|
|
BOWLING GREEN First Half Results BALL ST |
|
| 37.5 | 27 Final 0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
101 | BOWLING GREEN | -12.5 | 102 | BALL ST | 36 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 8-3 | +3.8 | 8-3 | 6-5 | 43.8 | 22.7 | 565.1 | (6.8) | 1.0 | 29.4 | 16.0 | 436.5 | (5.6) | 1.7 | Road Games | 5-1 | +6.2 | 4-2 | 2-4 | 38.3 | 21.0 | 571.8 | (6.5) | 0.8 | 27.2 | 14.7 | 420.7 | (5.5) | 1.7 | Last 3 Games | 2-1 | -2.4 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 43.7 | 22.7 | 484.7 | (6.4) | 2.0 | 31.7 | 21.3 | 478.7 | (5.6) | 1.7 | Turf Games | 7-2 | +2.8 | 7-2 | 5-4 | 46.3 | 23.2 | 568.9 | (7) | 0.9 | 26.2 | 14.1 | 419.0 | (5.4) | 2.0 | Conference Games | 6-1 | +1.6 | 5-2 | 3-4 | 46.9 | 25.1 | 549.9 | (6.9) | 1.0 | 23.6 | 13.9 | 412.7 | (5.2) | 2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 43.8 | 22.7 | 29.7 | 28:27 | 38-164 | (4.3) | 30-44 | 68.1% | 401 | (9) | 83-565 | (6.8) | (12.9) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 27.3 | 14.2 | 20.9 | 30:46 | 38-158 | (4.1) | 20-34 | 58.1% | 239 | (7) | 72-397 | (5.5) | (14.5) | Offense Road Games | 38.3 | 21.0 | 30.3 | 29:20 | 41-177 | (4.3) | 30-47 | 65.4% | 395 | (8.5) | 88-572 | (6.5) | (14.9) | Defense (All Games) | 29.4 | 16.0 | 24.5 | 31:21 | 41-172 | (4.2) | 23-38 | 60.1% | 264 | (7) | 79-436 | (5.6) | (14.9) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 27.8 | 15.5 | 21 | 30:12 | 39-172 | (4.4) | 20-34 | 58.4% | 232 | (6.8) | 73-403 | (5.5) | (14.5) | Defense Road Games | 27.2 | 14.7 | 23.5 | 30:40 | 39-174 | (4.4) | 22-37 | 60.0% | 247 | (6.7) | 76-421 | (5.5) | (15.5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 3-8 | -11.4 | 4-7 | 3-7 | 24.3 | 10.4 | 381.4 | (5.1) | 1.1 | 34.7 | 20.9 | 512.7 | (6.7) | 1.5 | Home Games | 2-3 | -8.4 | 2-3 | 0-4 | 23.6 | 11.4 | 385.4 | (4.9) | 1.2 | 24.8 | 14.2 | 463.6 | (6.3) | 1.6 | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | -1 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 19.3 | 6.7 | 333.3 | (5.2) | 1.3 | 37.3 | 20.3 | 588.7 | (7.3) | 0.7 | Turf Games | 3-6 | -10.4 | 3-6 | 2-6 | 25.0 | 11.2 | 386.1 | (5.1) | 1.1 | 33.6 | 19.3 | 510.1 | (6.7) | 1.3 | Conference Games | 2-5 | -3 | 3-4 | 2-5 | 22.6 | 10.1 | 362.3 | (5.1) | 1.1 | 33.6 | 20.0 | 514.1 | (6.8) | 1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 24.3 | 10.4 | 21.3 | 27:48 | 36-157 | (4.3) | 22-38 | 57.0% | 224 | (5.9) | 74-381 | (5.1) | (15.7) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 28.3 | 14.2 | 22 | 30:21 | 39-185 | (4.7) | 21-35 | 59.5% | 226 | (6.5) | 74-412 | (5.6) | (14.5) | Offense Home Games | 23.6 | 11.4 | 23.4 | 28:30 | 37-135 | (3.6) | 26-42 | 61.9% | 251 | (6) | 79-385 | (4.9) | (16.3) | Defense (All Games) | 34.7 | 20.9 | 24.2 | 32:12 | 43-215 | (5) | 24-34 | 70.5% | 297 | (8.8) | 77-513 | (6.7) | (14.8) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 29.1 | 15.4 | 21.7 | 30:37 | 38-162 | (4.3) | 22-36 | 61.8% | 271 | (7.5) | 74-433 | (5.9) | (14.8) | Defense Home Games | 24.8 | 14.2 | 22.0 | 31:30 | 35-145 | (4.1) | 28-39 | 73.1% | 319 | (8.3) | 74-464 | (6.3) | (18.7) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: BOWLING GREEN 29.5, BALL ST 26.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
9/26/2015 | @ PURDUE | 35-28 | W | -4 | W | 74 | U | 33-137 | 43-59-402 | 2 | 38-77 | 30-40-349 | 1 | 10/3/2015 | @ BUFFALO | 28-22 | W | -7.5 | L | 68.5 | U | 42-212 | 23-29-324 | 0 | 37-152 | 35-59-348 | 1 | 10/10/2015 | MASSACHUSETTS | 62-38 | W | -12 | W | 79 | O | 46-206 | 37-45-519 | 1 | 15-30 | 37-61-486 | 2 | 10/17/2015 | AKRON | 59-10 | W | -13 | W | 62.5 | O | 42-120 | 27-33-412 | 0 | 42-167 | 15-30-104 | 4 | 10/24/2015 | @ KENT ST | 48-0 | W | -13 | W | 58.5 | U | 46-153 | 29-45-449 | 0 | 26-55 | 12-25-111 | 2 | 11/4/2015 | OHIO U | 62-24 | W | -20.5 | W | 66 | O | 30-182 | 29-39-399 | 0 | 56-299 | 21-41-244 | 2 | 11/11/2015 | @ W MICHIGAN | 41-27 | W | -3.5 | W | 73 | U | 41-236 | 23-41-269 | 1 | 45-205 | 24-40-282 | 2 | 11/17/2015 | TOLEDO | 28-44 | L | -8 | L | 72.5 | U | 30-94 | 29-47-274 | 5 | 50-198 | 16-24-208 | 1 | 11/24/2015 | @ BALL ST | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/26/2015 | @ NORTHWESTERN | 19-24 | L | 17.5 | W | 48 | U | 34-181 | 14-35-178 | 1 | 57-290 | 18-31-256 | 3 | 10/3/2015 | TOLEDO | 10-24 | L | 5.5 | L | 54.5 | U | 30-26 | 23-37-236 | 1 | 48-280 | 16-22-164 | 2 | 10/10/2015 | @ N ILLINOIS | 41-59 | L | 10.5 | L | 54.5 | O | 35-110 | 31-53-393 | 1 | 59-273 | 29-32-363 | 1 | 10/17/2015 | GEORGIA ST | 19-31 | L | -14 | L | 63 | U | 40-154 | 28-48-218 | 1 | 32-33 | 28-39-412 | 1 | 10/24/2015 | C MICHIGAN | 21-23 | L | 7 | W | 56 | U | 29-112 | 25-40-187 | 1 | 31-118 | 30-39-316 | 2 | 10/31/2015 | MASSACHUSETTS | 20-10 | W | 1 | W | 66 | U | 44-152 | 20-32-275 | 2 | 36-189 | 32-44-259 | 1 | 11/5/2015 | @ W MICHIGAN | 7-54 | L | 15.5 | L | 61.5 | U | 25-74 | 12-27-78 | 1 | 56-358 | 20-27-353 | 1 | 11/17/2015 | @ OHIO U | 31-48 | L | 10 | L | 56 | O | 30-174 | 16-34-247 | 1 | 56-332 | 15-22-275 | 0 | 11/24/2015 | BOWLING GREEN | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| BOWLING GREEN: The return of MAC Player of the Year contender Matt Johnson under center might give them the most explosive offense in the MAC, but Bowling Green has one of the nation's worst defenses. After taking their lumps as underdogs in each of their four September games, the Falcons could easily defend their division title considering they play both of the presumed top challengers, Akron and Ohio, at home. | | BALL ST: Bowl eligibility is within reach, even with the naturally tougher schedule in the MAC West and road games at Texas A&M and Northwestern. The Cardinals will get VMI and Georgia State in their other non-conference match-ups and will have a chance of knocking off Toledo at home, which could push them to seven wins. If they go .500, it will be because they find stability at quarterback and the run defense holds its own. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 5/21/2024 2:05:42 PM EST. |
|
|