|
|
S FLORIDA First Half Results CINCINNATI |
|
| 26 | 16 Final 14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
155 | S FLORIDA | 27.5 | 156 | CINCINNATI | -8 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 7-2 | +2.2 | 2-7 | 4-4 | 33.3 | 13.2 | 493.8 | (6.6) | 1.7 | 30.9 | 14.3 | 442.1 | (5.7) | 1.8 | Road Games | 3-1 | +2 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 36.0 | 12.7 | 538.5 | (6.8) | 1.7 | 35.5 | 17.0 | 461.7 | (5.7) | 2.0 | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | -3.4 | 0-3 | 2-1 | 29.7 | 10.3 | 506.7 | (6.7) | 2.7 | 42.7 | 20.7 | 522.0 | (7) | 1.3 | Turf Games | 3-1 | +2 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 36.0 | 12.7 | 538.5 | (6.8) | 1.7 | 35.5 | 17.0 | 461.7 | (5.7) | 2.0 | Conference Games | 3-2 | -1.4 | 0-5 | 2-3 | 26.8 | 9.4 | 460.6 | (6.3) | 2.0 | 33.0 | 16.4 | 455.4 | (5.8) | 1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 33.3 | 13.2 | 24.4 | 27:15 | 40-220 | (5.5) | 22-35 | 61.2% | 274 | (7.8) | 75-494 | (6.6) | (14.8) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 34.5 | 18.9 | 23.8 | 30:50 | 41-203 | (4.9) | 20-33 | 62.1% | 264 | (8.1) | 74-467 | (6.3) | (13.6) | Offense Road Games | 36.0 | 12.7 | 26.0 | 29:26 | 43-258 | (5.9) | 21-36 | 58.0% | 280 | (7.8) | 79-538 | (6.8) | (15) | Defense (All Games) | 30.9 | 14.3 | 23.2 | 32:45 | 48-249 | (5.1) | 15-29 | 53.7% | 194 | (6.8) | 77-442 | (5.7) | (14.3) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 28.8 | 13.4 | 21.3 | 30:04 | 44-218 | (4.9) | 15-27 | 55.5% | 194 | (7.1) | 72-412 | (5.7) | (14.3) | Defense Road Games | 35.5 | 17.0 | 25.2 | 30:34 | 45-195 | (4.3) | 22-36 | 60.0% | 267 | (7.4) | 81-462 | (5.7) | (13) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 8-1 | +10 | 6-3 | 2-6 | 35.0 | 18.1 | 449.6 | (6) | 1.4 | 14.0 | 8.0 | 274.3 | (4.2) | 1.3 | Home Games | 4-0 | +3 | 3-1 | 2-1 | 44.0 | 25.2 | 515.5 | (7.4) | 1.2 | 14.5 | 9.5 | 257.7 | (4.1) | 1.2 | Last 3 Games | 2-1 | +1 | 1-2 | 0-3 | 28.3 | 15.0 | 413.0 | (5.4) | 2.0 | 14.7 | 5.7 | 279.7 | (4.3) | 1.7 | Turf Games | 6-0 | +5 | 4-2 | 2-3 | 37.2 | 19.2 | 462.0 | (6.4) | 1.3 | 13.0 | 7.5 | 263.3 | (4.2) | 1.2 | Conference Games | 4-1 | +3 | 3-2 | 1-4 | 34.2 | 18.0 | 468.8 | (6.1) | 2.0 | 14.4 | 7.6 | 274.2 | (4.2) | 1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 35.0 | 18.1 | 23.7 | 32:19 | 47-236 | (5.1) | 18-28 | 63.1% | 214 | (7.6) | 75-450 | (6) | (12.8) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 35.9 | 19.1 | 24.5 | 30:14 | 42-219 | (5.2) | 19-31 | 63.2% | 251 | (8.2) | 73-470 | (6.4) | (13.1) | Offense Home Games | 44.0 | 25.2 | 26.5 | 30:27 | 44-273 | (6.1) | 17-25 | 67.6% | 242 | (9.5) | 70-515 | (7.4) | (11.7) | Defense (All Games) | 14.0 | 8.0 | 14.9 | 27:41 | 32-103 | (3.2) | 16-32 | 48.4% | 171 | (5.3) | 65-274 | (4.2) | (19.6) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 25.4 | 12.9 | 18.5 | 30:53 | 39-171 | (4.4) | 15-28 | 55.0% | 192 | (6.8) | 67-363 | (5.4) | (14.3) | Defense Home Games | 14.5 | 9.5 | 15.0 | 29:33 | 40-135 | (3.4) | 10-22 | 43.3% | 123 | (5.5) | 62-258 | (4.1) | (17.8) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: S FLORIDA 23.7, CINCINNATI 26.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
9/15/2018 | @ ILLINOIS | 25-19 | W | -14 | L | 59 | U | 44-215 | 23-40-411 | 2 | 48-212 | 20-31-168 | 1 | 9/22/2018 | E CAROLINA | 20-13 | W | -19 | L | 67 | U | 32-115 | 12-20-181 | 1 | 46-156 | 22-50-256 | 1 | 10/6/2018 | @ MASSACHUSETTS | 58-42 | W | -15.5 | W | 72.5 | O | 41-365 | 17-24-209 | 2 | 34-85 | 33-52-401 | 5 | 10/12/2018 | @ TULSA | 25-24 | W | -10 | L | 59.5 | U | 47-250 | 17-40-237 | 1 | 49-220 | 6-21-79 | 0 | 10/20/2018 | CONNECTICUT | 38-30 | W | -33.5 | L | 67.5 | O | 37-346 | 20-28-265 | 3 | 51-322 | 10-21-133 | 1 | 10/27/2018 | @ HOUSTON | 36-57 | L | 10 | L | 74.5 | O | 42-204 | 26-39-263 | 2 | 49-263 | 28-41-419 | 2 | 11/3/2018 | TULANE | 15-41 | L | -6 | L | 60.5 | U | 33-110 | 29-49-332 | 3 | 52-368 | 4-11-61 | 1 | 11/10/2018 | @ CINCINNATI | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/17/2018 | @ TEMPLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/23/2018 | UCF | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/15/2018 | ALABAMA A&M | 63-7 | W | -43.5 | W | | - | 55-409 | 21-26-332 | 1 | 25-48 | 12-28-134 | 1 | 9/22/2018 | OHIO U | 34-30 | W | -7 | L | 56 | O | 34-150 | 19-31-274 | 1 | 45-234 | 12-27-178 | 2 | 9/29/2018 | @ CONNECTICUT | 49-7 | W | -16 | W | 62.5 | U | 53-320 | 23-29-339 | 1 | 28-85 | 14-36-181 | 1 | 10/6/2018 | TULANE | 37-21 | W | -7 | W | 48 | O | 48-272 | 15-25-174 | 3 | 38-134 | 12-31-132 | 1 | 10/20/2018 | @ TEMPLE | 17-24 | L | 2.5 | L | 47 | U | 47-200 | 14-34-111 | 3 | 30-80 | 20-42-237 | 3 | 10/27/2018 | @ SMU | 26-20 | W | -8.5 | L | 52 | U | 39-125 | 33-50-352 | 3 | 24-23 | 22-43-328 | 1 | 11/3/2018 | NAVY | 42-0 | W | -13 | W | 47 | U | 41-262 | 14-20-189 | 0 | 52-124 | 3-4-47 | 1 | 11/10/2018 | S FLORIDA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/17/2018 | @ UCF | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/23/2018 | E CAROLINA | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| S FLORIDA: The Bulls took a huge leap defensively under head coach Charlie Strong, which is a result that he never really achieved during his tenure at Texas. USF should continue to defend at a high level this year, as the team returns enough playmakers and faces a Charmin-soft schedule. But replacing quarterback Quinton Flowers isn't going to be easy. He was a monumental part of USF's offense throughout his career, but the good news is that the Bulls have a lot of talent in their receiving corps. They can give UCF a run for their money if everything breaks right. | | CINCINNATI: Head coach Luke Fickell went 4-8 in his first year with Cincinnati after having spent 16 of the previous 17 seasons on the Ohio State staff. A Year 2 improvement looks very realistic, as the Bearcats offense should be able to keep them in games. In quarterback Hayden Moore and wide receiver Kahlil Lewis, Cincinnati will have one of the best aerial combos in the conference. What's holding the team back is a defense that is weak in the secondary and doesn't possess the ability to get after the quarterback. That's never a good combination. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 4/25/2024 2:21:35 PM EST. |
|
|