|
|
GEORGIA TECH WAKE FOREST |
|
| 134 | 79 Final 70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
533 | GEORGIA TECH | 136.5 | 136.5 | 534 | WAKE FOREST | -4.5 | -5 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 11-10 | -6.4 | 6-8 | 6-7 | 69.3 | 33.8 | 43.8% | 37.1 | 67.9 | 30.0 | 41.8% | 33.4 | Road Games | 3-6 | -1.2 | 4-5 | 3-5 | 65.6 | 33.0 | 41.6% | 37.9 | 71.6 | 32.1 | 44.1% | 32.8 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -2.4 | 2-2 | 3-2 | 65.4 | 31.8 | 42.8% | 30.4 | 71.0 | 29.4 | 48.3% | 32.8 | Conference Games | 2-6 | -2.4 | 3-4 | 4-4 | 64.9 | 32.5 | 42.9% | 31.7 | 72.5 | 32.4 | 46.7% | 33.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 69.3 | 33.8 | 25-57 | 43.8% | 5-17 | 30.1% | 14-20 | 68.5% | 37 | 10 | 14 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 69.8 | 32.4 | 24-56 | 43.3% | 6-19 | 33.8% | 15-22 | 70.1% | 35 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 65.6 | 33.0 | 24-58 | 41.6% | 5-18 | 30.6% | 11-17 | 68.7% | 38 | 10 | 11 | 19 | 4 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 67.9 | 30.0 | 24-57 | 41.8% | 6-19 | 33.3% | 14-21 | 68.6% | 33 | 8 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 10 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 70.9 | 33.1 | 25-56 | 44.0% | 6-18 | 34.4% | 15-23 | 68.8% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 19 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 71.6 | 32.1 | 24-55 | 44.1% | 7-18 | 39.1% | 16-23 | 69.5% | 33 | 7 | 12 | 16 | 6 | 9 | 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 14-7 | +3.3 | 9-8 | 5-11 | 71.4 | 32.7 | 44.4% | 38.3 | 67.8 | 32.6 | 40.1% | 37.2 | Home Games | 12-1 | +5.1 | 5-4 | 1-7 | 75.2 | 34.1 | 45.3% | 42.1 | 63.9 | 30.8 | 37.9% | 36.6 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +1.2 | 2-3 | 1-4 | 65.6 | 30.2 | 44.6% | 32.2 | 66.4 | 28.6 | 39.0% | 38.2 | Conference Games | 4-4 | +2.3 | 4-4 | 3-5 | 64.6 | 29.4 | 43.3% | 31.0 | 69.1 | 32.0 | 41.3% | 40.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 71.4 | 32.7 | 25-56 | 44.4% | 5-16 | 31.8% | 17-27 | 63.7% | 38 | 9 | 14 | 19 | 5 | 12 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 68.8 | 32.5 | 24-57 | 42.5% | 6-19 | 33.7% | 14-21 | 68.3% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 75.2 | 34.1 | 26-57 | 45.3% | 5-16 | 29.9% | 19-30 | 63.9% | 42 | 10 | 14 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 67.8 | 32.6 | 24-59 | 40.1% | 5-17 | 27.8% | 15-23 | 67.8% | 37 | 11 | 12 | 21 | 7 | 11 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 72.4 | 34.2 | 25-56 | 45.1% | 6-17 | 34.3% | 16-23 | 68.9% | 37 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 63.9 | 30.8 | 23-61 | 37.9% | 5-18 | 26.4% | 13-20 | 64.6% | 37 | 10 | 10 | 22 | 7 | 12 | 4 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: GEORGIA TECH 75.1, WAKE FOREST 74.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/16/2013 | KENNESAW ST | 74-57 | W | | - | | - | 27-59 | 45.8% | 46 | 11 | 21-55 | 38.2% | 37 | 11 | 12/21/2013 | @ VANDERBILT | 63-76 | L | 3 | L | 139 | P | 25-65 | 38.5% | 39 | 11 | 26-52 | 50.0% | 37 | 9 | 12/29/2013 | @ CHARLOTTE | 58-55 | W | 2 | W | 143.5 | U | 23-51 | 45.1% | 41 | 16 | 20-60 | 33.3% | 32 | 8 | 1/4/2014 | @ MARYLAND | 61-77 | L | 8.5 | L | 140 | U | 23-60 | 38.3% | 36 | 11 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 34 | 6 | 1/7/2014 | @ DUKE | 57-79 | L | 15 | L | 146 | U | 26-53 | 49.1% | 25 | 11 | 24-51 | 47.1% | 33 | 7 | 1/11/2014 | NOTRE DAME | 74-69 | W | 1 | W | 140 | O | 27-63 | 42.9% | 41 | 11 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 40 | 8 | 1/14/2014 | PITTSBURGH | 74-81 | L | 7 | T | 131.5 | O | 26-57 | 45.6% | 18 | 12 | 29-51 | 56.9% | 38 | 14 | 1/18/2014 | MIAMI | 42-56 | L | -1 | L | 121.5 | U | 13-44 | 29.5% | 27 | 13 | 20-43 | 46.5% | 31 | 11 | 1/21/2014 | @ BOSTON COLLEGE | 68-60 | W | 4.5 | W | 139.5 | U | 25-48 | 52.1% | 32 | 10 | 21-52 | 40.4% | 19 | 4 | 1/26/2014 | @ NC STATE | 78-80 | L | 4.5 | W | 134.5 | O | 28-65 | 43.1% | 42 | 14 | 32-60 | 53.3% | 31 | 10 | 1/29/2014 | N CAROLINA | 65-78 | L | 4 | L | 142 | O | 23-55 | 41.8% | 33 | 10 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 45 | 6 | 2/1/2014 | @ WAKE FOREST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/4/2014 | @ CLEMSON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/8/2014 | VIRGINIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/12/2014 | BOSTON COLLEGE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/18/2014 | DUKE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/22/2014 | CLEMSON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/17/2013 | ST BONAVENTURE | 77-62 | W | -5.5 | W | 144.5 | U | 28-57 | 49.1% | 42 | 15 | 25-63 | 39.7% | 32 | 14 | 12/21/2013 | UNC-GREENSBORO | 59-51 | W | -17 | L | 151 | U | 22-49 | 44.9% | 41 | 14 | 19-60 | 31.7% | 40 | 12 | 12/28/2013 | @ XAVIER | 53-68 | L | 8.5 | L | 137 | U | 19-53 | 35.8% | 34 | 13 | 26-66 | 39.4% | 50 | 12 | 1/5/2014 | N CAROLINA | 73-67 | W | 6.5 | W | 145 | U | 26-54 | 48.1% | 34 | 13 | 29-75 | 38.7% | 53 | 17 | 1/8/2014 | @ VIRGINIA | 51-74 | L | 12 | L | 122 | O | 17-48 | 35.4% | 25 | 15 | 26-52 | 50.0% | 38 | 12 | 1/11/2014 | @ PITTSBURGH | 65-80 | L | 15.5 | W | 133.5 | O | 20-51 | 39.2% | 28 | 9 | 26-53 | 49.1% | 38 | 10 | 1/15/2014 | NC STATE | 70-69 | W | -2.5 | L | 139.5 | U | 19-35 | 54.3% | 25 | 14 | 23-55 | 41.8% | 34 | 11 | 1/18/2014 | @ CLEMSON | 53-61 | L | 7.5 | L | 119.5 | U | 21-58 | 36.2% | 32 | 10 | 20-43 | 46.5% | 31 | 9 | 1/22/2014 | @ VIRGINIA TECH | 83-77 | W | 2.5 | W | 136.5 | O | 30-56 | 53.6% | 37 | 9 | 22-65 | 33.8% | 38 | 6 | 1/25/2014 | NOTRE DAME | 65-58 | W | -1.5 | W | 145.5 | U | 23-47 | 48.9% | 32 | 9 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 33 | 5 | 1/29/2014 | SYRACUSE | 57-67 | L | 9 | L | 126 | U | 18-53 | 34.0% | 35 | 8 | 21-58 | 36.2% | 55 | 9 | 2/1/2014 | GEORGIA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/4/2014 | @ DUKE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/11/2014 | @ NC STATE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/15/2014 | FLORIDA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/18/2014 | @ MARYLAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/22/2014 | @ N CAROLINA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| GEORGIA TECH: The Yellow Jackets made solid improvements under second-year head coach Brian Gregory and with the team mostly returning from last season, it should be able to do just that again, even if they will struggle to compete in the deep ACC. The loss of Mfon Udofia at point guard will be difficult to deal with, but Solomon Poole (1.8 PPG, 1.0 APG in 9.0 MPG) should be able to fill that role adequately in a full season of work. He will often be feeding Trae Golden (12.1 PPG, 3.9 APG), who received an NCAA wavier to play immediately after transferring from Tennessee, and should lead the team in scoring. And as Marcus Georges-Hunt (10.8 PPG, 4.9 RPG) and Robert Carter (9.9 PPG, 6.7 RPG) continue to develop, this could be a team that threatens for a few big upsets in ACC play, even if they inevitably won't be dancing in March. | | WAKE FOREST: It will be tough for the Demon Deacons to cope with the loss of last season's leading scorer C.J. Harris, but Travis McKie (13.5 PPG, 7.0 RPG) and Devin Thomas (9.1 PPG, 7.5 RPG) give this team surprisingly talented weapons in the post. The big question mark is if players such as Codi Miller-McIntyre (8.1 PPG, 2.6 APG) will be able to step up enough to make the squad competitive on the perimeter. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 4/25/2024 10:37:24 PM EST. |
|
|