| | | |
CALIFORNIA WASHINGTON |
|
| 133 | 90 Final 88 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
819 | CALIFORNIA | 130.5 | 130.5 | 820 | WASHINGTON | -7.5 | -6.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 12-9 | -1.5 | 8-13 | 7-13 | 65.4 | 28.3 | 43.4% | 36.2 | 64.4 | 28.7 | 40.3% | 34.1 | Road Games | 4-3 | +1.7 | 3-4 | 2-5 | 63.1 | 29.7 | 40.9% | 37.7 | 64.9 | 30.9 | 38.0% | 38.6 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -3 | 1-4 | 1-4 | 56.6 | 25.6 | 40.8% | 33.8 | 72.2 | 31.4 | 44.4% | 34.4 | Conference Games | 2-6 | -8.3 | 2-6 | 3-5 | 60.9 | 25.5 | 39.9% | 33.6 | 72.0 | 31.4 | 44.0% | 36.5 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 65.4 | 28.3 | 24-56 | 43.4% | 5-15 | 34.1% | 12-18 | 65.6% | 36 | 8 | 13 | 19 | 4 | 11 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 65.7 | 30.4 | 23-55 | 42.1% | 6-18 | 34.3% | 13-19 | 68.6% | 33 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 12 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 63.1 | 29.7 | 24-58 | 40.9% | 5-16 | 33.3% | 10-16 | 62.8% | 38 | 8 | 11 | 19 | 4 | 11 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 64.4 | 28.7 | 22-55 | 40.3% | 5-15 | 31.1% | 15-22 | 70.2% | 34 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 5 | 10 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 68.8 | 32 | 24-55 | 43.5% | 6-19 | 33.9% | 15-21 | 70.0% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 64.9 | 30.9 | 22-57 | 38.0% | 4-15 | 28.2% | 17-24 | 73.3% | 39 | 9 | 11 | 17 | 5 | 9 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 14-6 | -0.1 | 9-10 | 9-10 | 69.2 | 31.3 | 44.4% | 38.5 | 63.2 | 27.8 | 37.2% | 35.5 | Home Games | 7-3 | -4.5 | 4-6 | 4-6 | 70.8 | 31.1 | 45.9% | 39.5 | 61.3 | 27.5 | 35.6% | 35.3 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +1 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 64.6 | 24.8 | 44.2% | 33.4 | 66.2 | 30.8 | 42.3% | 33.0 | Conference Games | 3-5 | -8.6 | 3-5 | 5-3 | 66.9 | 27.6 | 44.3% | 34.6 | 70.0 | 30.7 | 42.4% | 33.2 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 69.2 | 31.3 | 25-57 | 44.4% | 5-17 | 31.6% | 13-20 | 65.7% | 38 | 10 | 14 | 17 | 5 | 12 | 6 | vs opponents surrendering | 65.5 | 30.2 | 23-55 | 41.7% | 6-19 | 33.7% | 13-19 | 68.7% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 70.8 | 31.1 | 26-57 | 45.9% | 5-17 | 28.3% | 13-21 | 63.4% | 39 | 10 | 14 | 16 | 5 | 12 | 7 | Stats Against (All Games) | 63.2 | 27.8 | 22-60 | 37.2% | 6-19 | 33.1% | 12-18 | 67.9% | 35 | 11 | 10 | 18 | 6 | 11 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 67.4 | 31.6 | 24-55 | 43.3% | 6-18 | 35.4% | 14-20 | 68.2% | 35 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 61.3 | 27.5 | 22-61 | 35.6% | 7-20 | 34.8% | 11-16 | 67.9% | 35 | 11 | 10 | 19 | 6 | 12 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: CALIFORNIA 75.1, WASHINGTON 73 |
| | |
|
|
12/13/2014 | PRINCETON | 67-57 | W | -10.5 | L | 125.5 | U | 25-51 | 49.0% | 29 | 9 | 21-44 | 47.7% | 24 | 16 | 12/19/2014 | E WASHINGTON | 78-67 | W | -5.5 | W | 140.5 | O | 27-47 | 57.4% | 36 | 11 | 23-54 | 42.6% | 23 | 7 | 12/22/2014 | WISCONSIN | 56-68 | L | 10 | L | 127 | U | 21-54 | 38.9% | 29 | 6 | 24-55 | 43.6% | 39 | 6 | 12/28/2014 | CS-BAKERSFIELD | 52-55 | L | -15.5 | L | 118 | U | 18-46 | 39.1% | 38 | 18 | 18-46 | 39.1% | 27 | 9 | 1/2/2015 | WASHINGTON | 81-75 | W | 1 | W | 125 | O | 26-61 | 42.6% | 29 | 4 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 42 | 12 | 1/4/2015 | WASHINGTON ST | 66-69 | L | -9.5 | L | 134.5 | O | 22-58 | 37.9% | 34 | 9 | 23-55 | 41.8% | 38 | 10 | 1/7/2015 | @ USC | 57-71 | L | -2 | L | 130.5 | U | 23-65 | 35.4% | 37 | 13 | 26-61 | 42.6% | 40 | 8 | 1/11/2015 | @ UCLA | 54-73 | L | 6.5 | L | 135 | U | 21-52 | 40.4% | 34 | 16 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 40 | 6 | 1/14/2015 | STANFORD | 59-69 | L | 2 | L | 133 | U | 22-62 | 35.5% | 41 | 9 | 25-52 | 48.1% | 34 | 8 | 1/22/2015 | ARIZONA ST | 44-79 | L | -2 | L | 126.5 | U | 15-45 | 33.3% | 29 | 19 | 26-54 | 48.1% | 35 | 11 | 1/24/2015 | ARIZONA | 50-73 | L | 12.5 | L | 128.5 | U | 23-53 | 43.4% | 25 | 19 | 24-49 | 49.0% | 31 | 14 | 1/29/2015 | @ WASHINGTON ST | 76-67 | W | 2.5 | W | 140 | O | 28-55 | 50.9% | 40 | 11 | 19-57 | 33.3% | 32 | 7 | 2/1/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/5/2015 | USC | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/7/2015 | UCLA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/12/2015 | @ COLORADO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/15/2015 | @ UTAH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/21/2015 | @ STANFORD | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
12/14/2014 | E WASHINGTON | 81-77 | W | -7.5 | L | 146 | O | 26-56 | 46.4% | 42 | 13 | 25-68 | 36.8% | 35 | 12 | 12/17/2014 | GRAMBLING | 86-38 | W | -36.5 | W | 126 | U | 32-63 | 50.8% | 51 | 10 | 14-60 | 23.3% | 29 | 17 | 12/20/2014 | *OKLAHOMA | 69-67 | W | 6 | W | 145.5 | U | 25-51 | 49.0% | 36 | 14 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 35 | 8 | 12/22/2014 | TULANE | 66-57 | W | -14 | L | 134 | U | 25-48 | 52.1% | 33 | 18 | 19-60 | 31.7% | 36 | 14 | 12/28/2014 | STONY BROOK | 57-62 | L | -13.5 | L | 131.5 | U | 23-67 | 34.3% | 47 | 12 | 23-62 | 37.1% | 45 | 13 | 1/2/2015 | @ CALIFORNIA | 75-81 | L | -1 | L | 125 | O | 28-62 | 45.2% | 42 | 12 | 26-61 | 42.6% | 29 | 4 | 1/4/2015 | @ STANFORD | 60-68 | L | 5.5 | L | 131.5 | U | 21-55 | 38.2% | 37 | 19 | 23-59 | 39.0% | 38 | 9 | 1/10/2015 | WASHINGTON ST | 77-80 | L | -11.5 | L | 137 | O | 32-65 | 49.2% | 31 | 9 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 34 | 10 | 1/15/2015 | OREGON ST | 56-43 | W | -7 | W | 123.5 | U | 18-43 | 41.9% | 31 | 13 | 15-47 | 31.9% | 30 | 15 | 1/18/2015 | OREGON | 85-77 | W | -5.5 | W | 142.5 | O | 30-59 | 50.8% | 43 | 11 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 34 | 6 | 1/22/2015 | @ COLORADO | 52-50 | W | 1 | W | 129 | U | 18-50 | 36.0% | 35 | 13 | 19-60 | 31.7% | 40 | 12 | 1/25/2015 | @ UTAH | 56-77 | L | 13 | L | 127.5 | O | 22-52 | 42.3% | 28 | 12 | 28-52 | 53.8% | 30 | 9 | 1/28/2015 | STANFORD | 74-84 | L | 2 | L | 140.5 | O | 27-56 | 48.2% | 30 | 13 | 28-53 | 52.8% | 31 | 9 | 2/1/2015 | CALIFORNIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/4/2015 | @ OREGON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/8/2015 | @ OREGON ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/13/2015 | ARIZONA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/15/2015 | ARIZONA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/22/2015 | @ WASHINGTON ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | CALIFORNIA: The story of the Pac-12 this offseason has been two coaches, and the Golden Bears have a new leader in Cuonzo Martin. The school lost some talent from last season (Justin Cobbs and Richard Solomon), but still has a backcourt that can compete with any in the conference. PG Tyrone Wallace (11.3 PPG, 4.1 RPG, 2.7 APG) and SG Jabari Bird (8.3 PPG, 80% FT) are two talented guards who can get to the basket extremely well. Both players need to improve their long-range shooting, with both knocking down only 32% threes last season. If these two can score from the perimeter, that will allow PF David Kravish (11.4 PPG, 7.7 RPG, 2.1 BPG) to get one-on-one opportunities on the low block. | | WASHINGTON: The Huskies have had some struggles the past couple seasons, but have some potential to surprise people in the Pac-12. PG Nigel Williams-Goss (13.4 PPG, 4.4 RPG, 4.4 APG) is an ultra-talented floor leader that will have to become more of a scorer to help make up for the loss of C.J. Wilcox. At 6-foot-3, he has great size for the point, but will have to cut back on the turnovers. His partner in the backcourt is SG Andrew Andrews (12.3 PPG, 3.9 RPG, 2.6 APG), who is another combo guard who can go for 20 points on any given night. Both of these guys are very fast with the ball, and they put a lot of pressure on opposing defenses. The Huskies ranked 189th in the nation in rebounding, but teams can't crash the offensive glass because they have to get back to stop the fast break. For Washington to contend for an NCAA Tournament berth, PF Shawn Kemp Jr. (4.4 PPG, 1.8 RPG, 56% FG, 71% FT) must become more of a presence down low. If he is able to help the team rebound the ball, Washington could make a surprising run in the conference. |
| | |
| Last Updated: 5/3/2024 5:20:53 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|