|
|
BOSTON COLLEGE W VIRGINIA |
|
| 141 | 66 Final 70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PUERTO RICO TIP OFF - Round 2 - Coliseo Roberto Clemente - San Juan, PR |
|
| | |
555 | BOSTON COLLEGE | 139 | 142 | 556 | W VIRGINIA | -9 | -9 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 2-1 | +0.8 | 1-1 | 1-0 | 63.0 | 32.0 | 39.4% | 36.3 | 62.0 | 24.0 | 40.9% | 34.3 | Road Games | 1-1 | +0.8 | 1-1 | 1-0 | 65.5 | 34.0 | 41.1% | 37.0 | 68.0 | 27.0 | 46.6% | 32.0 | Last 5 Games | 2-1 | +0.8 | 1-1 | 1-0 | 63.0 | 32.0 | 39.4% | 36.3 | 62.0 | 24.0 | 40.9% | 34.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 63.0 | 32.0 | 22-55 | 39.4% | 5-23 | 20.6% | 15-22 | 68.2% | 36 | 10 | 11 | 24 | 7 | 15 | 2 | vs opponents surrendering | 62.9 | 30.2 | 23-57 | 40.7% | 6-20 | 28.0% | 11-17 | 63.4% | 33 | 8 | 13 | 24 | 6 | 15 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 65.5 | 34.0 | 23-56 | 41.1% | 6-24 | 26.5% | 13-19 | 66.7% | 37 | 10 | 13 | 27 | 7 | 17 | 2 | Stats Against (All Games) | 62.0 | 24.0 | 19-46 | 40.9% | 3-13 | 20.5% | 22-31 | 70.2% | 34 | 7 | 11 | 21 | 9 | 17 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 72.3 | 30.2 | 22-52 | 43.0% | 5-15 | 31.6% | 23-31 | 73.0% | 39 | 10 | 13 | 19 | 7 | 15 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 68.0 | 27.0 | 20-44 | 46.6% | 1-8 | 12.5% | 26-37 | 70.3% | 32 | 6 | 11 | 19 | 10 | 16 | 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 3-0 | +1 | 1-1 | 1-0 | 79.3 | 37.7 | 36.5% | 47.3 | 58.3 | 25.7 | 45.7% | 32.3 | Road Games | 1-0 | +1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 91.0 | 53.0 | 44.4% | 43.0 | 65.0 | 27.0 | 48.9% | 33.0 | Last 5 Games | 3-0 | +1 | 1-1 | 1-0 | 79.3 | 37.7 | 36.5% | 47.3 | 58.3 | 25.7 | 45.7% | 32.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 79.3 | 37.7 | 27-74 | 36.5% | 8-29 | 26.1% | 18-26 | 67.9% | 47 | 21 | 16 | 20 | 13 | 11 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 67.8 | 29.8 | 21-62 | 34.3% | 8-26 | 28.9% | 18-27 | 66.9% | 42 | 16 | 12 | 20 | 9 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 91.0 | 53.0 | 32-72 | 44.4% | 9-26 | 34.6% | 18-26 | 69.2% | 43 | 12 | 18 | 26 | 16 | 12 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 58.3 | 25.7 | 20-43 | 45.7% | 4-11 | 32.4% | 15-23 | 66.7% | 32 | 5 | 10 | 24 | 5 | 23 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 62.9 | 30.6 | 21-48 | 44.7% | 5-13 | 34.2% | 16-23 | 69.5% | 35 | 6 | 9 | 24 | 6 | 17 | 3 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 65.0 | 27.0 | 22-45 | 48.9% | 5-12 | 41.7% | 16-32 | 50.0% | 33 | 6 | 10 | 24 | 5 | 24 | 2 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: BOSTON COLLEGE 74.7, W VIRGINIA 67.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/14/2014 | NEW HAMPSHIRE | 58-50 | W | | - | | - | 19-53 | 35.8% | 35 | 11 | 15-49 | 30.6% | 39 | 19 | 11/16/2014 | *MASSACHUSETTS | 62-71 | L | 5 | L | | - | 20-57 | 35.1% | 43 | 18 | 20-41 | 48.8% | 34 | 15 | 11/20/2014 | *NEW MEXICO | 69-65 | W | 5 | W | 131.5 | O | 26-55 | 47.3% | 31 | 16 | 21-47 | 44.7% | 30 | 18 | 11/21/2014 | *W VIRGINIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/1/2014 | MARIST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/5/2014 | PROVIDENCE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/11/2014 | MAINE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/14/2014 | BINGHAMTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/14/2014 | MONMOUTH | 64-54 | W | -16 | L | | - | 18-69 | 26.1% | 49 | 14 | 17-38 | 44.7% | 33 | 24 | 11/16/2014 | LAFAYETTE | 83-56 | W | | - | | - | 31-81 | 38.3% | 50 | 6 | 20-46 | 43.5% | 31 | 20 | 11/20/2014 | *GEORGE MASON | 91-65 | W | -10 | W | 138.5 | O | 32-72 | 44.4% | 43 | 12 | 22-45 | 48.9% | 33 | 24 | 11/21/2014 | *BOSTON COLLEGE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/26/2014 | *VMI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/29/2014 | COLL OF CHARLESTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/4/2014 | LSU | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/7/2014 | @ N KENTUCKY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/14/2014 | *MARSHALL | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| BOSTON COLLEGE: While it does not seem likely that the Eagles have the talent to compete in the conference, the team does have one of the conference's best players in PG Oliver Hanlan (18.5 PPG, 3.4 RPG, 2.9 APG). He has tremendous size for a floor general (6-foot-4), and he is also fearless when driving to the basket. Hanlan is a great athlete, and if he is able to improve from the 3-point line (35%), he has a chance to become at least a 20-point scorer. SG Patrick Heckmann (6.0 PPG, 45% FG) and SG Lonnie Jackson (7.0 PPG, 38% threes) are two solid role players, but they will have to increase their scoring to open up driving lanes for Hanlan. One positive for the Eagles is that they have eight seniors on the team, which could play a big role in a conference that sees some of its top teams relying on a lot of freshmen. | | W VIRGINIA: West Virginia had some big wins last season against Kansas and Kansas State, and has one of the top returning scorers in college basketball in combination G Juwan Staten (18.1 PPG, 5.8 APG and 5.6 RPG). Staten is nearly impossible to contain off the bounce, as he does a great job of finishing at the rim and drawing fouls (182-of-253, 72% from the free-throw line). For Staten, he will have to be even better this season as the No. 2 and No. 3 scorers for the Mountaineers are no longer on the team. PF Devin Williams (8.4 PPG, 7.2 RPG) is a guy that can get double-doubles on any given night, and he will have to do that for a West Virginia team that is going to struggle to score the ball. Head coach Bob Huggins always gets his teams to play hard, but to make a run at the NCAA Tournament, players like SG Gary Browne (5.9 PPG and 2.4 RPG) and JUCO transfer SG Jaysean Paige are going to have to play really well. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 3/19/2024 3:04:55 AM EST. |
|
|