-40-455 | 1 | | 9/24/2017 | E CAROLINA | 38-41 | L | -5 | L | 63 | O | 38-190 | 24-39-406 | 1 | 47-170 | 30-39-426 | 0 | | 9/30/2017 | @ SMU | 28-49 | L | 16.5 | L | 75 | O | 36--8 | 22-28-408 | 1 | 41-218 | 27-39-280 | 0 | | 10/6/2017 | MEMPHIS | 31-70 | L | 16 | L | 76 | O | 34-167 | 21-35-310 | 3 | 45-231 | 39-55-480 | 0 | | 10/14/2017 | @ TEMPLE | 28-24 | W | 10.5 | W | 58 | U | 38-139 | 18-28-105 | 2 | 29-117 | 33-55-356 | 2 | | 10/21/2017 | TULSA | 20-14 | W | 4 | W | 76.5 | U | 42-69 | 23-29-372 | 0 | 44-194 | 17-28-259 | 1 | | 10/28/2017 | MISSOURI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/4/2017 | S FLORIDA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/11/2017 | @ UCF | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/18/2017 | *BOSTON COLLEGE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/25/2017 | @ CINCINNATI | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
 | MISSOURI: In QB Drew Lock and WR J'Mon Moore, the Tigers should have a dynamic duo in the passing game. The team did, however, allow 31.5 PPG last season (89th in CFB). Mizzou also returned only five players on defense. | | CONNECTICUT: Head coach Randy Edsall is back with the Huskies, and he'll need to get more out of an offense that ranked last in FBS in scoring in 2016. There is optimism that he can do that, but probably not for another year or two. Defensively, the Huskies have some talent among the team's front seven. |
|
|
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/8/2024 6:11:40 AM EST. |
|
|