| | CBB : Teaser Line Matchup |
| |
OHIO ST WISCONSIN |
|
| 130 | 59 Final 58 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
527 | OHIO ST | +9.5 | Over 125 | 528 | WISCONSIN | -1.5 | Under 133 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 16-5 | -14 | 9-11 | 7-12 | 72.6 | 35.3 | 45.4% | 35.2 | 58.9 | 27.7 | 39.8% | 34.4 | Road Games | 3-3 | -2.8 | 3-3 | 2-4 | 62.8 | 26.8 | 41.0% | 33.0 | 61.3 | 28.2 | 41.7% | 38.2 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -17 | 0-5 | 2-3 | 64.2 | 29.6 | 39.9% | 29.0 | 68.2 | 31.2 | 47.5% | 35.6 | Conference Games | 3-5 | -17 | 3-5 | 5-3 | 68.9 | 30.4 | 42.4% | 32.1 | 66.9 | 30.9 | 45.1% | 35.5 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 72.6 | 35.3 | 25-54 | 45.4% | 7-19 | 34.2% | 17-24 | 69.2% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 16 | 8 | 11 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 68.8 | 32.2 | 24-56 | 42.3% | 6-19 | 33.6% | 15-22 | 68.9% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 62.8 | 26.8 | 23-56 | 41.0% | 4-19 | 23.0% | 13-20 | 63.1% | 33 | 8 | 14 | 19 | 8 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 58.9 | 27.7 | 22-55 | 39.8% | 5-17 | 26.9% | 11-16 | 69.3% | 34 | 9 | 9 | 20 | 4 | 15 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 72.9 | 34.3 | 26-57 | 45.1% | 6-18 | 34.3% | 16-22 | 70.1% | 36 | 9 | 13 | 19 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 61.3 | 28.2 | 22-53 | 41.7% | 4-15 | 26.1% | 13-19 | 67.9% | 38 | 9 | 10 | 18 | 7 | 16 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 17-4 | +4.7 | 10-9 | 8-8 | 74.3 | 35.8 | 45.9% | 33.9 | 63.4 | 27.6 | 42.5% | 32.3 | Home Games | 10-2 | +0.4 | 5-6 | 6-4 | 78.0 | 37.7 | 46.7% | 33.3 | 64.3 | 28.6 | 43.6% | 31.5 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -5.9 | 1-4 | 3-2 | 67.6 | 31.2 | 41.8% | 30.0 | 71.2 | 32.4 | 49.3% | 34.4 | Conference Games | 4-4 | -2.9 | 3-5 | 5-2 | 73.0 | 33.7 | 44.9% | 32.2 | 68.0 | 29.5 | 43.2% | 36.1 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 74.3 | 35.8 | 25-54 | 45.9% | 8-21 | 37.3% | 17-23 | 74.2% | 34 | 8 | 12 | 15 | 5 | 8 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 66.5 | 30.8 | 23-55 | 41.6% | 6-18 | 32.5% | 15-21 | 69.0% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 20 | 6 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 78.0 | 37.7 | 26-55 | 46.7% | 9-22 | 40.4% | 18-24 | 74.4% | 33 | 8 | 13 | 15 | 5 | 8 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 63.4 | 27.6 | 24-58 | 42.5% | 5-14 | 32.3% | 10-14 | 71.6% | 32 | 8 | 10 | 20 | 4 | 10 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 72.1 | 33.8 | 25-56 | 44.5% | 6-18 | 34.0% | 16-23 | 70.3% | 36 | 9 | 13 | 19 | 7 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 64.3 | 28.6 | 25-57 | 43.6% | 5-14 | 36.9% | 9-13 | 71.7% | 31 | 8 | 9 | 21 | 5 | 11 | 2 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: OHIO ST 74.2, WISCONSIN 76.7 |
| | |
|
|
12/14/2013 | N DAKOTA ST | 79-62 | W | -15 | W | 134.5 | O | 27-51 | 52.9% | 36 | 11 | 22-52 | 42.3% | 26 | 7 | 12/18/2013 | DELAWARE | 76-64 | W | -19 | L | 143.5 | U | 24-59 | 40.7% | 46 | 13 | 25-57 | 43.9% | 30 | 13 | 12/21/2013 | *NOTRE DAME | 64-61 | W | -6 | L | 137 | U | 23-55 | 41.8% | 34 | 11 | 23-51 | 45.1% | 33 | 13 | 12/27/2013 | LA-MONROE | 71-31 | W | -24 | W | 131 | U | 23-52 | 44.2% | 40 | 9 | 10-54 | 18.5% | 35 | 17 | 12/31/2013 | @ PURDUE | 78-69 | W | -6 | W | 135.5 | O | 29-65 | 44.6% | 37 | 6 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 46 | 12 | 1/4/2014 | NEBRASKA | 84-53 | W | -15.5 | W | 130 | O | 27-50 | 54.0% | 33 | 7 | 21-56 | 37.5% | 32 | 13 | 1/7/2014 | @ MICHIGAN ST | 68-72 | L | 4.5 | W | 134 | O | 24-58 | 41.4% | 42 | 21 | 26-57 | 45.6% | 28 | 17 | 1/12/2014 | IOWA | 74-84 | L | -6 | L | 138 | O | 25-56 | 44.6% | 31 | 17 | 29-61 | 47.5% | 40 | 10 | 1/16/2014 | @ MINNESOTA | 53-63 | L | -3 | L | 135.5 | U | 18-51 | 35.3% | 24 | 13 | 24-47 | 51.1% | 39 | 18 | 1/20/2014 | @ NEBRASKA | 62-68 | L | -7.5 | L | 130.5 | U | 21-53 | 39.6% | 27 | 13 | 23-46 | 50.0% | 33 | 17 | 1/23/2014 | ILLINOIS | 62-55 | W | -11 | L | 127.5 | U | 20-48 | 41.7% | 31 | 12 | 21-51 | 41.2% | 32 | 15 | 1/29/2014 | PENN ST | 70-71 | L | -13 | L | 133 | O | 21-55 | 38.2% | 32 | 8 | 28-58 | 48.3% | 34 | 14 | 2/1/2014 | @ WISCONSIN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/4/2014 | @ IOWA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/8/2014 | PURDUE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/11/2014 | MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/15/2014 | @ ILLINOIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/19/2014 | NORTHWESTERN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/22/2014 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
12/14/2013 | E KENTUCKY | 86-61 | W | -16.5 | W | 130.5 | O | 26-43 | 60.5% | 33 | 11 | 24-58 | 41.4% | 20 | 9 | 12/28/2013 | PRAIRIE VIEW A&M | 80-43 | W | -33.5 | W | 138 | U | 25-58 | 43.1% | 42 | 2 | 17-52 | 32.7% | 25 | 13 | 1/2/2014 | @ NORTHWESTERN | 76-49 | W | -10 | W | 125 | P | 32-58 | 55.2% | 38 | 4 | 19-55 | 34.5% | 27 | 7 | 1/5/2014 | IOWA | 75-71 | W | -6.5 | L | 137.5 | O | 20-53 | 37.7% | 35 | 12 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 42 | 10 | 1/8/2014 | ILLINOIS | 95-70 | W | -10 | W | 126.5 | O | 32-57 | 56.1% | 35 | 4 | 25-79 | 31.6% | 48 | 8 | 1/14/2014 | @ INDIANA | 72-75 | L | -4 | L | 141.5 | O | 32-60 | 53.3% | 28 | 10 | 32-62 | 51.6% | 33 | 9 | 1/18/2014 | MICHIGAN | 70-77 | L | -8 | L | 132.5 | O | 26-60 | 43.3% | 30 | 9 | 29-53 | 54.7% | 31 | 11 | 1/22/2014 | @ MINNESOTA | 68-81 | L | -3 | L | 136 | O | 22-50 | 44.0% | 22 | 6 | 33-56 | 58.9% | 32 | 7 | 1/25/2014 | @ PURDUE | 72-58 | W | -4.5 | W | 139 | U | 19-46 | 41.3% | 37 | 9 | 23-65 | 35.4% | 37 | 8 | 1/29/2014 | NORTHWESTERN | 56-65 | L | -17 | L | 122 | U | 15-57 | 26.3% | 33 | 9 | 23-48 | 47.9% | 39 | 14 | 2/1/2014 | OHIO ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/4/2014 | @ ILLINOIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/9/2014 | MICHIGAN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/13/2014 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/16/2014 | @ MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/22/2014 | @ IOWA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | OHIO ST: The Buckeyes were just four points away from the Final Four last season, but were upset by Wichita State in Elite Eight. While Deshaun Thomas is gone to the NBA, there is still a lot of talent in Columbus. PG Aaron Craft (10.0 PPG, 4.6 APG, 3.6 RPG) is one of the top point guards in all of the country. While he still may have his limitations shooting the ball (42% FG, 30% threes), he's widely regarded as the nation's best on-ball defender. Craft also does a terrific job of setting up teammates for easy baskets, and he once again has some very talented scorers to share the ball with. One of those, SF Sam Thompson (7.8 PPG, 3.5 RPG, 40% 3-pt FG) figures to be one of the most improved players in all of the country. Thompson is one of the top athletes in the country, while also developing as a much better shooter throughout the season. With Thomas no longer the go-to guy, look for Thompson's scoring average to double this season. Center Amir Williams (3.5 PPG, 3.9 RPG, 1.4 BPG) must develop and become more of a defensive presence. If the Buckeyes are able to get solid play from their frontcourt, then there's the potential to advance even farther this season. | | WISCONSIN: The Badgers are coming off a season that ended in disappointment, falling in the first round of the NCAA Tournament. However, Wisconsin has some very talented players coming back, including 6-foot-7 stud sophomore SF Sam Dekker (9.6 PPG, 3.4 RPG, 39% 3-pt FG). He is one of the most versatile scorers in all of the country with the ability to hit from the outside, but all use his size to finish over smaller defenders in the paint. The Badgers will also get back PG Josh Gasser, who missed all of last season because of a torn ACL. Two seasons ago, Gasser (7.6 PPG, 4.2 RPG, 45% 3-pt FG in 2011-12) was a huge part of the Badgers offense as a shooting guard, but will man the point this season in a backcourt pairing with senior SG Ben Brust (11.1 PPG, 5.1 RPG, 39% 3-pt FG). While the Badgers will be missing the majority of their post scoring from last season, they will remain one of the top three-pointing shooting teams in all of the country. Head coach Bo Ryan has been very difficult to beat because of his team's slow-paced style of play, and that figures to be the case this season as well. |
| | Follow Genaro Armas at http://twitter.com/GArmasAP
|
| Last Updated: 4/19/2024 2:19:36 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|