|
|
S FLORIDA
First Half Results
CINCINNATI |
|
|
25.5
| 0
Final
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|  | |
| 123 | S FLORIDA | 24 | | 124 | CINCINNATI | -8 |
|
|
|  | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 3-7 | -11.2 | 3-6 | 4-5 | 23.4 | 9.5 | 402.7 | (5.7) | 2.2 | 27.5 | 10.2 | 412.4 | (5.7) | 0.9 | | Road Games | 1-4 | -6.4 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 24.2 | 7.0 | 443.6 | (5.9) | 2.2 | 33.2 | 14.0 | 455.4 | (6.4) | 1.0 | | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | -1.6 | 0-2 | 1-2 | 19.3 | 11.0 | 397.7 | (5.6) | 1.7 | 27.7 | 7.3 | 465.0 | (6.3) | 1.3 | | Turf Games | 1-2 | -3.4 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 28.0 | 8.3 | 492.0 | (6.4) | 1.7 | 29.7 | 15.0 | 448.7 | (6.1) | 1.3 | | Conference Games | 1-4 | -6.8 | 1-3 | 2-3 | 23.0 | 9.2 | 388.4 | (5.4) | 2.2 | 26.0 | 6.4 | 407.6 | (5.5) | 1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Offense (All Games) | 23.4 | 9.5 | 22.0 | 27:49 | 37-169 | (4.6) | 19-34 | 56.0% | 234 | (6.8) | 71-403 | (5.7) | (17.2) | | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 25.4 | 13.7 | 20.1 | 29:15 | 38-152 | (4) | 18-31 | 57.8% | 225 | (7.2) | 69-377 | (5.5) | (14.9) | | Offense Road Games | 24.2 | 7.0 | 25.2 | 29:03 | 39-186 | (4.7) | 21-36 | 56.6% | 257 | (7.1) | 76-444 | (5.9) | (18.3) | | Defense (All Games) | 27.5 | 10.2 | 22.8 | 32:11 | 41-150 | (3.7) | 22-32 | 68.1% | 263 | (8.2) | 73-412 | (5.7) | (15) | | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 28.8 | 14.8 | 21.1 | 30:30 | 39-162 | (4.1) | 20-31 | 63.7% | 234 | (7.6) | 70-396 | (5.6) | (13.7) | | Defense Road Games | 33.2 | 14.0 | 24.6 | 30:57 | 41-177 | (4.3) | 22-31 | 72.3% | 279 | (9) | 72-455 | (6.4) | (13.7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 7-3 | 0 | 5-4 | 4-4 | 31.1 | 14.9 | 444.1 | (6.5) | 1.8 | 17.9 | 8.4 | 380.6 | (5.3) | 1.9 | | Home Games | 5-1 | +0.3 | 3-3 | 2-2 | 32.7 | 14.8 | 440.5 | (6.5) | 1.8 | 13.7 | 7.3 | 376.3 | (5.1) | 2.2 | | Last 3 Games | 2-1 | -0.7 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 24.0 | 12.7 | 427.7 | (6.4) | 1.7 | 14.7 | 9.0 | 388.7 | (5.3) | 1.7 | | Turf Games | 5-3 | -2.9 | 3-4 | 3-3 | 31.2 | 14.9 | 434.2 | (6.4) | 2.0 | 18.1 | 9.2 | 392.1 | (5.4) | 1.9 | | Conference Games | 3-2 | -0.7 | 3-1 | 2-3 | 27.4 | 14.4 | 420.0 | (6.4) | 1.6 | 17.6 | 8.2 | 421.0 | (5.6) | 1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Offense (All Games) | 31.1 | 14.9 | 21.2 | 28:46 | 39-213 | (5.4) | 16-29 | 54.0% | 231 | (8) | 68-444 | (6.5) | (14.3) | | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 27.5 | 14 | 21.1 | 29:23 | 38-179 | (4.6) | 18-30 | 60.6% | 230 | (7.6) | 69-408 | (6) | (14.9) | | Offense Home Games | 32.7 | 14.8 | 21.2 | 28:15 | 41-225 | (5.5) | 16-27 | 59.4% | 215 | (8.1) | 67-440 | (6.5) | (13.5) | | Defense (All Games) | 17.9 | 8.4 | 19.1 | 31:14 | 35-140 | (4) | 20-36 | 55.2% | 241 | (6.7) | 71-381 | (5.3) | (21.3) | | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 24.6 | 11.2 | 19.7 | 31:35 | 35-139 | (3.9) | 21-33 | 62.1% | 242 | (7.2) | 69-381 | (5.5) | (15.5) | | Defense Home Games | 13.7 | 7.3 | 19.7 | 31:45 | 34-129 | (3.8) | 22-39 | 57.0% | 247 | (6.3) | 73-376 | (5.1) | (27.5) |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: S FLORIDA 34.9, CINCINNATI 28.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 9/29/2012 | FLORIDA ST | 17-30 | L | 17 | W | 53 | U | 32-125 | 17-33-143 | 3 | 40-183 | 19-26-242 | 0 | | 10/6/2012 | @ TEMPLE | 28-37 | L | -4.5 | L | 47 | O | 44-165 | 18-31-219 | 3 | 51-216 | 16-20-167 | 0 | | 10/20/2012 | @ LOUISVILLE | 25-27 | L | 6 | W | 56 | U | 44-197 | 21-38-189 | 2 | 33-128 | 21-25-256 | 1 | | 10/27/2012 | SYRACUSE | 36-37 | L | -3 | L | 53.5 | O | 45-369 | 17-30-183 | 1 | 46-192 | 27-40-328 | 0 | | 11/3/2012 | CONNECTICUT | 13-6 | W | -7 | T | 46.5 | U | 34-81 | 20-32-202 | 1 | 31-43 | 24-38-284 | 3 | | 11/17/2012 | @ MIAMI | 9-40 | L | 6.5 | L | 57 | U | 29-154 | 23-43-204 | 3 | 31-92 | 24-36-456 | 1 | | 11/23/2012 | @ CINCINNATI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/1/2012 | PITTSBURGH | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 9/29/2012 | *VIRGINIA TECH | 27-24 | W | 6 | W | 47 | O | 32-103 | 20-43-392 | 2 | 34-160 | 17-30-242 | 3 | | 10/6/2012 | MIAMI OHIO | 52-14 | W | -19.5 | W | 58 | O | 50-272 | 13-23-157 | 0 | 19-59 | 27-53-320 | 4 | | 10/13/2012 | FORDHAM | 49-17 | W | -40 | L | | - | 33-210 | 15-24-262 | 0 | 29-42 | 31-42-262 | 1 | | 10/20/2012 | @ TOLEDO | 23-29 | L | -5 | L | 64.5 | U | 35-251 | 15-37-227 | 2 | 43-229 | 13-24-126 | 1 | | 10/26/2012 | @ LOUISVILLE | 31-34 | L | 3 | T | 53 | O | 41-196 | 13-28-157 | 3 | 37-108 | 24-41-416 | 1 | | 11/3/2012 | SYRACUSE | 35-24 | W | -4.5 | W | 56 | O | 53-263 | 16-27-207 | 3 | 41-193 | 23-47-286 | 2 | | 11/10/2012 | @ TEMPLE | 34-10 | W | -8 | W | 56 | U | 40-228 | 13-21-244 | 0 | 35-125 | 12-32-142 | 1 | | 11/17/2012 | RUTGERS | 3-10 | L | -6.5 | L | 47.5 | U | 28-90 | 17-31-251 | 2 | 47-234 | 11-20-186 | 2 | | 11/23/2012 | S FLORIDA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/1/2012 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
 | S FLORIDA:
Despite last season's 5-7 record, South Florida is a team that could surprise some people and win the Big East championship this year. B.J Daniels is back at QB after throwing for 2,604 yards and 13 TD, while rushing for 601 yards and six scores as a junior. He'll benefit from playing behind one of the best offensive lines in the conference, and he has his top four receivers back from last year, led by junior Sterling Griffin (team-high 530 rec yds in eight games, 3 TD). One question mark on this South Florida team is a secondary that lacks experience at both the cornerback and safety positions. The defensive line and linebacker groups are both excellent, as the Bulls ranked second in the nation in Tackles For Loss (8.3 per game) and fourth in sacks (3.3 per game), but they'll need the secondary to defend against the pass (244 YPG allowed, 83rd in FBS) to have a real shot at winning this conference.
| | CINCINNATI: The Bearcats QB position is a question mark, but it seems as though either Munchie Legaux (5 TD, 4 INT) will win the job outright, or Cincinnati will employ a two-QB system with senior Brendan Kay (8 career pass attempts). Legaux will need to improve his 47% completion rate if he's going to be successful. Junior WR Anthony McClung returns after a team-high 683 receiving yards and 6 TD in 2011. The task of replacing Isaiah Pead falls to senior RB George Winn, who had just 40 carries last year but scored on a 69-yard TD run in the Liberty Bowl. The Bearcats defensive line helped lead the nation in Tackles For Loss (8.6 per game) and finish second in sacks (3.5 per game). The linebackers are solid too, but the secondary could cause Butch Jones fits, as for years now, the team has struggled against the pass, allowing 261 passing YPG in 2011. |
|
|
Game Notes: |
|
| Last Updated: 4/18/2024 2:52:19 AM EST. |
|
|