|
|
NOTRE DAME BOSTON COLLEGE |
|
| 54 | 49 Final 20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
115 | NOTRE DAME | -11.5 | -14 | 116 | BOSTON COLLEGE | 51 | 52 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 1-1 | -1.3 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 34.0 | 20.5 | 435.5 | (5.8) | 1.5 | 18.0 | 10.0 | 328.0 | (4.6) | 1.5 | Last 3 Games | 1-1 | -1.3 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 34.0 | 20.5 | 435.5 | (5.8) | 1.5 | 18.0 | 10.0 | 328.0 | (4.6) | 1.5 | Turf Games | 1-1 | -1.3 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 34.0 | 20.5 | 435.5 | (5.8) | 1.5 | 18.0 | 10.0 | 328.0 | (4.6) | 1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 34.0 | 20.5 | 22.0 | 26:44 | 40-238 | (5.9) | 18-35 | 52.9% | 197 | (5.6) | 75-435 | (5.8) | (12.8) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 21.1 | 9.1 | 19.2 | 29:22 | 35-135 | (3.8) | 21-36 | 58.9% | 247 | (6.8) | 71-382 | (5.3) | (18.1) | Defense (All Games) | 18.0 | 10.0 | 17.0 | 33:15 | 40-135 | (3.4) | 17-32 | 54.7% | 193 | (6) | 72-328 | (4.6) | (18.2) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 22.9 | 13.8 | 17.7 | 31:38 | 38-149 | (3.9) | 17-30 | 57.0% | 203 | (6.7) | 68-352 | (5.1) | (15.4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 1-1 | -0.1 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 16.5 | 10.0 | 322.0 | (3.7) | 2.5 | 27.0 | 15.5 | 338.0 | (4.7) | 0.5 | Home Games | 0-1 | -1.1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 10.0 | 7.0 | 305.0 | (3.7) | 4.0 | 34.0 | 21.0 | 309.0 | (4.4) | 0.0 | Last 3 Games | 1-1 | -0.1 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 16.5 | 10.0 | 322.0 | (3.7) | 2.5 | 27.0 | 15.5 | 338.0 | (4.7) | 0.5 | Turf Games | 1-1 | -0.1 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 16.5 | 10.0 | 322.0 | (3.7) | 2.5 | 27.0 | 15.5 | 338.0 | (4.7) | 0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 16.5 | 10.0 | 20.0 | 30:13 | 45-145 | (3.2) | 22-41 | 53.0% | 177 | (4.3) | 87-322 | (3.7) | (19.5) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 12.5 | 5.8 | 17 | 31:48 | 45-139 | (3.1) | 15-31 | 48.4% | 130 | (4.2) | 76-270 | (3.5) | (21.6) | Offense Home Games | 10.0 | 7.0 | 19.0 | 26:47 | 41-142 | (3.5) | 18-41 | 43.9% | 163 | (4) | 82-305 | (3.7) | (30.5) | Defense (All Games) | 27.0 | 15.5 | 16.5 | 29:47 | 43-161 | (3.7) | 14-29 | 50.0% | 177 | (6.1) | 72-338 | (4.7) | (12.5) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 35.8 | 24.8 | 21.8 | 29:12 | 45-200 | (4.5) | 18-30 | 60.8% | 216 | (7.2) | 75-416 | (5.6) | (11.6) | Defense Home Games | 34.0 | 21.0 | 15.0 | 33:13 | 52-158 | (3) | 13-19 | 68.4% | 151 | (7.9) | 71-309 | (4.4) | (9.1) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: NOTRE DAME 39.5, BOSTON COLLEGE 34.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
9/2/2017 | TEMPLE | 49-16 | W | -20 | W | 55.5 | O | 44-422 | 17-30-184 | 1 | 37-85 | 19-35-245 | 1 | 9/9/2017 | GEORGIA | 19-20 | L | -5.5 | L | 57 | U | 37-55 | 20-40-210 | 2 | 43-185 | 16-29-141 | 2 | 9/16/2017 | @ BOSTON COLLEGE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/23/2017 | @ MICHIGAN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/30/2017 | MIAMI OHIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/7/2017 | @ N CAROLINA | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/1/2017 | @ N ILLINOIS | 23-20 | W | -3.5 | L | 46.5 | U | 50-148 | 26-42-191 | 1 | 35-164 | 16-39-203 | 1 | 9/9/2017 | WAKE FOREST | 10-34 | L | 0 | L | 45 | U | 41-142 | 18-41-163 | 4 | 52-158 | 13-19-151 | 0 | 9/16/2017 | NOTRE DAME | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/23/2017 | @ CLEMSON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/30/2017 | C MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/7/2017 | VIRGINIA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/14/2017 | @ LOUISVILLE | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| NOTRE DAME: Notre Dame's 2016 season was a nightmare, but the team should be able to turn things around this year. The Fighting Irish have a good offensive line, so they should be able to improve in the running game. They do, however, have to be a lot better defensively. | | BOSTON COLLEGE: DE Harold Landry is back to anchor an Eagles defense that should be one of the ACC's best. The question is whether or not the team can figure things out offensively, which hasn't yet happened under Steve Addazio. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 3/28/2024 10:37:51 PM EST. |
|
|