| | | |
PENN ST First Half Results WISCONSIN |
|
| 57.5 | 18 Final 29 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
505 | PENN ST | 58.5 | 506 | WISCONSIN | -10 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 8-4 | -0.2 | 3-4 | 3-2 | 65.4 | 30.2 | 40.9% | 37.3 | 65.9 | 26.2 | 40.8% | 31.5 | Road Games | 1-3 | -2 | 0-3 | 2-1 | 56.7 | 27.5 | 37.2% | 34.0 | 72.7 | 30.2 | 47.7% | 33.5 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +1 | 2-1 | 1-1 | 74.2 | 37.8 | 46.5% | 41.0 | 69.4 | 27.4 | 37.5% | 30.0 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 65.4 | 30.2 | 22-53 | 40.9% | 6-19 | 29.1% | 16-23 | 68.8% | 37 | 10 | 10 | 21 | 6 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 67 | 31.4 | 24-57 | 41.7% | 6-19 | 32.6% | 13-19 | 70.0% | 35 | 10 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 56.7 | 27.5 | 20-54 | 37.2% | 4-18 | 23.3% | 12-18 | 65.8% | 34 | 13 | 8 | 21 | 6 | 13 | 1 | Stats Against (All Games) | 65.9 | 26.2 | 20-50 | 40.8% | 8-22 | 36.0% | 17-23 | 73.7% | 31 | 6 | 11 | 21 | 6 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 69.6 | 33.1 | 25-55 | 44.2% | 7-20 | 33.7% | 14-20 | 69.7% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 17 | 6 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 72.7 | 30.2 | 23-48 | 47.7% | 9-20 | 46.8% | 17-24 | 72.2% | 33 | 8 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 12 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 9-4 | -7 | 4-7 | 4-3 | 73.2 | 35.4 | 45.1% | 37.7 | 56.3 | 25.5 | 40.3% | 30.5 | Home Games | 8-1 | -4.5 | 4-3 | 2-2 | 77.2 | 37.9 | 47.9% | 40.1 | 49.3 | 19.7 | 36.5% | 27.1 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | -1.4 | 2-3 | 1-2 | 72.4 | 35.4 | 46.0% | 39.0 | 51.6 | 21.4 | 39.6% | 28.6 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 73.2 | 35.4 | 27-59 | 45.1% | 8-23 | 36.4% | 12-18 | 64.8% | 38 | 12 | 15 | 14 | 8 | 9 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 66.3 | 31.1 | 24-56 | 42.3% | 6-19 | 33.6% | 12-18 | 69.5% | 34 | 9 | 13 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 77.2 | 37.9 | 29-60 | 47.9% | 9-22 | 38.7% | 11-16 | 69.0% | 40 | 12 | 17 | 12 | 8 | 9 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 56.3 | 25.5 | 21-52 | 40.3% | 4-13 | 33.3% | 10-15 | 68.7% | 31 | 7 | 9 | 18 | 5 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 67.8 | 32.7 | 24-55 | 44.1% | 6-18 | 33.4% | 13-19 | 70.5% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 17 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 49.3 | 19.7 | 19-51 | 36.5% | 4-14 | 30.6% | 8-12 | 66.7% | 27 | 5 | 8 | 16 | 5 | 14 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: PENN ST 70.7, WISCONSIN 71.8 |
| | |
|
|
11/15/2012 | *NC STATE | 55-72 | L | 13 | L | 136.5 | U | 19-60 | 31.7% | 36 | 13 | 26-52 | 50.0% | 36 | 14 | 11/16/2012 | *PROVIDENCE | 55-52 | W | -3 | T | | - | 20-53 | 37.7% | 35 | 16 | 15-44 | 34.1% | 36 | 21 | 11/18/2012 | *AKRON | 60-85 | L | 4 | L | 127 | O | 20-55 | 36.4% | 29 | 13 | 27-48 | 56.2% | 35 | 10 | 11/23/2012 | BUCKNELL | 60-57 | W | | - | | - | 22-57 | 38.6% | 38 | 8 | 16-41 | 39.0% | 31 | 13 | 11/28/2012 | BOSTON COLLEGE | 61-73 | L | -1.5 | L | 125 | O | 19-53 | 35.8% | 33 | 13 | 19-45 | 42.2% | 38 | 12 | 12/1/2012 | PENNSYLVANIA | 58-47 | W | -7.5 | W | | - | 18-42 | 42.9% | 34 | 11 | 18-50 | 36.0% | 30 | 16 | 12/5/2012 | *LASALLE | 57-82 | L | 9 | L | 126.5 | O | 22-50 | 44.0% | 36 | 11 | 24-49 | 49.0% | 27 | 4 | 12/8/2012 | ARMY | 78-70 | W | | - | | - | 29-57 | 50.9% | 41 | 17 | 21-54 | 38.9% | 27 | 15 | 12/15/2012 | DELAWARE ST | 80-76 | W | | - | | - | 26-53 | 49.1% | 38 | 11 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 34 | 8 | 12/23/2012 | NEW HAMPSHIRE | 72-45 | W | -7 | W | 126 | U | 25-54 | 46.3% | 40 | 7 | 12-53 | 22.6% | 34 | 15 | 12/29/2012 | DUQUESNE | 84-74 | W | -5 | W | | - | 25-59 | 42.4% | 50 | 15 | 22-59 | 37.3% | 28 | 10 | 1/3/2013 | @ WISCONSIN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/7/2013 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/10/2013 | NORTHWESTERN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/13/2013 | @ PURDUE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/16/2013 | MICHIGAN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/19/2013 | NEBRASKA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/23/2013 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/26/2013 | OHIO ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
11/14/2012 | @ FLORIDA | 56-74 | L | 6 | L | 123.5 | O | 21-59 | 35.6% | 21 | 10 | 26-42 | 61.9% | 40 | 20 | 11/18/2012 | CORNELL | 73-40 | W | -22 | W | | - | 27-67 | 40.3% | 54 | 16 | 16-61 | 26.2% | 31 | 18 | 11/20/2012 | PRESBYTERIAN | 88-43 | W | | - | | - | 33-63 | 52.4% | 37 | 6 | 16-44 | 36.4% | 21 | 16 | 11/23/2012 | *CREIGHTON | 74-84 | L | 1 | L | 128.5 | O | 27-66 | 40.9% | 34 | 8 | 27-58 | 46.6% | 40 | 10 | 11/24/2012 | *ARKANSAS | 77-70 | W | -8.5 | L | | - | 22-49 | 44.9% | 39 | 11 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 34 | 6 | 11/28/2012 | VIRGINIA | 54-60 | L | -10 | L | 115.5 | U | 21-55 | 38.2% | 25 | 5 | 21-46 | 45.7% | 36 | 10 | 12/2/2012 | CALIFORNIA | 81-56 | W | -8 | W | 127.5 | O | 30-58 | 51.7% | 36 | 13 | 18-47 | 38.3% | 30 | 23 | 12/4/2012 | NEBRASKA-OMAHA | 86-40 | W | -36 | W | | - | 34-70 | 48.6% | 49 | 9 | 17-51 | 33.3% | 26 | 19 | 12/8/2012 | @ MARQUETTE | 50-60 | L | -2.5 | L | 130.5 | U | 17-52 | 32.7% | 35 | 14 | 25-52 | 48.1% | 39 | 16 | 12/12/2012 | WI-GREEN BAY | 65-54 | W | -17.5 | L | 128 | U | 24-51 | 47.1% | 32 | 6 | 21-56 | 37.5% | 35 | 9 | 12/22/2012 | WI-MILWAUKEE | 74-53 | W | -26.5 | L | 124 | O | 28-59 | 47.5% | 36 | 8 | 22-50 | 44.0% | 21 | 13 | 12/29/2012 | SAMFORD | 87-51 | W | -29 | W | | - | 31-59 | 52.5% | 43 | 6 | 18-51 | 35.3% | 22 | 10 | 1/3/2013 | PENN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/6/2013 | @ NEBRASKA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/12/2013 | ILLINOIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/15/2013 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/19/2013 | @ IOWA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/22/2013 | MICHIGAN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/26/2013 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | PENN ST: The Nittany Lions may be looking forward to the hardwood to distract from the football turmoil of the last year, but Patrick Chambers' crew will have a difficult time improving on last year's rough 4-14 record in the conference. The good news is they still have star point guard Tim Frazier (18.8 PPG, 4.7 RPG, 6.2 APG, 2.4 SPG) who is a workhorse on the perimeter, leading Penn State in points, rebounds, assists and steals last season. Jermaine Marshall (10.8 PPG) and Southern Miss transfer D.J. Newbill complete a strong backcourt, but PSU will be overmatched down low on a nightly basis. | | WISCONSIN: Head coach Bo Ryan's Badgers may not be able to match up to Indiana, Michigan, Michigan State and Ohio State in this year's Big Ten but they should be favored against the rest of the competition. Wisconsin's defense and slow tempo is legendary, holding opponents to a Division-I low 53.2 PPG, and that shouldn't change even without last year's leader Jordan Taylor, who had a team-high 14.8 PPG and 4.1 APG. Now it's time for Ryan Evans (11.0 PPG, 6.8 RPG) and Jared Berggren (10.5 PPG, 4.9 RPG, 1.7 BPG) to lead this team from the inside out. Despite standing at 6-foot-10 and playing center in a lot of Ryan's lineups, Berggren is also a threat on the perimeter, averaging 1.3 threes per game last year, where he will be especially needed considering sniper Josh Gasser, who played 34.1 MPG last year and nailed 45.2% of his shots from beyond the arc, is out for the year with a torn ACL. At 6-foot-7, freshman SF Sam Dekker will be a perfect addition to Ryan's style of play, giving this team a lengthy and flexible roster that should continue to play lockdown defense. |
| | |
| Last Updated: 3/29/2024 5:12:24 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|