|
|
S FLORIDA CONNECTICUT |
|
| 40.5 | 13 Final 10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
129 | S FLORIDA | 40.5 | 40.5 | 130 | CONNECTICUT | -6 | -3.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 1-4 | -2.8 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 16.8 | 10.6 | 264.6 | (4.4) | 2.4 | 34.2 | 19.0 | 361.4 | (5.6) | 2.4 | Road Games | 0-1 | 0 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 155.0 | (2.5) | 2.0 | 21.0 | 7.0 | 265.0 | (4.3) | 2.0 | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | -2.8 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 19.0 | 13.3 | 275.3 | (4.6) | 2.3 | 32.3 | 18.3 | 372.7 | (5.8) | 3.0 | Grass Games | 1-4 | -2.8 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 16.8 | 10.6 | 264.6 | (4.4) | 2.4 | 34.2 | 19.0 | 361.4 | (5.6) | 2.4 | Conference Games | 1-0 | +3.2 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 26.0 | 23.0 | 241.0 | (4.4) | 1.0 | 20.0 | 6.0 | 350.0 | (5.1) | 4.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 16.8 | 10.6 | 13.2 | 28:23 | 33-120 | (3.6) | 12-27 | 42.6% | 145 | (5.3) | 60-265 | (4.4) | (15.7) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 18.9 | 10.1 | 14.9 | 28:35 | 32-130 | (4.1) | 15-31 | 48.3% | 166 | (5.3) | 63-296 | (4.7) | (15.7) | Offense Road Games | 6.0 | 6.0 | 12.0 | 28:31 | 35-89 | (2.5) | 6-26 | 23.1% | 66 | (2.5) | 61-155 | (2.5) | (25.8) | Defense (All Games) | 34.2 | 19.0 | 18.2 | 31:27 | 38-151 | (4) | 16-27 | 60.4% | 210 | (7.8) | 64-361 | (5.6) | (10.6) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 36.3 | 19.9 | 20.6 | 32:23 | 40-185 | (4.6) | 19-31 | 61.1% | 234 | (7.5) | 71-419 | (5.9) | (11.5) | Defense Road Games | 21.0 | 7.0 | 16.0 | 30:39 | 38-171 | (4.5) | 12-24 | 50.0% | 94 | (3.9) | 62-265 | (4.3) | (12.6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 0-4 | -15.4 | 1-3 | 3-1 | 18.0 | 11.5 | 274.0 | (4.2) | 2.2 | 32.5 | 15.2 | 378.2 | (5.5) | 2.2 | Home Games | 0-3 | -14 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 20.0 | 11.3 | 292.0 | (4.6) | 1.7 | 29.7 | 11.0 | 394.3 | (5.6) | 2.7 | Last 3 Games | 0-3 | -3.4 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 18.0 | 12.0 | 269.7 | (4) | 2.3 | 32.3 | 16.0 | 373.3 | (5.4) | 2.7 | Grass Games | 0-3 | -14 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 20.0 | 11.3 | 292.0 | (4.6) | 1.7 | 29.7 | 11.0 | 394.3 | (5.6) | 2.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 18.0 | 11.5 | 15.5 | 27:20 | 31-47 | (1.5) | 18-34 | 54.1% | 227 | (6.7) | 65-274 | (4.2) | (15.2) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 22.5 | 12.1 | 17.9 | 28:31 | 34-117 | (3.5) | 18-32 | 56.3% | 226 | (7) | 66-343 | (5.2) | (15.3) | Offense Home Games | 20.0 | 11.3 | 16.0 | 26:33 | 28-54 | (1.9) | 20-35 | 57.5% | 238 | (6.7) | 64-292 | (4.6) | (14.6) | Defense (All Games) | 32.5 | 15.2 | 18.0 | 32:40 | 46-192 | (4.2) | 12-23 | 53.3% | 186 | (8.1) | 69-378 | (5.5) | (11.6) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 33 | 17.7 | 19.2 | 32:29 | 43-175 | (4.1) | 16-26 | 60.8% | 222 | (8.6) | 69-396 | (5.8) | (12) | Defense Home Games | 29.7 | 11.0 | 19.0 | 33:27 | 47-206 | (4.3) | 13-24 | 54.9% | 189 | (8) | 71-394 | (5.6) | (13.3) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: S FLORIDA 32.2, CONNECTICUT 27 |
|
|
|
|
|
8/31/2013 | MCNEESE ST | 21-53 | L | -20.5 | L | 48.5 | O | 21-133 | 19-40-209 | 3 | 42-180 | 16-25-244 | 1 | 9/7/2013 | @ MICHIGAN ST | 6-21 | L | 21 | W | 41.5 | U | 35-89 | 6-26-66 | 2 | 38-171 | 12-24-94 | 2 | 9/14/2013 | FLA ATLANTIC | 10-28 | L | -12 | L | 45 | U | 40-167 | 9-25-130 | 3 | 36-130 | 10-17-98 | 1 | 9/28/2013 | MIAMI | 21-49 | L | 17.5 | L | 48.5 | O | 33-99 | 13-27-189 | 3 | 39-165 | 19-32-375 | 4 | 10/5/2013 | CINCINNATI | 26-20 | W | 10.5 | W | 47 | U | 37-112 | 11-18-129 | 1 | 33-110 | 24-36-240 | 4 | 10/12/2013 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/26/2013 | LOUISVILLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/31/2013 | @ HOUSTON | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/29/2013 | TOWSON | 18-33 | L | -16.5 | L | 47.5 | O | 27-81 | 16-28-206 | 2 | 50-201 | 13-20-192 | 1 | 9/14/2013 | MARYLAND | 21-32 | L | 4.5 | L | 47 | O | 33-34 | 29-46-349 | 2 | 43-224 | 15-28-277 | 3 | 9/21/2013 | MICHIGAN | 21-24 | L | 18.5 | W | 51 | U | 25-47 | 16-32-159 | 1 | 49-192 | 11-23-97 | 4 | 9/28/2013 | @ BUFFALO | 12-41 | L | -2.5 | L | 48.5 | O | 39-27 | 12-29-193 | 4 | 43-153 | 10-21-177 | 1 | 10/12/2013 | S FLORIDA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/19/2013 | @ CINCINNATI | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/26/2013 | @ UCF | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/8/2013 | LOUISVILLE | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| S FLORIDA: USF closed with a 1-9 mark, scoring 8.8 PPG in the final four games. QBs Matt Floyd (0 TD, 5 INT) and Bobby Eveld (3 TD, 7 INT career) are huge drop-offs from B.J. Daniels. WR Andre Davis (534 rec. yds, 6 TD) is impressive, but top RB Marcus Shaw (4.9 YPC, 0 TD) doesn't exude greatness. New DC Chuck Bresnahan doesn't have a lot to work with, but former Notre Dame DE Aaron Lynch is beastly, and LB DeDe Lattimore (76 tackles) can also play. | | CONNECTICUT: The Huskies offense was awful (17.8 PPG, 4th-fewest in FBS) and really needs subpar QB Chandler Whitmer (9 TD, 16 INT) to improve in new OC T.J. Weist's hurry-up offense. Junior RB Lyle McCombs (860 rush yds, 3.5 YPC) had a down year due mostly to poor O-Line play. The staunch defense (310 YPG, 9th in FBS) lost a lot, but star MLB Yawin Smallwood (120 tackles, 15 TFL) returns, and DB Byron Jones (87 tackles) leads a strong secondary. |
|
|
Game Notes: |
|
Last Updated: 4/25/2024 3:30:25 AM EST. |
|
|