|
|
VIRGINIA TECH First Half Results WASHINGTON |
|
| 73 | 59 Final 28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2K CLASSIC - Final Rnd - Madison Square Garden - New York, NY |
|
| | |
777 | VIRGINIA TECH | -4 | 778 | WASHINGTON | 76 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 2-1 | -10.6 | 2-1 | 3-0 | 104.7 | 49.0 | 56.6% | 44.0 | 83.0 | 41.7 | 42.0% | 33.0 | Road Games | 0-1 | -10.6 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 71.0 | 29.0 | 40.4% | 33.0 | 77.0 | 36.0 | 47.4% | 43.0 | Last 5 Games | 2-1 | -10.6 | 2-1 | 3-0 | 104.7 | 49.0 | 56.6% | 44.0 | 83.0 | 41.7 | 42.0% | 33.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 104.7 | 49.0 | 37-65 | 56.6% | 8-21 | 40.3% | 22-33 | 67.0% | 44 | 10 | 23 | 20 | 7 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 83.7 | 41.4 | 31-64 | 48.1% | 8-25 | 32.0% | 14-20 | 68.9% | 39 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 16 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 71.0 | 29.0 | 21-52 | 40.4% | 6-19 | 31.6% | 23-36 | 63.9% | 33 | 6 | 12 | 24 | 6 | 10 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 83.0 | 41.7 | 29-68 | 42.0% | 9-26 | 34.2% | 17-22 | 74.6% | 33 | 7 | 14 | 26 | 8 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 84.9 | 43.2 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 10-28 | 34.3% | 15-21 | 71.3% | 39 | 11 | 16 | 20 | 9 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 77.0 | 36.0 | 27-57 | 47.4% | 4-18 | 22.2% | 19-25 | 76.0% | 43 | 6 | 13 | 26 | 6 | 13 | 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 2-1 | +1 | 3-0 | 2-1 | 78.3 | 35.0 | 44.4% | 36.7 | 76.0 | 38.0 | 46.7% | 32.0 | Road Games | 0-1 | -1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 70.0 | 30.0 | 39.3% | 38.0 | 77.0 | 37.0 | 51.0% | 37.0 | Last 5 Games | 2-1 | +1 | 3-0 | 2-1 | 78.3 | 35.0 | 44.4% | 36.7 | 76.0 | 38.0 | 46.7% | 32.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 78.3 | 35.0 | 25-57 | 44.4% | 6-18 | 35.2% | 21-31 | 69.6% | 37 | 10 | 10 | 21 | 9 | 15 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 69 | 30.1 | 23-58 | 40.0% | 5-20 | 27.0% | 18-25 | 70.0% | 37 | 9 | 9 | 21 | 7 | 14 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 70.0 | 30.0 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 9-27 | 33.3% | 13-22 | 59.1% | 38 | 13 | 11 | 23 | 11 | 19 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.0 | 38.0 | 26-56 | 46.7% | 9-23 | 37.1% | 15-23 | 64.7% | 32 | 6 | 18 | 26 | 5 | 15 | 2 | vs opponents averaging | 74.8 | 36.4 | 26-57 | 45.0% | 9-23 | 36.5% | 15-21 | 69.1% | 36 | 7 | 15 | 23 | 5 | 13 | 3 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 77.0 | 37.0 | 25-49 | 51.0% | 8-15 | 53.3% | 19-28 | 67.9% | 37 | 3 | 22 | 21 | 8 | 19 | 2 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: VIRGINIA TECH 64.7, WASHINGTON 77.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/10/2017 | DETROIT | 111-79 | W | -18.5 | W | 159.5 | O | 42-74 | 56.8% | 48 | 12 | 26-70 | 37.1% | 32 | 14 | 11/12/2017 | THE CITADEL | 132-93 | W | -25.5 | W | 187.5 | O | 48-70 | 68.6% | 51 | 19 | 33-78 | 42.3% | 24 | 16 | 11/16/2017 | *SAINT LOUIS | 71-77 | L | -13 | L | 144.5 | O | 21-52 | 40.4% | 33 | 10 | 27-57 | 47.4% | 43 | 13 | 11/17/2017 | *WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/21/2017 | HOUSTN BAPTIST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/25/2017 | MOREHEAD ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/28/2017 | IOWA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/2/2017 | @ OLE MISS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/6/2017 | RADFORD | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/10/2017 | MD-EAST SHORE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/10/2017 | BELMONT | 86-82 | W | 2 | W | 157 | O | 28-52 | 53.8% | 32 | 15 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 30 | 16 | 11/12/2017 | E WASHINGTON | 79-69 | W | -9 | W | 160 | U | 24-58 | 41.4% | 40 | 10 | 22-55 | 40.0% | 29 | 10 | 11/16/2017 | *PROVIDENCE | 70-77 | L | 8 | W | 143.5 | O | 24-61 | 39.3% | 38 | 19 | 25-49 | 51.0% | 37 | 19 | 11/17/2017 | *VIRGINIA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/24/2017 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/26/2017 | CAL DAVIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/28/2017 | KENNESAW ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/3/2017 | NEBRASKA-OMAHA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/6/2017 | *KANSAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/10/2017 | GONZAGA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| VIRGINIA TECH: Last season: 22-11, lost to Wisconsin in first round of NCAA Tournament.
Who's gone: F Zach LeDay, G Seth Allen, G Ty Outlaw, Khadim Sy
Who's back: G/F Chris Clarke, eventually. The Hokies' most athletic player sustained a torn ACL last season and, depending on who you talk to, could be ready for the start of the season, or not at all. He averaged 11.4 points and 7.3 rebounds and provides boundless energy. G Ahmed Hill. He also averaged 11.4 points and was second on the team with 59 3-pointers, which have always been a big part of the offense for what always seems to be a undersized team, and is again.
Who's new: True freshmen Wabissa Bede, Nickeil Alexander-Walker and P.J. Horne and redshirt freshman Tyrie Jackson are all being counted on to boost the Hokies' outside shooting and provide depth to a team that has only six returnees with experience in the rigors of ACC play.
The Skinny: Virginia Tech basically outscored people last season, but is less likely to be able to do that this year. Williams has pledged an increased emphasis on defense, and while his players seem on board, the absence of experienced depth or proven defensive stoppers will make last year's success hard to replicate. | | WASHINGTON: Last season: 9-22
Who's gone: Coach Lorenzo Romar; G Markelle Fultz; F Malik Dime; F Matthew Atewe.
Who's back: G David Crisp was the Huskies' second-leading scorer last year at 13.8 points per game. Will need to take on an even greater scoring load this season; F Noah Dickerson averaged 12.5 points and 8.2 rebounds last season. Has lost weight and should be more athletic but must stay out of foul trouble; G Matisse Thybulle is Huskies' best defender but must improve offensively from last season's 10.5 points per game average.
Who's new: Almost everybody. The one prime recruit that stayed with the Huskies is Seattle native Jaylen Nowell. The swingman is expected to have a significant role immediately. Other newcomers include forward Hameir Wright, guard Michael Carter III and forward Nahziah Carter, the nephew of music mogul Jay Z.
The Skinny: It's all new for Washington this season after the firing of Lorenzo Romar after 15 seasons. The firing of Romar cost the Huskies arguably the most talented recruiting class in school history and left Hopkins scrambling to put together a complete roster. That means expectations are muted and a 10th-place selection in the preseason conference poll is probably correct. The Huskies could surprise if maximum potential is reached but it's unlikely this is the year Washington snaps its NCAA Tournament drought. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 5/2/2024 10:14:08 PM EST. |
|
|