| | | |
TEXAS TECH First Half Results W VIRGINIA |
|
| 64.5 | 31 Final 37 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
533 | TEXAS TECH | 63.5 | 534 | W VIRGINIA | -9 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 11-10 | -1.8 | 6-10 | 4-6 | 63.3 | 29.0 | 39.9% | 36.1 | 63.0 | 29.8 | 40.8% | 33.0 | Road Games | 0-7 | -7.5 | 2-5 | 1-4 | 51.6 | 25.0 | 32.3% | 35.3 | 71.6 | 32.9 | 45.4% | 37.9 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | +1.8 | 2-3 | 1-4 | 50.0 | 22.2 | 29.7% | 34.2 | 67.4 | 28.8 | 45.1% | 35.2 | Conference Games | 1-7 | -0.2 | 2-6 | 4-4 | 54.0 | 23.4 | 32.9% | 33.6 | 71.4 | 31.1 | 45.7% | 36.9 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 63.3 | 29.0 | 21-52 | 39.9% | 5-16 | 30.7% | 17-26 | 65.5% | 36 | 11 | 11 | 17 | 6 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 65.6 | 30.3 | 23-54 | 41.9% | 6-18 | 33.2% | 14-20 | 67.9% | 35 | 10 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 51.6 | 25.0 | 17-54 | 32.3% | 4-17 | 23.3% | 13-20 | 63.6% | 35 | 11 | 7 | 18 | 5 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 63.0 | 29.8 | 22-53 | 40.8% | 6-20 | 32.1% | 13-20 | 67.1% | 33 | 9 | 11 | 21 | 7 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 68 | 31.9 | 24-55 | 42.9% | 6-19 | 33.4% | 14-21 | 68.2% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 71.6 | 32.9 | 25-54 | 45.4% | 7-20 | 37.7% | 15-21 | 71.9% | 38 | 9 | 14 | 18 | 7 | 12 | 6 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 17-3 | +3 | 11-7 | 8-5 | 77.0 | 35.1 | 41.4% | 38.4 | 63.9 | 29.5 | 44.2% | 34.5 | Home Games | 7-2 | -3.5 | 4-4 | 3-2 | 78.8 | 36.6 | 39.7% | 40.6 | 62.2 | 29.6 | 44.4% | 33.8 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | 0 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 71.8 | 32.4 | 36.1% | 37.0 | 72.0 | 32.0 | 44.3% | 40.8 | Conference Games | 5-2 | +2 | 4-3 | 4-3 | 73.6 | 32.0 | 38.7% | 37.6 | 70.6 | 31.6 | 43.7% | 38.9 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 77.0 | 35.1 | 27-64 | 41.4% | 6-20 | 29.7% | 18-26 | 66.9% | 38 | 15 | 15 | 23 | 13 | 12 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 65.3 | 30.4 | 23-55 | 40.9% | 6-18 | 32.6% | 14-21 | 67.8% | 35 | 10 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 78.8 | 36.6 | 27-67 | 39.7% | 7-23 | 28.2% | 19-27 | 71.1% | 41 | 17 | 16 | 21 | 13 | 11 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 63.9 | 29.5 | 21-47 | 44.2% | 5-15 | 34.6% | 17-25 | 66.2% | 35 | 8 | 11 | 23 | 5 | 22 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 69.3 | 32.7 | 24-55 | 44.1% | 6-19 | 34.1% | 14-21 | 67.6% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 62.2 | 29.6 | 21-47 | 44.4% | 5-14 | 36.4% | 15-22 | 68.5% | 34 | 7 | 11 | 23 | 5 | 21 | 4 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: TEXAS TECH 73.2, W VIRGINIA 74.3 |
| | |
|
|
12/14/2014 | PRAIRIE VIEW A&M | 79-51 | W | | - | | - | 27-51 | 52.9% | 39 | 9 | 18-50 | 36.0% | 22 | 17 | 12/17/2014 | S CAROLINA ST | 101-39 | W | | - | | - | 37-64 | 57.8% | 53 | 11 | 14-66 | 21.2% | 35 | 12 | 12/19/2014 | ARK-PINE BLUFF | 72-51 | W | | - | | - | 23-48 | 47.9% | 37 | 15 | 15-48 | 31.2% | 25 | 16 | 12/22/2014 | *LOYOLA-IL | 44-62 | L | -7 | L | | - | 17-50 | 34.0% | 29 | 9 | 17-45 | 37.8% | 39 | 14 | 12/23/2014 | *HOUSTON | 69-82 | L | -6 | L | | - | 21-52 | 40.4% | 33 | 12 | 27-50 | 54.0% | 31 | 12 | 12/29/2014 | N TEXAS | 60-45 | W | -12 | W | | - | 19-44 | 43.2% | 36 | 19 | 18-52 | 34.6% | 30 | 16 | 1/3/2015 | TEXAS | 61-70 | L | 8 | L | 127 | O | 22-52 | 42.3% | 29 | 15 | 20-52 | 38.5% | 41 | 17 | 1/5/2015 | W VIRGINIA | 67-78 | L | 6 | L | 134.5 | O | 19-46 | 41.3% | 35 | 22 | 30-63 | 47.6% | 35 | 8 | 1/10/2015 | @ KANSAS | 54-86 | L | 15 | L | 133 | O | 18-55 | 32.7% | 34 | 15 | 32-61 | 52.5% | 43 | 11 | 1/14/2015 | @ KANSAS ST | 51-58 | L | 9.5 | W | 124 | U | 19-56 | 33.9% | 38 | 13 | 17-44 | 38.6% | 30 | 11 | 1/17/2015 | TCU | 42-62 | L | 2.5 | L | 125.5 | U | 11-48 | 22.9% | 31 | 12 | 19-42 | 45.2% | 36 | 11 | 1/21/2015 | @ OKLAHOMA ST | 43-63 | L | 14 | L | 126.5 | U | 15-54 | 27.8% | 32 | 10 | 21-47 | 44.7% | 36 | 13 | 1/24/2015 | IOWA ST | 78-73 | W | 10 | W | 136 | O | 22-53 | 41.5% | 35 | 13 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 35 | 10 | 1/28/2015 | @ OKLAHOMA | 36-81 | L | 16 | L | 128 | U | 11-52 | 21.2% | 35 | 17 | 32-61 | 52.5% | 39 | 9 | 1/31/2015 | @ W VIRGINIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/4/2015 | KANSAS ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/7/2015 | @ IOWA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/10/2015 | KANSAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/14/2015 | @ TEXAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/17/2015 | BAYLOR | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/21/2015 | OKLAHOMA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
12/14/2014 | *MARSHALL | 69-66 | W | -18 | L | | - | 22-57 | 38.6% | 36 | 15 | 19-38 | 50.0% | 26 | 24 | 12/20/2014 | *NC STATE | 83-69 | W | -2.5 | W | 139 | O | 31-58 | 53.4% | 28 | 14 | 20-36 | 55.6% | 26 | 23 | 12/22/2014 | WOFFORD | 77-44 | W | -12.5 | W | | - | 27-55 | 49.1% | 37 | 13 | 11-41 | 26.8% | 27 | 21 | 12/30/2014 | VIRGINIA TECH | 82-51 | W | -17 | W | 141.5 | U | 30-59 | 50.8% | 36 | 17 | 20-43 | 46.5% | 22 | 25 | 1/3/2015 | @ TCU | 78-67 | W | 1 | W | 127.5 | O | 28-66 | 42.4% | 43 | 14 | 19-44 | 43.2% | 33 | 18 | 1/5/2015 | @ TEXAS TECH | 78-67 | W | -6 | W | 134.5 | O | 30-63 | 47.6% | 35 | 8 | 19-46 | 41.3% | 35 | 22 | 1/10/2015 | IOWA ST | 72-74 | L | -4.5 | L | 150 | U | 22-68 | 32.4% | 38 | 9 | 25-50 | 50.0% | 40 | 18 | 1/13/2015 | OKLAHOMA | 86-65 | W | -4 | W | 141 | O | 30-68 | 44.1% | 42 | 9 | 21-50 | 42.0% | 35 | 22 | 1/17/2015 | @ TEXAS | 50-77 | L | 3 | L | 136 | U | 13-54 | 24.1% | 32 | 17 | 21-49 | 42.9% | 44 | 19 | 1/24/2015 | TCU | 86-85 | W | -10.5 | L | 131.5 | O | 29-71 | 40.8% | 37 | 14 | 27-55 | 49.1% | 47 | 19 | 1/27/2015 | @ KANSAS ST | 65-59 | W | 1 | W | 135 | U | 20-55 | 36.4% | 36 | 20 | 18-49 | 36.7% | 38 | 25 | 1/31/2015 | TEXAS TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/3/2015 | @ OKLAHOMA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/7/2015 | BAYLOR | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/11/2015 | KANSAS ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/14/2015 | @ IOWA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/16/2015 | KANSAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/21/2015 | @ OKLAHOMA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | TEXAS TECH: The Red Raiders will look to their backcourt to get them back to the postseason for the first time since an NIT berth in 2010. Texas Tech was competitive in many games last season, as they defeated Baylor and Oklahoma State, while losing in the final minutes to Iowa State and Kansas. PG Robert Turner (9.3 PPG, 2.6 APG and 2.6 RPG) and SG Toddrick Gotcher (7.3 PPG, 2.9 RPG and 1.9 APG) are the only two starters back on the team, and they will be looked upon to take on the biggest chunks of the scoring load. But both players shot just 40% FG last season, and Tubby Smith will need to find somebody to rely on in a thin frontcourt. | | W VIRGINIA: West Virginia had some big wins last season against Kansas and Kansas State, and has one of the top returning scorers in college basketball in combination G Juwan Staten (18.1 PPG, 5.8 APG and 5.6 RPG). Staten is nearly impossible to contain off the bounce, as he does a great job of finishing at the rim and drawing fouls (182-of-253, 72% from the free-throw line). For Staten, he will have to be even better this season as the No. 2 and No. 3 scorers for the Mountaineers are no longer on the team. PF Devin Williams (8.4 PPG, 7.2 RPG) is a guy that can get double-doubles on any given night, and he will have to do that for a West Virginia team that is going to struggle to score the ball. Head coach Bob Huggins always gets his teams to play hard, but to make a run at the NCAA Tournament, players like SG Gary Browne (5.9 PPG and 2.4 RPG) and JUCO transfer SG Jaysean Paige are going to have to play really well. |
| | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ PA SPORTSTICKER COLLEGE BASKETBALL PREVIEW (TEXAS TECH-WEST VIRGINIA) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
*Texas Tech-West Virginia Preview* ==================================
By KEVIN CHROUST STATS Writer
Texas Tech (11-10) at West Virginia (17-3), 12:00 p.m. EDT
Big 12 play isn't doing much to slow West Virginia from bringing out the worst in opponents' ball handling.
That seems unlikely to change Saturday at home against last-place Texas Tech, which turns the ball over more than all but one team in the conference.
The 17th-ranked Mountaineers (17-3, 5-2) lead the nation with 22.1 turnovers forced per game and a plus-9.7 turnover differential, and they again dominated in that area in Tuesday's 65-59 win at Kansas State with the Wildcats committing 25.
Kansas State ranks last in the league with 14.2 turnovers per game and Texas Tech (11-10, 1-7) isn't far off at 14.0. The Mountaineers have conference opponents coughing up the ball 20.4 times per game.
"That's what we do," said guard Jevon Carter, one of five West Virginia players who had two steals Tuesday. "We pick teams up full court, try to turn them over, make them uncomfortable. That's just what we do."
Tarik Phillip had 12 points off the bench while Juwan Staten added 11 for West Virginia, which shot 36.4 percent but held Kansas State to its lowest percentage in conference play at 36.7.
Staten, the team leader with 14.9 points per game, matched a season low with seven shot attempts as part of a more selective trend for the senior. He's averaging 8.0 attempts in the last four games after shooting 13.0 times through his first 15, but the recent shift has yielded just 9.0 points per game and 28.1 percent shooting.
Coach Bob Huggins downplayed any falloff Tuesday.
"Sometimes people will look and see that Wanny had 11 points and have no idea what he did for us," Huggins said. "He was terrific tonight."
West Virginia already got under the Red Raiders' skin in Lubbock on Jan. 5. The Mountaineers won 78-67 - their fifth victory in as many regular-season tries against Texas Tech since joining the Big 12 - with a 22-8 turnover advantage.
Shift that to a hostile road environment for the Red Raiders, and coach Tubby Smith's team could be in even more trouble.
"We just need to go out each game and do what the coaches tell us and execute," senior guard Robert Turner told the Red Raiders' official website. "It is on us older players to lead this team and get us where we need to go."
Staten had a team-high 16 points earlier this month and is averaging 19.0 on 55.0 percent in the last three meetings, while Texas Tech's Devaugntah Williams scored 21.
Turnovers meant little in Texas Tech's 81-36 loss at No. 24 Oklahoma on Wednesday. The Red Raiders committed 17, but getting a shot off didn't help much with an 11-of-52 (21.2 percent) effort.
Turner and reserve Stan Mays each had eight points in a head-scratching performance that followed last Saturday's 78-73 home win over then-No. 9 Iowa State.
"What we are looking for is some consistency," said Smith, whose team is facing a third straight ranked opponent. "We have to remember that we have seven new faces on our team that are adjusting to Division I basketball in the toughest league in the country. There is a learning curve. We are just trying to get better each day."
It was the second time in four games that Texas Tech had been limited to 11 field goals and its lowest scoring output in the Big 12 era.
Dating to last season, Smith's team has dropped its last nine true road games by an average of 19.1 points. Texas Tech has lost 25 straight road games against the Top 25 by an average of 23.3 points.
|
| Last Updated: 5/5/2024 11:57:48 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|