|
|
VIRGINIA TECH WAKE FOREST |
|
|
| 79 Final 90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
825 | VIRGINIA TECH | | | 826 | WAKE FOREST | -5.5 | -5.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 13-17 | +0.5 | 11-13 | 6-4 | 70.2 | 31.4 | 42.4% | 36.3 | 74.1 | 34.1 | 42.9% | 37.5 | Road Games | 3-10 | +0.8 | 6-6 | 4-3 | 67.6 | 29.9 | 39.4% | 36.7 | 79.8 | 36.8 | 43.7% | 39.8 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | +1 | 2-3 | 2-2 | 64.0 | 29.2 | 44.7% | 30.2 | 76.0 | 35.0 | 48.7% | 31.2 | Conference Games | 4-13 | -1.8 | 6-9 | 4-2 | 64.9 | 28.7 | 41.2% | 34.1 | 74.9 | 33.8 | 45.0% | 36.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 70.2 | 31.4 | 25-58 | 42.4% | 6-18 | 31.6% | 15-22 | 70.9% | 36 | 10 | 10 | 18 | 4 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 65.5 | 30.4 | 23-56 | 42.0% | 6-18 | 33.1% | 13-19 | 68.8% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 67.6 | 29.9 | 24-60 | 39.4% | 6-19 | 30.6% | 15-21 | 68.5% | 37 | 11 | 9 | 19 | 4 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 74.1 | 34.1 | 26-60 | 42.9% | 8-22 | 34.3% | 15-22 | 67.0% | 37 | 11 | 14 | 18 | 5 | 10 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 69 | 32.2 | 25-56 | 43.9% | 6-18 | 34.2% | 14-20 | 69.0% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 79.8 | 36.8 | 26-60 | 43.7% | 9-23 | 38.9% | 18-25 | 72.7% | 40 | 12 | 15 | 17 | 5 | 10 | 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 12-17 | -1.1 | 15-11 | 4-3 | 66.9 | 31.5 | 42.9% | 32.7 | 69.8 | 34.8 | 45.3% | 35.1 | Home Games | 10-5 | +6.9 | 8-4 | 1-1 | 69.2 | 33.0 | 45.6% | 32.7 | 64.4 | 31.0 | 42.4% | 35.6 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -1.8 | 1-4 | 1-0 | 64.2 | 30.2 | 39.2% | 30.4 | 69.2 | 33.6 | 44.5% | 38.2 | Conference Games | 5-12 | 0 | 9-8 | 2-3 | 64.5 | 31.4 | 41.0% | 33.3 | 70.7 | 36.4 | 46.5% | 35.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 66.9 | 31.5 | 23-53 | 42.9% | 5-16 | 34.2% | 16-23 | 68.7% | 33 | 8 | 11 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 66 | 30.3 | 24-56 | 42.0% | 6-18 | 33.3% | 13-19 | 69.1% | 34 | 10 | 12 | 17 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 69.2 | 33.0 | 23-51 | 45.6% | 5-16 | 34.2% | 17-24 | 69.0% | 33 | 7 | 12 | 17 | 8 | 14 | 6 | Stats Against (All Games) | 69.8 | 34.8 | 25-56 | 45.3% | 6-17 | 35.7% | 13-19 | 68.2% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 20 | 7 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 69.3 | 32.1 | 25-55 | 44.6% | 6-18 | 35.2% | 14-20 | 69.7% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 17 | 6 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 64.4 | 31.0 | 24-56 | 42.4% | 4-15 | 27.9% | 12-19 | 64.3% | 36 | 11 | 11 | 20 | 7 | 15 | 4 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: VIRGINIA TECH 74.1, WAKE FOREST 76 |
|
|
|
|
|
1/19/2013 | WAKE FOREST | 66-65 | W | -3 | L | | - | 27-60 | 45.0% | 38 | 7 | 25-68 | 36.8% | 43 | 8 | 1/24/2013 | VIRGINIA | 58-74 | L | 5 | L | | - | 19-43 | 44.2% | 32 | 14 | 26-51 | 51.0% | 24 | 6 | 1/27/2013 | @ CLEMSON | 70-77 | L | 11.5 | W | | - | 21-60 | 35.0% | 33 | 5 | 22-49 | 44.9% | 42 | 9 | 1/30/2013 | MIAMI | 64-73 | L | 9 | T | | - | 24-53 | 45.3% | 29 | 17 | 26-54 | 48.1% | 33 | 12 | 2/2/2013 | @ N CAROLINA | 60-72 | L | 16.5 | W | | - | 24-62 | 38.7% | 34 | 14 | 24-64 | 37.5% | 47 | 12 | 2/7/2013 | MARYLAND | 55-60 | L | 5 | T | | - | 22-65 | 33.8% | 38 | 7 | 21-52 | 40.4% | 46 | 15 | 2/9/2013 | GEORGIA TECH | 54-64 | L | 1.5 | L | | - | 19-62 | 30.6% | 35 | 8 | 23-59 | 39.0% | 49 | 11 | 2/12/2013 | @ VIRGINIA | 55-73 | L | 14 | L | 124 | O | 18-52 | 34.6% | 33 | 9 | 22-50 | 44.0% | 33 | 6 | 2/16/2013 | @ NC STATE | 86-90 | L | 14 | W | 152.5 | O | 35-80 | 43.7% | 42 | 14 | 26-55 | 47.3% | 39 | 12 | 2/21/2013 | DUKE | 56-88 | L | 12.5 | L | 146.5 | U | 22-51 | 43.1% | 25 | 12 | 30-56 | 53.6% | 34 | 5 | 2/24/2013 | FLORIDA ST | 80-70 | W | 2 | W | 138 | O | 25-50 | 50.0% | 32 | 11 | 25-55 | 45.5% | 33 | 12 | 2/27/2013 | @ MIAMI | 58-76 | L | 16.5 | L | 133.5 | O | 21-53 | 39.6% | 30 | 10 | 23-46 | 50.0% | 31 | 10 | 3/2/2013 | CLEMSON | 69-61 | W | 0 | W | | - | 23-42 | 54.8% | 33 | 16 | 23-54 | 42.6% | 21 | 9 | 3/5/2013 | @ DUKE | 57-85 | L | 20 | L | 146.5 | U | 22-57 | 38.6% | 31 | 10 | 30-58 | 51.7% | 37 | 4 | 3/10/2013 | @ WAKE FOREST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/19/2013 | @ VIRGINIA TECH | 65-66 | L | 3 | W | | - | 25-68 | 36.8% | 43 | 8 | 27-60 | 45.0% | 38 | 7 | 1/22/2013 | NC STATE | 86-84 | W | 8 | W | | - | 31-63 | 49.2% | 40 | 12 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 44 | 13 | 1/26/2013 | @ GEORGIA TECH | 62-82 | L | 6.5 | L | | - | 20-57 | 35.1% | 36 | 16 | 32-59 | 54.2% | 36 | 15 | 1/30/2013 | DUKE | 70-75 | L | 13.5 | W | | - | 25-52 | 48.1% | 29 | 17 | 28-54 | 51.9% | 29 | 15 | 2/2/2013 | @ MARYLAND | 60-86 | L | 11 | L | | - | 22-64 | 34.4% | 21 | 8 | 35-52 | 67.3% | 42 | 19 | 2/5/2013 | @ N CAROLINA | 62-87 | L | 14.5 | L | 148 | O | 24-55 | 43.6% | 33 | 21 | 32-62 | 51.6% | 38 | 14 | 2/9/2013 | FLORIDA ST | 71-46 | W | 2.5 | W | 139.5 | U | 26-53 | 49.1% | 45 | 14 | 14-43 | 32.6% | 25 | 17 | 2/13/2013 | @ BOSTON COLLEGE | 63-66 | L | 5.5 | W | | - | 24-47 | 51.1% | 27 | 17 | 21-48 | 43.7% | 24 | 11 | 2/16/2013 | GEORGIA TECH | 56-57 | L | -2 | L | | - | 14-48 | 29.2% | 35 | 17 | 22-56 | 39.3% | 32 | 14 | 2/23/2013 | MIAMI | 80-65 | W | 7.5 | W | | - | 26-48 | 54.2% | 36 | 12 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 35 | 13 | 2/26/2013 | @ FLORIDA ST | 62-76 | L | 5.5 | L | 137 | O | 18-55 | 32.7% | 21 | 8 | 23-47 | 48.9% | 44 | 16 | 3/2/2013 | MARYLAND | 57-67 | L | 2.5 | L | | - | 16-49 | 32.7% | 30 | 18 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 41 | 19 | 3/6/2013 | @ NC STATE | 66-81 | L | 13 | L | | - | 28-60 | 46.7% | 30 | 15 | 31-64 | 48.4% | 39 | 14 | 3/10/2013 | VIRGINIA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| VIRGINIA TECH: Despite three returning starters, this will be a new-look Hokies squad with Seth Greenberg out and James Johnson in as head coach after the team failed to make the Big Dance yet again, going 4-12 in ACC play. Last year's leading scorer Erick Green (15.6 PPG) is back in the fold after he scored nearly a quarter of the team's points last season (65.1 PPG). Jarell Eddie (9.1 PPG, 4.8 RPG) and Cadarian Raines (5.9 PPG, 3.9 RPG) round out the returning starters. But it will take Johnson more than one year to rebuild this program, with no top recruits joining a squad that struggled to compete last season. | | WAKE FOREST: After going 4-12 in the ACC last year, the Demon Deacons return both of their leading scorers from last year's campaign in C.J. Harris (16.7 PPG) and Travis McKie (16.1 PPG, 7.0 RPG). Cody Miller-McIntyre could be a valuable asset as a freshman point guard, while sophomore guard Chase Fischer (6.3 PPG) will be expected to fill a much larger role in his second season. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 3/28/2024 3:02:38 PM EST. |
|
|