| | CBB : Teaser Line Matchup |
| |
UCLA WASHINGTON |
|
| 148.5 | 91 Final 82 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
543 | UCLA | Pk | Over 145.5 | 544 | WASHINGTON | +8 | Under 153.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 22-7 | +5.6 | 17-11 | 13-10 | 82.6 | 39.8 | 48.9% | 35.8 | 71.0 | 33.8 | 42.6% | 33.6 | Road Games | 6-5 | -0.9 | 6-5 | 5-6 | 77.5 | 38.3 | 46.0% | 32.1 | 74.0 | 35.5 | 46.0% | 33.9 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -0.5 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 79.4 | 32.2 | 46.8% | 32.6 | 74.2 | 35.2 | 45.7% | 35.4 | Conference Games | 11-5 | +3.6 | 10-6 | 8-7 | 80.2 | 36.4 | 46.2% | 35.3 | 71.8 | 34.7 | 44.1% | 34.6 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 82.6 | 39.8 | 29-60 | 48.9% | 7-16 | 40.0% | 17-23 | 75.1% | 36 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 10 | 11 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 70.1 | 32.1 | 24-57 | 43.0% | 6-18 | 33.8% | 15-22 | 69.6% | 34 | 9 | 13 | 20 | 6 | 12 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 77.5 | 38.3 | 27-59 | 46.0% | 8-19 | 39.4% | 16-21 | 74.0% | 32 | 8 | 15 | 19 | 10 | 12 | 2 | Stats Against (All Games) | 71.0 | 33.8 | 24-57 | 42.6% | 8-24 | 34.3% | 14-21 | 67.7% | 34 | 9 | 14 | 18 | 6 | 15 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 73.7 | 33.9 | 25-55 | 45.4% | 6-18 | 35.2% | 17-24 | 70.9% | 36 | 9 | 13 | 19 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 74.0 | 35.5 | 25-54 | 46.0% | 9-23 | 38.9% | 15-22 | 70.3% | 34 | 8 | 15 | 17 | 6 | 15 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 16-13 | +2.3 | 14-13 | 12-13 | 74.4 | 34.4 | 44.7% | 34.8 | 74.4 | 34.6 | 47.6% | 32.7 | Home Games | 13-3 | +4.8 | 7-7 | 5-7 | 77.6 | 34.7 | 46.1% | 35.2 | 72.2 | 34.7 | 46.3% | 31.1 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +2 | 4-1 | 1-4 | 70.4 | 35.0 | 46.8% | 37.8 | 64.2 | 32.2 | 44.0% | 27.8 | Conference Games | 8-8 | +5.2 | 10-5 | 6-10 | 69.4 | 31.9 | 44.5% | 33.7 | 70.4 | 32.2 | 45.8% | 33.3 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 74.4 | 34.4 | 26-59 | 44.7% | 6-17 | 34.1% | 16-22 | 75.4% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 19 | 5 | 11 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 69 | 31.8 | 24-56 | 42.9% | 6-18 | 34.3% | 15-21 | 69.5% | 33 | 9 | 12 | 20 | 6 | 12 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 77.6 | 34.7 | 26-57 | 46.1% | 6-17 | 34.7% | 19-25 | 76.5% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 11 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 74.4 | 34.6 | 27-56 | 47.6% | 5-16 | 31.3% | 16-23 | 68.2% | 33 | 8 | 12 | 19 | 5 | 11 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 72.6 | 33.4 | 25-55 | 45.3% | 6-18 | 35.7% | 16-23 | 70.2% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 19 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 72.2 | 34.7 | 27-58 | 46.3% | 5-17 | 30.0% | 14-21 | 66.1% | 31 | 8 | 11 | 21 | 5 | 12 | 4 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: UCLA 75.1, WASHINGTON 75.2 |
| | |
|
|
1/16/2014 | @ COLORADO | 69-56 | W | 1 | W | 150 | U | 26-66 | 39.4% | 41 | 11 | 20-50 | 40.0% | 37 | 17 | 1/18/2014 | @ UTAH | 69-74 | L | 1 | L | 144 | U | 27-63 | 42.9% | 35 | 15 | 25-53 | 47.2% | 31 | 15 | 1/23/2014 | STANFORD | 91-74 | W | -6 | W | 154.5 | O | 34-65 | 52.3% | 33 | 6 | 22-57 | 38.6% | 42 | 19 | 1/26/2014 | CALIFORNIA | 76-64 | W | -6.5 | W | 154.5 | U | 26-58 | 44.8% | 39 | 12 | 20-58 | 34.5% | 38 | 12 | 1/30/2014 | @ OREGON | 70-68 | W | 2.5 | W | 162.5 | U | 23-51 | 45.1% | 29 | 16 | 21-53 | 39.6% | 24 | 15 | 2/2/2014 | @ OREGON ST | 67-71 | L | -5 | L | 154.5 | U | 22-57 | 38.6% | 32 | 13 | 24-50 | 48.0% | 39 | 18 | 2/8/2014 | @ USC | 83-73 | W | -9.5 | W | 149.5 | O | 24-60 | 40.0% | 37 | 9 | 27-58 | 46.6% | 38 | 15 | 2/13/2014 | COLORADO | 92-74 | W | -9.5 | W | 146.5 | O | 35-62 | 56.5% | 37 | 11 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 27 | 12 | 2/15/2014 | UTAH | 80-66 | W | -8.5 | W | 147.5 | U | 31-58 | 53.4% | 38 | 9 | 23-55 | 41.8% | 29 | 13 | 2/19/2014 | @ CALIFORNIA | 86-66 | W | 2 | W | 147 | O | 33-58 | 56.9% | 30 | 6 | 24-55 | 43.6% | 34 | 13 | 2/22/2014 | @ STANFORD | 74-83 | L | 2 | L | 149 | O | 26-58 | 44.8% | 26 | 12 | 28-45 | 62.2% | 28 | 15 | 2/27/2014 | OREGON | 83-87 | L | -3 | L | 152.5 | O | 26-66 | 39.4% | 38 | 11 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 50 | 12 | 3/2/2014 | OREGON ST | 74-69 | W | -14 | L | 151 | U | 24-59 | 40.7% | 31 | 6 | 24-51 | 47.1% | 36 | 16 | 3/6/2014 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/8/2014 | @ WASHINGTON ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
1/15/2014 | @ CALIFORNIA | 56-82 | L | 8 | L | 144.5 | U | 19-63 | 30.2% | 33 | 7 | 33-60 | 55.0% | 44 | 9 | 1/18/2014 | @ STANFORD | 67-79 | L | 10 | L | 144 | O | 28-65 | 43.1% | 34 | 6 | 26-48 | 54.2% | 33 | 7 | 1/23/2014 | OREGON | 80-76 | W | 2.5 | W | 159 | U | 26-45 | 57.8% | 25 | 11 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 32 | 10 | 1/25/2014 | OREGON ST | 87-81 | W | -3.5 | W | 153.5 | O | 31-62 | 50.0% | 34 | 7 | 28-57 | 49.1% | 27 | 5 | 2/1/2014 | @ WASHINGTON ST | 67-72 | L | -2.5 | L | 130 | O | 25-57 | 43.9% | 36 | 12 | 22-53 | 41.5% | 39 | 5 | 2/6/2014 | @ UTAH | 69-78 | L | 9.5 | W | 139.5 | O | 28-64 | 43.7% | 28 | 13 | 27-45 | 60.0% | 34 | 17 | 2/9/2014 | @ COLORADO | 65-91 | L | 7.5 | L | 142.5 | O | 21-65 | 32.3% | 30 | 9 | 31-56 | 55.4% | 44 | 11 | 2/12/2014 | STANFORD | 64-60 | W | 2.5 | W | 147.5 | U | 21-46 | 45.7% | 33 | 16 | 23-57 | 40.4% | 29 | 9 | 2/15/2014 | CALIFORNIA | 59-72 | L | 2 | L | 147 | U | 23-64 | 35.9% | 41 | 14 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 39 | 9 | 2/19/2014 | @ OREGON | 71-78 | L | 10.5 | W | 152.5 | U | 24-55 | 43.6% | 33 | 12 | 29-51 | 56.9% | 21 | 13 | 2/22/2014 | @ OREGON ST | 86-62 | W | 5.5 | W | 147.5 | O | 39-68 | 57.4% | 43 | 11 | 25-52 | 48.1% | 23 | 11 | 2/28/2014 | WASHINGTON ST | 72-49 | W | -8 | W | 132.5 | U | 26-51 | 51.0% | 39 | 10 | 14-45 | 31.1% | 27 | 11 | 3/6/2014 | UCLA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/8/2014 | USC | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | UCLA: The Steve Alford era begins at UCLA this season as he comes over from being the head coach at New Mexico. Luckily for Alford, there is still a lot of talent on the Bruins team. Swingman Kyle Anderson (9.7 PPG, 8.6 RPG, 3.5 APG) is a complete player that can take over a game in many different ways. At 6-foot-9, he can play four different positions on the court. His versatility allows other players like SG Jordan Adams (15.3 PPG, 3.8 RPG) to play off the ball, where he is at his best. Adams is as good of scorer as there is in the country, netting at least 20 points in 11 games. This duo can be one of the most prolific in all of the country, and if they play up to their talents, UCLA can be good enough to contend for the Pac-12. Bigger things are also expected out of 6-foot-10 senior twins Travis Wear (10.9 PPG, 5.2 RPG) and David Wear (7.1 PPG, 5.0 RPG). | | WASHINGTON: Lorenzo Romar is looking to get the Huskies back to the NCAA Tournament, and he has one of the most talented players in the conference on his side. SG C.J. Wilcox (16.8 PPG, 4.3 RPG, 37% 3-pt FG) is one of the top shooters in all of the country. He is able to shoot the ball off the dribble, as well as off the screen. However, he is not one-dimensional, as he is a very good defensive player as well. PF Shawn Kemp Jr. (6.3 PPG, 3.0 RPG, 53% FG) started to play much better as the season wore on, and will need to continue that improvement this season to give the Huskies a second option. Like his dad, Kemp Jr. is a big time leaper that could be a terrific rebounder, and he will be counted upon to dominate the glass. SF Desmond Simmons (4.9 PPG, 6.5 RPG) is also fierce on the boards and the team is very excited about freshman PG Nigel Williams-Goss who has the size (6-foot-4) and strength to control the game. |
| | |
| Last Updated: 4/26/2024 9:49:51 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|