|
|
TEMPLE CONNECTICUT |
|
| 41 | 17 Final 14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
137 | TEMPLE | 44 | 41 | 138 | CONNECTICUT | -3.5 | -5.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 2-2 | -1.6 | 2-2 | 2-1 | 29.5 | 10.7 | 303.0 | (5) | 0.7 | 24.5 | 14.2 | 393.5 | (5.4) | 2.5 | Road Games | 0-1 | -1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 13.0 | 3.0 | 237.0 | (4.4) | 0.0 | 24.0 | 14.0 | 491.0 | (6.3) | 1.0 | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | -2.6 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 25.7 | 5.0 | 283.3 | (4.7) | 1.0 | 29.3 | 15.7 | 403.0 | (5.4) | 2.7 | Grass Games | 2-2 | -1.6 | 2-2 | 2-1 | 29.5 | 10.7 | 303.0 | (5) | 0.7 | 24.5 | 14.2 | 393.5 | (5.4) | 2.5 | Conference Games | 1-0 | +1.7 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 37.0 | 9.0 | 383.0 | (5.4) | 0.0 | 28.0 | 7.0 | 384.0 | (5.1) | 3.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 29.5 | 10.7 | 14.7 | 28:14 | 41-170 | (4.1) | 10-19 | 54.7% | 132 | (7.1) | 60-303 | (5) | (10.3) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 26.2 | 13.4 | 16.8 | 30:09 | 40-171 | (4.2) | 15-26 | 59.0% | 167 | (6.4) | 66-337 | (5.1) | (12.9) | Offense Road Games | 13.0 | 3.0 | 13.0 | 23:08 | 28-113 | (4) | 13-26 | 50.0% | 124 | (4.8) | 54-237 | (4.4) | (18.2) | Defense (All Games) | 24.5 | 14.2 | 21.7 | 31:46 | 44-173 | (3.9) | 16-28 | 57.1% | 220 | (7.9) | 72-393 | (5.4) | (16.1) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 20.7 | 11.5 | 19.3 | 30:46 | 40-146 | (3.7) | 17-30 | 55.4% | 213 | (7.1) | 70-359 | (5.1) | (17.3) | Defense Road Games | 24.0 | 14.0 | 27.0 | 36:52 | 42-173 | (4.1) | 24-36 | 66.7% | 318 | (8.8) | 78-491 | (6.3) | (20.5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 3-3 | -1 | 1-3 | 2-4 | 19.8 | 10.2 | 310.5 | (4.8) | 2.5 | 16.2 | 6.7 | 248.8 | (3.9) | 1.2 | Home Games | 2-1 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-3 | 22.7 | 12.3 | 323.7 | (5) | 2.3 | 9.0 | 3.3 | 226.0 | (3.6) | 1.3 | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | -1 | 0-3 | 1-2 | 17.0 | 9.0 | 343.0 | (5.1) | 2.3 | 22.0 | 10.0 | 323.7 | (4.8) | 1.0 | Grass Games | 3-1 | +1 | 1-1 | 1-3 | 23.0 | 12.7 | 298.5 | (4.8) | 2.0 | 12.0 | 4.2 | 220.7 | (3.5) | 1.5 | Conference Games | 0-1 | -1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 244.0 | (4) | 5.0 | 19.0 | 6.0 | 280.0 | (4.5) | 1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 19.8 | 10.2 | 15.7 | 31:29 | 36-102 | (2.8) | 16-28 | 58.2% | 208 | (7.4) | 65-310 | (4.8) | (15.7) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 25.4 | 14.1 | 18.4 | 30:42 | 37-140 | (3.8) | 17-30 | 57.5% | 225 | (7.6) | 67-365 | (5.5) | (14.3) | Offense Home Games | 22.7 | 12.3 | 14.3 | 32:23 | 39-105 | (2.7) | 15-25 | 60.5% | 219 | (8.6) | 64-324 | (5) | (14.3) | Defense (All Games) | 16.2 | 6.7 | 13.3 | 28:29 | 35-82 | (2.4) | 14-29 | 49.4% | 166 | (5.7) | 64-249 | (3.9) | (15.4) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 24.2 | 13.3 | 19.7 | 30:18 | 38-144 | (3.8) | 19-33 | 57.0% | 223 | (6.7) | 71-367 | (5.1) | (15.2) | Defense Home Games | 9.0 | 3.3 | 9.3 | 27:37 | 35-66 | (1.9) | 12-28 | 44.6% | 160 | (5.8) | 62-226 | (3.6) | (25.1) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: TEMPLE 26.8, CONNECTICUT 29.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
8/31/2012 | VILLANOVA | 41-10 | W | -17.5 | W | | - | 47-301 | 5-11-61 | 0 | 44-212 | 11-24-153 | 2 | 9/8/2012 | MARYLAND | 27-36 | L | -7.5 | L | 43.5 | O | 39-52 | 7-18-178 | 3 | 48-144 | 11-21-190 | 4 | 9/22/2012 | @ PENN ST | 13-24 | L | 6 | L | 43 | U | 28-113 | 13-26-124 | 0 | 42-173 | 24-36-318 | 1 | 10/6/2012 | S FLORIDA | 37-28 | W | 4.5 | W | 47 | O | 51-216 | 16-20-167 | 0 | 44-165 | 18-31-219 | 3 | 10/13/2012 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/20/2012 | RUTGERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/27/2012 | @ PITTSBURGH | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/3/2012 | @ LOUISVILLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/10/2012 | CINCINNATI | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/30/2012 | MASSACHUSETTS | 37-0 | W | -21 | W | 47 | U | 43-147 | 16-27-225 | 3 | 24-3 | 9-23-56 | 1 | 9/8/2012 | NC STATE | 7-10 | L | 3 | T | 48 | U | 32-35 | 15-27-204 | 4 | 41-54 | 15-30-204 | 1 | 9/15/2012 | @ MARYLAND | 24-21 | W | -3 | T | 39 | O | 40-153 | 11-17-70 | 1 | 40-96 | 10-24-109 | 2 | 9/22/2012 | @ W MICHIGAN | 24-30 | L | 2 | L | 44 | O | 34-92 | 28-44-333 | 2 | 30-77 | 21-40-253 | 0 | 9/29/2012 | BUFFALO | 24-17 | W | -16.5 | L | 44 | U | 42-133 | 15-22-227 | 0 | 39-141 | 13-30-220 | 2 | 10/6/2012 | @ RUTGERS | 3-19 | L | 7.5 | L | 40 | U | 28-53 | 14-33-191 | 5 | 35-123 | 18-27-157 | 1 | 10/13/2012 | TEMPLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/19/2012 | @ SYRACUSE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/3/2012 | @ S FLORIDA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/9/2012 | PITTSBURGH | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| TEMPLE: The inexperienced Owls could be in for a rude awakening when they rejoin the Big East in 2012. However, they are finally strong at the quarterback position with junior Chris Coyer (30-for-50, 463 yds, 6 TD, 0 INT), who emerged as the leader of their football team. The offensive line is losing four starters, but head coach Steve Addazio is confident that the new linemen can step in and contribute immediately. The running game has big shoes to fill for the departed Bernard Pierce and his 1,481 rushing yards and 27 TD. On defense, Temple allowed a mere 13.9 PPG (3rd in nation), holding five teams to single digits. But the Owls return only five players and will be facing more talented offenses in the Big East than they did in the MAC. | | CONNECTICUT: UConn is heading into the 2012 season with another quarterback controversy. Transfer QB Chandler Whitmer had a strong showing in the spring game, but senior Johnny McEntee (2,110 pass yds, 12 TD, 8 INT) has the most experience after starting last year. The offensive line could be a problem as the Huskies lost two starters from what already wasn't a successful unit last year (4th-most sacks allowed in nation). This could significantly hurt the development of RB Lyle McCombs, who rushed for 1,151 yards (2nd in Big East) and 7 TD last season. The defensive line will once again be a strength for UConn (2.8 sacks per game, 13th in nation). DT Ryan Wirth didn't play a lot last year, but he dominated the spring game with 4.5 sacks. The secondary needs work (281 passing YPG allowed, 113th in FBS), but UConn has a chance to improve with several players who saw the field last year. |
|
|
Game Notes: |
|
Last Updated: 4/25/2024 3:27:15 AM EST. |
|
|