|
|
UTAH
WASHINGTON ST |
|
|
122.5
| 46
Final
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|  | |
| 833 | UTAH | -140 | | 834 | WASHINGTON ST | +120 |
|
|
|  | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 12-3 | +2.2 | 8-1 | 3-6 | 83.6 | 37.6 | 52.4% | 39.0 | 61.1 | 27.3 | 38.5% | 29.9 | | Road Games | 0-2 | -2 | 1-0 | 0-2 | 62.0 | 23.0 | 45.3% | 29.5 | 64.0 | 29.0 | 47.1% | 29.0 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -1 | 3-0 | 1-3 | 79.6 | 36.0 | 50.3% | 39.4 | 59.8 | 24.4 | 38.6% | 27.4 | | Conference Games | 1-2 | -1 | 2-0 | 1-2 | 68.3 | 31.3 | 45.2% | 31.0 | 66.0 | 28.7 | 45.0% | 31.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 83.6 | 37.6 | 30-57 | 52.4% | 7-20 | 34.7% | 17-22 | 74.6% | 39 | 9 | 18 | 15 | 7 | 11 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 78.2 | 36.4 | 27-59 | 46.6% | 7-19 | 35.8% | 16-24 | 69.6% | 37 | 10 | 15 | 19 | 7 | 12 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 62.0 | 23.0 | 24-53 | 45.3% | 4-22 | 18.2% | 10-15 | 64.5% | 29 | 7 | 7 | 15 | 7 | 12 | 1 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 61.1 | 27.3 | 22-58 | 38.5% | 5-19 | 27.2% | 11-17 | 66.7% | 30 | 7 | 9 | 20 | 6 | 13 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 70.6 | 32.6 | 24-57 | 42.7% | 6-19 | 32.9% | 16-22 | 71.2% | 34 | 9 | 13 | 20 | 6 | 14 | 3 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 64.0 | 29.0 | 24-51 | 47.1% | 4-14 | 32.1% | 11-17 | 67.6% | 29 | 6 | 6 | 15 | 7 | 13 | 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 7-8 | -3.7 | 5-6 | 3-6 | 66.0 | 28.7 | 42.5% | 34.9 | 64.1 | 30.3 | 42.9% | 33.3 | | Home Games | 4-2 | -1.7 | 2-2 | 1-3 | 70.3 | 31.0 | 43.9% | 36.7 | 59.5 | 27.3 | 42.3% | 32.7 | | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -4.7 | 2-3 | 1-4 | 55.6 | 22.6 | 39.3% | 34.2 | 61.8 | 26.6 | 40.2% | 35.4 | | Conference Games | 0-3 | -2 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 47.3 | 21.3 | 34.2% | 30.7 | 65.7 | 27.7 | 42.5% | 37.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 66.0 | 28.7 | 24-56 | 42.5% | 8-24 | 32.4% | 11-17 | 61.7% | 35 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 70.5 | 32.8 | 25-57 | 43.1% | 6-19 | 33.1% | 15-21 | 68.3% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 20 | 6 | 12 | 3 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 70.3 | 31.0 | 24-56 | 43.9% | 7-25 | 29.5% | 14-24 | 59.2% | 37 | 10 | 12 | 19 | 8 | 12 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 64.1 | 30.3 | 22-51 | 42.9% | 6-16 | 36.5% | 14-22 | 65.4% | 33 | 8 | 10 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 2 | | vs opponents averaging | 72.3 | 34.2 | 25-56 | 45.0% | 6-18 | 36.1% | 16-23 | 67.8% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 19 | 6 | 12 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 59.5 | 27.3 | 21-50 | 42.3% | 5-14 | 33.7% | 13-22 | 58.8% | 33 | 8 | 10 | 21 | 6 | 14 | 1 |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: UTAH 66.6, WASHINGTON ST 70.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 11/23/2013 | SAVANNAH ST | 71-57 | W | | - | | - | 22-54 | 40.7% | 34 | 5 | 22-51 | 43.1% | 29 | 12 | | 11/27/2013 | BALL ST | 88-69 | W | -12 | W | 134.5 | O | 32-57 | 56.1% | 35 | 9 | 22-57 | 38.6% | 31 | 15 | | 12/3/2013 | @ BOISE ST | 67-69 | L | 10 | W | 154.5 | U | 26-53 | 49.1% | 28 | 12 | 25-54 | 46.3% | 32 | 13 | | 12/7/2013 | FRESNO ST | 90-77 | W | -11.5 | W | 139.5 | O | 34-57 | 59.6% | 27 | 6 | 27-53 | 50.9% | 26 | 11 | | 12/10/2013 | IDAHO ST | 74-66 | W | -17 | L | 141 | U | 25-43 | 58.1% | 29 | 13 | 24-56 | 42.9% | 30 | 8 | | 12/14/2013 | BYU | 81-64 | W | 2.5 | W | 159 | U | 27-65 | 41.5% | 45 | 10 | 21-64 | 32.8% | 44 | 10 | | 12/19/2013 | TEXAS ST | 69-50 | W | -15 | W | 128 | U | 21-49 | 42.9% | 33 | 12 | 18-47 | 38.3% | 30 | 15 | | 12/28/2013 | ST KATHERINE | 124-51 | W | | - | | - | 49-73 | 67.1% | 71 | 14 | 17-70 | 24.3% | 12 | 7 | | 1/2/2014 | OREGON | 68-70 | L | 2.5 | W | 149 | U | 24-63 | 38.1% | 38 | 14 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 42 | 16 | | 1/4/2014 | OREGON ST | 80-69 | W | -7 | W | 139 | O | 29-50 | 58.0% | 24 | 8 | 25-50 | 50.0% | 27 | 15 | | 1/8/2014 | @ WASHINGTON | 57-59 | L | 2 | T | 142.5 | U | 22-53 | 41.5% | 31 | 12 | 23-48 | 47.9% | 26 | 14 | | 1/12/2014 | @ WASHINGTON ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/16/2014 | USC | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/18/2014 | UCLA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/23/2014 | @ ARIZONA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/26/2014 | @ ARIZONA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/1/2014 | @ COLORADO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 11/24/2013 | TCU | 62-64 | L | -14 | L | 138 | U | 19-52 | 36.5% | 24 | 8 | 24-44 | 54.5% | 34 | 12 | | 11/28/2013 | *BUTLER | 69-76 | L | 6 | L | 141 | O | 25-50 | 50.0% | 33 | 13 | 27-56 | 48.2% | 27 | 6 | | 11/29/2013 | *PURDUE | 69-54 | W | 6 | W | 151 | U | 25-56 | 44.6% | 36 | 14 | 19-58 | 32.8% | 37 | 15 | | 12/1/2013 | *ST JOSEPHS | 67-72 | L | 2 | L | 139 | P | 25-54 | 46.3% | 27 | 8 | 27-56 | 48.2% | 37 | 7 | | 12/7/2013 | @ IDAHO | 67-66 | W | | - | | - | 25-64 | 39.1% | 35 | 9 | 18-44 | 40.9% | 31 | 11 | | 12/15/2013 | PEPPERDINE | 78-61 | W | -9.5 | W | 135.5 | O | 30-56 | 53.6% | 39 | 9 | 20-52 | 38.5% | 34 | 15 | | 12/18/2013 | *SAN FRANCISCO ST | 80-50 | W | | - | | - | 30-65 | 46.2% | 51 | 12 | 18-52 | 34.6% | 23 | 10 | | 12/21/2013 | UTEP | 51-64 | L | -6.5 | L | 131 | U | 20-59 | 33.9% | 35 | 9 | 22-43 | 51.2% | 34 | 9 | | 12/28/2013 | MISS VALLEY ST | 85-48 | W | -20 | W | 144.5 | U | 33-55 | 60.0% | 44 | 18 | 17-62 | 27.4% | 30 | 19 | | 1/2/2014 | @ ARIZONA | 25-60 | L | 18 | L | 130.5 | U | 9-45 | 20.0% | 28 | 14 | 20-45 | 44.4% | 42 | 11 | | 1/5/2014 | @ ARIZONA ST | 47-66 | L | 10 | L | 134 | U | 18-53 | 34.0% | 31 | 14 | 21-50 | 42.0% | 37 | 14 | | 1/8/2014 | *COLORADO | 70-71 | L | 8.5 | W | 128 | O | 27-60 | 45.0% | 33 | 11 | 21-51 | 41.2% | 34 | 6 | | 1/12/2014 | UTAH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/15/2014 | @ STANFORD | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/18/2014 | @ CALIFORNIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/22/2014 | OREGON ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/26/2014 | OREGON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/1/2014 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
 | UTAH: It may be a very difficult season for the Utes, as they return one starter and bring in seven guys that have not played for a game for the team. Their top returner, SF Jordan Loveridge (12.1 PPG, 7.0 RPG, 37% 3-pt FG) is only a sophomore. He is your typical staff-stuffer who can influence the game in many different areas. With so many new faces, for the Utes will look for him to push those numbers up to 16 points and 10 rebounds a game to help make up for the other losses on the roster. Another sophomore, 5-foot-10 PG Brandon Taylor (6.9 PPG, 2.0 APG, 42% 3-pt FG) is another guy that has the potential to take his game to the next level. | | WASHINGTON ST: The Cougars will have to replace standout forward Brock Motum, and a lot of his scoring will fall on the shoulders of junior SG Royce Woolridge. (11.0 PPG, 2.8 RPG, 2.7 APG) The former Kansas Jayhawk has found a nice home in Pullman, shooting 38 percent from deep last season, and will be given more shot opportunities now as he becomes the No. 1 option on offense. He is joined in the backcourt by PG DaVonte Lacy (10.5 PPG, 2.9 RPG, 2.0 APG). Like Woolridge, Lacy is a very talented shooter from deep (38% 3-pt FG) as he attempted 62 percent of his shots from behind the ar. The Cougars will rely on the three-ball this season as they do not have the inside presence that they did last season. |
|
|
|
|
| Last Updated: 7/5/2024 7:21:58 PM EST. |
|
|