|
|
E CAROLINA First Half Results BYU |
|
| 30 | 21 Final 28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
353 | E CAROLINA | 29.5 | 354 | BYU | -5.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 3-2 | +3 | 3-2 | 4-1 | 31.4 | 15.4 | 428.6 | (5.9) | 1.8 | 29.4 | 17.0 | 402.6 | (5.5) | 1.0 | Road Games | 1-2 | 0 | 2-1 | 3-0 | 31.3 | 14.0 | 431.0 | (5.6) | 2.3 | 33.0 | 20.3 | 386.0 | (5.4) | 0.7 | Last 3 Games | 2-1 | +3 | 2-1 | 3-0 | 35.0 | 18.7 | 456.7 | (6.4) | 2.0 | 32.0 | 21.7 | 408.0 | (5.4) | 0.3 | Grass Games | 2-1 | +3 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 29.0 | 14.0 | 394.3 | (5.5) | 1.7 | 26.3 | 11.3 | 409.3 | (5.7) | 1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 31.4 | 15.4 | 22.6 | 27:39 | 35-153 | (4.4) | 27-38 | 71.1% | 276 | (7.3) | 73-429 | (5.9) | (13.6) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 25.4 | 12.4 | 20.4 | 28:38 | 38-184 | (4.8) | 19-31 | 62.8% | 214 | (7) | 69-398 | (5.8) | (15.6) | Offense Road Games | 31.3 | 14.0 | 23.7 | 28:21 | 32-124 | (3.8) | 31-44 | 69.2% | 307 | (6.9) | 77-431 | (5.6) | (13.8) | Defense (All Games) | 29.4 | 17.0 | 22.6 | 32:21 | 46-192 | (4.2) | 15-28 | 55.1% | 211 | (7.6) | 73-403 | (5.5) | (13.7) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 30.9 | 17.3 | 21.8 | 32:17 | 45-202 | (4.5) | 15-26 | 58.2% | 201 | (7.8) | 71-404 | (5.7) | (13) | Defense Road Games | 33.0 | 20.3 | 22.0 | 31:39 | 48-208 | (4.4) | 13-23 | 55.7% | 178 | (7.6) | 71-386 | (5.4) | (11.7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 3-2 | +1.9 | 4-1 | 2-3 | 24.2 | 9.6 | 388.2 | (5.2) | 1.4 | 24.0 | 13.0 | 377.2 | (5.6) | 2.0 | Home Games | 2-0 | +2.1 | 2-0 | 1-1 | 32.5 | 7.0 | 460.0 | (5.6) | 2.5 | 18.5 | 8.5 | 295.5 | (4.8) | 2.5 | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | -1 | 2-1 | 0-3 | 17.7 | 5.7 | 349.7 | (4.5) | 1.3 | 22.7 | 13.7 | 360.0 | (5.6) | 1.7 | Grass Games | 2-1 | +1.1 | 3-0 | 1-2 | 29.3 | 8.0 | 441.7 | (5.3) | 2.0 | 20.3 | 6.7 | 331.0 | (5.4) | 2.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 24.2 | 9.6 | 20.4 | 31:05 | 34-118 | (3.5) | 24-41 | 59.8% | 270 | (6.6) | 75-388 | (5.2) | (16) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 17.2 | 7.2 | 17.5 | 29:02 | 35-115 | (3.3) | 19-35 | 53.6% | 206 | (6) | 69-322 | (4.6) | (18.8) | Offense Home Games | 32.5 | 7.0 | 23.5 | 33:10 | 40-123 | (3.1) | 26-41 | 62.7% | 337 | (8.1) | 81-460 | (5.6) | (14.2) | Defense (All Games) | 24.0 | 13.0 | 19.2 | 28:55 | 37-160 | (4.4) | 18-31 | 56.8% | 217 | (7) | 68-377 | (5.6) | (15.7) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 30.1 | 16.2 | 21.2 | 31:58 | 40-177 | (4.5) | 19-33 | 59.8% | 239 | (7.4) | 72-416 | (5.8) | (13.8) | Defense Home Games | 18.5 | 8.5 | 15.5 | 26:49 | 29-63 | (2.2) | 19-33 | 59.1% | 232 | (7) | 62-295 | (4.8) | (16) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: E CAROLINA 29.4, BYU 42.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
9/5/2015 | TOWSON | 28-20 | W | -28 | L | 58 | U | 34-210 | 29-37-230 | 0 | 44-179 | 17-33-237 | 2 | 9/12/2015 | @ FLORIDA | 24-31 | L | 20.5 | W | 53 | O | 22--13 | 37-58-346 | 3 | 38-168 | 15-25-205 | 2 | 9/19/2015 | @ NAVY | 21-45 | L | 4.5 | L | 58.5 | O | 21-80 | 36-49-325 | 2 | 75-415 | 4-7-41 | 0 | 9/26/2015 | VIRGINIA TECH | 35-28 | W | 10 | W | 50 | O | 43-182 | 14-20-228 | 2 | 42-158 | 20-35-281 | 1 | 10/3/2015 | @ SMU | 49-23 | W | -5.5 | W | 64.5 | O | 54-306 | 19-26-249 | 2 | 30-40 | 20-38-289 | 0 | 10/10/2015 | @ BYU | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/17/2015 | TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/22/2015 | TEMPLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/30/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/7/2015 | S FLORIDA | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/5/2015 | @ NEBRASKA | 33-28 | W | 5 | W | 57.5 | O | 26-132 | 28-46-379 | 1 | 37-126 | 24-41-319 | 2 | 9/12/2015 | BOISE ST | 35-24 | W | 2 | W | 56 | O | 39-72 | 17-29-309 | 2 | 31-64 | 25-38-297 | 3 | 9/19/2015 | @ UCLA | 23-24 | L | 16.5 | W | 58 | U | 41-161 | 30-47-244 | 1 | 38-296 | 11-23-106 | 3 | 9/26/2015 | @ MICHIGAN | 0-31 | L | 7 | L | 48.5 | U | 22-50 | 12-28-55 | 0 | 51-254 | 14-25-194 | 0 | 10/2/2015 | CONNECTICUT | 30-13 | W | -15 | W | 44 | U | 41-174 | 35-54-365 | 3 | 27-62 | 14-28-168 | 2 | 10/10/2015 | E CAROLINA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/16/2015 | CINCINNATI | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/24/2015 | WAGNER | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/6/2015 | @ SAN JOSE ST | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| E CAROLINA: There could be some growing pains with the new quarterback, so four road tilts in the first six games of 2015 is less than ideal. But that sets up four home games in the second half of the season and a trip to woeful UConn (2-10 last year). The final two games of the season (at UCF and versus Cincinnati) could determine the AAC title, since Memphis, one of three 7-1 AAC teams last year, is not on the Pirates schedule. The non-conference slate contains only one cupcake (Towson) plus games at Florida, at BYU and hosting Virginia Tech, but an ECU bowl berth for the ninth time in 10 years appears to be likely. | | BYU: If the Cougars remain the fourth-most penalized team in the nation (81.0 yards per game), they may not be able to extend their bowl streak to 11 straight appearances because of an absolutely brutal 2015 schedule. A winless September is a real possibility with games against four potential Top 25 teams (at Nebraska, vs. Boise State, at UCLA, at Michigan). October and November are obviously easier, but playing at Utah State, Missouri in K.C., and home tilts versus Cincinnati, Fresno State and ECU will provide significant challenges. That leaves only UConn, Wagner and San Jose St. as guaranteed wins. |
|
|
Game Notes: |
|
Last Updated: 5/2/2024 6:52:11 PM EST. |
|
|