|
|
CINCINNATI First Half Results CONNECTICUT |
|
| 20.5 | 14 Final 10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
309 | CINCINNATI | -2.5 | 310 | CONNECTICUT | 20 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 8-3 | +1 | 6-4 | 4-5 | 30.7 | 14.7 | 437.5 | (6.4) | 1.6 | 17.2 | 7.6 | 373.8 | (5.2) | 1.9 | Road Games | 2-2 | -0.3 | 2-1 | 2-2 | 28.7 | 15.0 | 449.5 | (6.5) | 1.7 | 24.2 | 10.0 | 387.0 | (5.6) | 1.5 | Last 3 Games | 2-1 | -0.7 | 2-1 | 0-3 | 21.3 | 12.3 | 395.0 | (6.3) | 0.7 | 10.0 | 3.3 | 331.0 | (4.7) | 1.7 | Grass Games | 2-0 | +2.9 | 2-0 | 1-1 | 30.5 | 15.0 | 483.5 | (7.1) | 1.0 | 17.0 | 5.0 | 334.5 | (5.1) | 2.0 | Conference Games | 4-2 | +0.3 | 4-1 | 2-4 | 27.3 | 14.2 | 412.0 | (6.3) | 1.3 | 16.3 | 6.8 | 401.8 | (5.3) | 1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 30.7 | 14.7 | 20.9 | 28:46 | 39-211 | (5.4) | 16-29 | 54.7% | 226 | (7.9) | 68-438 | (6.4) | (14.2) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 27.3 | 13.6 | 21 | 30:36 | 38-174 | (4.5) | 18-30 | 60.9% | 231 | (7.6) | 69-405 | (5.9) | (14.8) | Offense Road Games | 28.7 | 15.0 | 21.2 | 29:32 | 37-194 | (5.3) | 15-32 | 47.3% | 255 | (7.9) | 69-449 | (6.5) | (15.6) | Defense (All Games) | 17.2 | 7.6 | 19.4 | 31:14 | 36-139 | (3.9) | 20-36 | 55.1% | 235 | (6.4) | 72-374 | (5.2) | (21.8) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 23.9 | 10.8 | 19.8 | 30:24 | 35-139 | (3.9) | 21-34 | 61.1% | 240 | (7.1) | 69-378 | (5.5) | (15.8) | Defense Road Games | 24.2 | 10.0 | 18.2 | 30:28 | 37-155 | (4.2) | 16-32 | 52.0% | 231 | (7.3) | 69-387 | (5.6) | (16) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 5-6 | -0.7 | 3-5 | 3-8 | 17.8 | 11.1 | 313.4 | (4.7) | 2.1 | 18.5 | 6.7 | 305.7 | (4.5) | 1.0 | Home Games | 3-2 | -0.7 | 2-2 | 0-5 | 21.2 | 15.0 | 339.4 | (5) | 1.8 | 12.2 | 3.4 | 272.4 | (4.2) | 1.2 | Last 3 Games | 2-1 | +3.6 | 2-0 | 0-3 | 17.7 | 12.3 | 304.3 | (4.5) | 1.7 | 16.7 | 2.3 | 344.7 | (4.7) | 0.7 | Grass Games | 4-3 | -0.7 | 2-2 | 1-6 | 19.4 | 13.1 | 321.0 | (4.8) | 1.9 | 13.6 | 4.4 | 264.3 | (4.1) | 1.3 | Conference Games | 2-4 | -0.7 | 2-3 | 1-5 | 13.3 | 10.7 | 304.7 | (4.5) | 2.2 | 21.0 | 6.7 | 358.3 | (5) | 0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 17.8 | 11.1 | 16.7 | 30:60 | 35-93 | (2.6) | 18-31 | 57.5% | 221 | (7.1) | 66-313 | (4.7) | (17.6) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 26.6 | 13.7 | 20 | 30:09 | 38-156 | (4.1) | 18-31 | 59.7% | 227 | (7.4) | 69-384 | (5.5) | (14.4) | Offense Home Games | 21.2 | 15.0 | 16.6 | 32:55 | 40-107 | (2.7) | 17-28 | 62.1% | 232 | (8.3) | 68-339 | (5) | (16) | Defense (All Games) | 18.5 | 6.7 | 16.0 | 28:59 | 36-100 | (2.8) | 17-32 | 53.3% | 205 | (6.4) | 68-306 | (4.5) | (16.5) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 24.4 | 12 | 20.1 | 30:51 | 37-143 | (3.8) | 20-33 | 58.4% | 236 | (7.1) | 71-378 | (5.4) | (15.5) | Defense Home Games | 12.2 | 3.4 | 12.6 | 27:05 | 36-90 | (2.5) | 14-29 | 48.3% | 183 | (6.4) | 64-272 | (4.2) | (22.3) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: CINCINNATI 28.5, CONNECTICUT 31.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
10/6/2012 | MIAMI OHIO | 52-14 | W | -19.5 | W | 58 | O | 50-272 | 13-23-157 | 0 | 19-59 | 27-53-320 | 4 | 10/13/2012 | FORDHAM | 49-17 | W | -40 | L | | - | 33-210 | 15-24-262 | 0 | 29-42 | 31-42-262 | 1 | 10/20/2012 | @ TOLEDO | 23-29 | L | -5 | L | 64.5 | U | 35-251 | 15-37-227 | 2 | 43-229 | 13-24-126 | 1 | 10/26/2012 | @ LOUISVILLE | 31-34 | L | 3 | T | 53 | O | 41-196 | 13-28-157 | 3 | 37-108 | 24-41-416 | 1 | 11/3/2012 | SYRACUSE | 35-24 | W | -4.5 | W | 56 | O | 53-263 | 16-27-207 | 3 | 41-193 | 23-47-286 | 2 | 11/10/2012 | @ TEMPLE | 34-10 | W | -8 | W | 56 | U | 40-228 | 13-21-244 | 0 | 35-125 | 12-32-142 | 1 | 11/17/2012 | RUTGERS | 3-10 | L | -6.5 | L | 47.5 | U | 28-90 | 17-31-251 | 2 | 47-234 | 11-20-186 | 2 | 11/23/2012 | S FLORIDA | 27-10 | W | -14 | W | 50.5 | U | 40-194 | 17-27-178 | 0 | 38-130 | 21-39-176 | 2 | 12/1/2012 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10/6/2012 | @ RUTGERS | 3-19 | L | 7.5 | L | 40 | U | 28-53 | 14-33-191 | 5 | 35-123 | 18-27-157 | 1 | 10/13/2012 | TEMPLE | 14-17 | L | -5 | L | 41 | U | 41-88 | 22-39-293 | 1 | 49-202 | 13-26-132 | 2 | 10/19/2012 | @ SYRACUSE | 10-40 | L | 5 | L | 43.5 | O | 18--6 | 23-41-296 | 2 | 53-251 | 14-20-251 | 0 | 11/3/2012 | @ S FLORIDA | 6-13 | L | 7 | T | 46.5 | U | 31-43 | 24-38-284 | 3 | 34-81 | 20-32-202 | 1 | 11/9/2012 | PITTSBURGH | 24-17 | W | 3.5 | W | 43.5 | U | 42-132 | 19-25-213 | 1 | 25-48 | 19-34-302 | 0 | 11/24/2012 | @ LOUISVILLE | 23-20 | W | 10 | W | 46 | U | 39-149 | 9-28-92 | 1 | 28-27 | 35-65-374 | 1 | 12/1/2012 | CINCINNATI | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| CINCINNATI: The Bearcats QB position is a question mark, but it seems as though either Munchie Legaux (5 TD, 4 INT) will win the job outright, or Cincinnati will employ a two-QB system with senior Brendan Kay (8 career pass attempts). Legaux will need to improve his 47% completion rate if he's going to be successful. Junior WR Anthony McClung returns after a team-high 683 receiving yards and 6 TD in 2011. The task of replacing Isaiah Pead falls to senior RB George Winn, who had just 40 carries last year but scored on a 69-yard TD run in the Liberty Bowl. The Bearcats defensive line helped lead the nation in Tackles For Loss (8.6 per game) and finish second in sacks (3.5 per game). The linebackers are solid too, but the secondary could cause Butch Jones fits, as for years now, the team has struggled against the pass, allowing 261 passing YPG in 2011. | | CONNECTICUT: UConn is heading into the 2012 season with another quarterback controversy. Transfer QB Chandler Whitmer had a strong showing in the spring game, but senior Johnny McEntee (2,110 pass yds, 12 TD, 8 INT) has the most experience after starting last year. The offensive line could be a problem as the Huskies lost two starters from what already wasn't a successful unit last year (4th-most sacks allowed in nation). This could significantly hurt the development of RB Lyle McCombs, who rushed for 1,151 yards (2nd in Big East) and 7 TD last season. The defensive line will once again be a strength for UConn (2.8 sacks per game, 13th in nation). DT Ryan Wirth didn't play a lot last year, but he dominated the spring game with 4.5 sacks. The secondary needs work (281 passing YPG allowed, 113th in FBS), but UConn has a chance to improve with several players who saw the field last year. |
|
|
Game Notes: |
|
Last Updated: 3/29/2024 10:35:17 AM EST. |
|
|