|
|
KANSAS ST W VIRGINIA |
|
| 133.5 | 71 Final 81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
559 | KANSAS ST | | | 560 | W VIRGINIA | -3 | -3.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 15-6 | -2.2 | 12-6 | 5-12 | 68.1 | 32.6 | 42.7% | 36.9 | 61.1 | 28.0 | 40.0% | 34.0 | Road Games | 4-5 | -0.5 | 6-3 | 3-6 | 64.9 | 29.4 | 42.5% | 35.0 | 64.4 | 30.0 | 42.9% | 33.4 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +1 | 4-1 | 2-3 | 71.0 | 34.8 | 44.9% | 35.8 | 65.6 | 32.8 | 38.7% | 35.0 | Conference Games | 5-3 | +2.8 | 6-2 | 4-4 | 69.2 | 33.7 | 44.4% | 34.9 | 66.5 | 33.5 | 40.7% | 33.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 68.1 | 32.6 | 24-55 | 42.7% | 6-19 | 31.6% | 15-23 | 65.3% | 37 | 11 | 15 | 21 | 6 | 12 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 70.5 | 33 | 24-57 | 42.5% | 7-20 | 33.5% | 15-22 | 69.1% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 20 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 64.9 | 29.4 | 23-54 | 42.5% | 6-18 | 31.9% | 13-19 | 70.7% | 35 | 11 | 13 | 21 | 5 | 12 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 61.1 | 28.0 | 21-52 | 40.0% | 5-16 | 28.3% | 15-22 | 65.0% | 34 | 10 | 11 | 20 | 6 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 74.4 | 35.2 | 26-57 | 45.2% | 6-18 | 35.3% | 17-24 | 69.4% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 19 | 7 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 64.4 | 30.0 | 23-53 | 42.9% | 5-16 | 33.1% | 14-22 | 63.8% | 33 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 5 | 12 | 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 12-9 | -0.8 | 9-7 | 8-8 | 78.2 | 38.0 | 45.1% | 36.0 | 70.8 | 33.7 | 43.4% | 35.4 | Home Games | 6-4 | -3.2 | 2-4 | 3-2 | 83.2 | 42.0 | 46.6% | 37.7 | 70.2 | 33.2 | 43.0% | 35.3 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -0.3 | 2-3 | 4-1 | 70.6 | 32.4 | 40.1% | 32.0 | 76.8 | 38.4 | 49.2% | 36.0 | Conference Games | 4-4 | +0.7 | 5-3 | 6-2 | 73.5 | 35.5 | 42.4% | 32.7 | 76.5 | 37.9 | 48.0% | 35.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 78.2 | 38.0 | 27-60 | 45.1% | 8-21 | 38.3% | 16-23 | 70.9% | 36 | 11 | 14 | 20 | 6 | 10 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 69.9 | 32.6 | 24-57 | 42.7% | 6-19 | 33.9% | 15-21 | 69.7% | 35 | 10 | 12 | 20 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 83.2 | 42.0 | 29-63 | 46.6% | 8-22 | 38.8% | 16-22 | 75.1% | 38 | 11 | 15 | 18 | 7 | 8 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 70.8 | 33.7 | 24-56 | 43.4% | 7-20 | 35.2% | 15-23 | 66.6% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 20 | 5 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 73.7 | 34.7 | 25-56 | 45.0% | 7-19 | 35.7% | 16-24 | 68.6% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 19 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 70.2 | 33.2 | 25-57 | 43.0% | 7-20 | 36.2% | 14-21 | 66.2% | 35 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 4 | 13 | 3 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: KANSAS ST 74.7, W VIRGINIA 74.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/15/2013 | TROY | 72-43 | W | -14.5 | W | 124 | U | 28-65 | 43.1% | 44 | 9 | 17-47 | 36.2% | 27 | 16 | 12/21/2013 | *GONZAGA | 72-62 | W | 7.5 | W | 138 | U | 24-54 | 44.4% | 32 | 4 | 24-50 | 48.0% | 31 | 12 | 12/28/2013 | *TULANE | 72-41 | W | -12.5 | W | 127 | U | 27-67 | 40.3% | 41 | 6 | 12-42 | 28.6% | 36 | 16 | 12/31/2013 | GEORGE WASHINGTON | 72-55 | W | -5 | W | 128 | U | 28-58 | 48.3% | 37 | 13 | 17-49 | 34.7% | 33 | 14 | 1/4/2014 | OKLAHOMA ST | 74-71 | W | 5.5 | W | 135.5 | O | 22-60 | 36.7% | 38 | 8 | 21-52 | 40.4% | 37 | 10 | 1/7/2014 | @ TCU | 65-47 | W | -3.5 | W | 122 | U | 21-40 | 52.5% | 37 | 18 | 17-49 | 34.7% | 21 | 9 | 1/11/2014 | @ KANSAS | 60-86 | L | 11.5 | L | 133 | O | 22-50 | 44.0% | 25 | 10 | 32-57 | 56.1% | 33 | 7 | 1/14/2014 | OKLAHOMA | 72-66 | W | -4.5 | W | 144 | U | 21-50 | 42.0% | 42 | 13 | 22-66 | 33.3% | 38 | 9 | 1/18/2014 | W VIRGINIA | 78-56 | W | -4 | W | 131.5 | O | 28-51 | 54.9% | 32 | 13 | 16-49 | 32.7% | 33 | 15 | 1/21/2014 | @ TEXAS | 64-67 | L | 5.5 | W | 135 | U | 26-61 | 42.6% | 36 | 11 | 26-57 | 45.6% | 35 | 10 | 1/25/2014 | @ IOWA ST | 75-81 | L | 10 | W | 140.5 | O | 27-64 | 42.2% | 37 | 12 | 26-54 | 48.1% | 35 | 13 | 1/28/2014 | TEXAS TECH | 66-58 | W | -8.5 | L | 129 | U | 22-50 | 44.0% | 32 | 9 | 19-56 | 33.9% | 34 | 10 | 2/1/2014 | @ W VIRGINIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/8/2014 | TEXAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/10/2014 | KANSAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/15/2014 | @ BAYLOR | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/19/2014 | TCU | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/22/2014 | @ OKLAHOMA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/14/2013 | *MARSHALL | 74-64 | W | -9 | W | 159 | U | 25-50 | 50.0% | 38 | 16 | 25-60 | 41.7% | 35 | 15 | 12/22/2013 | PURDUE | 70-73 | L | -5 | L | 147.5 | U | 24-65 | 36.9% | 38 | 8 | 25-60 | 41.7% | 45 | 11 | 12/29/2013 | *WM & MARY | 82-45 | W | -10 | W | 147 | U | 30-61 | 49.2% | 47 | 9 | 14-55 | 25.5% | 31 | 12 | 1/4/2014 | @ TCU | 74-69 | W | -4 | W | 138 | O | 24-59 | 40.7% | 38 | 9 | 25-53 | 47.2% | 30 | 14 | 1/6/2014 | @ TEXAS TECH | 89-86 | W | -2.5 | W | 143 | O | 34-61 | 55.7% | 26 | 9 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 35 | 14 | 1/11/2014 | OKLAHOMA ST | 72-73 | L | 5.5 | W | 151.5 | U | 24-58 | 41.4% | 38 | 12 | 27-60 | 45.0% | 35 | 11 | 1/13/2014 | TEXAS | 69-80 | L | -5 | L | 145 | O | 26-69 | 37.7% | 30 | 6 | 29-55 | 52.7% | 49 | 18 | 1/18/2014 | @ KANSAS ST | 56-78 | L | 4 | L | 131.5 | O | 16-49 | 32.7% | 33 | 15 | 28-51 | 54.9% | 32 | 13 | 1/22/2014 | TEXAS TECH | 87-81 | W | -7 | L | 139.5 | O | 29-54 | 53.7% | 29 | 7 | 24-49 | 49.0% | 26 | 10 | 1/25/2014 | @ OKLAHOMA ST | 75-81 | L | 13.5 | W | 150 | O | 21-57 | 36.8% | 41 | 15 | 26-59 | 44.1% | 36 | 12 | 1/28/2014 | @ BAYLOR | 66-64 | W | 5.5 | W | 143 | U | 24-60 | 40.0% | 27 | 6 | 20-44 | 45.5% | 37 | 17 | 2/1/2014 | KANSAS ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/5/2014 | OKLAHOMA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/8/2014 | @ KANSAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/10/2014 | IOWA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/15/2014 | @ TEXAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/22/2014 | BAYLOR | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| KANSAS ST: Bruce Weber brought last season's team to great success, which resulted in a No. 4 seed in the NCAA Tournament. But they went one and done and will need to adjust quickly this season without their top two scorers from last season, including Angel Rodriguez who transferred to Miami. But Shane Southwell (8.4 PPG, 44% 3-pt FG) has the potential to become an above-average scorer and he should receive reasonable help on the wing from rising senior Will Spradling (7.4 PPG, 2.4 APG). Down low, the key returning piece is junior Thomas Gipson, who put up 7.9 PPG and 5.0 RPG in only 18.7 MPG last season. If he can efficiently build on those totals in a starting role, he could become a dangerous threat. | | W VIRGINIA: The Mountaineers finished below .500 for the first time in Bob Huggins' tenure as head coach with a team that didn't have one player average double-digit points. With troubled 6-foot-10 C Aaric Murray no longer with the program, the frontcourt will be extremely thin. Huggins hopes newcomer Jonathan Holton can post numbers like he did at Rhode Island (10.2 PPG, 8.1 RPG) before he was arrested and kicked off the team before salvaging his career at community college. The backcourt is in pretty good shape though with Eron Harris (9.8 PPG, 35% 3-pt FG) expected to improve in his second campaign alongside long-range shooter Terry Henderson (8.0 PPG, 40% 3-pt FG). Add in top recruit Devin Williams leading a strong freshman class, and the Mountaineers should regain their status as a quality basketball program very soon. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 4/20/2024 12:15:07 AM EST. |
|
|