|
|
S FLORIDA CINCINNATI |
|
| 60 | 17 Final 34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
111 | S FLORIDA | 58 | 61.5 | 112 | CINCINNATI | -11 | -10 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 3-4 | -1 | 5-2 | 3-4 | 21.7 | 11.6 | 311.3 | (5.2) | 1.7 | 29.0 | 15.7 | 418.3 | (5.8) | 2.0 | Road Games | 1-1 | +1 | 2-0 | 1-1 | 24.0 | 5.0 | 328.5 | (6.8) | 2.0 | 28.5 | 15.0 | 471.0 | (6.3) | 1.0 | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | 0 | 3-0 | 1-2 | 21.7 | 9.0 | 335.7 | (6.1) | 1.7 | 28.3 | 12.3 | 474.3 | (6.4) | 1.0 | Turf Games | 1-1 | +1 | 2-0 | 1-1 | 24.0 | 5.0 | 328.5 | (6.8) | 2.0 | 28.5 | 15.0 | 471.0 | (6.3) | 1.0 | Conference Games | 2-1 | +1 | 3-0 | 1-2 | 24.0 | 12.7 | 344.3 | (5.2) | 1.3 | 24.0 | 13.7 | 371.3 | (6.1) | 1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 21.7 | 11.6 | 14.9 | 27:32 | 33-130 | (4) | 12-27 | 45.5% | 181 | (6.7) | 60-311 | (5.2) | (14.3) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 28.4 | 14.9 | 18.8 | 29:42 | 37-175 | (4.8) | 18-32 | 55.7% | 230 | (7.1) | 69-406 | (5.9) | (14.3) | Offense Road Games | 24.0 | 5.0 | 13.5 | 23:03 | 25-106 | (4.2) | 12-22 | 55.6% | 222 | (9.9) | 48-328 | (6.8) | (13.7) | Defense (All Games) | 29.0 | 15.7 | 21.6 | 32:28 | 40-181 | (4.5) | 21-32 | 65.6% | 237 | (7.4) | 72-418 | (5.8) | (14.4) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 29.7 | 15.1 | 22.9 | 31:18 | 36-166 | (4.6) | 24-39 | 61.0% | 266 | (6.8) | 76-432 | (5.7) | (14.5) | Defense Road Games | 28.5 | 15.0 | 23.0 | 36:57 | 49-234 | (4.8) | 16-26 | 63.5% | 237 | (9.1) | 75-471 | (6.3) | (16.5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 3-3 | -1.5 | 2-4 | 3-3 | 34.3 | 21.8 | 443.0 | (6.3) | 1.2 | 34.5 | 18.7 | 524.0 | (6.7) | 1.7 | Home Games | 2-1 | -0.6 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 34.3 | 24.0 | 435.3 | (6.3) | 1.3 | 33.0 | 18.3 | 512.3 | (6.2) | 1.3 | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | -1.5 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 29.7 | 15.0 | 427.3 | (5.6) | 1.7 | 33.0 | 18.0 | 502.3 | (7) | 1.7 | Turf Games | 3-2 | -0.6 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 34.4 | 24.2 | 447.2 | (6.8) | 0.8 | 30.4 | 17.6 | 504.6 | (6.2) | 1.8 | Conference Games | 1-1 | -0.6 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 27.5 | 17.5 | 430.0 | (6.2) | 1.0 | 22.0 | 15.0 | 443.0 | (5.7) | 2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 34.3 | 21.8 | 23.2 | 25:36 | 30-120 | (4) | 23-40 | 57.7% | 323 | (8) | 70-443 | (6.3) | (12.9) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 29.9 | 16.7 | 22.1 | 30:38 | 38-164 | (4.3) | 21-34 | 61.7% | 244 | (7.2) | 72-407 | (5.7) | (13.6) | Offense Home Games | 34.3 | 24.0 | 23.0 | 23:60 | 28-115 | (4) | 23-40 | 57.9% | 321 | (8) | 69-435 | (6.3) | (12.7) | Defense (All Games) | 34.5 | 18.7 | 25.8 | 34:23 | 46-242 | (5.3) | 20-32 | 63.5% | 282 | (8.8) | 78-524 | (6.7) | (15.2) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 29.5 | 15.7 | 22.3 | 30:21 | 38-174 | (4.6) | 20-35 | 58.4% | 253 | (7.3) | 72-426 | (5.9) | (14.5) | Defense Home Games | 33.0 | 18.3 | 25.3 | 36:00 | 51-214 | (4.2) | 20-31 | 62.8% | 299 | (9.5) | 82-512 | (6.2) | (15.5) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: S FLORIDA 28.7, CINCINNATI 33.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
8/30/2014 | W CAROLINA | 36-31 | W | -27 | L | 49 | O | 33-294 | 10-27-191 | 2 | 29-80 | 46-67-374 | 2 | 9/6/2014 | MARYLAND | 17-24 | L | 11 | W | 53 | U | 37-83 | 15-37-174 | 1 | 40-116 | 17-28-201 | 6 | 9/13/2014 | NC STATE | 17-49 | L | 2.5 | L | 52.5 | O | 27-70 | 5-20-89 | 3 | 53-315 | 21-33-274 | 2 | 9/19/2014 | CONNECTICUT | 17-14 | W | -1.5 | W | 41.5 | U | 53-158 | 10-18-113 | 1 | 26-57 | 6-10-88 | 1 | 9/27/2014 | @ WISCONSIN | 10-27 | L | 32.5 | W | 51 | U | 19-72 | 8-19-173 | 2 | 57-294 | 11-18-160 | 1 | 10/11/2014 | E CAROLINA | 17-28 | L | 16.5 | W | 57 | U | 27-93 | 21-42-257 | 1 | 37-231 | 24-34-250 | 1 | 10/18/2014 | @ TULSA | 38-30 | W | -2 | W | 49 | O | 32-140 | 17-26-272 | 2 | 41-174 | 22-34-314 | 1 | 10/24/2014 | @ CINCINNATI | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/1/2014 | HOUSTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/15/2014 | @ SMU | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/22/2014 | @ MEMPHIS | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/12/2014 | TOLEDO | 58-34 | W | -9 | W | 58.5 | O | 30-148 | 29-42-436 | 0 | 39-240 | 28-43-323 | 1 | 9/20/2014 | MIAMI OHIO | 31-24 | W | -30 | L | 61.5 | U | 30-99 | 25-39-271 | 2 | 44-102 | 13-26-262 | 3 | 9/27/2014 | @ OHIO ST | 28-50 | L | 17 | L | 60.5 | O | 19-70 | 21-33-352 | 0 | 65-380 | 26-36-330 | 1 | 10/4/2014 | MEMPHIS | 14-41 | L | -3 | L | 62.5 | U | 25-97 | 16-40-255 | 2 | 69-299 | 18-25-311 | 0 | 10/11/2014 | @ MIAMI | 34-55 | L | 15 | L | 66.5 | O | 29-67 | 31-60-355 | 3 | 35-335 | 17-25-286 | 1 | 10/18/2014 | @ SMU | 41-3 | W | -12.5 | W | 62 | U | 46-240 | 17-27-268 | 0 | 24-98 | 20-37-178 | 4 | 10/24/2014 | S FLORIDA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/31/2014 | @ TULANE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/13/2014 | E CAROLINA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/22/2014 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| S FLORIDA: The Bulls' offense lacks star power with underwhelming QB Mike White (6.2 YPA, 3 TD, 9 INT) and no clear-cut top rusher. WR Andre Davis (735 rec yds) and TE Sean Price (21 rec) are quality pass-catchers though. USF boasts an opportunistic defense (25 TO) under DC Chuck Bresnahan with LB Reshard Cliett (7 TFL) and DBs Nate Godwin (46 tackles) and Hassan Childs (3 INT). | | CINCINNATI: Notre Dame transfer QB Gunner Kiel is expected to run the Bearcats offense with plenty of talent at receiver, especially WR Shaq Washington (78 rec, 783 yds). Cincinnati can also rush the football effectively with RBs Hosey Williams (655 rush yds, 5.7 YPC), Ralph David Abernathy IV (518 rush yds, 5 TD) or Tion Green (412 rush yds, 7 TD). New DC Hank Hughes will keep the 4-3 defense intact that is ignited by the pass-rushing of DE Silverberry Mouhon (9.5 sacks) and relies on LB Nick Temple (79 tackles, 5.5 sacks). |
|
|
Game Notes: |
|
Last Updated: 3/19/2024 6:19:50 AM EST. |
|
|