| | | |
TEMPLE ARMY |
|
| 57.5 | 63 Final 32 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
315 | TEMPLE | 56.5 | 57.5 | 316 | ARMY | -2 | -3.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 3-6 | -3.8 | 3-6 | 5-3 | 21.0 | 9.7 | 293.0 | (4.6) | 1.7 | 30.3 | 17.4 | 426.0 | (6.2) | 1.4 | Road Games | 1-3 | -1.2 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 16.0 | 8.5 | 301.0 | (4.7) | 2.0 | 32.5 | 22.5 | 477.0 | (6.6) | 0.5 | Last 3 Games | 0-3 | -3 | 0-3 | 2-1 | 14.7 | 9.0 | 300.0 | (4.6) | 2.3 | 42.0 | 28.7 | 502.7 | (7.9) | 0.0 | Turf Games | 0-1 | -1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 17.0 | 17.0 | 309.0 | (5.2) | 4.0 | 45.0 | 31.0 | 508.0 | (7.8) | 0.0 |
|
| |
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 21.0 | 9.7 | 15.4 | 29:05 | 42-168 | (4) | 11-22 | 50.5% | 125 | (5.8) | 63-293 | (4.6) | (14) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 23 | 11.5 | 18.2 | 30:36 | 38-152 | (4) | 17-29 | 57.0% | 195 | (6.6) | 67-346 | (5.1) | (15.1) | Offense Road Games | 16.0 | 8.5 | 17.2 | 27:40 | 40-175 | (4.4) | 12-24 | 52.1% | 126 | (5.3) | 64-301 | (4.7) | (18.8) | Defense (All Games) | 30.3 | 17.4 | 21.2 | 30:55 | 40-170 | (4.3) | 18-29 | 60.8% | 256 | (8.9) | 69-426 | (6.2) | (14) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 24.5 | 12.7 | 19.7 | 30:22 | 38-150 | (4) | 18-30 | 59.4% | 231 | (7.6) | 68-382 | (5.6) | (15.6) | Defense Road Games | 32.5 | 22.5 | 24.0 | 32:20 | 38-159 | (4.2) | 22-34 | 64.7% | 317 | (9.3) | 72-477 | (6.6) | (14.7) |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 2-8 | -6.7 | 3-7 | 4-4 | 24.6 | 11.3 | 432.2 | (5.6) | 1.7 | 34.4 | 18.0 | 426.6 | (6.7) | 1.3 | Home Games | 2-4 | -2.3 | 3-3 | 2-2 | 26.2 | 11.0 | 444.8 | (5.6) | 1.3 | 29.5 | 17.2 | 412.8 | (6.5) | 1.8 | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | +0.2 | 1-2 | 0-2 | 23.3 | 12.3 | 376.7 | (4.8) | 1.3 | 26.3 | 10.3 | 334.3 | (4.9) | 2.3 | Turf Games | 2-7 | -5.7 | 3-6 | 4-3 | 26.6 | 12.6 | 443.3 | (5.6) | 1.6 | 33.6 | 17.7 | 424.8 | (6.6) | 1.4 |
|
| |
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 24.6 | 11.3 | 23.5 | 32:35 | 68-366 | (5.4) | 4-10 | 42.6% | 66 | (6.5) | 78-432 | (5.6) | (17.6) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 25.3 | 13 | 21.9 | 30:09 | 41-187 | (4.5) | 19-32 | 60.6% | 228 | (7.2) | 73-415 | (5.7) | (16.4) | Offense Home Games | 26.2 | 11.0 | 25.0 | 33:53 | 70-376 | (5.4) | 4-10 | 46.6% | 69 | (7.1) | 79-445 | (5.6) | (17) | Defense (All Games) | 34.4 | 18.0 | 20.8 | 27:25 | 40-209 | (5.2) | 15-23 | 64.4% | 218 | (9.4) | 64-427 | (6.7) | (12.4) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 28.3 | 14.7 | 20.7 | 30:49 | 41-196 | (4.7) | 16-28 | 58.2% | 198 | (7.2) | 69-394 | (5.7) | (13.9) | Defense Home Games | 29.5 | 17.2 | 20.2 | 26:07 | 41-207 | (5.1) | 14-23 | 62.6% | 206 | (8.9) | 64-413 | (6.5) | (14) |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: TEMPLE 34.1, ARMY 28.8 |
| | |
|
|
9/22/2012 | @ PENN ST | 13-24 | L | 6 | L | 43 | U | 28-113 | 13-26-124 | 0 | 42-173 | 24-36-318 | 1 | 10/6/2012 | S FLORIDA | 37-28 | W | 4.5 | W | 47 | O | 51-216 | 16-20-167 | 0 | 44-165 | 18-31-219 | 3 | 10/13/2012 | @ CONNECTICUT | 17-14 | W | 5 | W | 41 | U | 49-202 | 13-26-132 | 2 | 41-88 | 22-39-293 | 1 | 10/20/2012 | RUTGERS | 10-35 | L | 3.5 | L | 44.5 | O | 42-119 | 8-17-72 | 3 | 30-139 | 17-27-232 | 2 | 10/27/2012 | @ PITTSBURGH | 17-47 | L | 6.5 | L | 47.5 | O | 40-129 | 18-28-195 | 2 | 36-207 | 20-28-321 | 0 | 11/3/2012 | @ LOUISVILLE | 17-45 | L | 16 | L | 53 | O | 43-255 | 6-16-54 | 4 | 32-170 | 22-33-338 | 0 | 11/10/2012 | CINCINNATI | 10-34 | L | 8 | L | 56 | U | 35-125 | 12-32-142 | 1 | 40-228 | 13-21-244 | 0 | 11/17/2012 | @ ARMY | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/23/2012 | SYRACUSE | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
9/22/2012 | @ WAKE FOREST | 37-49 | L | 7 | L | 54.5 | O | 77-429 | 3-6-77 | 1 | 38-296 | 15-24-221 | 0 | 9/29/2012 | STONY BROOK | 3-23 | L | -9.5 | L | | - | 45-273 | 4-9-57 | 4 | 59-273 | 11-15-151 | 1 | 10/6/2012 | BOSTON COLLEGE | 34-31 | W | 7 | W | 56.5 | O | 79-516 | 5-13-79 | 2 | 28-186 | 16-29-234 | 1 | 10/13/2012 | KENT ST | 17-31 | L | 1 | L | 59 | U | 70-325 | 10-20-132 | 1 | 36-283 | 7-12-84 | 0 | 10/20/2012 | @ E MICHIGAN | 38-48 | L | -2.5 | L | 62 | O | 52-413 | 3-11-65 | 2 | 47-208 | 19-31-369 | 1 | 10/27/2012 | BALL ST | 22-30 | L | 3 | L | 68.5 | U | 62-341 | 3-6-38 | 1 | 52-224 | 18-27-189 | 1 | 11/3/2012 | AIR FORCE | 41-21 | W | 7 | W | 62 | P | 76-314 | 4-6-100 | 0 | 43-103 | 17-29-235 | 5 | 11/10/2012 | @ RUTGERS | 7-28 | L | 17 | L | 53.5 | U | 68-282 | 7-17-55 | 3 | 34-113 | 15-18-139 | 1 | 11/17/2012 | TEMPLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/8/2012 | *NAVY | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | TEMPLE: The inexperienced Owls could be in for a rude awakening when they rejoin the Big East in 2012. However, they are finally strong at the quarterback position with junior Chris Coyer (30-for-50, 463 yds, 6 TD, 0 INT), who emerged as the leader of their football team. The offensive line is losing four starters, but head coach Steve Addazio is confident that the new linemen can step in and contribute immediately. The running game has big shoes to fill for the departed Bernard Pierce and his 1,481 rushing yards and 27 TD. On defense, Temple allowed a mere 13.9 PPG (3rd in nation), holding five teams to single digits. But the Owls return only five players and will be facing more talented offenses in the Big East than they did in the MAC. | | ARMY: Army seemingly was on the right track after playing in a bowl game in 2010, but the loss of a stew of starters forced a young, inexperienced group of players to play big minutes before they were ready. This season, that youth has a lot more experience and should improve upon a disappointing 3-9 season. Fourth-year starting QB Trent Steelman (3 TD, 2 INT; 645 rush yds, 12 TD) is back after a season plagued by injuries that kept him off the field for three games. The Knights had the nation's leading rushing attack (347 YPG) and they'll get back RBs Raymond Maples (1,066 rush yds, 7.3 YPC, 4 TD) and Jared Hassin (450 rush yds). The offensive line will be a solid group, as they will be starting four seniors. Defensively, Army is losing only three starters, so the unit that was on the field last season (164 pass YPG allowed, 5th in nation) had an entire year to grow together. |
| | Game Notes: |
| Last Updated: 3/19/2024 9:10:39 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|