|
|
TEMPLE CINCINNATI |
|
| 55 | 20 Final 38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
109 | TEMPLE | +26.5 | Over 45.5 | 110 | CINCINNATI | -14.5 | Under 57.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 0-5 | -4.3 | 2-3 | 1-4 | 15.8 | 5.8 | 342.4 | (4.8) | 1.6 | 27.2 | 16.8 | 518.0 | (6.7) | 0.4 | Road Games | 0-2 | -3.3 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 15.0 | 4.5 | 386.0 | (5.1) | 0.5 | 27.0 | 19.0 | 510.5 | (7.3) | 0.0 | Last 3 Games | 0-3 | -3.3 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 20.0 | 3.3 | 350.0 | (5.1) | 1.3 | 28.7 | 18.0 | 507.7 | (6.7) | 0.0 | Conference Games | 0-2 | -1 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 10.0 | 6.5 | 277.5 | (4.2) | 2.5 | 26.0 | 16.5 | 524.5 | (6.3) | 1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 15.8 | 5.8 | 21.2 | 27:05 | 35-138 | (4) | 19-37 | 50.3% | 205 | (5.5) | 72-342 | (4.8) | (21.7) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 24.8 | 12.1 | 21.9 | 28:12 | 37-158 | (4.2) | 21-34 | 60.3% | 229 | (6.7) | 72-387 | (5.4) | (15.6) | Offense Road Games | 15.0 | 4.5 | 23.5 | 27:15 | 29-147 | (5.1) | 23-47 | 48.9% | 238 | (5.1) | 76-386 | (5.1) | (25.7) | Defense (All Games) | 27.2 | 16.8 | 24.8 | 32:55 | 39-190 | (4.9) | 24-38 | 62.8% | 328 | (8.6) | 77-518 | (6.7) | (19) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 31.4 | 15.1 | 23.2 | 31:27 | 40-176 | (4.4) | 21-35 | 61.2% | 286 | (8.2) | 75-462 | (6.2) | (14.7) | Defense Road Games | 27.0 | 19.0 | 20.0 | 32:45 | 34-178 | (5.2) | 21-35 | 60.6% | 332 | (9.4) | 69-510 | (7.3) | (18.9) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 3-2 | -6.2 | 2-3 | 2-2 | 31.8 | 12.4 | 453.8 | (6.1) | 2.2 | 17.4 | 12.0 | 251.0 | (4.3) | 1.6 | Home Games | 2-0 | +1 | 2-0 | 1-0 | 54.0 | 24.5 | 547.0 | (7.9) | 1.5 | 8.0 | 8.0 | 202.5 | (3.6) | 2.5 | Last 3 Games | 2-1 | -4.2 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 33.3 | 13.7 | 462.7 | (6.2) | 2.3 | 11.7 | 10.7 | 169.0 | (3.2) | 1.3 | Turf Games | 3-1 | -2 | 2-2 | 2-1 | 34.7 | 14.0 | 479.7 | (6.4) | 1.7 | 15.2 | 9.2 | 253.5 | (4.3) | 1.7 | Conference Games | 0-1 | -4.2 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 20.0 | 6.0 | 350.0 | (5.1) | 4.0 | 26.0 | 23.0 | 241.0 | (4.4) | 1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 31.8 | 12.4 | 23.4 | 31:08 | 42-200 | (4.8) | 21-32 | 65.8% | 254 | (7.9) | 74-454 | (6.1) | (14.3) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 38.6 | 18.5 | 22.5 | 30:15 | 40-212 | (5.2) | 18-29 | 63.7% | 247 | (8.6) | 69-458 | (6.6) | (11.9) | Offense Home Games | 54.0 | 24.5 | 24.0 | 32:48 | 46-271 | (5.8) | 18-23 | 78.3% | 275 | (12) | 69-547 | (7.9) | (10.1) | Defense (All Games) | 17.4 | 12.0 | 13.4 | 28:52 | 32-99 | (3.1) | 15-26 | 58.9% | 152 | (5.9) | 58-251 | (4.3) | (14.4) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 19.4 | 10.9 | 16.4 | 30:43 | 35-120 | (3.5) | 16-30 | 52.3% | 177 | (5.8) | 65-297 | (4.6) | (15.3) | Defense Home Games | 8.0 | 8.0 | 12.0 | 27:11 | 28-82 | (2.9) | 16-29 | 55.2% | 120 | (4.1) | 57-202 | (3.6) | (25.3) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: TEMPLE 28.2, CINCINNATI 19 |
|
|
|
|
|
8/31/2013 | @ NOTRE DAME | 6-28 | L | 28 | W | 53 | U | 29-134 | 23-47-228 | 1 | 35-188 | 17-27-355 | 0 | 9/7/2013 | HOUSTON | 13-22 | L | 2.5 | L | 67.5 | U | 39-100 | 20-39-200 | 3 | 48-219 | 29-48-305 | 2 | 9/14/2013 | FORDHAM | 29-30 | L | -20.5 | L | 53.5 | O | 49-245 | 14-26-140 | 2 | 45-200 | 23-36-320 | 0 | 9/28/2013 | @ IDAHO | 24-26 | L | -7.5 | L | 57.5 | U | 29-161 | 23-47-249 | 0 | 33-168 | 26-44-310 | 0 | 10/5/2013 | LOUISVILLE | 7-30 | L | 33 | W | 58 | U | 28-48 | 13-26-207 | 2 | 34-177 | 25-36-348 | 0 | 10/11/2013 | @ CINCINNATI | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/19/2013 | ARMY | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/26/2013 | @ SMU | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/2/2013 | @ RUTGERS | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/31/2013 | PURDUE | 42-7 | W | -10.5 | W | 49 | P | 47-221 | 17-25-204 | 3 | 22-65 | 18-35-161 | 4 | 9/7/2013 | @ ILLINOIS | 17-45 | L | -7 | L | 56.5 | O | 32-148 | 23-42-308 | 1 | 39-210 | 26-37-312 | 0 | 9/14/2013 | NORTHWESTERN ST | 66-9 | W | -29.5 | W | 55.5 | O | 46-322 | 19-21-347 | 0 | 34-100 | 14-23-79 | 1 | 9/21/2013 | @ MIAMI OHIO | 14-0 | W | -24.5 | L | 55 | U | 52-198 | 23-37-171 | 3 | 29-7 | 7-16-80 | 2 | 10/5/2013 | @ S FLORIDA | 20-26 | L | -10.5 | L | 47 | U | 33-110 | 24-36-240 | 4 | 37-112 | 11-18-129 | 1 | 10/11/2013 | TEMPLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/19/2013 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/30/2013 | @ MEMPHIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/9/2013 | SMU | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| TEMPLE: Temple lost its final five Big East games by a 199-74 margin. With star RB Montel Harris gone, the team will throw more with junior QB Connor Reilly operating Matt Rhule's new spread attack. Other than WR Jalen Fitzpatrick (363 rec. yds), skill positions are weak. The porous defense (437 YPG, 92nd in FBS) doesn't have much after LB Tyler Matakevich (101 tackles). DE Sean Daniels (3 sacks) and CB Anthony Robey (6 PD) are adequate at best. | | CINCINNATI: The new coach prefers QB Brendon Kay (9.4 YPA, 10 TD, 2 INT) over QB Munchie Legaux (7.5 YPA, 13 TD, 9 INT) to run the offense. TE Travis Kelce (722 rec. yds, 8 TD) and WR Anthony McClung (539 rec. yds) are both solid. All five O-Line starters return for this quality ground attack (201 YPG, 30th in FBS). The nation's 14th-best scoring defense (18.5 PPG) is fast and athletic, led by LB Greg Blair (138 tackles), but the weak D-Line is concerning. |
|
|
Game Notes: |
|
Last Updated: 5/2/2024 8:50:41 PM EST. |
|
|